|
Financial Sense Home l Market Monitor l Market WrapUp l Storm Watch l About Us l Contact Us |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"...with the stock market appearing like brothel with all the late trading, insider trading, program trading, accounting shenanigans, earnings management, insider selling, and media spin, etc., who in their right mind can hold Exxon Mobil (in a college savings account yet) when it goes to $36?" "Brothel?" That's a pretty strong word. Yet, it totally encapsulates the disgust of many professionals when it comes to the un-ending "late trading, insider trading, program trading, accounting shenanigans, earnings management, insider selling, and media spin" that seem to be the order of the day. A good examplein my humble viewis what took place on Friday, May 7, 2004. As many may recall, on that day the bond market plunged and so did many stocks at the NYSE. In fact, that day the NYSE experienced one of the worst breadth ratios ever, 12:1! On that day 256 issues advanced, while 3152 declined and the NYSE fell 119 points. Interestingly, NASDAQ and most notably the NDX held rather well. The NDX fell just 12.82 points, while the shameless talking heads at CNBC marveled throughout the entire day at the "strength" and "resilience" exhibited by tech, which they immediately interpreted to be a "good thing" for the market! At the end of the day, I looked under the surface to see how much strength there really was in tech. On that day NASDAQ had 832 advancing issues, 2343 declining issues, 587,109,000 shares made up the up volume, and 1,012,777,000 made up the down volume. To begin with I do not think a market with a breadth 3:1 in favor of decliners is a "strong" market, despite the blubbering to the contrary by the spin masters of CNBC and the like. Second, in examining the up volume that accompanied the up issues, this is what I found out: Just 18 stocks of the 832 advancing ones were responsible for 347,000,0000 shares of the 587,109,000 that made up the up volume. In other words, 2% of all advancing issues were responsible for 59% of all the up volume! Moreover, by some "strange" coincidence, all of those 18 stocks were components of the NDX!
What was the compelling reason for any portfolio manager to pile up on any of these stocks on that particular day? NONE! In my opinion, it was a coordinated effort by interested parties to buy those stocks in order to keep the NDX up and create the illusion that the crowd's beloved NASDAQ was exhibiting "extraordinary strength," which of course had to be "good" for the market! In summary, I would like to reiterate what I mentioned last week with regards to tops and bottoms: Notice the difference in the formation between now and March-April of 2003. Even a novice can tell that last year the A/D had formed a bottom and it was moving up. In that type of environment it made sense to be a buyer, because most stocks were appreciating. However, over the past 3 months, the A/D line has formed a clear top and it is declining. In this current type of environment, it makes sense to be a seller, because most stocks are depreciating. The two charts on the bottom show the change that investors would want to see, in order to become buyers again.
When the A/D lines stop to decline and they begin to formonce againpatterns that are usually associated with "bottom formations," then we can conclude with a reasonable degree of certainty that a positive change in the market environment has taken place and thus, we should be buyers. Right now, the A/D, and Cumulative Volume lines for all major U.S. Indices are in a free-fall. Thus, it is premature to be looking for intermediate-term buying opportunities. In fact, judging from the current chart pattern, investors ought to be concerned with whether the markets are in the process of completing intermediate-term tops. Ike Iossif All
charts are property of Aegean Capital Group, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home l Broadcast l Market Monitor l Storm Watch l Sitemap l About Us l Contact Us |
Copyright ©
James J. Puplava Financial Sense is a Registered Trademark
P. O. Box 503147 San Diego, CA 92150-3147 USA 858.487.3939
Disclaimer