Trump and the Fed
President Trump could appoint up to six members to the Fed’s Board of Governors, which will affect the direction of US monetary policy for several years.
The Fed’s Board of Governors consists of seven members appointed for a fourteen-year term. This includes a Chair and a Vice-Chair, who serve separate four-year terms in this capacity. The seven individuals on the Board of Governors, along with the president of the New York Fed, are permanent voting members of the FOMC. The remaining four votes are rotated annually among the other Fed districts. The key point is that with seven out of twelve votes, the Board of Governors has a disproportionate weight in setting US monetary policy.
With Governor Tarullo announcing his resignation on Friday, there are now three vacancies on the Board of Governors. Janet Yellen’s term as Fed Chair expires in February 2018 and Stanley Fischer’s term as the Vice Chair will expire in June 2018. It is very likely that they will not be reappointed. In addition, it is quite possible that Governor Brainard, a Democrat and Clinton supporter, will also step down sometime in the next few years. All this means that President Trump may end up appointing five or six Fed governors.
It is certainly easy to envision Trump stacking the Board of Governors with doves. An accommodative Fed would help his agenda on two fronts. First, he is a self-proclaimed “king of debt” and his fiscal policies would blow out the deficit. The budgetary shortfalls could be financed at lower than otherwise interest rates. Second, a dovish Fed would push the dollar lower, providing support to manufacturing and exports.
The problem with this theory is that Trump’s public pronouncements on monetary policy have generally been on the hawkish side. He criticized Janet Yellen on the campaign trail, accusing her of trying to goose the economy in order to help the Democrats at the polls. Granted, Trump’s views on the hard money/easy money debate may have changed now that he is president and poised to benefit politically from a more stimulative monetary policy. Nevertheless, it could still be difficult for him to make a complete U-turn on the subject, especially since Senate Republicans are likely to resist efforts to pack the Fed with doves.
Read more at BCA Research
About BCA Research
BCA Research Archive
|02/17/2017||The Reflationary Window: Open How Wide For How Long?||story|
|01/27/2017||The "IF" Rally May Be Unraveling||story|
|01/18/2017||US Banks: Higher Rates Vs. Weaker Loan Growth||story|
|01/12/2017||The 2017 Outlook: Shifting Regimes||story|
|01/10/2017||Global Equities to Trend Higher||story|
|12/02/2016||Catalysts for Higher Global Bond Yields||story|
|11/23/2016||Dollar Strength Warrants Caution On U.S. Equities||story|
|10/31/2016||Trouble Ahead for USD-Denominated Sovereign Debt?||story|
|10/24/2016||EM Reflation Confirming Indicator Raises a Red Flag||story|