Deficits Ain’t Debt
Lots of talk about “deficits” of late. I’m not sure what a deficit really means. Consider the Clinton years. The economy was good, there were no wars or disasters, the deficits were small, there were a few years where there was a budget surplus. – Aaaah - The debt exploded during those “good” years. The cumulative deficit for the Clinton years was only $327 Billion, but the debt rose by $1.56 Trillion (475% more debt than deficits).
The deficit is a component of the debt. But it is not the only driver of debt. The following chart is the difference between the reported deficit, and the increase in debt going back to 2000.
The cumulative deficits add up to $6.9T, while the increase in debt is $10.4T. Over the past dozen years, debt has exceeded deficits by $3.5T (50%).
I bring up the discrepancy between debt and deficits to make the point that they are quite different, and any “happy talk” about deficits improving over the next few years should be tempered by the facts about debt.
First an explanation for the $3.5T discrepancy between debt and deficits. The vast majority of the difference is attributable to the country’s Trust Funds (SS, FERS and MRF – private/federal/military retirement). In past years these Funds have had true cash surpluses. The Funds lent the surpluses back to the government, and Uncle Sam promptly spent the loot.
In Washington they have funny accounting system that allows them to create both an Asset (the Funds) and a Liability (Treasury). On a “Unified” basis, the asset and liability net out, and therefore it is magically not reflected in the budget deficit. There are two sets of books, one is flawed accounting, the other is the real debt.
Within the definition of debt is the Debt Owed To the Public (DTP), and the Intergovernmental Debt (IG) (owed to the Trust Funds). Follows is a chart of the two categories of debt. Note that DTP has been exploding while the IG debt has stabilized.
The future of the Trust Funds is absolutely clear. They are in permanent decline. Every year they are forced to redeem a portion of their “savings” to meet current requirements to pay benefits. The cash drain will be approximately $70b in 2013. This will force Treasury to borrow an additional $70B ABOVE and BEYOND what the deficit will be. Every year the TFs will be forced to redeem more and more bonds, and every dollar must result in an increase in the DTP. Over the next few decades the TF will force an increase in the DTP of at least $5T. Five years from now the TFs will be pushing up DTP by $200b a year. After ten-years, the numbers go ballistic.
Again – this increase in DTP will be in addition to the annual deficits the country has now programed in. And again – none of this will ever appear on what is know as the budget.
The budget debate is meaningless, what matters is the Debt to the Public, and no one is looking at that – for now.
About Bruce Krasting
Bruce Krasting Archive
|09/01/2015||California – A Deluge Followed by Mega Drought?||story|
|07/30/2014||Social Security Versus CBO – Who Do You Trust?||story|
|10/03/2013||CBO Recommends Taxes Raised “Immediately and Permanently” to Fund Social Security||story|
|04/04/2013||Krugman Vs. Feldstein on Interest Rates and the Fed||story|
|03/12/2013||On Senator Ron Johnson Vs Krugman||story|
|02/25/2013||On the Global Numbers – CIA Edition||story|
|02/22/2013||The Best Thing to Happen to America in a Long Time||story|
|02/19/2013||G-20 Green-Lights Another Big Move in the Yen?||story|
|02/11/2013||CBO – The Coming Raid on Social Security||story|