Obama Wants Cheaper Pennies and Nickels; Why Not Do Away With Both?
Thanks to the Fed, pennies and nickels are now nearly worthless, except en masse, and except for the metal content of them (at least for now).
Please consider Obama wants cheaper pennies and nickels.
The U.S. Mint is facing a problem -- especially during these penny-pinching times. It turns out it costs more to make pennies and nickels than the coins are worth.
And because of that, the Obama administration this week asked Congress for permission to change the mix of metal that goes to make pennies and nickels, an expensive recipe that has remained unchanged for more than 30 years.
To be precise, it cost 2.4 cents to make one penny in 2011 and about 11.2 cents for each nickel.
Given the number of coins that the mint produces -- 4.3 billion pennies and 914 million nickels last year alone, those costs add up pretty quickly: a little more than $100 million for each coin.
But even though Treasury has been studying new metals since 2010, it has yet to come up with a workable mix that would definitely be cheaper, and it has no details yet as to what metals should be used or how much it would save to do so.
Even if a cheaper metal can be used, it might not take the cost of a penny down to less than a penny.
Just the administrative cost of minting 4.3 billion pennies costs almost a half-cent per coin by itself, leaving precious little room to make a penny for less than a cent, no matter the raw material used.
The raw material cost of the metals used in a current penny is only about 0.6 cents per coin, according to prices quoted on the London Metal Exchange, and a breakdown of a penny's composition from the mint. The mint paid 1.1 cents on average for the metal used in a penny in 2011, but that is the cost of ready-to-stamp blanks from the supplier, not raw material traded on commodity markets.
Treasury spokesman Matt Anderson said Treasury has the authority to stop making the dollar coins on its own, but it can't change the mix of metals in pennies without permission.
As for the suggestion of some that the penny be abandoned altogether, Anderson said only "that is not a proposal we have put forward."
Pennies are a nuisance and to a lesser degree, so are nickels.
Rounding up every transaction to the nearest nickel or dime should be easy enough, and there is no legitimate reason to not do precisely that.
There would be a step-up in productivity if people did not have to deal with the damn things.
Source: Global Economic Analysis
About Michael Shedlock
Michael Shedlock Archive
|12/06/2013||Enormous Discrepancy Between Jobs and Employment Continues||story|
|12/05/2013||Number of Banks and Percentage of Problem Banks Over Time||story|
|12/03/2013||What Will Your Bank Look Like 5 Years From Now?||story|
|11/26/2013||Majority in U.S. Say Healthcare Not Government’s Responsibility||story|
|11/22/2013||Eurozone Flash PMI Shows Slight Growth, France Back in Contraction||story|
|11/20/2013||Is Retirement at 80 the New Norm?||story|
|11/14/2013||Free Money Idiocy: Switzerland Referendum Proposes “Free Money” Annually to Everyone Alive||story|
|11/13/2013||What’s Really Hurting Small Businesses: Lack of Credit or Poor Economic Prospects?||story|
|11/06/2013||Obamacare Website: “You Have No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy”||story|
|11/04/2013||10 Corporations Control Nearly Everything You Buy||story|