With the year drawing to a close and the dollar poised to rally from
January to July 2006 we thought we'd recap why we forecasted a strong
rally for the dollar in 2005. Some readers may recall that we said
dollar bears were "looking in the rear view mirror" if they
thought we'd see a fourth consecutive year of decline.
In fact, we said buying
dollars was possibly the "Best Trade of 2005." But that honor
should go to gold as it surpassed our upside target of $480/$500. For
commodity and currency traders alike this "anomaly" of dollar
and gold strength is perhaps the most interesting development in markets
for some time.
The explanation is
really quite simple. As readers of our reports are aware, last year we
showed a little known ratio that has a high degree of fit with the
dollar index. Basically, we take the ratio of the 3-week TBill to
30-year yield. This shows us the market's expectation of short term
interest rates in the US, which is the primary mover in currency
markets. We said the market was predicting higher short term rates in
the US and with Europe looking sickly, higher US rates would attract
deposits.
With the upturn in
interest rate expectations we said in December of 2004 that the time had
come to start buying the dollar index because the market was projecting
higher short term interest rates. But we only bought the dollar against
the Swiss franc and Japanese yen (two components of the dollar index
with the best interest rate advantage) while we also maintained long
positions in certain key commodity currencies (AUD, MXN).
In currency trading you
buy one currency and sell the other. Interest rates are a prime concern
and so is value. With gold, there is no interest rate, but we feel that
it is undervalued by at least 200-300 dollars. So gold represents a long
term buy and hold asset. Even while the dollar rallied this year, we
never once recommended shorting gold.
While gold is an
"asset" play, currency trading/forecasting is really much more
simple than commonly believed. Interest rates - not deficits, housing
starts, Greenspan's briefcase - are the single main driver.
To make a simple
analogy, would you prefer a checking account that paid you 2%, 4% or
even 7% on your deposits, or would you prefer a checking account that
charged you 2%, 4% or more?
Some analysts feel that
paying 2-4% interest is a fine trade off for the scary trade deficit.
But if you prefer collecting interest on your short term deposits, and
can manage not listening to the economists, you might make a very good
currency trader. As ludicrous and scary as the trade deficit is the TICS
data keep showing strong interest in our assets.
In the following chart
we show in greater detail just how integral short term interest rates
are to foreign exchange rate dynamics. Below we show the ECB rate
subtracted from the Fed funds rate (Fed-ECB=USD/EUR rate differential).
The blue line over the left axis is what annual percentage rate the USD/EUR
checking account paid you over the past six years.
As you can see, the USD/EUR
checking account paid as much as 2.5% annualized on overnight deposits
in 1999-2000 and cost you as much as 2% in November 2002. Again, this is
represented by the Fed-ECB rate differential in blue (left axis is basis
points in hundreds).
The orange lines show
when the checking account crosses from interest bearing to interest
charging. Currency traders, much to the dismay of media outlets, don't
really care about much else. Note that when the Fed/ECB bank decided to
stop paying us on our short term USD/EUR deposits, we withdrew money
from the bank. When they decided to pay us, we poured money in again.
Our clients have seen
chart after chart this year indicating why the dollar would rally in
2005. Longtime readers of our public reports may also recall that we
even forecast that once the dollar did rally off the 80 support level in
2005 the media would shift its focus from the "trade deficit"
to "interest rates." This is because it is the media's job to
rationalize the moves for you. Wanting to be in the papers and on TV,
many currency analysts simply ignore the real reason currencies trend
and focus on the "She said, He said" of market noise. A
contrarian armed with correct knowledge of currency dynamics can use
this misinformation to his/her advantage.
In fact, the media's
preoccupation with Fed wording last week was very, very misleading. As
you can see from the chart above, the rate differential between the Fed
and ECB began narrowing in 2000 but the dollar rallied another 20% until
the Fed/ECB rate differential went negative. Certainly, an actual
decrease in the Fed/ECB rate differential is more important than
"words."
But the dollar
continued to rally in 2000-2002 because the rate differential remained
positive. Following the move to negative territory, currency traders
said "Thank you very much, we'll do our banking elsewhere."
The prime beneficiaries during the dollar collapse were high yielding
currencies in 2002-2005 such as the Aussie and NZD. The reason for the
dollar collapse was not the trade deficit. It was the record pace that
the Fed slashed overnight deposit rates.
One of the other
"non-interest rate" reasons the dollar did so well in
2000-2001 was that foreigners were buying our domestic stocks like there
was no tomorrow. Note that foreign stock buying (gray line) tends to run
coincident with dollar moves. While we don't use this as a primary
indicator for dollar direction, we do find it interesting that in the
2000-2001 time frame the Fed/ECB bank was paying 2.5% interest and
foreigners were buying stocks at the fastest rate on record. That was a
pretty handsome deal for foreigners.
In our view this
creates a "virtuous circle" for the dollar against the EUR and
even more so against low yielding currencies like the Swiss franc. In
case you haven't heard, foreigners are on track to surpass the 2000
buying frenzy. So, the well established upward trend in the dollar
against the Euro and CHF should continue in 2006 until we see a reversal
in this trend.
Our final chart deals
with our forecast this month that the dollar would suffer a sharp
correction in December followed by a "snap-back" as it would
resume its rally during the seasonally bullish period from January to
July 2006.
We first analyze the
currency market from an interest rate perspective, then value. Finally,
we take into account seasonal trends. As you can see, seasonal trends
show that December is one of the worst months on record for the dollar.
Knowing this, the
dollar still suffered a larger than expected decline - larger than we
expected at least. But it held above the key 89 support last week (where
we recommended to clients buying dollars again) and has begun to rally
sharply this week.
Just so you don't
accuse of of being oblivious to the overall trend, note that we think
this rally in USD is simply a bear market one that is setting up a
massive Head and Shoulders pattern.
In our final chart we
show to you our long-term forecast for 2006-2009. Note that our forecast
for a rally to 95/100 appears to be back on track. But once the dollar
reaches our long held target we then foresee a sharp pullback to the 80
level from mid 2006 to the end of 2007. As such, we plan to cycle out of
dollar longs next year and subscribers are already aware of what
currencies we plan to sell the dollar against in 2006.


© 2005 Jes Black
Editorial Archive
|
Contact
Information
Jes
Black
FX Money Trends, LLC
One Henderson Street
Hoboken, NJ 07030
646.229.5401 Tel
201.222.5577 Fax
www.fxmoneytrends.com
Email |

|
|