|
The
Casey Files
I
recall asking my father, many years ago, his opinion on some matter of
world affairs. He was a man of broad knowledge and experience but few
words-at least when he was talking to me. His answer was: "It's all
a matter of economics." Cryptic, in that it didn't answer anything,
but profound, in that it answered everything.
A
couple of years later I asked him another question, on another big
topic. His answer was: "It's all a matter of psychology." Both
answers were absolutely right, of course, and equally applicable to
every field of human action.
It would be so much neater if I could just leave it at that but, at
about the same time I received the "psychology" answer, I was
talking with a Sgt. Major Max Trujillo about a related question. Max was
quite philosophically inclined, especially for someone with his
background. His answer was: "It's all a matter of semantics."
The
fact of the matter is that all three answers are correct, depending on
the circumstances you are confronted with.
Which
brings us to the following essay by Dave Forest, editor of our Casey
Energy Speculator. As you’ll read, he has come across some
interesting data that suggests that politics may have more to do with
the recent pullback in oil prices than meets the eye.
And,
as we all know, politics is just an extension of psychology.
Doug
Casey
Who’s
Keeping Oil Down?
By
Dave Forest
Oil
had energy investors reaching for the Tums the last few weeks.
After
crude tagged a record intra-day high of $78.40 on July 14, it drifted
lower through the end of summer and on August 29 closed below $70 for
the first time since June 20. On September 4, the sell-off accelerated:
WTI closed at $68.60 and continued falling throughout the week, finally
bottoming below $61, a
price that hadn’t been seen since March 10.
Along
the way, it helped pull the TSX Venture Exchange—which
tends to live and die at the hands of energy and resource stocks—down
more than 10%.
So,
what happened? Mainstream financial media blamed crude’s tumble on
everything from Iran playing nice with the U.S. to a so far
hurricane-less hurricane season in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. But any
intelligent observer can see that the fall was too hard and too sudden
to be caused by these factors alone.
More
than anything, this sell-off looked like it was caused by seasonal and
technical factors. Crude is
almost always weak in the fourth quarter, and the price had gotten ahead
of itself in recent months—not surprising, given Israel and Lebanon
going to toe-to-toe.
But
the timing of oil’s decline also coincides with another event: U.S.
mid-term elections. Although these two things sound unrelated, oil and
politics in fact go hand in hand. In fact, there is an eye-opening
correlation between U.S. president George Bush’s popularity and
American gasoline prices over the past four years. As the chart below
shows, the higher the price at the pump, the more people think of Bush
as a chump.

Which
begs the question: with elections looming, might the Republicans be
trying to bring down oil prices (and therefore gasoline costs) in an
attempt to cull favor at the polls?
While
we’re generally skeptical of conspiracy theories (after all, if the
government can’t deliver mail on time, how could it organize a
large-scale covert action?), it’s a known fact that the feds have
several mechanisms by which they could nudge crude lower.
The
Strategic Petroleum Reserve, for one. Release of crude from this
stockpile helped push oil prices lower last fall in the wake of
hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Another
lesser-known influence on oil prices is the “crack spread.” This is
the difference between the price that oil refiners pay for crude and the
price they receive for the gasoline they produce. Put another way,
it’s the profit margin that refiners make on their products.
Currently,
the crack spread is at—in the words of the U.S. Energy Information
Administration—“unusually low levels.” This means that refiners
are selling gasoline for little more than the cost of the oil they
purchase. This makes no sense from a business perspective… generally
in such a situation, refiners would simply up the sales price of their
gasoline, improving their margins.
However,
it does make sense if the refiners are purposely attempting to keep a
lid on prices.
Why
would these companies voluntarily take lower profits? There’s no way
to know for sure, but it’s a certainty that the White House and Big
Oil are close friends. Witness Dick Cheney’s ties to Halliburton, and
George Bush’s background in the Texas oil patch. Might the Republicans
be calling in a favor from their refinery manager pals, asking them to
keep gas prices down until November 7 has passed?
Of
course, there’s no way to prove this. But for energy investors, it’s
worth considering. If gasoline prices are being artificially depressed,
we can expect a rebound during the last few weeks of the year.
Which—judging from the historical relationship between gasoline and
crude—would lift oil prices, and therefore oil stocks. If such case
does present itself, now might be the time to buy oil producers, many of
which are selling at fire sale prices. This is a story we will,
naturally, continue to follow in the pages of the Casey
Energy Speculator.
Don’t
miss the follow-on story, as well as multiple other energy play
opportunities poised to double or more in 12 months, it could cost you!
Click here to sign-up for a 6 month, risk-free trial subscription
to the Casey Energy Speculator and learn for yourself why Doug Casey is
one of the most respected natural resource speculators in the
business.

© 2006 Doug Casey
Editorial Archive
(Ed.
Note: DOUG CASEY
and his subscribers have made millions investing in under valued natural
resource stocks. Doug is the author of Crisis Investing which was #1 on
the New York Times Best-Seller list for 26 weeks. His company, Casey
Research, publishes the International
Speculator - now in it’s 26th year - one of the
nation's most established and highly respected publications on gold,
silver and other natural resource investments and the Casey
Energy Speculator a monthly newsletter dedicated to energy
opportunities with the very real potential of at least 100% growth
within a year.)
If
you like uranium like I like uranium and are looking to leverage
your returns through investments in a junior uranium play, do
yourself a favor and start getting a lot more selective in what
you own. If you fail to do so, not only do you risk missing the
next big leg-up, you risk throwing your portfolio into reverse.
You
don’t have to go it on your own!
Doug
Casey publishes his favorite uranium and other junior energy
stocks every month in the Casey
Energy Speculator, a monthly newsletter helping
subscribers looking to make 100%, 500%, even 1000% profits from
early stage energy companies. For a limited time only, you can
subscribe for just $79 a year and your subscription comes with a 6-month,
100% money-back guarantee. You take no
risk to discover just how profitable the Casey
Energy Speculator can be! Learn
more now.

www.caseyresearch.com
and www.kitcocasey.com
|