|

GOLDEN
PROFITS FROM THE
CHINESE TRADE DEFICIT
- The Casey Files -
by
David Galland
Managing Editor, BIG GOLD
from Casey
Research
July 23, 2007
A
quick chat about trade deficits seems timely. Starting with the
notion that they are inflationary, right?
Well,
technically, they don’t have to be. That’s because, in the
absence of government intervention, all a trade deficit should
mean is that the people of one country are willing to trade their
money for something on offer by the people of another
country.
In
the 1800s, the U.S. ran big deficits and did quite well because
our country was full of opportunity and promise, so foreigners
invested here, more than we invested there.
The
problem comes when a government, say China, steps into the picture
and deliberately suppresses its currency to attract businesses to
certain sectors of its economy—for instance, city dwellers. That
causes an aberration, the result being a lot of U.S. dollars
shipping out to China in exchange for all manner of consumer
goods… dollars that the Chinese have then turned around and
invested in U.S. Treasuries.
More
on that momentarily.
It’s
All Political… and Politics Are Fickle
The
massive deficits with China are unstable because, rather than
being the result of open trade, they are based largely on
political decisions made by a handful of people in the Chinese
government.
In
time, those people—or their successors—may decide that there
is more advantage to spending the dollars. Or they will be forced
to do it. Say, to appease other segments of the economy now
penalized by the higher cost of foreign goods. Or they might have
to spend the dollars to pay the cost of a war or to bail the
country out of a financial crisis.
Regardless
of the reason, at some point the political advantage of spending
those dollars, rather than hoarding them—which the Japanese did
to their detriment in recent decades—will reach a tipping point
after which those greenbacks will come flooding back to the
market, devastating the value of the dollar on foreign exchange
markets.
The
dollar has already, since 2002, lost about 26% of its value. Of
course, a good deal of the pain that depreciation has caused to
the wallets of foreigners has been offset by the interest they
earned on their Treasuries. But treading water is one thing, and
standing by while your pile of cash starts to go up in the flames
of a monetary crisis is another.
Viewed
from another angle, over time it isn’t the trade deficit that is
inflationary. Rather, the trade deficit is effectively a subsidy
provided to the U.S. by China … a subsidy that comes from the
Chinese having used the river of dollars provided by U.S.
consumers to buy the unbacked paper of the U.S. government. That
has allowed U.S. interest rates to remain artificially low and
forestalled inflation in the U.S. It is as if China is building up
a big bank of inflation points. Sooner or later, they are going to
spend those inflation points.
Make
no mistake, we are in uncharted water; it is unprecedented that
the claims represented by the fiat currency of one
government—that of the U.S.—have been accumulated in such
massive quantities for the reserves of other governments. And
we’re not just talking China but virtually the world. And the
world is getting nervous.
To
quote Thai Finance Minister Chalongphob Sussangkarn in his recent
address to the annual meeting of the Asian Development Bank in
Kyoto:
"Should
the financial markets lose confidence in the U.S. dollar, huge
capital outflows from the U.S. could lead to a rapid depreciation
of the U.S. dollar, and thus dramatic appreciation of other
currencies."
The
whole matter of trade deficits is, unfortunately for investors not
paying attention, just one of far too many aerosol cans now
roasting in the fire. When they start exploding, you’ll want to
be safely hiding behind a wall of gold and silver.
In
the final analysis, every day gold goes up and gold goes down,
with the movements based on any number of inputs. To avoid being
panicked one way or the other, a long-term perspective is required
to see these fluctuations in their proper perspective. And,
despite all the jagged fits and starts these past few years, and
all the nay saying along the way, three years ago, gold was
trading for $393 an ounce… 40% lower than it is today.
And
the better gold shares have offered exponentially higher returns
than that.
While
now is the time to begin accumulating your gold and gold share
positions—if you have not already started doing so—how will
you know when things are about to get really “interesting”? My
partner Doug Casey recently made the observation that it is not
when the trade deficit is rising that you should be concerned, but
when it starts to contract… because that is a sign that the
flood of greenbacks is starting to return home.

© 2007 David Galland
Managing Editor, Casey Research
Editorial Archive
David Galland is the
managing editor of BIG
GOLD,
a new publication from Casey Research dedicated to helping
investors profit from the developing bull market in precious
metals--with an easy-to-maintain portfolio of conservative mid- to
large-cap gold producers and near-producers.

www.caseyresearch.com
and www.kitcocasey.com
|