|

AN
INTERVIEW WITH RON PAUL
by Doug Casey
Chairman,
CaseyResearch.com
December 13, 2007
There
are very few political figures for whom I have any respect. One
exception is Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX). Ron has been a personal
friend of mine for many years. I can assure you that he’s a
“stand up guy,” who has voted “no” more times in Congress
not just more than any other member, but more than the rest of
that august body combined. He’s often called “Dr. No.”
The
fact that he has managed to get reelected numerous times -- in
Texas, of all places -- in spite of his outspoken stands against
the so-called “War on Drugs,” the “War on Terror” and
other popular stupidities is one of the few things that make me
think all is not absolutely lost in America.
How
does he do it? Ron’s an almost archetypical country doctor; he
simply radiates honesty and sound principles. He’s about the
last person you’d expect to see in Congress. The voters may not
agree with everything Ron believes in, but they know they can
trust him to do what he says he’ll do: always vote for lower
taxes, less regulation and, in fact, against absolutely anything
not specifically authorized in the U.S. Constitution.
His
campaign for the U.S. presidency on the Republican ticket – once
laughed at by mainstream apparatchiks from both parties – has
generated a huge groundswell of national support. Recently, his
campaign broke the record for the most funds raised online in a
single day. That, in itself, raised a lot of eyebrows – and the
money has since been put into high-profile ad campaigns
libertarian-minded candidates could previously only dream of.
Ron
is famous for his principled rejection of fiat currency, and
advocacy of hard money – the gold standard. That’s a matter of
particular interest to us, with obvious investment implications.
We thought, therefore, we’d get an update from Ron, to see if
his thinking has changed any.
The
following interview is from the December 2007 edition of the International
Speculator, our flagship publication dedicated to uncovering
highly prospective opportunities in pretty much any market sector,
but these days mostly in junior precious metals exploration stocks
– a sector that has treated subscribers very, very well in
recent years.
And
they should only continue to do well unless Boobus
americanus stands up on his hind legs and demands some radical
changes, at which point we’d happily sell the gold we own as a
hedge against the fiscal calamity that is now all but inevitable.
Importantly, Ron Paul’s campaign isn’t about the relatively
trivial issue of who should govern, Tweedledee or Tweedledum.
It’s about what the nature of the government should be – and
how much and how fast we can cut it down.
If
you like what you read, then check out Ron’s web site and give
serious consideration to making a donation. You can learn more and
donate by clicking here. https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate?c=GOLD05
Doug
Casey
CR:
Why would the typical American, who gets far more from government
than he or she pays, even consider voting for Ron Paul?
RP:
Even those Americans who receive a higher nominal amount in
transfer payments than they pay in income taxes suffer from Big
Government. Their standard of living is eroded by inflation, their
wages are garnished by income and payroll taxes, their civil
liberties are under constant assault, and their economic prospects
are limited because of the drag the welfare-warfare state places
on the economy. Furthermore, unless we reverse course quickly,
future generations will suffer a declining standard of living and
loss of liberty. Thus, I expect many Americans to vote for me not
only out of concern for their own well-being, but out of concern
for their children.
CR:
What is your outlook for the U.S. dollar, absent any significant
change in the current course of things?
RP:
Unless we return to a sensible monetary policy and rein in
government spending, I expect the value of the dollar to continue
to fall.
CR:
Do you think we could see currency or capital controls being
implemented?
RP:
History shows that governments tend to react to economic crises by
increasing government control over the free market, so, yes, it is
quite possible that the U.S. Government will respond to a future
economic downturn with currency and capital controls.
CR:
We have seen the other presidential candidates perform all sorts
of linguistic gymnastics when asked how they would handle the
looming fiscal problems of Social Security and Medicare. While the
solutions will obviously not be quick or easy, where would you
start?
RP:
I would transfer some of the money saved by my cuts in foreign
programs and unconstitutional domestic bureaucracies into the
entitlements programs to keep the promises to those relying on the
system. I would then work to transition to a market system,
phasing in an option for younger workers to opt out of Social
Security and Medicare taxes in return for agreeing to provide for
their own retirement and health care needs without participating
in a government entitlement program.
CR:
Further on domestic issues, just what do you think the role of the
federal government should be?
RP:
Ideally, it should be limited to providing protection from foreign
threats, securing the borders and ensuring free trade among the
states.
CR:
By what % would you estimate that federal government spending
could be cut without causing any great hardship? Which agencies
would you cut first?
RP:
I don’t have an exact percentage, but I am confident that if the
welfare state were cut, along with a corresponding reduction in
taxes, private charities would quickly step up to help the truly
needy – and do so in a much more effective and compassionate way
than government bureaucracies. I would cut the Iraq war, foreign
aid and all foreign commitments immediately. Domestically, I would
work to shut down the Departments of Education, Energy, and
Commerce. I would also work to eliminate all forms of corporate
welfare and business subsidies.
CR:
Any idea how much of the total federal debt could be paid off if
the government sold all the land, buildings, equipment and other
assets it doesn't need for activities authorized by the
Constitution?
RP:
I do not have an estimate on that, but it is definitely something
I would pursue.
CR:
There is much talk about the Chinese deliberately keeping their
currency cheap in order to undercut U.S. and European
manufacturers. And we are increasingly hearing discussions about
layering on more tariffs aimed at the Chinese. We assume you are
anti-tariff, so do you do anything at all about “unfair”
competition or just let the global marketplace sort things out
over time?
RP:
The United States does not have the authority to tell China, or
any other country, what to do with their currencies. The values of
currencies should be set by the market. Instead of worrying about
the speck in China's eye, I would focus on the beam in our eye by
reducing the national debt, restoring a market in currency by
repealing the legal tender laws and ending the continued
debasement of the American currency.
CR:
Much of the politicking this campaign season has certain religious
overtones. Are you a believer in a strict separation of church and
state?
RP:
Yes. However, I believe state and local communities have the right
to adopt policies such as school prayer without interference from
the Federal Judiciary or any other branch of the federal
government.
Additional
Resources:
1)
Doug Casey and Ron Paul recently join forces to debate Larry
Abraham and Dinesh D’Souza. You can view the debate by following
this link… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC-ZxzYneOQ
2)
Doug Casey’s International
Speculator
3)
And don’t forget, to learn more on Ron Paul’s campaign and to
make a donation to his campaign, visit… https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate?c=GOLD05

© 2007 David Galland
Managing Director, Casey Research
Editorial Archive
David Galland is the
managing editor of BIG
GOLD,
a new publication from Casey Research dedicated to helping
investors profit from the developing bull market in precious
metals--with an easy-to-maintain portfolio of conservative mid- to
large-cap gold producers and near-producers.

www.caseyresearch.com
and www.kitcocasey.com
|