|

GET
READY - HERE COME THE GOLD STOCKS!
- The Casey Files -
by
David Galland
Managing Editor, BIG GOLD
from Casey
Research
March 3, 2008
You’d have to be a monk
living in isolated penury to miss the fact that gold is on a tear.
Specifically, it has risen from $277.75 on January 4, 2002 to $950
last week, a gain of 242% in just over 6 years. Over the same
period, the trembling S&P 500 is up an anemic 22%.
In a gold bull
market, an investor would expect the profits on gold stocks to be
a multiple of those to be had from bullion. That leverage comes
from simple arithmetic: once a gold producer covers its production
costs, then each 1% rise in the price of gold can translate into a
5%, 10% or even richer improvement in the bottom line. For a
company such as Barrick, with 125 million ounces in proven and
probable reserves, even a $1 per ounce increase in the price of
gold can mean big money.
And so we see that between January 2002 and
last week, the gold stocks were in fact up 612%. So far, so good.
Yet, the gold stocks have stalled in recent
months; between August 1, 2007 and February 21, 2008 gold bullion
rose 42%, but gold stocks were up just 37%.
What’s going on? Is it that, in their
concern over the broader equity markets, people have forgotten
that gold stocks are associated with gold? Or is something else at
work here?
The answer is “something else.”
The
Mothball Years
While
there are a number of plausible reasons for gold stocks lagging of
late, we have come to the conclusion that the true explanation
reaches much farther into the past. It’s that the managements of
the gold producers have only recently escaped the state of fear
they operated under during gold’s 20-year bear market.
Consider:
as recently as the year 2002, gold was still trading near $280.
Against that number was a cash cost of around $250 per ounce for a
typical company. That cost figure is about as low as the number
could go, and it was the response of an industry beaten down and
huddling in a trench.
Caution
lingers after the reason for it has gone. As gold began its upward
move in 2002, it did so against the backdrop of an industry still
in mothballs and still run by managers whose primary skills were
cost cutting and frugality. This is important on a number of
fronts.
1)
Having been trained
in the acid bath of razor-thin margins, management was intensely
skeptical about gold’s rally. They suspected it might be just
another bear market trap, ready to punish unwary optimists who
parted with cash to ramp up production.
2)
In the hunkered-down
years, miners focused on the higher-grade, easy-to-mine material
that gave them the best shot at turning a profit, however small
that might be. And being in survival mode, they were extremely
cautious about buying new equipment or maintaining a large
workforce. Employee rosters were reduced to the bare
minimum.
3)
Because staying in
business was such an urgent goal, they were willing, even eager,
to sell future production at a set price -- a perfectly rational
strategy in a bear market, because it at least assured they would
receive a price that covered the known costs.
With
all these factors taken together, it’s easy to understand why
the industry was slow to respond when gold started rising. In
fact, it was only in February 2003, with gold trending over $350,
that Barrick Gold Corp., the world’s largest gold miner, began
the expensive process of unwinding its hedges. And it wasn’t
until November of that year that the company announced it would
stop forward selling altogether and would eliminate its entire
hedge book.
Once
the turning point came – when management finally realized the
bull market was for real -- the industry began to scramble to
catch up. Which, in a choo-choo industry like mining, means hiring
and training lots of people, buying or refurbishing the equipment
needed to reestablish production on second-tier deposits,
upgrading facilities, building expensive new mills, etc., etc.
And, of course, dealing with the challenge and expense of
unwinding hundreds of millions of dollars worth of forward hedge
contracts.
The
rebuilding of the gold mining industry, in short, really only
began in earnest over the past few years.
The
Ugly Duckling Years
As
would be expected, the costs associated with rebuilding the
industry sent big hits to the bottom line, resulting in the kind
of ugly financial metrics that repel institutional
investors.
The
metrics were not at all helped by the shift away from high-grade
ore, because the lower the grade, the more the material you have
to dig, hoist, haul and process, meaning increased production
costs. In addition, the industry rebuild occurred against a
backdrop of generally rising inflation and a falling dollar, which
helped push the cash cost of production up by more than double
from the mothball years, keeping the miners unattractive as
investments.
By contrast, the base metals companies, which had hit bottom
earlier, near the end of 1998, had already emerged from the
mothball stage, thanks to increasing demand from China and
elsewhere. They were, as a result, well on the road to recovery
when the big price increases for base metals kicked off in 2004.
So, while the gold miners have been widely shunned as ugly
ducklings in recent times, the base metals sector has been
enjoying salad days, reflected in multi-billion mergers and
acquisitions and, of course, sharply higher share prices.
The
Golden Years
Here
at Casey Research, we are of the firm opinion that, now that the
biggest costs related to restarting their industry are behind
them, the big gold companies are poised to take off. The proof
should come in rapidly improving margins which, lo and behold, we
have begun to see in the quarterly reports now being
released.
Just
last week, Goldcorp announced that fourth-quarter profit had
nearly quadrupled over the same quarter the year before. And then
Kinross announced that it, too, had posted a record quarter, with
profits up almost three-fold over Q406. Meanwhile, Barrick
reported that net profit for 2007 was 28% ahead of 2006. In
addition, Barrick is feeling sufficiently flush (and optimistic)
that it’s buying out Rio Tinto’s 40% interest in the Cortez
Hills joint venture for $1.695 billion… cash.
And
the exception to this picture of profit eggs finally hatching is
only superficially an exception. Newmont announced a loss of $1.8
billion in 2007. But most of it came from a one-time house
cleaning -- $531 million to unwind 18.5 million ounces of forward
gold sales and a $1.6 billion non-cash charge to terminate
operations related to merchant banking. Look past those elements,
which are an overdue recognition of money that went down the drain
years ago, and you find that Newmont’s mining business is
actually in a healthy position. Looked at from another angle,
Newmont took these charges now because they could afford to do so
and because they felt that the damage to their share price would
be softened by the strong performance of their current operations.
Now that they’ve cleaned up the books, they too are dressed up
to join the profit party.
How
to Profit
It
won’t be long before others also note the pending improvements
to the bottom lines of the big gold companies. The investment
herd, we are convinced, is coming and, we expect, coming soon
How
to profit?
First
and foremost, you want to be moving into the established producing
companies post haste. The gangway on this ship is getting ready to
be pulled up.
Secondly,
you should seriously consider moving some funds into the
higher-quality junior exploration stocks. History has proven that,
absent an exciting discovery story, the big gold stocks must get
in gear before investor sentiment can reach the critical mass
needed to ignite the juniors.
History
also shows that as profitable as the big gold companies are in a
bull market, returns on the juniors can blow those away.
Exponentially. This upside, of course, comes with a greater degree
of risk.
But
paradoxically, this risk has been largely mitigated by the
majors’ slow take-off. That’s because, anticipating that the
gold stocks would follow the metal higher – and history shows no
example of them not doing so – investors have already poured
record amounts of money into exploration programs. As a result, we
now know which companies have the goods -- significant
discoveries that juniors have spent tens of millions to define and
prove up with the clear intent of selling to the majors.
The
missing element, of course, has been that, until recently, the
majors didn’t have enough free cash to make those acquisitions.
That is about to change.
While
you don’t know me and so will have to take my word for it, I am
not the type of person to fall in love with any investment. And
any time I feel such an urge coming on, I check all my assumptions
twice and then check them again. That said, I will also say that I
have never been more bullish than I am now on the gold mining
sector as a whole, with an added nod to the well-run exploration
companies..

© 2008 David Galland
Managing Editor, BIG GOLD, Casey Research
Editorial Archive
David
Galland
is the Managing Editor of BIG
GOLD, the highly acclaimed monthly publication dedicated to
keeping investors closely in touch with opportunities in the
precious metals producers and near-producers with larger market
capitalization, the very stocks that institutional investors
gravitate to during periods of crisis. Large volume makes these
easy-to-buy, easy-to-sell stocks ideal for investors looking for
the extraordinary upside of gold stocks in a gold bull market, but
without the more speculative risks from junior exploration stocks.
Learn
more by clicking here now.

www.caseyresearch.com
and www.kitcocasey.com
|