|
The
Daily Reckoning PRESENTS:
"To
follow the Silk Road is to follow a ghost. It flows through the heart of
Asia, but it has officially vanished…"- Colin Thubron, Shadow of
the Silk Road
In importance and
influence, the new Silk Road may stand to rival its namesake. As with
the old Silk Road, the new one will make some investors rich.
The old Silk Road was
not even a road in the normal sense of that term. It was, as travel
writer Colin Thubron describes it, "a shifting fretwork of arteries
and veins, laid to the Mediterranean." Thubron recently covered
7,000 miles in eight months following the old trails of this fabled
trade route.
The Silk Road ended, or
began, in Antioch, Turkey. It stretched all the way to old Changan, or
what is today known as Xian, in China. For a long time, it had no name.
A German geographer coined the term "Silk Road" only in the
19th century.
Yet traffic along the
Silk Road goes way back into the slipstream of humanity's past. Thubron
writes: "Chinese silk from 1500 B.C. has turned up in tombs in
north Afghanistan, and strands were discovered twisted into the hair of
a 10th-century B.C. Egyptian mummy." Archeologists found silk
dating from 1100 B.C. lying in the grave of a prince in Germany. The
stuff got around.
The Silk Road carried
much more than just silk across its rugged landscape. From China, the
West got jade, lacquer, ceramics, the first roses, azaleas. Also,
oranges, peaches, mulberries, apricots and rhubarb. Coming from the West
to the East came glass, gold, silver, Indian spices, gems and linen.
Also, fig trees, flax, pomegranates, jasmine, dates and olives.
Back and forth went
vegetables, fruits, furniture, artifacts of all kinds, musical
instruments - even slaves. Even weapons. The crossbow, a Chinese
invention, made its way across the old Silk Road to arm the Norman and
Capetian kings in their battle with the dreaded English longbow at Crecy
(in which they were famously defeated).
The old Silk Road
seemed to embrace almost every national and ethnic group from Arabia to
Japan - Persians, Turks, Sogdians, Syrians, Indians and many others.
(Often called the greatest traders of the Silk Road, the Sogdians were
an Iranian people. The Chinese believed them born traders. Myth held
that "their mothers fed them sugar to honey their voices, and their
baby palms were daubed with paste to attract profitable things,"
writes Thubron.)
None of them made the
journey the whole way through. No Roman ever walked the streets of Xian
or visited the tomb of the Yellow Emperor. No Chinese trader ever gazed
upon the pillars of imperial Rome or dipped his toes in the
Mediterranean Sea. Or perhaps it would be safer to say such journeys
must have been extremely rare.
Instead, the Silk Road
was more like a long relay race. Only luxury items could generally make
the whole journey - the jade and the silk, for example - or perhaps
incidental items people carried with them, like a flute or an old
trader's pipe. It was simply too expensive to ship most things the whole
distance, except those things people were willing to pay a heavy price
for.
Still, the old Silk
Road was the dominant trade route in human history for over a thousand
years. Its importance only diminished sometime in the 16th century, when
ships replaced the harrowing journey overland and transported goods much
cheaper and faster.
There is a Silk Road
revival, though, at least metaphorically. The old trading posts worked
in storied cities such as Samarkand, Kashgar and Meshed. The new Silk
Road weaves through Dubai, Riyadh, through Mumbai and Chennai in India,
to Kuala Lumpur, Singapore, Hong Kong - even as far as Tokyo.
Like the old Silk Road,
the new one is not a road either. But it is a useful metaphor to
describe the surge in trade between the Middle East and Asia. Between
1995-2005, trade between these two regions increased fourfold, according
to McKinsey & Co. Projections call for trade between the six members
of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) - Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar,
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - and East Asia to explode
from $59 billion to $300-500 billion by 2020.
Why is this happening?
Short answer: The GCC has cash and Asia has huge investment needs.
Rapidly growing Asian
economies have, at least in part, driven demand for oil. Higher oil
prices in recent years mean overflowing coffers in the GCC. They need to
put that treasure to work. More and more, it is winding up in Asia.
McKinsey reports: "Recent interviews with more than a dozen Gulf
investors who collectively control more than $300 billion in assets
revealed that they are set to shift their portfolio asset allocation
toward Asia by 10-30%."
It's a feedback loop.
More growth in Asia means more demand for oil - with more and more
coming from the Middle East. By 2030, estimates put half of China's oil
imports coming from the Middle East. Asia - including India - could
account for half the increase in the world's demand for oil. That means
more cash for the GCC and more investment in Asia - in real estate
development, in banking, in communications, in infrastructure. And on it
goes.
In the meantime,
Chinese, Indian and other Asian companies are active in the Middle East.
They bring low-cost consumer goods (Dubai is already home to
Chinamexmart, which McKinsey describes as a "mini-city of Chinese
companies distributing their products throughout the region").
Asian companies also bid on major construction projects in the Middle
East.
Another interesting
barometer of economic activity: As late as 2000, there were only seven
daily flights between the Gulf states and China. Today, there are more
than 48.
Thubron notes on his
trip how the influence of the old Silk Road flowed into even remote
hamlets. "The nervous system of the Silk Road radiated into the
poorest extremities," he writes. "It traversed minor
ecological divides, as well as empires." Likewise, this new surging
trade between these regions will have ripple effects in the patterns of
world trade and in financial markets everywhere.
Owning the assets the
new Silk Road demands and investing in businesses with ties to the
region should prove profitable. Our own Nabors Industries (NYSE:NBR)
is active in the Middle East and also has a joint venture with a Chinese
rig manufacturer. We also own several companies with valuable oil and
gas properties - such as Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ),
an indirect beneficiary of Asian consumption. Finally, ABB (NYSE:ABB)
is another way we've invested in the global boom in infrastructure.
Such feverish growth in
trade will have its pauses. Even the hummingbird must sleep. But
remember, the old Silk Road dominated trade for a thousand years and
made many a fortune. Perhaps the new Silk Road will do the same.
Regards,
Chris Mayer
for The Daily Reckoning
P.S.
In July, I'll be speaking at the Agora Financial Investment Symposium,
where the theme is centered on crisis and opportunity in the Far East.
You won't want to miss out on this event, which is sure to sell out.
Click here for all the details:
AF
Investment Symposium - July 24-27, Vancouver B.C.

© 2007 Chris Mayer
The
Daily Reckoning Archives
www.dailyreckoning.com
Editor’s Note: Chris
Mayer is a veteran of the banking industry, specifically in the area of
corporate lending. A financial writer since 1998, Mr. Mayer’s essays
have appeared in a wide variety of publications, from the Mises.org
Daily Article series to here in The Daily Reckoning. He is the editor of
Mayer’s Special Situations and Capital and Crisis - formerly the Fleet
Street Letter.
|