So here we are, half way through the year 2005 and that much closer to
when the slowdown in the money supply is expected to show effects on the
economy and financial markets. The slowdown in the money supply rate of
change is one of the economic stories of the year (although the
mainstream press hasn’t caught onto it yet) and already several key
commodities are responding to the slowdown in economic performance that
is sure to follow.
Respectable economists
such as Ed Yardeni have been talking about an economic slowdown in the
global economy to develop by later in the year based on various monetary
considerations.
This year will
undoubtedly prove to be a critical one in the integration effort of the
global economy. The Fed has appointed itself with the task of sopping up
the excess liquidity generated during the reflation period of the past
three years. Slowing down money creation is one of those ways. Yet it
would be a mistake not to take into account the excess liquidity around
the world (or as Business Week recently called a "global savings
glut"). The economic slowdown is obviously being engineered with an
eye toward drawing much of this overseas savings out of hiding so that
the integration process can progress according to the limits imposed by
the regulators.
Gold in particular is
being closely watched by those in charge of regulating this process (see
my previous article "Greenspan has his eye on
gold"). Gold, silver and the precious metal shares have
experienced spasms in recent months in response to the onset of this
economic slowdown and mini- (and temporary) deflation.
One way of looking at
the period we are now in is to examine the year 1995, which in many ways
was similar to what we’re now experiencing. For instance, the trend of
MZM money supply growth (annualized) took a precipitous drop beginning
in 1994 before bottoming in late 1995 before turning around in 1996. In
similar fashion, MZM started dropping in sustained fashion in 2004 and
is now at an 8-year low and almost exactly where it was in 1995.
Even the Fed’s
interest rate policy between 1994-1995 was similar to the action
they’ve taken so far this year in raising rates in successive fashion.
Back then they went ½% too far in raising the fed funds rate in 1995;
consequently, unemployment insurance claims leapt higher in response to
this extreme action. Today, unemployment claims are at a similar level
to where they were in 1994-1995 as well.

The XAU gold/silver
index in 1995 was in part a reflection of the relatively tight monetary
condition of that period. Although the XAU ended that year above its
lows from the start of the year, it was mostly a year of lateral trading
range activity. The same has been true year-to-date in 2005, although
with a slight downward bias. Even some of the turning points of 1995
have corresponded rather closely with 2005.
Turning our attention
to the current XAU weekly chart, we see a dual parabolic pattern with a
smaller dome within a larger bowl. The XAU price line bottomed in May
this year slightly to the right of the bowl’s center, or vertex. This,
along with the recent peak of the 40-week cycle, will likely prove to be
a limiting factor on the XAU in coming weeks and will give more
credibility to the parabolic dome pattern that is coming down on top of
XAU right now.

If the 1995 pattern is
any guide, then we can expect a bottom by October/November followed by
an end-of-the year rally, a scenario that would come close to fitting
the current cycle configuration.

© 2005 Clif Droke
Editorial Archive
Clif
Droke
P.O. Box 3401
Topsail Beach, N.C. 28445-9831 USA
Website l Email
|