|
Introduction
AMERICAN PRIDE AND POWER -
NEVER SELL IT SHORT
America is the greatest
nation ever built by the brains and brawn of its own people and using
its own resources. Examples of America’s great capability often come
in wartime as the nation’s efforts are focused on survival. The huge
national effort to develop the atomic bomb is a great example. I did not
work on the Manhattan Project that developed the atomic bomb, but was
very well aware that many of my personal friends were involved. Where
would we be today if Germany or Japan had won the nuclear race and
dropped an A Bomb on New York or San Francisco? Think about that
question for a starter.
Less than a decade after
the war, from 1949 to 1957, I had a major role in another great program
to develop and build the first nuclear power plants for War and Peace.
My contribution to this program led directly to an American nuclear navy
and a world wide program of nuclear electric power plants. I hope that
the following account of that program will increase your pride in the
unique strength of our great nation, the ability of our people to
conceive and complete great projects for the benefit of all mankind.
Why do people of every
other nation on earth try to emigrate to our great nation? Think about
that fact for a moment. One of the principle reasons is that in America our people are free to use their God-given ability to reach
their personal dreams. It is always easier to dwell on our problems
rather than on our successes. One of the great weaknesses in our schools
is their failure to highlight the unique capabilities of our great
nation.
In the Memoir that
follows,
I give major credit to the leadership of Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, a
Jew who reportedly suffered from prejudice during his years at
Annapolis. Trained in nuclear physics during the Manhattan Atomic Bomb
Project, he dreamed a great dream, as have other Americans, and
personally led a huge national effort to bring it to a successful
conclusion. He got full Congressional support for the program, fought
the opposition of the Navy leaders and gave America a large and capable
nuclear navy.
THE FROSTING ON THE CAKE
The Memoir that follows was
written in the Spring of 2000. It was sent to the Navy History
Division in Washington DC for transmission to various Navy archives,
including the Nautilus Museum in Groton, Connecticut. During this process, I
discovered that the Nautilus Alumni Association was having their
Biennial Reunion in September 2000 on Shelter Island, San Diego—one of
my favorite vacation spots. I sent a copy of my Memoir to the retired
officer in charge of the reunion, with the result that my wife and I
were invited to attend as guests of the 3-day affair. We had a great
time meeting again some of the original officers and crew as well as
more recent members. As a point of interest, the officers and crew
members were indistinguishable in the large group of attendees - the
result of their close working quarters in the submarine. At the final
dinner I received a rising vote of appreciation from the group as a
fitting close to this great event.
I
would be pleased to hear from
any former submariners, either nuclear or conventional. Robert
B. Gordon, ScD
August 1, 2003 Foreword
During
an 8-year period in the middle of the last century, a truly amazing
series of events took place in this country. Under the dynamic
leadership of Hyman G. Rickover, thousands of scientists, engineers and
technicians worked long hours to make the world’s first nuclear
powered submarine, the Nautilus. Then, based on its great success, they
teamed to build the world’s first civilian nuclear power generating
station. Both projects succeeded due largely to their use of two
miraculous—previously
rare—metals
in the heart of the nuclear reactor. Since the work was highly
classified, the complete inside story never reached the public. The
writer played an important role in developing these new metals and in
manufacturing the nuclear reactor cores. Since the Navy project leader,
Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, and many of the key technical contributors
are now deceased, I may be the last team member able to bring this
amazing story to a non-technical audience. 
TWO
MIRACLE METALS SERVING IN WAR AND
PEACE

INTRODUCTION In
the Fall of 1949, I was working for Westinghouse Electric in Pittsburgh
as Manager of the Special Alloy Development Department involved in
creating new alloys for use in Westinghouse civilian and defense
products. Ten years earlier, I had joined this company as Research
Engineer after receiving a Doctorate in Physical Metallurgy from M.I.T.
In 1949, I was living happily with my wife and sons and not
contemplating any major change in my life or employment. But, it was all
to change abruptly in the form of a letter from our company’s top
management. It said that the company had just received a large
government contract to develop and build a nuclear reactor power plant
for the Nautilus, the world’s first nuclear submarine. It went on to
say that they had picked me for a key position in the new Atomic Power Division
and that I should report immediately for my new assignment. Little did I
know at that time about the tremendous professional opportunities and
challenges my new job would bring. HYMAN
G. RICKOVER, FATHER OF THE NUCLEAR NAVY
In
1949, Rickover, then a Captain, was about to see his long dream come to
pass. After graduating from Annapolis and spending years in relative
obscurity as a design engineer in naval ship construction, Rickover was
given a special assignment during the War years to study nuclear
engineering in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Whether his dream was
born or matured there is not important. What is very important is that
he left Oak Ridge with an overwhelming conviction to build not one
submarine, not a fleet of submarines, but an entire nuclear navy free to
roam the seas unencumbered by fuel tankers. The
task of convincing the Navy brass and getting the Congressional
appropriations was formidable, but Rickover sold them, first on the
Nautilus project and then on all future nuclear ship construction. His
desire and determination to attain his goals had to be witnessed in
person to be believed. The next eight years made me a believer. The
close of this eight-year segment of my memoirs includes my personal
reflections on the personality and accomplishments of this remarkable
individual. Some
very shrewd planning went into Rickover’s plans for a nuclear navy.
First of all, he picked the submarine to use the first nuclear reactor
because of the dramatic change in performance and endurance that nuclear
power would provide. Then he made a brilliant tactical move. He doubled
his chances of success by awarding duplicate contracts to two commercial
competitors. He gave the job of building a liquid sodium cooled reactor
to General Electric in Schenectady and a contract for a light water
cooled reactor to Westinghouse. This action guaranteed each company
would use its best people and efforts to win the goal. From my vantage
point in Pittsburgh, I can attest to the intense competition that
ensued. RICKOVER’S
PROJECT MANAGEMENT OFFICE Technical,
financial and schedular management of the twin submarine contracts was
provided by Rickover’s hand picked staff in Washington, DC. It
consisted of active duty naval personnel and civilian technical experts
in needed specialties. From Rickover on down, this group spent much of
the time in the field overseeing their phases of the work. From my
experience, they were capable and worked long and hard to achieve a
successful mission. Rickover, personally, worked more hours than I can
believe possible for a human being. He followed every technical detail.
He chaired many decision meetings. For years after a full work day, he
flew to Pittsburgh twice a week for evening meetings and then returned
to Washington on the overnight train departing at twelve PM. I presume
he spent an equal time in Schenectady. In
the first year of the program while our facilities were being built at
Bettis Field, Pittsburgh, Rickover used the capabilities at other Atomic
Energy Commission (AEC) facilities to do the early experimental work on
the effects of nuclear irradiation on materials. He presided over large
classified meetings that were regularly held at these sites to
coordinate the work of the widespread experimenters. Smaller meetings
were held in our limited space at Bettis. On those occasions, Rickover
appeared not to recognize my presence. He was not known for small talk
or idle chatter, but I was puzzled by his attitude. I knew that my
credentials had passed across his desk before being assigned to work at
Bettis. This awkward situation changed dramatically when, in a
subsequent large meeting at Battelle in Columbus, Ohio, I rose and asked
him a challenging question. There was noticeable stir in the audience.
He knew me after that.
To
meet the nearly impossible schedule laid down in advance, Rickover
realized that risks had to be assumed and that the most important thing
was not to bog down in debate over technical decisions. In a typical
evening decisions meeting, Rickover sat at the head of a conference
table with all concerned specialists in the other seats. He would
announce the purpose of the meeting and ask for any discussion. He would
phrase the question to be decided and then go around the table asking
each attendee for a vote of Yes or No or A or B. If the vote was close
or even, Rickover would make the decision knowing that the most
important thing was to move ahead and meet the schedule. I
was the Westinghouse manager picked to develop and manufacture the
nuclear core of the Nautilus—the
unique central part of his great dream. My development laboratories and
pilot manufacturing facilities were of great interest to Rickover and I
personally guided him through them on nearly every one of his frequent
visits to Pittsburgh. At the end of his tours, he always asked,
"What do you need to speed up the work?" Once our facilities
were complete, we quickly went to a seven-day, twenty-four hour
operation and Rickover never stopped trying to add a 25th hour to the
day. And, dear reader, remember this was in "peace" time. During
the early months when we were building facilities and buying equipment,
we were given generous budgets so that we could solve most
foreseen needs. But once we were involved in the tough, trail
blazing work described later, we had unexpected needs for funds. On one
occasion when Rickover asked what we needed, I requested a million
dollars for special equipment (real money in those days) and had the
additional funding very quickly. That is how we were able to meet a very
difficult schedule. UNUSUAL
METALS NEEDED FOR THE NAUTILUS REACTOR Before
the Navy issued its contract to build the reactor, they requested
experts at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to specify the basic
characteristics of the design. It was to be a light-water cooled,
thermal reactor using Uranium 238 slightly enriched with Uranium 235
from the Oak Ridge enrichment plant. In common terms, this means it used
ordinary (not heavy) water to slow down the fast neutrons produced by
fission of U235 to "thermal" energy so as to facilitate
capture and more fissions of U235. The nuclear reactor was to be
contained in a huge, steel pressure vessel, needed so that cooling water
would still be liquid at the temperatures needed to produce power
efficiently. These design features were very desirable for their
inherent nuclear safety and physical compactness, both needed in a
submarine and highly desirable for other applications as well. From
a study of the known nuclear properties of all metals with high melting
points, the design report specified that the nuclear core (the central
space containing the U235 fuel elements which heat the cooling water to
provide the energy) should use Zirconium as the structural material to
hold and contain the fuel. Its sister metal, Hafnium, was specified for
the control rods to provide safety and vary the reactor power output.

Source: www.chemsoc.org
The
Oak Ridge proposal was very fine in theory, but very radical in a
practical sense since these wonder metals did not exist in the real
world. Thanks to the wartime Bomb Project, there was a plentiful supply
of nuclear fuel. There was a crucial need for a strong,
corrosion-resistant metal with appropriate nuclear properties to contain
the fuel and another metal to control the reactor power level. The
designer’s choice of two ideal—but
unavailable—metals
posed a major immediate problem for the chosen contractor, Westinghouse,
and for me personally since I was the manager designated to develop the
metals and processes and build the reactor core. In the Fall of 1949,
the world supply of these two (then rare) metals was measured in ounces
and their purity level was very inadequate. The job ahead was
unprecedented and formidable. WORK
BEGINS AT THE WESTINGHOUSE BETTIS AIRPORT AND ARCO, IDAHO SITES

 |
Westinghouse
purchased the original Pittsburgh airport, named for a World War I
aviator, as the site for the new atomic power facilities. It was already
a large level site, rare in hilly Pittsburgh, but its facilities
consisted of just a small administrative building and two hangars, each
only one-hundred feet square. Starting from scratch, Westinghouse hired
3,000 employees and built the organization plus the many laboratory and
pilot manufacturing facilities from the ground up in record time. As
anticipated, our miracle metals required specialized new equipment and
fabrication processes both in the laboratory and in final manufacture.
New employees started from scratch and had to learn every detail of
their new job. From
its origin, the nuclear submarine project envisioned a Mark I land-based
nuclear reactor prototype to be built and operated ahead of the power
plant for the Nautilus. Understandably, no one wished to send an
unproven nuclear submarine to sea. Mark I was to be identical in design
and construction to Mark II, but with less stringent service life
required. This decision permitted the use of our new metals at an
earlier state of their development, especially with regard to long term
corrosion resistance. In just two years of intense efforts, construction
of the nuclear reactor core for the Arco, Idaho, land-based Nautilus
prototype was well underway using the specified metals from an Oregon
beach sand. The miracle had begun! |
COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT OF THE MIRACLE METALS The
two metals that made the Nautilus a tremendous success are now
performing well in scores of reactors in our nuclear U.S. Navy. They are
also in hundreds of pressurized light-water reactors providing large
amounts of electric power to many industrialized nations. The
extraordinary story of their transition from unused rarities to widely
used commercial metals has been hidden from the public. The exciting
pioneer work was done in many laboratories across the country which
provided specialized skills for the main goal of building a successful
nuclear submarine on a "crash" schedule in peace time. In
addition to the 200 scientists, engineers and technicians under my
direction in Pittsburgh, there were major contributions from other
laboratories. Basic metallurgy research on both metals and their alloys
was conducted by a parallel group at Bettis. Important specialized
assistance was given by classified research groups at Argonne National
Laboratories in Chicago and Battelle Memorial in Columbus. The
metals Titanium, Zirconium and Hafnium form group 4 B in the Periodic
Table of Elements. Their minerals are prevalent in the earth’s crust,
but are very difficult to reduce to metallic form. Titanium is the most
common and has found major uses in airplanes and golf clubs because of
its light weight. Its nuclear properties are not of interest. The
primary interest in the denser and higher melting cousins Zr and Hf
stems from their very unusual properties for water cooled nuclear
reactors such as that of the Nautilus. Zr has a very low capture
capability for slow neutrons such as those in water reactors. It is
almost transparent to the neutrons needed to split the U235 atoms and is
an ideal structural material to hold and contain the fuel in a reactor.
On the other hand, Hf has a very high neutron capture capability and is
an ideal material for control rods that will readily absorb neutrons to
reduce and control the power level when desired or to shut down the
reactor. Although
Zr and Hf have very different nuclear properties, they are very similar
in their chemistry. Because of this fact, they are usually found
combined in the same beach sands which serve as their primary source.
They are very reactive and require special procedures to remove the
common impurities. They have very high melting points, so cannot be
reduced from their ores with common methods. It is very important to
emphasize that without a special chemical process to separate the 2% Hf
"impurity" from the 98% zirconium, the original metal
product is of no value in a nuclear reactor. For
some time before work on the Nautilus project began, the U.S. Bureau of
Mines in Albany, Oregon had a small scale program to improve processes
for reducing the minerals in the nearby Oregon beach sands. Shortly
after reporting to work as employee #12 at the Atomic Power Division, I
made the first of many trips from Pittsburgh to Albany via Portland.
[What a contrast to today’s flights - Prop-driven DC3’s flying
through the Rocky mountain passes rather than over the peaks. On one
return trip on a sunny winter day, our pilot circled around Old Faithful
in Yellowstone so we could see the geyser spout. He wouldn’t try that
today.] On
my first trip to Albany, I held in my hand a small piece of impure
zirconium sponge metal containing the usual 2% hafnium. It probably
represented a large part of the total world supply at that point in
time. It had been produced in a small retort containing zirconium
chloride and magnesium metal as a reducing agent. The process was small
scale, with many slow steps too complex to detail here. After the choice
of this new metal for the Nautilus program, the work at the Bureau of
Mines was greatly expanded and resulted in a more efficient and larger
scale production process for producing sponge zirconium. Better
procedures for separating the hafnium were developed and then for
producing the desirable quantities of hafnium sponge metal. Based on the
success of the laboratory and pilot scale work at Albany, a commercial
firm took on the manufacture of much larger quantities of hafnium-free
sponge zirconium. DEVELOPMENT
OF REACTOR QUALITY METALS AND ALLOYS Pressurized
water at 600 to 650 degrees F was quite corrosive to the early zirconium
metal and its alloys melted from the best available sponge metal. A
large alloy research and development program was launched at
Westinghouse to obtain a high degree of corrosion resistance, but since
success was not assured on the "crash" Navy schedule, we
decided on a two prong approach: (1) Develop adequate quantities of
ultra pure Zr and (2) develop improved corrosion resistance through
alloying additions. For Goal 1, an unusual production plant was
constructed at Bettis Field. It employed a very unorthodox (deBoer)
process built and operated by the Bettis chemical engineering group.
Large evacuated furnaces formed zirconium (or hafnium) iodide vapor that
deposited the pure metals onto a hot filament. The Zr and Hf produced
from this process was in the form of long crystalline bars of high
purity metal. It was decided to use this metal as raw material for the
nuclear core of the land based Mark 1 prototype reactor in Arco, Idaho.
The alloy research and development work proceeded at a high rate using
the pure crystal bar zirconium. Additions of moderate amounts of tin
were found to be most effective in improving the high temperature water
corrosion resistance of pure Zirconium. A binary alloy with tin was
chosen for use in the Mark I prototype reactor core. It was given the
name Zircaloy 1 to distinguish it from later alloys. DEVELOPMENT
OF EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES FOR FABRICATING THE NUCLEAR CORE Due
to its high melting point and very reactive nature, it was impossible to
melt and fabricate Zr in air or in conventional metal processing
equipment. It was highly reactive to available refractories. In any
atmosphere other than a high vacuum or pure helium, Zr absorbs oxygen
and nitrogen from the atmosphere and cannot be used. It was necessary
from the very beginning for Westinghouse personnel to develop and build
special arc melting furnaces to produce ingots of a size and shape
suitable for processing into the required shapes for the reactor fuel
elements. In the initial alloy development work, the small arc melting
furnaces used tungsten electrodes and water cooled copper crucibles.
Small diameter ingots from these furnaces were then used as consumable
electrodes for a second, larger scale arc melting operation. The
remelting operation significantly reduced impurities. Due
to the extreme schedule urgency dictated by the Navy, the reactor core
for the Mark I prototype was produced from pure crystal bar Zr alloyed
with tin (Zircaloy 1) to provide adequate corrosion resistance. In the
early days of producing crystal bar Zr, Rickover decided—in
a major gamble—not
to use this expensive process for the Nautilus. Since he wanted to build
many nuclear powered vessels, he ordered full speed ahead on the further
development of better quality sponge and melting processes.
Although there was no guarantee of success at that time, his dream of a
fully commercial Zr industry was realized. Eventually
after much hard work in the laboratory, we were able—with
better sponge quality and larger-scale double consumable arc melting—to
produce reactor grade Zr. The De Boer crystal bar plant was closed.
Thus, our two miracle metals became fully available for the Nautilus
Mark II core. The specialized equipment and processes needed for the
Nautilus core were subsequently scaled up for the much larger production
requirements of the future nuclear navy and hundreds of commercial
nuclear power plants. SELECTING
THE ALLOY FOR THE NAUTILUS CORE I
have a vivid memory, almost five decades later, of the meeting to
specify the precise composition of the zirconium-base alloy for the
Nautilus. Like all previous major decisions, it was done on the last
possible date permitted by the schedule for the Mark II core. This
permitted completion of a maximum number of critical, long term
corrosion tests. The meeting was in my office at about 9 p.m. I cannot
remember the day of the week since 7 work day weeks were common.
Attending were the writer and the three other principal managers
involved in the critical alloy development and testing work. We
reviewed all the relevant data, including tests just completed. We
agreed on the percentage of the principal alloying agent, tin, and then
debated the merits of minor beneficial amounts of nickel, chromium and
iron (curiously, all needed for stainless steel). After discussion, we
put a final composition to a vote and the composition for Zircaloy 2 for
the Nautilus core was set in concrete. We left the meeting for home and
sleep, united in our confidence that our chosen alloy, manufactured by a
complex process we had pioneered, would do the job. The full, long
operating history of naval reactors since then has confirmed our faith. Approximately
20 years later, when the Nautilus was close to ending its brilliant
service, four principal contributors to the development of zirconium
alloys received public recognition. At the October 1972 annual meeting
of the American Society for Metals in Cleveland, the writer and three
others were honored with the Engineering Materials Achievement Award for
that year. The large certificate on my wall reads "For the
development of Zirconium Alloy Systems and their contributions to
Nuclear Energy." U.S. patents were granted to me and 3 others for
the Zircaloy compositions and to me and one other person for the double
consumable arc-melting process.
THE NUCLEAR POWER TRIAL RUN AT ARCO, IDAHO The
year 1953 was extremely busy for all persons working on development and
manufacture of the reactor cores for the Mark I and Mark II power
plants. As soon as the Mark I core was shipped to Arco, Idaho for the
initial nuclear power run, all facilities and personnel at Bettis worked
around the clock as needed to meet the schedule for the Nautilus. In
June 1953 the full power run at Arco was made with total success, thus
removing any possible roadblock to shipping the Nautilus core to meet
the launch schedule at the Groton, Connecticut plant of General
Dynamics, the submarine builder. The
complete success at Arco gave the hard working team at Bettis their
first chance at recognition by the outside world. Although all details
about the nuclear plant were withheld, the Navy released some
photographs of the Arco reactor plus limited information on the soon to
be launched Nautilus. The top management of Westinghouse was extremely
happy with the good news from Arco, especially because their Navy
project appeared to be progressing better than a second submarine of
different concept under contract to General Electric. In the end, it
turned out that the brilliant Nautilus success was not duplicated. The
GE-built Sea Wolf submarine eventually made several test runs at sea and
was then dismantled. So
great was the confidence at this time in the complete success of the
Nautilus, that the President of Westinghouse awarded his company’s
highest honor—the
Order of Merit—to
ten key Bettis managers. Pittsburgh’s leading paper publicized the
event with photos of the ten awardees. The impressive, self-standing
bronze medal contains a large silver W and the inscription "To whom
his fellow men delight to honor." I have displayed mine proudly
since 1953 and consider it a partial return for the long hours and
mental strain involved. Fortunately, this is not an honor a recipient
must die for. THE
LAUNCHING OF THE NAUTILUS January
21, 1954 was a great day for every contributor to the design and
construction of the vessel and its nuclear power plant. On a gray winter
day in Groton, Connecticut, Mamie Eisenhower, the President’s wife,
raised the champagne bottle and almost missed the boat due to its swift
slide into the Thames river. I was fortunate to attend all the festive
activities as a guest of the Electric Boat division of General Dynamics,
the builder. During the short trip into the water, I was completely
overcome by my emotions with tears running down both cheeks. This was
totally unexpected as it had never happened in my adult life to that
day. I think that this emotional release was beneficial to me as I
returned to complete the Nautilus core and go on to other
first-of-their-kind achievements dreamed up by our insatiable Navy
project leader Rickover.
EXPERIENCES
OF MY TWO SUBMARINE RIDES Rickover
was a strong advocate of training for key Westinghouse and Navy
personnel. For example, the officer crew of the Nautilus had been
selected by the time we started work at the old Bettis Airport in late
1949. When they took command in 1954, they understood every detail of
the nuclear plant design and construction. While the facilities were
being built, we attended courses in Reactor Physics even though not
needed directly in our field of work. More pertinent education in
radiation damage to metals was gained by visits to experts in government
laboratories at Argonne and Oak Ridge. Rickover also wanted the key
non-Navy personnel to have a "feel" for the unusual
environment of a submarine. So,
in line with this philosophy, a small group from Bettis received
invitations to spend July 26, 1954 on a scheduled crew training trip in
a Guppy Snorkeler sub, the Atule SS-403, based in Groton, CT. It was a
Sunday and the weather was sunny with patches of fog on Long Island
sound. The water was cluttered with small pleasure craft both motor and
sail-powered. The Atule was about 300 feet long and we spent the entire
day practicing diving for the benefit of the crew. These were
"real" dives with the conning tower hatch open and two men on
deck. The boat would start to dive immediately after a loud siren
sounded Dive! Dive! The men on deck would race to the hatch, get inside
and close it as they tumbled down the vertical ladder. Each dive was
unique and collectively they made for an interesting day.
During
the course of the day, we probably made about 20 or 30 dives. What made
each of them exciting was that the sub was longer than the depth of the
water, so there was always the possibility of sticking the prow of the
sub in the mud. Coming up had more interesting possibilities. Although
there was a crewman looking out through a periscope, there were always a
few small boats in our immediate vicinity when we rose to the surface.
Our final surprise of the busy day was when we learned that the young
crewmen operating the diving planes were also on their FIRST SUBMARINE
RIDE. They had just finished their six-week training program on land and
this was their graduation exercise. At day end, we all received cards
signed by the Commander signifying we were members of "The New
Order of Guppy Snorkelers." We
left this cruise with a full understanding of why nuclear power was
necessary in submarines. To a first visitor, the Atule was crowded,
smelly, noisy and generally unattractive. At that time I had never in my
wildest thoughts ever dreamed of a ride in the Nautilus. When that great
surprise came, just ten months later, it was not a business trip but a
wonderful gesture of appreciation and thanks from Admiral Rickover. After
launching the Nautilus, several months were needed to fit it for service
followed by numerous test runs at sea to determine its full range of
capabilities. It was commissioned as SSN-571 in September 1954. Of
course the details of its incredible speed and performance were closely
held, but I learned many years later that its performance forced the
Navy to develop measures for future defense against such capabilities in
unfriendly hands. May
8, 1955 was the date I became an "Atomic Submariner
Extraordinary" according to my Order of the Nuclear Navy card
signed by E.P. Wilkinson, Nautilus Commander. Unlike the Guppy sub
commander, Gene Wilkinson was an old friend from his frequent visits to
Bettis. Surprisingly, he was not an Annapolis graduate, but his
abilities were very great as he rose to high Naval commands later in his
career. Undersea travel on the Nautilus was unlike any other experience.
It was like a luxury cruise ship, but much quieter and smoother. We had
the sensation of traveling very fast, but we were never given a number.
The crew quarters were very spacious and provided means for their
entertainment on long cruises. The officer’s mess was equipped with a
full set of Zircaloy cutlery. This jewel-like, unique set was
furnished at an unknown, but almost certainly large cost by a supplier
company at Rickover’s request. Unlike our first undersea experience,
there was absolutely no excitement. But the trip was well earned and
appreciated by the small group of Bettis employee invitees. Despite my
long acquaintance with Rickover, I never had any idea that his great
thank-you gift would be forthcoming. As a complete surprise, it was even
more pleasurable. THE
SHIPPINGPORT CIVILIAN POWER PLANT The
complete success of the Mark I "submarine in the desert" was
all the evidence Rickover needed to unwrap his big plans. These, of
course, involved his dream to place duplicate copies of the Nautilus
reactor on every new major naval ship including cruisers and aircraft
carriers. All of these things would be accomplished in due time, but
involved mainly design and construction work. Rickover needed another
huge "first" to follow the Nautilus. Thus was born the joint
project with Duquesne Light Co. to build the first central station
nuclear power plant. A site was selected at Shippingport on the shore of
the Ohio river, south of Pittsburgh and the Westinghouse Bettis plant
geared up for a brand new project.
A
land-based power plant does not have to be especially compact and is not
subject to the many large motions of a naval vessel. It must however be
earthquake resistant. Cost was a big factor, so every effort was made to
design a reactor core that would be simple and economical to
manufacture. So the chosen nuclear core design was radically different
from that in the Nautilus but, outside the pressure vessel, the power
plant was almost identical. The miracle metals zirconium and hafnium
were again to be used in the core, but the uranium-bearing fuel elements
were to have a completely new composition and structure. The slightly
enriched U235 fuel was to be used as a ceramic oxide rather than a metal
alloy. This required personnel under my direction to develop completely
different equipment and processes to manufacture the reactor core.
Accordingly, we designed and built a large combined laboratory and
manufacturing plant called the "G" building since the
"F" building was still busy with advanced submarine cores.
Again, as before, it was all done on a crash schedule. The
civilian power plant was called the PWR, short for Pressurized Water
Reactor. It was designed to produce 75 megawatts of electricity for
Duquesne Light customers in the Pittsburgh area. Although too small to
generate electricity at a competitive cost, this pioneering plant was
the prototype for very many large 1200 MW plants subsequently built in
the U.S. and abroad. The plant was opened in a gala ceremony, with the
startup signaled by President Eisenhower pressing a key in Washington,
DC. One
small detail of the luncheon served under tents that hot summer day
in1956 permits me to tell an unusual story about Rickover. At each
place for the hundred or so distinguished guests was an inexpensive
souvenir. It was a small plastic model of a Westinghouse TV with a
picture of the new reactor on the "screen." It probably
cost about a dollar to make. This unique little souvenir was
conspicuously absent from the places for the Bettis employees and their
wives. Some time later, I asked our Bettis division manager if he could
get me one of the souvenirs. It was not forthcoming, so on the next
visit I had from Rickover I repeated my request. I then forgot about the
whole incident. Several weeks later my big boss called on the phone and
said that he had something for me. In his office, he reached into a desk
drawer with a grin and pulled out the desired TV souvenir. He said that
the Admiral, in a phone call, had asked him to give me the souvenir. I
still treasure the unexpected gift and have it on my desk as I write. It
is an example of Rickover’s attention to the most minute detail. THE
LARGE SHIP REACTOR PROJECT The
project for the first nuclear carrier was born early in the Mark II
program for the Nautilus, but at a low exploratory level. It was
expected to require installation of eight Nautilus-size reactors—a
huge task. It was also decided to take a fresh look at new fuel
materials to see if they offered any advantages. In November 1954 after
the Nautilus was at sea, I learned by copy of a letter to Rickover from
our Bettis manager, that Rickover had—without
my knowledge—requested
that I be transferred to the new LSR project. Our manager stated that I
was urgently needed to complete the PWR reactor, but would be made
available in June 1955. Rickover could have ordered my transfer, but
chose not to do so at that time. In
June of 1955, I became manager of the Core Engineering Dept with a large
group of people to develop the LSR cores. This was a job that involved
line responsibility for the work. I had only been in this new job for
several months when I received a surprise phone call from my division
manager. Rickover had called and this time he didn’t request my
transfer, he ordered it. He wanted me to be relieved of my supervisory
responsibility and made Task Leader of a small staff group to
investigate a special study of a new fuel material. It was flattering to
be wanted, but I was not happy with the move. Happy or not, we pitched
in and got the new job done and I returned to my earlier spot in the
organization. This was just another example of who was running the show.
Our paycheck said Westinghouse, but our real boss was Rickover. DEVELOPING
COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR CORE MANUFACTURING PLANTS With
the great success of the Nautilus, it was obvious that the Navy would
require quantities of nuclear cores for initial installation in new
vessels and to replace spent cores in operating ships. Accordingly,
Bettis employees were actively involved in providing information and
assistance to companies who had been selected as prospective Navy core
vendors. This was a thoroughly enjoyable task as it signified that our
earlier pioneering efforts had been successful beyond our wildest dreams
at the start. MY
ELEVEN DAYS IN ENGLAND WITH RICKOVER With
the Nautilus at sea and the follow-on PWR program going well, Rickover
apparently decided he could afford to undertake an unusual
information-gathering project. It was one of the first—if
not the first—such
project of its kind. Its goal was to gather all the scientific and
engineering information that the British government had accumulated from
their own extensive nuclear research programs. It was to include
everything they had done on nuclear power including all classified work.
Appropriate approvals were obtained on both sides of the ocean for eight
people to visit the British national laboratories and nuclear
facilities. The
party consisted of Rickover, three of his senior staff, two from General
Electric and two from Westinghouse. I am going to give details that
illustrate some interesting characteristics of Rickover and how he chose
to tackle a job. I had plenty of opportunity to observe him in a quite
different environment. Our party of eight assembled in Washington on a
Saturday in mid-December 1954 for a final briefing. The flight to Boston
was uneventful, but we were detained for three hours by strong headwinds
before taking off for London. At the Boston airport, I soon found
that I had to buy crackers for Rickover if I wanted to quell my own
hunger pangs during the long wait. The
plane was a propeller-driven Boeing Stratacruiser requiring 16 hours for
the flight to London. After a multi-course dinner spread over many
hours, Rickover retired to one of several berths on the large plane. It
was mid-afternoon on Sunday when we arrived and by pre-arrangement a
large and distinguished British group awaited us at their main Harwell
nuclear laboratory near Oxford. Sir John Cockroft, famed Nobel Laureate
and Harwell Director, greeted us and started to discuss the agenda they
had prepared. It involved weekdays only with short morning and afternoon
sessions broken by long coffee and tea breaks etc. Before he finished,
Rickover jumped to his feet and announced his schedule of long full-day
work sessions with few breaks and continuing through Saturday and
Sunday. He also specified we would need expert secretarial service in
the final days to complete our report before departing. The assembled
British experts had never experienced anything like this, but Rickover
got what he asked for: access to their working level technical experts
plus secretarial support. Rickover
and his chief assistant, Commander Louis Roddis, elected to spend full
time traveling to all far-flung British nuclear facilities. The
remaining six worked strenuous, full days in detailed interview sessions
with Harwell experts that started early and lasted late. [In an
interesting tie-in with this trip, Lou Roddis, in 1971, was
Vice-Chairman of Con Edison Electric in New York City and invited me to
head their nuclear safety/quality control function.] So, I completed my
31-year nuclear career working with Con Edison’s three nuclear plants
on the Hudson river, north of New York, York City. I retired in 1980
having formed the first Quality Control and Reliability function in the
Electric Utility industry. All
of our party stayed in the Crown and Thistle Inn in Abingdon built in
fourteen hundred something. It had no central heat and was bitter cold
when we returned at night since the maids opened all the windows each
day. Based on my prior experience that Rickover expected and enjoyed
small favors, at breakfast I always bought two morning papers for a
halfpenny each. We were driven to and from the Harwell lab each
day in small passenger cars, always at breakneck speed on orders from
the Admiral. Near the end of our trip, we attended a swanky dinner party
on a very foggy evening. Rickover was in the front seat of one car and I
was in the rear. We were late. The curvy, country road was barely wide enough
for two small cars. I was squirming in the back seat; while Rickover
kept urging the driver to go faster. Fortunately, there were few
oncoming cars and we made it. We had survived previous such incidents of
crazy speed, but they were all in daylight on good U.S. roads. Rickover
had a knack for creating problems for those trying to assist him. True
to precedent, on the Sunday morning following our full week in Britain,
Rickover’s electric razor failed to function. Again, in his usual
form, he made a very big fuss, much to the chagrin of the rest of his
party. Our hosts had to move heaven and earth to get it fixed on a
Sunday morning, but eventually did. We
finished our work and had the secretaries type the lengthy report. These
girls had never before worked evenings or weekends. As gifts, we bought
them all much-treasured silk stockings. Rickover was pleased with our
work and told us to take an extra day in London and do some Christmas
shopping. He did not know it, but with this extra day, he saved our
lives. The plane, originally scheduled for our return, crashed with loss
of all passengers on the first leg from London to Glasgow. We neither
saw nor heard about our report again, but it was a memorable trip. We,
and our Christmas gifts, arrived home safely after a sixteen-hour flight
at 8,000 feet because of headwinds. It was good to be back home and
enjoy our central heating in the good old USA. REFLECTIONS
ON H. G. RICKOVER Rickover,
in my considered judgment, was truly a great man. He was tough and
single-minded. He planned well and followed the plan to a successful
conclusion. He chose good subordinates and could not stand incompetence
at any level. He was like a bull in a china shop. He was a man, small in
stature, who hid his inferiority complex by always being the first to
attack. In every personal confrontation, he struck first to disadvantage
his opponent. He was the most determined, tenacious man I ever knew. He
was a very demanding and difficult superior under whom to work. He never
intended or tried to win a popularity contest, but he made a tremendous
contribution to the Navy, our Nation, and the world with his pioneering
nuclear power accomplishments. With
his career-long "pedal-to-the-floor attitude", it's a wonder
Rickover lived to reach his old age. But he did survive countless trips
to innumerable airports; while urging the driver "Can’t you go
any faster?" He took up the goal of better education after leaving
the Navy and became a national spokesman for this cause. Despite
his huge contributions to the Navy, Rickover’s disrespect for
authority and abrasive ways created problems with his superiors who
tried several times to force his retirement. But, thanks to his great
popularity with Congress, these attempts failed. By withholding naval
appropriations, they forced the Navy brass to promote rather than retire
Rickover. He spent his final years as a Vice-Admiral. He was finally
retired by President Reagan at age 80. During all the time this
interesting Washington drama was playing to the final curtain, my moral
support always went to the Admiral.
I
can recall only one direct compliment from Rickover in my eight years
with his programs. I always knew that I held his respect, since I would
have been replaced at any time he was dissatisfied. In August 1955, I
did receive a letter over his signature addressed to "Dear Bob."
It thanked me for my contributions to a major 740-page book on "The
Metallurgy of Zirconium" written by many expert authors at his
specific request. I edited a large chapter on "Melting and Shaping
of Zirconium and its Alloys." If my memory is correct, this
was the only time Rickover addressed me by my first name. My
only knowledge of the war-time Manhattan Bomb Project directed by Major
General Leslie Groves comes from reading about it after the war. Groves
was widely acclaimed for his genius in guiding this program. It is not
possible to compare the Bomb and Nautilus projects, but Groves had the
highest national wartime priority to aid him plus the advantage that the
end product needed only a useful life measured in microseconds rather
than years. Grove’s achievements were widely applauded after the war;
while Rickover’s name slid into relative obscurity, remembered only by
those who worked by his side. Although
there were times when I had less than happy thoughts about my old
"boss," I truly feel at this time that he was a great leader
and I have nothing but admiration and respect for his achievements. REFLECTIONS
ON THE WONDERS OF CREATION Thinking
not of the entire Universe, but just of Planet Earth, consider these
miracles:
1.
A
metallic element Uranium and its fissionable isotope U235, capable
of releasing enormous amounts of energy for good or evil.
2. Two
chemically similar metallic elements, zirconium and hafnium, found
together in beach sands in Oregon and around the globe.
3. When
freed from its sister element, zirconium possesses unique nuclear
properties that permit U235 to be used for maximum efficiency
in producing nuclear power.
4. When
freed from its sister element, hafnium possesses unique nuclear
properties that permit nuclear power to be safely controlled for its
intended purposes.
5. The
achievements of modern science and engineering that made it possible
for these individual miracles to be used collectively to develop
unique nuclear power plants to benefit mankind.

"There are only two ways to live your life:
as though nothing is a miracle, or
as though everything is a miracle."
—
Albert
Einstein

©
2000-2003
Robert B. Gordon, ScD
February 5, 2000
Sun City West, Arizona
Email

Go Top
Dr,
Gordon's Editorial Archive
|