|
Throughout the 1990s,
roughly 90 to 95 percent of all new power plants constructed in the US
were natural gas fired. The conventional wisdom was that North America
had plenty of natural gas to satisfy demand.
After all, total proven
gas reserves for North America stand at roughly 260 trillion cubic feet
while annual consumption is on the order of 2.75 trillion cubic feet. A
simple back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests nearly a century's
worth of consumption. That certainly compares favorably to the crude oil
market, where more than 10 million barrels per day--more than 3.6
billion barrels annually--of North American consumption must be covered
by imports from abroad.
But the truth about the
natural gas market should now be apparent. North America doesn't have
enough gas production to cover current demand; natural gas isn't the
panacea that many promoted back in the ‘90s. Even a rather temporary
disruption, such as we saw in the Gulf of Mexico last fall, is enough to
prompt a massive spike in gas prices.
Some power producers
bought the gas story hook, line and sinker in the ‘90s and built huge
gas-fired power plant capacity. Those companies are now feeling the
pinch of higher commodity pricing. Calpine Corp, for example, recently
was forced to declare bankruptcy even though demand for power remains
strong in the US.
Natural gas isn't just
a US or North American issue. Europe, too, is dangerously dependant on
gas-fired power generation and Asia faces emerging supply constraints.
Check out the chart “The Global Gas Crunch.”

Source: BP 2005 Statistical Review
This chart depicts the
difference between natural gas consumption and production for several
different regions of the world. North American gas consumption only
exceeds production by roughly 3 billion cubic feet per day. The US is
quite obviously the biggest consumer in the region, while Canada has
traditionally had excess production to export to the US market.
The North American gas
problem is getting bigger. Canada's gas production is at or near its
peak; US gas production has already peaked. Unconventional gas sources,
such as Texas's Barnett Shale, will make the speed of production
declines rather shallow. However, rapidly rising demand in both Canada
and the US will necessitate rising imports of gas from abroad. That
spells rising imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the coming
years.
To calculate Europe's
gas gap, I excluded Russian production (and consumption) of gas. Here we
can see that the European gas gap is much larger than America's--nearly
24 billion cubic feet of gas per day must be imported into Europe to
meet demand.
The vast majority of
that supply comes from Russia, a country with the world's largest
reserves of gas. Much of this gas can be transported by pipeline into
Europe.
But recent events show
that Russian supply disruptions can produce some major headaches for all
of Europe. Early in 2006, Russia reduced the flow of gas through
Europe's most important pipeline as a result of a pricing dispute with
the Ukraine. This resulted, however, in significant reductions in gas
flows into Western Europe. It's widely suspected that the Ukraine
“stole” Russian natural gas during this dispute.
More recently, Russia
has once again reduced the flow of gas through the pipeline. This time,
the reason is not political but weather-related: While the US is
enjoying a mild winter, Europe is experiencing a record cold snap.
Moscow has seen several days of temperatures as low as –30 degrees
Fahrenheit. Budapest, Hungary and Vienna, Austria, among others, have
seen temperatures consistently 10 to 20 degrees below normal.
The problem is Russia's
demand for natural gas has been steadily rising as temperatures
fall--demand for heating is on the rise. That means some of the gas that
would normally be exported to Europe is instead being consumed
domestically. Hungary, for example, is reporting gas volumes 20 to 25
percent below normal while Italy is reporting roughly a 10 to 15 percent
volume drop-off. Meanwhile, both Italy and Hungary have seen huge jumps
in demand for gas this winter amid unseasonably cold weather.
This situation is
exacerbated by Russia's own gas price controls. As domestic natural gas
prices are heavily subsidized in Russia, domestic demand for natural gas
is likely far higher than it otherwise would be. Nonetheless, it's pure
folly to think that Russia won't cover her own gas needs ahead of the
European Union's.
Finally, we come to
Asia. Asia's position is currently rather similar to America's. While
the gas gap isn't that large in real terms, it's growing rapidly. Japan,
India and China are already major importers of gas and rapid economic
growth in the latter two countries spells steadily rising demand. China
recently announced that it's quite unlikely to meet its targets for new
natural gas plant construction. The reason is simple: The country
doesn’t have enough import capacity to satisfy gas demand.
There are two
implications of the global gas crunch. One, natural gas is fast
becoming, like oil already is, a globally traded commodity. Gone are the
days when a region such as North America or Europe could look at natural
gas as a domestic market. This means that India, China, Europe and the
US will be competing for the same global supplies of gas. This spells
higher prices and will be a boon to companies (or countries) with large
reserves of gas for export.
And two, the naïve
view that we can rely on clean burning gas to meet all the globe's power
needs has been exposed as farcical. This opens the door to other fuels.
In particular, I see turmoil in the natural gas markets as a major
catalyst for nuclear and coal-fired power.

© 2006 Elliott H. Gue
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax email
|