|
Let’s start today’s
issue with a “golden question”:
Imagine
that you were put in a time machine and were launched from now to
100,000 years in the future, and there’s no way back. You don't know
if there are humans or any kind of civilization. You are only allowed to
take with you either one million dollars or one troy ounce of gold.
Which is it that you choose to take with you? Andrew
Stanton, a floor trader in the gold options pit, submitted this
question.
Judging by my e-mail
correspondence and our order flow, gold (and, to a lesser extent,
silver) are without a doubt today’s hot commodities. I’m going to
spend a bit more ink than usual on this market, and perhaps provide more
stats than you wish to see. But if you’re in gold, or if you’re
thinking about gold, this is vital information. I see the gold market at
or close to a major price point that will lead to either a major
washout-type collapse or to an acceleration of the current uptrend.
Which will it be? Read
on...
The recent gold run has
been nothing short of spectacular, and the metal has greatly
outperformed most gold stocks. In the last 30 days, gold prices have
surged 16 percent with virtually no meaningful corrections. If this rate
of return were to continue, an annualized return, without leverage, of
nearly 200 percent would result. Alongside the historic 1979-80
“Mother Of Bull Runs,” this is the only other time in history gold
has had a rally of this magnitude without a major correction.
Is this move like that
move? If it is, gold is going a lot higher. On the other hand, if the
current market action is a blow-off top, then this is the time to exit
all precious metals positions and aggressive traders can start to
consider bear market strategies.
We’ll get back to the
historic 1979-80 market shortly, but first I’d like to discuss the
bull argument and then the technical tone of the current market
condition.
The bull argument is
that gold is no longer a “barbaric relic,” but a new asset class and
a necessary alternative to holding depreciating currencies. The
following is an argument (updated and paraphrased) from Jerry Stewart, a
retired banker, a successful investor and a friend of mine:
“Even
at mroe than $500 per ounce, gold is modestly priced today--and about
the same price as it was during the Great Depression.
“Consider
this: Since the Depression, the CPI (consumer price index) has risen
about 15 times. At that time gold was $35 per ounce. Multiply $35 times
15. The answer is $525, which is what gold is selling for now.
“Now
try this ‘15 times’ rule for equities. The Dow was about 100 during
the early 1930s (as low as 40 in July of 1932); 15 times 100 equals a
Dow of 1,500 for today. Instead, the present Dow is about seven times
that amount.
"Try
real estate: A fine house could be bought for $5,000 in the ‘30s. If
house prices moved the same as the CPI times 15, you get $75,000. That
same house, depending upon the area, is presently selling for $300,000
to $500,000. And the price of housing is not even figured into the CPI.
So the big inflation has been in investment assets.
“Another
way of looking at this situation (to illustrate the over-pricing of
investment assets) is to try to live off the investment income of $1
million dollars. In the ‘30s, you would have lived like a super-king!
Today, the (no-risk) investment income from $1 million dollars would
bring in about $30,000 per year--hard to live on!
“So
think about gold as a way to preserve your cash assets.”
It’s hard not to like
gold in the long term; note on the monthly chart how the market has
recently broken above a three-year channel. But this market appears,
from a technical perspective, to be due for a correction. Open Interest,
at 340,000 contracts, is lower than the 370,000 all-time record level of
October, when gold traded well below $500.
The rule of thumb:
Declining open interest in a rising market is not bullish action. And
the bullish sentiment is a bit high right now for my tastes. The
commercial players are heavily net short (and they are usually right in
the long run), but I guess what really prevents me from getting
aggressively long today is the overbought condition of the RSI (relative
strength indicator). You can see this on the monthly chart.
The monthly RSI for
gold is currently at 79, an historically high level. I’ve labeled the
points in time where this oscillator (we use the 9-period) has traded
above 75 with an "X." On the monthly chart, this has happened
only five times since 1988 . All five were marked by a major correction
in the uptrend.
Monthly
Gold 1989-Present

www.commodity.com
The previous four
occurrences were: December 2003 (RSI peaked at 77); May 2002 (RSI peaked
at 78); June 2002 (RSI peaked at 77); and July 1993 (RSI peaked at 79).
All four resulted in corrections that ranged from 9 percent to 17
percent.
These corrections did
no real damage to the longer-term uptrend--they merely cleansed the
market of weaker owners. A similar correction from the recent $531 spot
high would point to a move below $500, at minimum. (I would first
anticipate support to surface just above $505.)
While we never
recommend fighting the trend, there are signs this market is overbought.
My sense is now isn't the time to load up on gold. The odds favor a
washout-type correction (I would like to see that 9-period monthly RSI
back into the sixties) to get aggressively long again. In fact this has
worked every time the monthly RSI has reached the upper 70s (it’s now
79), except the big bull run of 1979-80.
The
Historic Bull Gold Move of 1979-80
In August 1979, gold
was trading at $288 per ounce. It surged 59 percent to $445 by October
of that year with only small corrections. It then broke 18 percent to
$365 in one month.

www.commodity.com
But then the really big
move started. The market moved from $386 to $513, a move of 25 percent.
A 6.5 percent correction to $479 followed. From $479, the market moved
to $653--a 36 percent move before another 6 percent correction to $612.

www.commodity.com
The move from $612 to
the all-time high price of $895 was parabolic and took place in only
seven trading sessions. The all-time high was hit on Jan. 21, 1980: $875
on the spot market, $895 on the futures market (see the chart above).
The market was back down to $625 only seven days later, and back down to
$450 by late March, just two months later.
How did the monthly RSI
fare during that run? It hit 80 at just under $400 in September 1979.
There was a small 7 percent correction to $370, but the real move had
only just begun. The monthly RSI ran to 95 at the $875 high.
Monthly
Gold 1979-85

www.commodity.com
Present conditions
differ from those of 1980 (e.g., no double-digit inflation), but if this
move is like that move, this leg takes gold up 59 percent from $460 to
about $750. It eventually goes up from there another 37 percent to more
than $1,000.
It seems impossible,
but this type of move did happen in 1979-80.
If this move is like
that move, then throw the RSI and all indicators that measure the
overbought condition of a market out the window. Gold won’t have the
normal type of corrections. Rather, it will start to accelerate (if this
market is a corollary to the “Mother Of All Bull Runs”). This is
certainly not impossible because of all the excess liquidity in the
world today, especially from hedge funds, India, China and the Middle
East.
So which is it: a major
washout correction or an accelerated type of up-trend? The answer lies
in the market action in the coming weeks, and perhaps we’ll see the
answer as soon as this week. I don’t see gold remaining stagnant from
this level--I’m looking for one of these two scenarios.
The market will tell us
which of the two is correct, and nobody is smarter than the market. If
the market speaks out clearly and loudly, I’ll put out a new gold
trading recommendation in Futures
Market Forecaster, but you can watch the market action for
yourself. Hopefully, we’ve helped you identify what to watch for.

© 2005 George Kleinman
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|