|
Take
a look at this chart of corn prices for the last 16 years.
Monthly Corn 1990-2006

Source: Commodity.com
What most likely catches your eye is the price spike that took place
from 1995 into 1996 when corn prices doubled in a parabolic move. Since
corn futures are traded on 5 percent margin, this spike represents
fortunes made as well as fortunes lost. Fortunes were made by those who
recognized early on what was happening in the corn market--and then had
the guts and vision to stay with it.
Below I analyze the historic 1995-96 corn market and discuss reasons why
I believe today’s corn market is setting up for a sequel to that
famous rally.
During the summer of 1995, few people had any clue that the biggest bull
run in the history of the corn market had already begun. Prices had
dropped from mid-July into mid-August because the government, in its
mid-August crop report, indicated the US would produce a record corn
crop--similar to this year.
Take a look at the charts for July 1996 corn and July 2007 corn. Don’t
they appear somewhat similar?
July 1996 Corn & July 2007 Corn

The top chart is July 1996 corn
during the March 1995-August 1995 period. The bottom chart is July 2007
from the beginning of 2006 through the end of last week.
Source: CQG
Let’s take a look at what the corn market did next. The following
chart takes you from the summer of 1995 (the end of the above chart)
through the end of 1995.
July 1996 Corn (June 1995-November
1995)

Source: Commodity.com
It was clear by the end of 1995 that a large crop wasn’t sufficient to
keep prices down; corn prices rallied to record highs. But the real
fireworks had yet to begin. The next chart covers the period from the
end of 1995 through the spring of 1996.
July 1996 Corn (October 1995-March
1996)

Source: Commodity.com
This final chart completes the story. Those record-high prices of March
1996 actually look cheap in comparison to the final high of $5.545 per
bushel registered on July 12, 1996.
July 1996 Corn (January 1996-July
1996)

Source: Commodity.com
Fortunes were made in corn in 1996, but not many people realized during
the summer of 1995 what was about to happen. Those fortunes were made by
relatively few people.
Today, I see signs of complacency among corn buyers similar to those of
the summer of 1995. The 1995-96 bull market was a classic demand-driven
rally. The factors setting up today are, in my opinion, parallel to the
factors that caused that dramatic bull move.
A number of factors contributed to the price spike a decade ago, but the
most significant was a demand shock the likes of which hadn’t occurred
since the mid-1970s and hasn’t since. Unknown to the marketplace
during the summer of 1995 was that China, Asia’s largest corn
exporter, was turning into a corn importer due to a poor crop. The US,
the world’s largest exporter, produced a record crop in 1994-95 of 10
billion bushels. As a direct result of added Chinese demand (on top of
normal export demand from Japan, the US’ largest customer, and
others), total exports surged.
In 1995, the world believed there was a huge stockpile of corn. But in
1996, a buying panic set in when the new crop looked to be smaller than
average. Livestock and poultry feeders and industrial corn users worried
the world was about to run out. As a result, prices surged above $5 per
bushel--a level reached neither before nor since. We now know the world
didn’t run out of corn; instead, record-high prices rationed demand,
subsequent crops replenished stocks and prices retreated all the way
back.
Here’s the bottom line for the current market.
Similar to the 1995-96 market, I believe the dynamics are in place for
the next classic demand-driven bull market in corn. Last week I
recommended that Futures
Market Forecaster subscribers start accumulating positions in July
2007 corn futures. At this time, we’re risking less than $1,000 per
contract traded and will look to reduce this risk over time.
The reward potential is many, many times the risk. There are no
guarantees, and there's certainly risk in every trade. However, I’ll
be looking to add to this position over time to hopefully pyramid into
an extremely profitable trade.
Right now--when corn buyers are looking at a big crop (an expectation
already reflected by cheap prices) and complacency has set in--I believe
the corn market is forming a significant bottom. Just as the era of
cheap energy is behind us, 2006 is the last year of cheap corn. The
reason is ethanol.
With 100 ethanol plants either already up and running or close to
production and another 35-plus due to come online next year, corn usage
for fuel will surge. An average ethanol plant uses 18 million bushels of
corn annually. Corn usage for ethanol will grow in 2006 by 300 million
bushels versus last year and is projected to rise by more than 500
million bushels in 2007 versus this year. Even if 4 million or 5 million
additional acres are planted next year, there’s no way demand won’t
exceed supply by a wide margin in 2007.
This demand growth number is almost half of projected ending supply. For
the first time ever, corn usage for ethanol will exceed corn exports. I
believe July 1996 could be an analog of the July 2007 contract. In
1995-96, China provided the demand shock. This time the demand shock is
ethanol, but the ramifications to the corn market are the same.
The July 1996 corn futures contract actually bottomed in December 1994,
but there was a significant correction for a test of the lows in August
1995. (As I indicated, this year’s chart looks a lot like that
year’s.) August 1995 was the time to load up on the July 1996 contract
because prices bottomed at that time and remained in a major bull market
until July 1996.
The July 2007 contract low was registered last December at 254. I
believe this price will hold as the contract low. The market has now
broken more than 40 cents from the mid-July top, and the bearish
sentiment is high right now (just like it was in August 1995, right
after the crop report that year).
One additional point: If there are any weather problems during next
year’s growing season that create a supply shock, the perfect storm
will take place. It could be a history-making bull market with the
potential for new all-time-high prices. Should this unfold, we’ll also
look to purchase the December 2007 futures contract. But we know nothing
about next year’s crop, and today I’m looking for demand alone to
pull prices higher (even assuming a good 2007 crop).
Right now appears to be the perfect time to begin accumulating a
position, one we’ll look to pyramid over time as the market confirms
our expectations.
George Kleinman is editor of Commodities Trends.

© 2006 George Kleinman
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|