|
There
are a quite a few hedge fund managers--collectively controlling billions
of dollars--who take the latter part of the summer off. This group tends
to put their money back to work at the unofficial end of summer--in
other words, now. For this reason, it’s not uncommon for new and
important trends to begin right after Labor Day.
With
a full post-Labor Day trading session behind us, what I find most
interesting is that gold broke above a major downtrend line that had
been in formation since May. This is a bullish sign.
December Gold

Source: Commodity.com
Gold and the dollar generally trade in opposite directions, but
there’s a correlation with declining oil prices (like we’ve seen
recently) and weaker gold prices. You would, therefore, assume the
dollar was weak on this strong gold day, but it wasn’t. It was flat
(trading below a long-term negative trendline and above a long-term
positive trendline).
December Dollar Index

Source: Commodity.com
And it wasn’t only gold that exhibited strength this first trading day
after Labor Day; copper surged as well. And take a look at the aluminum
chart below. Aluminum (which is traded in London) confirmed gold by
breaking out on one of the heaviest volume days of 2006.
London
Aluminum

Source: Commodity.com
The dollar index is weighted toward the two most important non-dollar
currencies: the euro and the yen. While they’ve both been flat, one
minor currency--the Australian dollar--has had a breakout to the upside
similar to gold and aluminum.
December Australian Dollar

Source: Commodity.com
What does all this mean?
The Australian dollar is termed the “commodity currency” due to the
importance of commodities (particularly grains and metals) to the
Australian economy. What its breakout means is this recent gold strength
is no fluke--it was not only confirmed by aluminum (and other base
metals) but also by the “commodity currency.” In other words, this
breakout looks to be the real thing and a sign that the next major leg
up in gold prices should begin soon. I’ll be looking for a
reasonable-risk entry point to buy gold for Futures
Market Forecaster subscribers.
Corn
Update
In the last
issue of Commodities Trends,
I analogized the current corn market with the historic mega-bull market
of 1995-96. In 1995, the corn market didn’t bottom at harvest time, as
is usual, but in August (due to a demand shock). Last week I predicted
the same basic pattern this crop year, and guess what? So far, so good.
The bottom for the move thus far was registered August 18; the market is
now about 10 cents per bushel above that low. I remain very bullish on
corn, and I’m looking for sharply higher prices in 2007. The next
major event for the corn market will be the September 12 crop report;
the US Dept of Agriculture will provide its estimate of this year’s
crop size.
The market’s reaction to the news coming out of that report will be as
important as the news itself. If the market acts properly, I envision
adding to our current position.
George Kleinman is editor of Commodities
Trends.

© 2006 George Kleinman
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|