|
Billions of dollars were
made and lost trading commodities in 2006.
The financial press has a
habit of comparing the relative performance of competing investments to
let you know--with 20/20 hindsight--just where you should have placed
your money during the previous year. But by whatever method performance
is generally measured from January to December, the bottom line is it
all boils down to timing.
You certainly could have
been a buyer or a seller higher or lower than where the market is today,
and today there’s not one market trading above its 2006 high. Many
futures got ahead of themselves last year based on excessive optimism.
Consider the following. Here
are the 2006 high prices, with date achieved, for a set of commodities
futures contracts:
-
March 2007
Sugar--18.54 cents, April 19
-
February
2007 Crude Oil--$80.39, August 7
-
March 2007
Copper--$3.61, September 5
-
February
2007 Gold--$755, May 12
-
March 2007
Silver--$15.02, May 11
-
March 2007
Wheat--$5.60, October 12
-
July 2007
Corn--$4.04, December 29
Here are the recent contract prices as of
the close of trading January 5, with percent declines from 2006 highs,
for the same commodities:
-
March 2007
Sugar--11.09 cents, down 40 percent
-
February
2007 Crude Oil--$56.31, down 30 percent
-
March 2007
Copper--$2.53, down 30 percent
-
February
2007 Gold--$607, down 20 percent
-
March 2007
Silver--$12.23 down, 19 percent
-
March 2007
Wheat--$4.70, down 16 percent
-
July 2007
Corn--$3.84, down 5 percent
These figures tell us that not all
commodities are created equal. Just as some stocks go down in a bull
market and some go up in a bear market, commodity prices move at
different speeds and directions.
All commodities are currently below their
2006 highs, but sugar lost 28 percent on the year and oil lost 12
percent while gold gained 14 percent and corn gained 53 percent. How
many analysts predicted in early January 2006 that oil would lose while
gold would gain? Not many.
Let’s take a look at the closed-out Futures
Market Forecaster trades for last year. Our most-profitable
trade was in silver (sold at 14.04 on April 20 for a gross profit of
$6,850 per contract traded), while our worst trade was in natural gas
(sold at 8.45 on February 2 for a gross loss of $1,524 per contract
traded).
We can continually learn from our
successes and failures, so here are three of my mandatory rules for
successful trading in the coming year:
Have no preconceived notions; the
“experts” are often wrong. (The best trades are the hardest to do.)
The news will always sound the most bullish at the top and appear to be
the most hopeless at the bottom. This is why the technical tone of the
market is so important. If the news is good, but the market has stopped
going up, ask yourself why and then heed the call.
Bottoms can be the most confusing. The
accumulation phase, where the smart money is building positions, can be
marked by reactions, crosscurrents, shakeouts and false reversals.
After the bottom is finally in place,
many traders will be looking for the next break to be a buyer. After
all, the market has been so weak so long that the odds favor at least
one more break, right? But it never comes. The smart money won’t let
it. The “smart money’s” objective (after the bottom is in place)
is to move the market up to the next level; therefore, the best time to
be a buyer will often feel uncomfortable. However, the train has already
left the station, and at some point, you need to have the courage to hop
on for the ride.
Have a plan before you trade, and then
work it. If you have a plan and follow it, you’ll be able to avoid
the emotionalism that is the enemy of any trader. You must try to stay
calm during the heat of the session and remain focused. In those unusual
major moving markets (that occur rarely), you need to shoot for abnormal
profits. This is one of the keys to success.
The next is that you must always limit
losses on trades that aren’t going according to plan. This takes
willpower and is as essential a quality as having plenty of money. In
fact, it’s more important than having lots of money. Money isn’t to
hold on with; that’s for the sheep, and you don’t want to be
sheared. If big risks are required, don’t take that trade. Wait for an
opportunity where you can place a tighter stop. Legendary trader Jesse
Livermore told us he used to look for opportunities where he could enter
very close to his risk point. That way his risk per trade was small in
relation to the profit potential.
If you don’t have the willpower to take
the loss when your mental risk point is hit during the trading session,
then you must use stop loss orders. Simply place your stop at the same
time you place the trade.
I have a plan laid out the night before I
make a trade. I generally know what I’ll do if the market acts the way
I anticipate and, just as important, what I’ll do if it doesn’t. If
a market isn’t acting “right” according to my plan, I know it’s
time to act, either to take the profit, if available, or cut the loss if
not.
And remember this: There’s nothing
better than getting out quickly the minute you perceive you’re wrong.
Buy the strong markets, and sell the
weak. Looking at the above statistics, oil may look cheap in
relation to corn. But there’s a good reason the only open position we
own right now in the FMF Portfolio is long corn. When a market is
cheap or expensive, there’s probably a good reason why.
Livermore told us he always made money
selling short low-priced markets that were the public’s favorite and
in which a large long interest had developed. Alternatively, he cashed
in on expensive markets when “everyone” was bailing out because the
public thought the market was high enough for a healthy reaction.
The public was selling soybeans short at
$6 dollars per bushel in 1973 because it represented an all-time high,
as well as technical resistance. Who could have guessed soybeans
weren’t even half way to what would eventually be a record high at
$13? Corn, although perhaps expensive by historical standards, still may
be quite cheap going forward based on the new demand dynamics brought
about by ethanol. It’s not the price that’s important; it’s the
market action.
For the new year, I wish you good luck,
but combine it with sensible trading.

© 2007 George Kleinman
Editor of Commodities Trends
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|