|

BEST AND WORST COMMODITY
PERFORMERS
by George
Kleinman
Editor, Commodities
Trends
December 26, 2007
The S&P 500 began 2007
at 1,428. On Friday, Dec. 21, it closed at 1,498 for a respectable, if
unexciting, 4.9 percent return for the year.
Were there better
places to be over this past year? You bet.
When trading futures,
we use leverage. In many cases, all that’s required is a 5 percent
margin deposit of a contract's value. Under this scenario, just a 5
percent raw price move results in a 100 percent return on the initial
margin deposit.
There have been days
this year where various commodities have moved 5 percent in just one
day. However, leverage is a double-edged sword, and the downs can be
equally as dramatic as the ups, placing commodity futures in the
high-risk category.
What if you remove
leverage from the equation, putting the entire value of the contract up
front as most people do when trading stocks? Looking at it this way,
over the past year there have still been some fairly impressive moves in
many commodities. However, not all commodities are created equal, and
certain commodities lost value during 2007.
Top
Commodity Performers (in descending order)
No. 4--Gold
- Close on 12/29/06=
$674 an ounce*
- Close on12/21/07=
$815 an ounce
- Percent change in
2007= 21percent
*Prices based on the
February futures contract
In just the past few
weeks, the US Federal Reserve pumped $40 billion of new liquidity into
the financial system. This action should have trashed the US dollar, but
the greenback actually strengthened.
Why? Not to be undone,
the European Central Bank (ECB) pumped EUR500 billion into the banking
system during just this past week, and the Bank of England (BoE)
contributed an additional EUR20 billion. These are massively large
numbers, the magnitude of which is hard to grasp.
So, which currency is
the best place to be? If you think of gold as money, gold is the one
currency that should ultimately benefit from this massive paper money
explosion because it's very inflationary.
Will gold remain in the
top performer category during 2008? My vote is yes.
No. 3--Crude Oil
- Close on 12/29/06=
$67.18 per barrel
- Close on
12/21/07= $93.31 per barrel
- Percent change in
2007= 39 percent
February Oil

Source: Commodity.com
The International
Energy Agency (IEA) recently increased its estimate of 2008 world oil
demand to 87.8 million barrels per day (MPDA). According to T. Boone
Pickens, world production capacity tops out at 86.0 MPDA.
Is a recession coming?
Perhaps, but recessions in the past haven't appreciably decreased energy
demand since this demand is somewhat inelastic. My best guess is oil
will remain firm in 2008, but because of the raw price appreciation in
2007, it won't necessarily make the 2008 top performer list.
However, here’s one
prediction for you: $100-a-barrel oil (sometime early in 2008), here we
come.
No. 2--Soybeans
- Close on 12/29/06=
$7.43 per bushel
- Close on12/21/07=
$11.78 per bushel
- Percent change in
2007= 59 percent
January Soybeans

Source: Commodity.com
On Dec. 21, soybeans
closed at a new 34-year high. In just the first quarter of the marketing
year for soybeans--the marketing year runs from September to
September--the US has already sold 65 percent of the country's annual
target for soybean sales. As long as China continues to buy soybeans at
a record rate, this market should remain strong.
How high is too high? It
depends on how big the newly planted South American crop will turn out.
If it's big, the market could top out shortly. If there are any weather
problems in that part of the world into early next year, there's no way
of telling how high is really high.
Next year acreage is
projected to be up, but demand should also reach a new record high.
Future price predictions here are tough, so we’ll need to go with the
flow.
No. 1---Minneapolis
Wheat
- Close on 12/29/06=
$5.06 per bushel
- Close on
12/21/07= $10.78 per bushel
- Percent change in
2007= 113 percent
March Minneapolis
Wheat

Source: Commodity.com
Wheat ending stocks are
at a 60-year low because of poor crops this year in Australia, Canada
and the Ukraine. US wheat exports are up 66 percent versus a year ago,
and the US has already sold 90 percent of its annual target for wheat
sales. The supplies of the Minneapolis wheat variety, spring wheat, are
particularly tight because of sharply lower planted acreage this year.
Incredibly, more corn
acreage was planted in North Dakota than spring wheat. This has never
happened before and probably won't happen again. With these record-high
wheat prices, it's no surprise the planted acreage for next year’s
wheat crop is sharply higher.
Will wheat be one of
the 2008 top performers? My vote is no.
Bottom
Commodity Performers
No. 4--Coffee
- Close on 12/29/06=
$1.41 per pound
- Close on
12/21/07= $1.34 per pound
- Percent change in
2007= Down 5 percent
Commodities aren't all
created equal. Coffee prices actually lost 5 percent in 2007.
What's the best
estimate for 2008? Assuming normal growing weather in the coffee growing
regions of the world (South America, Asia and Africa), coffee will still
move back into the plus column, but not necessarily the top tier.
Weather problems?
Numbers will be much higher if the answer to this question is yes.
No. 3--Sugar
- Close on 12/29/06=
12.02 cents per pound
- Close on
12/21/07= 11.05 cents per pound
- Percent change in
2007= Down 8.1 percent
2006-07
Sugar

Source: Commodity.com
This is one of Jim
Rogers' favorites. However, a whole host of markets, including the
world’s stock markets, fared much better than sugar in 2007. Sugar was
also a poor performer in 2006, down 41 percent last year. To be fair,
Rogers has been bullish on sugar for years, and it was the top performer
for 2005 (up a remarkable 227 percent).
This coming year? At
historically cheap prices with the major trend turning up, my best
guesstimate is sugar will be solidly in the plus column by the end of
2008.
No. 2--Hogs
- Close on 12/29/06=
66 cents per pound
- Close on12/21/07=
59.7 cents per pound
- Percent change in
2007= Down 9.5 percent
Because of poor profit
margins and record high numbers, the hog market fared poorly in 2007.
However, the hog cycle is about six months long, and when producers are
squeezed, they traditionally adjust by cutting production. With feed
prices high, the squeeze continues and numbers should be much smaller in
2008, along with the associated higher prices.
A top performer in
2008? Not necessarily, but my vote for the hog market next year is a
standing in the plus column.
No. 1--Orange Juice
- Close on 12/29/06
$2.01 per pound
- Close on 12/21/07
$1.49 per pound
- Percent change in
2007= Down 26 percent
2006-07
Orange Juice

Source: Commodity.com
One of the best
performers for 2006 up 161 percent, orange juice took the cake for the
worst spot in 2007. And the outlook for this coming year? When it comes
to orange juice, your guess is as good a mine.
Here’s wishing you a
very happy holiday season and a very prosperous new year.

© 2007 George Kleinman
Editorial Archive

KCI Communications, Inc.
1750 Old Meadow Road, Suite 301
McLean, VA 22101
703-394-4931
phone 703-905-8100 fax Email
Risk
Disclaimer
Futures and futures options can entail a high degree of risk and are not
appropriate for all investors. Commodities Trends is strictly
the opinion of its writer. Use it as a valuable tool, not the "Holy
Grail." Any actions taken by readers are for their own account and
risk. Information is obtained from sources believed reliable, but is in
no way guaranteed. The author may have positions in the markets
mentioned including at times positions contrary to the advice quoted
herein. Opinions, market data and recommendations are subject to change
at any time. Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future
Results.
Hypothetical
Performance
Hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of
which are described below. No representation is being made that any
account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those
shown. In fact, there are frequently sharp differences between
hypothetical performance results and the actual results subsequently
achieved by any particular trading program. One of the limitations of
hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared
with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, hypothetical trading does
not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical trading record can
completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading.
For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a
particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material
points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are
numerous other factors related to the markets in general or to the
implementation of any specific trading program which cannot be fully
accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results and
all of which can adversely affect actual trading results.
|