SUMMARY:
- The
increased level of volatility in the steel sector is related
to industry consolidation, China’s expansion as a key
player, and the business cycle.
- Industry
consolidation: Major trend as companies have cash/industry is
fragmented/new strategies needed to tap growth areas in
emerging markets.
- The
rise of China: China emerging both as a producer and consumer;
- Supply
chaining: Companies in more mature industrial countries are
increasingly forced to look to assets (and growth) by setting
up production operations (steel factories) in key developing
economies that places then close to natural resource supplies
(both in terms of inputs and energy).

The global steel industry is highly cyclical, very competitive and
still fragmented in terms of market share. Currently the industry is
at the height of the business cycle and is going through a
consolidation phase, which might result in the smaller players being
acquired by the larger ones. The total output from the industry
exceeds 1.4 billion tons in 2005, most of it augmented by the increase
in output from China. This is expected to increase further, making
steel output from China among the largest in the world.
The
steel industry demonstrates a high degree of variability, both in
terms of earnings and production. The factors attributable for driving
this variability are global economic conditions with a particular
sensitivity to the performance of the automotive, construction,
capital goods and other industrial products industries. The commodity
nature of steel, the producers and consumers limited control on price,
and the demand and supply disparity have made steel prices volatile.
Significant increases in prices for metals and energy over the past
two years have also contributed to increased variability in the
industry.
Consolidation:
On the consolidation front, the steel industry was focused on
Mittal’s bid to gain control over Arcelor. As of July 2006, it
appears that Mittal has won its takeover effect for Arcelor, after a
protracted wooing. Mittal’s victory in the battle for global steel
industry control is giving the steel industry a new direction. The
world’s number one and two producers have combined and this will go
a long way to push consolidation. The now combined Arcelor- Mittal
would produce more 10 percent of the world output, close to 100
million tons of steel. This would give an increased pricing power for
producers and suppliers, and decrease the fragmentation. We expect
more M&A transactions to occur, with large players buying up the
smaller players. Currently it appears to be that Arcelor laid its
weapons, which were out before to defend itself from being acquired by
Mittal, though Mittal has proven itself to be an earnest and
hard-to-shake-off suitor.
Arcelor-Mittal
have become the largest steelmaker in the world by turnover as well as
by volume. In early 2006, Arcelor had contacted the Russian steel
maker Severstal for a rival merger, in order to fend off Mittal’s
hostile takeover bid, but it was unsuccessful in doing so. Alexey
Mordashov, the owner of Severstal, reacted to the hostile takeover by
marching back to Moscow, to wait and strike when the time is right.
After the takeover, Mordashov stated: “Severstal is reviewing all
its options”. This indicated that Severstal might fight Mittal, but
no resistance was seen. Mordashov was planning to collaborate with
Roman Abramovich (a wealthy Russian billionaire with diverse business
interests) to raise his offer for Arcelor but decided to go back and
conduct his business at Severstal. A possible candidate for
Mordashov’s future take over bid would be Corus of UK. It can
be envisaged that in the medium term that there will be a handful of
companies that will control about 1/3 of the global steel production.
China:
China, as the world’s major producer and consumer, and has a
considerable influence on the industry globally, but more sharply in
Asia. China’s production figures, which now represents 30% of the
world output, continues to grow actively, reaching 349mt in 2005 up a
substantial 25% from the 2004 level. Inundation of certain steel
products in China has sparked material declines in major product
prices and thus pushing the industry towards being more cyclical.
Consequentially, China has emerged as the key swing factor over the
direction of the global market, linking the ups and downs of its
economy to the fate of the steel industry.
As
of FY’2005
|
Global
Rank
|
Company
|
Production
in FY'05
million tons
|
Global
Market Share %
|
Country
|
|
1
|
Mittal
(Baa3/BBB+) |
63
|
5.56
|
Netherlands
|
|
2
|
Arcelor
(Baa2/BBB) |
47
|
4.15
|
Luxembourg
|
|
3
|
Nippon
(A1/BBB) |
32
|
2.82
|
Japan
|
|
4
|
Posco
(A2/A-) |
31
|
2.74
|
South
Korea
|
|
5
|
JFE
(Baa1/BBB) |
30
|
2.65
|
Japan
|
|
6
|
Baosteel
(BBB+) |
24
|
2.12
|
China
|
|
7
|
US
Steel (Baa1/BB) |
20
|
1.77
|
United
States
|
|
8
|
Corus
(B1/B+) |
18
|
1.59
|
United
Kingdom
|
|
9
|
Riva |
18
|
1.59
|
Italy
|
|
10
|
Nucor
(A1/A+) |
18
|
1.59
|
United
States
|
|
11
|
ThyssenKrupp
(Baa2/BBB) |
17
|
1.50
|
Germany
|
|
12
|
Tangshan |
16
|
1.41
|
China
|
|
13
|
Gerdau
(Baa1/BB+) |
15
|
1.32
|
Brazil
|
|
14
|
Severstal
(B2/B+) |
14
|
1.24
|
Russia
|
|
15
|
Evraz
(B2/BB-) |
14
|
1.24
|
Russia
|
|
|
Others |
756
|
66.73
|
|
|
Source:
|
Iron
and Steel Statistics Bureau
|
|
|
|

Brief Company Overviews
- Arcelor-
Mittal: The five-month long duel between
Rotterdam, Netherlands-based Mittal and Luxembourg-based Arcelor
has concluded. Mittal’s unprecedented takeover victory in the
battle for the global steel giant has brought the five-month
battle to a halt, after the final shareholder approval. In the
new Arcelor-Mittal combine the Mittal family collectively holds
a 43.5 percent share. The new steel company will have about
334,000 employees’ world-wide, and revenues close to $70
billion. Arcelor-Mittal is now the best of both worlds. Arcelor
is well-positioned in Western Europe and catering the high-grade
auto and construction industry. Mittal with mills spread out
through the four continents in low-cost locations such as Czech
Republic, Mexico, and Kazakhstan, producing mostly basic steel
products. Still there are things to be settled between Arcelor
and Mittal. For example, the fate of the Canadian steel maker
Dofasco acquired in April 2006 by Arcelor is yet to be decided.
Mittal’s aggressive business model has helped the company
create a profitable enterprise in countries
that were not regarded as obvious investment targets (such as
Ukraine and Indonesia). It has track record of buying
loss-making, bankrupt or under-producing steel companies, and
turning them around by restructuring, cost cutting and layoffs,
thereby creating leaner and more competitive operations. The
company has production units in 17 countries, United States,
Canada, China, Indonesia, Mexico, France, Germany, Poland,
Romania, Algeria, South Africa, Czech Republic, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Republic of Macedonia, Trinidad and Tobago,
Kazakhstan and Ukraine. In contrast, Arcelor holds front running
positions in its main markets: automotive, construction,
household appliances and packaging as well as general industry.
Arcelor is the number one steel producer in Europe and Latin
America. Taking advantage of its now dominant position,
Arcelor-Mittal has ambitions to further expand internationally
in order to take advantage of the growth potential of developing
economies and offer technologically advanced steel solutions to
its global customers.
Arcelor-Mittal is more than three times larger in terms of
production of and revenue from steel, than its nearest rival
Nippon Steel Corp. of Japan. The combined company will now have
a significant advantage in setting prices and negotiating the
terms of various contracts with key customers. The new steel
industry titan will be better equipped to combat the volatile
nature of the steel industry. This is due to the fact that it
will have globally diversified operations and a diversified
product line up giving it the power to negotiate with large
customers Toyota.
There are heavy ratings pressures on the four companies involved
in this long and intense courtship. Standard and Poor’s BBB+
Mittal Steel Co. N.V. has a negative outlook, though the rating
is on credit watch negative due to remaining uncertainty
pertaining to the final outcome of merger talks and concerns
that the combined group’s financial profile would deteriorate.
It is possible that Mittal’s credit rating could be lowered by
one level. Less likely is a two-level downgrade. Arcelor’s
ratings will eventually be the same as Mittal, which could see
it drop to a low BBB.
Severstal was placed on credit watch due to the uncertainty of
its merger with Arcelor. Due to no merger activity, Severstal is
likely to remain at its current ratings. The fourth company
involved in this M&A game was ThyssenKrupp AG, which has a
deal with Mittal to buy Dofasco. The fate of Dofasco is yet
undecided. In the event of ThyssenKrupp AG (BBB) acquiring
Dofasco, there is a possible downgrade in credit ratings by one
level to BBB-.
- Nippon
Steel Corporation: Nippon Steel
Corporation is Japan’s No. 1 steelmaker and the world’s
third largest, in terms of crude steel production, with annual
consolidated output of approximately 33 million tons. It is
backed by a solid business franchise supported by diverse
product lines with a focus on high value added products,
outstanding product development capability, as well as a strong
customer base. The Company has also secured a solid presence
overseas, fueled by distinctive research and development
capabilities and strategic alliances.
- Posco:
The Pohang Iron and Steel Company based in Pohang,
South Korea, it is one of the top steel producers. Posco
operates two steel companies in South Korea, one in Pohang and
the other in Gwangyang. In addition to this, Posco operates in a
joint venture with US Steel with name of USS–Posco, located in
Pittsburgh, California. In June 2005, Posco signed a memorandum
of understanding with the State Government of Orissa, India and
plans to invest $12 billion to construct a plant with four blast
furnaces, an electricity plant, housing, and an annual
production capacity of 12 million tons of steel and is expected
to start production in 2010.
- Severstal:
Severstal is the largest Russian steel producer, with 2005
annual steel production of 17.1 million tons. In addition,
Severstal owns Severstal North America, the fifth largest
integrated steel maker in the U.S. with 2005 production of 2.7
million tons, and Lucchini, Italy’s second largest steel group
with 2005 production of 3.5 million tons. Severstal is one of
the world’s lowest cost and most profitable steel producers,
with 2005 EBITDA of approximately 150 euros per ton. Severstal-Resource,
its own subsidiary owns 70 years of iron ore reserves and 84
years of coal reserves. 2005 revenue and EBITDA were
approximately EUR1.12 billion and EUR506 million, respectively.
Severstal-Resource produces coking coal, thermal coal, iron ore
pellets and iron ore concentrate.
- Corus:
Corus is a customer focused, innovative solutions driven
company, which manufactures, processes and distributes metal
products as well as providing design, technology and consultancy
services. The company’s headquarters are in London, with four
Divisions and operations worldwide. Corus ranks among the 10
largest steel producers in the world, with about 18 million
tonnes of crude steel production in 2005. Activities include
carbon steel production which a re 90% of sales and aluminum
smelting, rolling, and extrusion 10% of sales. The group's main
production bases are the U.K., The Netherlands, Sweden, Germany,
France, Belgium, and the U.S. It is often spoken about as a
possible takeover candidate.
Appendix:
Global Steel Industry
The
steel industry in the European Union 25 is structured
differently than the steel industry in the United States. The key
difference is the consolidation of the industry. Arcelor-Mittal,
ThyssenKrupp, and Corus enjoy substantial market share in a largely
consolidated market place.
The steel industry in the United States is completely
different compared to other industries globally. US corporate bond
issuers have a higher historical default rate than any other steel
producer globally. This reflects highly leveraged capital structures
of the US steel producers compared to the European counterparts who
hold higher cash balances placing significant importance to a cautious
approach to liquidity. The high default rate in the US steel industry
can be attributed to an elevated level of shareholder pressure for
high short-term returns, which then forces the management to deploy
higher-risk strategies.
Oversupply
in China, particularly in commodity based flat products and long
products, and the inventory build-up in Asian countries, with
consistent high input prices, are pressuring the region’s
profitability and cash flow and thus contributing to the variability
in the global steel industry. A new record high was set for world
trade in steel, which grew 8% in 2005 to about 1.3 billion tons. The
largest steel exporting countries in 2005 were EU 25 32.4 million
tons, Japan 32 million tons, Russia 30.9 million tons, Ukraine 27.3
million tons and, entering the top 5 for the first time, China
27.4million tons up a solid 37 percent.
- The
largest importing countries were China 275 million tons, the
EU25 166 million tons and Japan 132 million tons.
- The
major exporters of iron ore in 2005 were Australia 239 million
tons and Brazil 224 million tons.
Imports
into China increased by 32% in 2005, compared to 2004, imports into
the EU and Japan actually fell by 2%. Imports into China from
Australia in 2005 were 112million tons, an increase of 34million tons
on 2004. Imports from India, at 68.5million tons, were up by 18million
tons on 2004 which means that imports from India have increased
tenfold since 1998. Imports into China from Brazil reached 55 million
tons, and increase of 8 million tons. The break-up of Chinese imports
by country of origin shows that Australia supplied 41%, India 25% and
Brazil 20%, other countries such as South Africa contribute to the
remaining 14%.
China:
In 2005 steel production in China was 349 million tons up 25% from
2004. In comparison, production in 2004 was 280 million tons, 2003 was
222 million tons and 2002 182 million tons. Imports in 2005 fell 18%
to 27.3 million tons from 33.2 million tons in 2004. Imports had
previously risen significantly in 2003 to reach 43 million tons.
Exports grew 36% in 2005 to reach 27 million tons compared with 20
million tons in 2004 and 8 million tons in 2003. Since September 2004
exports have exceeded imports to make China a net steel exporter
although this was reversed from July. However, in December 2005,
exports again exceeded imports. Real GDP in China is expected to be
around 10 percent in 2006 and will most likely remain high in 2007 in
the run-up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, hence feeding demand.
China,
which is a major producer and consumer globally, is a net exporter of
steel and its increased supply of products might find its way to the
North America markets. The sudden increase in steel imports form China
is not only fueled by the Beijing Olympics scheduled for 2008, but
also because of the increase in domestic demand for infrastructure
ignited by the rapid industrialization in China. Currently there are
numerous small local steel companies in China, and in our view the
Chinese steel industry is ripe for a rapid consolidation phase. But
again a lot of it depends on a positive balance of imports and exports
maintained in the Chinese steel industry. After Beijing Olympics in
2008, there are prospects of a slow down in the industry do the over
production in order to feed big Chinese appetite for steel.

United
States: The US, which is traditionally a steel importer,
recorded imports of 30.2 million tons in 2005 a drop of 8% on 2004.
The key imported products were semis 6.3 million tons, hot rolled coil
3.7million tons, welded tubes 3.6million tons and wire rod 2.8million
tons. Key supplying countries include the NAFTA members Canada
5.6million tons and Mexico 3.8 million tons followed by Brazil
2.4million tons and China 2.3 million tons. US steel mill exports in
2005 were 9.4million tons compared with 7.8miliion tons in 2004.
European
Union 25: EU imports, after reaching their highest level
ever in Q1 2005 at 8.7 million tons, fell back sharply in the second
quarter to down to 7.7 million tons and also in quarter 3 down to 5.3
million tons. Hence in the first 9 months 2005 imports, at 21.7
million tons were 11% down on the same period 2004. Consequently, over
the first 9 months the EU has resumed its position as a net steel
exporter with a surplus of 2 million tons imports 21.7 million tons
and exports 23.7 million tons. Key products imported by the EU include
semis, hot rolled coil, wire rod, galvanized sheet, hr plates and CR
sheet. Key import sources include Russia 3.9 million tons, Turkey 2.1
million tons, Ukraine 2.2 million tons, China 1.5 million tons, India
0.9 million tons and Brazil 1.1 million tons.
While
the information and opinions contained within have been compiled from
sources believed to be reliable, KWR does not represent that it is
accurate or complete and it should be relied on as such. Accordingly,
nothing in this article shall be construed as offering a guarantee of
the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, or
as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of
any security. All opinions and estimates are subject to change without
notice. KWR staff, consultants and contributors to the KWR
International Advisor may at any time have a long or short position in
any security or option mentioned.
KWR Special Report Overview of Global Steel Industry

© 2006 Salman Anwar for KWR International, Inc,
Archived Editorials
Contact
Information
For more information on KWR International
and its client services, please contact:
KWR
International, Inc.
website
New York, NY 10023
Phone: +1.212.532.3005
Fax: +1.212.685.2413
Email

|