|

GLOBALIZATION
and the End of the Guns and Butter Economy
by Scott B.
MacDonald
Editor,
KWR International
Advisor
October 27, 2007
Over the past thirty
years, the United States has sought and to some extent achieved a guns
and butter economy; that is the pursuit of both political-military
objectives and an affluent lifestyle. On the political front, it has
dominated the international system, presiding over the defeat of the
Soviet Union, its hegemonic rival during the Cold War, and forming a
successful military coalition to liberate Kuwait in the first Iraq war.
It became even more unilateral under the Bush the younger
administration, with aggressive policies against militant Islam and Iraq
in Middle East and South Asia.
At the same time, the
consumer-driven U.S. economy continued to expand, with the last great
burst being the spike in homeownership in the 2003-2006 period.
Homeownership since the mid-1950s was long stuck at 65 percent of the
total population, but by year-end 2006, on the back of cheap credit and
lax underwriting standards, it reached 69 percent. Significantly,
countries such as China, Japan and Germany benefited from the U.S. guns
and butter economy, content to sell their exports and finance their
purchases via the buying of U.S. debt. This was the upside of
globalization.
But in July 2007 the
U.S. financial system signaled that the era of cheap money and lax
standards was over. Two Bear Stearns hedge funds collapsed and panic hit
credit markets, pounding the stock and bond values of any company
associated with mortgage lending and housing. By August the rout
filtered into the derivatives market (especially those structured
financial products that contained exposure to U.S. sub-prime debt),
negatively impacting European and Asian bank and insurance investment
portfolios.
The contagion eventually
rippled into London's inter-bank market, forcing central banks to inject
considerable amounts of liquidity to keep the system running. Even then,
nervousness about the standing of banks, especially those dependent on
short-term commercial paper for mortgage lending, forced the UK's
Northern Rock into a government rescue. This was the downside of
globalization.
The U.S. economy is
edging toward a significant slowdown in what is left of 2007; it will
take concerted effort and luck to avoid a recession. The housing sector
is hitting depths associated with the 1930s. The Fed's September 18th
cuts in the discount window and in Fed Funds gave markets a temporary
relief, a situation helped along by private sector actions to
consolidate the financial sector. This is reflected in Bank of America's
purchase of Countrywide Financial shares and Citigroup's stepping up
with credit lines for GMAC. But there remains a long distance to the
shore of economic safety.
A shadow is being cast
by a deficit of unresolved problems in an economy overloaded with debt,
a retreating federal responsibility for national infrastructure, and
large (and seemingly unending) overseas burdens. In the short-term, the
problem that looms on the horizon is that the housing meltdown is
finally chipping away at the consumer, who in the butter part of the
U.S. economy, accounting for about 70 percent of GDP. The consumer
relied on home equity (and foreign capital) to finance the ongoing
parade of goods and drove many households into negative territory in
terms of savings. Why save when you are penalized (taxed) on savings
amidst an unrelenting society-wide pitch to consume? Easy money during
the Greenspan years helped keep the guns and butter economy afloat
without too many major adjustments. That dynamic has changed.
On the short term side
there is going to be further bad news on housing. There is a very real
prospect of steeper declines in housing prices, pushed along by a
growing inventory (already 9 months of new homes waiting to be sold not
to mention those homes taken off the market by frustrated would be
sellers). In addition, there is a huge resetting of adjustable rate
mortgages over the next 12 months, with a large spike in March 2008.
Adding to the list of woes is the increasing pace of personnel
downsizing in the mortgage industry and declining profitability in the
financial sector.
On the longer-term side
of the equation, the economic landscape is chilling, considering the
massive structural problems. The guns part of the economy is a concern -
the war in Iraq and other missions (Afghanistan and Africa) cost
somewhere between $3-5 billion a day. In August, the Congressional
Budget Office (CBC) estimated as of June 2007 up to $500 billion has
been spent on combat operations in Iraq. The CBO also noted that if the
United States were to maintain 75,000 troops in Iraq over the next five
years, the nation would have to pay an additional $900 billion.
Moreover, there are further costs attached to training police and ground
forces in Iraq and Afghanistan as well as long-term health costs
associated with wounded personnel.
There are other
structural problems - a long term imbalance between government
expenditures and revenues (related to ongoing pressure for tax cuts).
There is a massive problem with national infrastructure - it is aging
rapidly and needs to be upgraded with a price tag of $1.6 trillion. That
includes roads, bridges, ports and other public utilities.
Any doubt of the
infrastructure problem one need only point to the July 2007 steam
conduit that exploded in Manhattan - the piping was laid 83 years ago
when Calvin Coolidge was president and was part of a system that started
to provide energy to New York City in 1882. In August 2007, a 40-year
old bridge in Minneapolis collapsed, leaving several dead in the
accident's wake. The national infrastructure is literally falling down
around the population, but the most recently passed Senate
transportation and housing bill contained at least $2 billion for pet
projects that include a North Dakota peace garden, a Montana baseball
stadium and a Las Vegas history museum.
Equally important is the
issue of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, the combined basis of
which is expected to grow 22 percent faster than the economy over the
next decade. This should come more sharply into focus next year when the
first of 78 million baby boomers become eligible for early Social
Security benefits.
American politics have
reached a very dysfunctional stage, with considerable energy given to
the indulgence of maintaining an economy and the debt required to keep
it going, with little thought being given to the adjustments now in
motion. Along these lines, it is easier to blame the outside world for
troubles at home, hence the turn to protectionism (with a number of
bills pending in the U.S. Congress). The plunging value of the U.S.
dollar and the huge sell-off in U.S. securities by foreigners in August
($163 billion) should convey the message that not all is well and that
unless there is an effort to start living more within one's means, the
rest of the world is going to stop financing the North American credit
glutton. The days of guns and butter for the U.S. economy are over; what
is going to replace it is a much more volatile world, with substantial
questions over the U.S. dollar as the major international currency and
the ability of the U.S. consumer to absorb the world's exports. As the
U.S. adjusts to this changing scenario, so will the rest of the global
economy. It is not going to be an easy transition.

© 2007 Scott B.
MacDonald for KWR International, Inc.
Archived Editorials
Contact
Information
For more information on KWR International
and its client services, please contact:
KWR
International, Inc.
website
New York, NY 10023
Phone: +1.212.532.3005
Fax: +1.212.685.2413
Email

|