|

RESPONSE
TO SUBPRIME ARTICLE BY NOVEL PRIZE WINNER JOSEPH STIGLITZ
by John Lee, CFA
Portfolio Manager, Mau
Capital
February 8, 2008
Mr. Joseph E Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize winner
in 2001 for his work on the economics of information, recently attended
the World Economic Forum in Davos and wrote an article published on
February 5th, 2008 titled:
Sub-prime crisis
has led to the humbling of America.
http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2008/02/05/pda/opinion_30064446.html
The article highlights
were:
1. Those who think that
globalization, technology, and the market economy will solve the world's
problems seemed subdued.
2. If we know the price
of cream and the price of skim milk, we can figure out the price of milk
with 1 per cent cream, 2 per cent cream, or 4 per cent cream. There
might be some money in repackaging, but not the billions that banks made
by slicing and dicing sub-prime mortgages into packages whose value was
much greater than their contents.
3. Mr. Stiglitz also
argued that central bankers also got it wrong by misjudging the threat
of a downturn and failed to provide sufficient regulation. They waited
too long to take action. Because it normally takes a year or more for
the full effects of monetary policy to be felt, central banks need to
act pre-emptively, not reactively.
4. This is the third US
crisis in the past twenty years, after the Savings & Loan crisis of
1989 and the Enron/World.Com crisis in 2002. Deregulation has not
worked. Unfettered markets may produce big bonuses for CEO's, but they
do not lead, as if by an invisible hand, to societal well-being. Until
we achieve a better balance between markets and government, the world
will continue to pay a high price.
For any economic problem,
it’s interesting how Keynesian economists always find the
greedy bankers guilty, the public innocent, and the government
responsible for prevention AND a cure through regulation.
Mr. Stiglitz correctly
explained how the subprime problem started. However he failed to point
out the root cause. The cause is not globalization, deregulation,
technology, or free market. The bankers were greedy to lend to earn
interests, and the public were greedy to borrow money and spend on
things they couldn’t afford.
But how can we fault
Johnny who loans his money to Jane that can't pay back? We can't blame
the government for not regulating the lending industry. The banks didn't
jam the money down our throat or force us to sign the dotted line did
they?
Government actions often
times have good intentions but with unintended consequences. Should the
government be more proactive in lowering interest rates and early
bailouts as Mr. Stiglitz suggests, this would amount to loosening
monetary policies, or to put it more bluntly, money printing, which is a
stealth wealth transfer by diluting savings of others.
Those who study the
history of money understand the cause of the debt bubble is composed of
two factors: The centralized interest rate model and the fractional
reserve system.
- The Fed unilaterally
sets the national interest rates, which indiscriminately applies to Bob,
Jane, and everyone else. The economy endured several years of
unprecedented, historic low interest rates below 3% since 2001. Low
interest rates encourage excessive borrowing, and ultra low interest
rates like 1% exacerbate the problem even more.
- Through the fractional
reserve banking system installed in 1913, banks can print money out of
thin air and lend to earn an interest. This magic of making something
from nothing leads to lax lending standards. The Fractional reserve
banking system is also directly responsible for gas prices going from
.15 cents a gallon in 1910 to today’s $4 a gallon.
The solution is less
regulation, not more as Mr. Stiglitz or Mr. Obama have proposed. Set the
market truly free. Let every individual lender, not the Fed, decide what
interest rate to apply to each of his borrowers. Eliminate fractional
reserve banking and phase out the Fed, this will restore confidence of
the dollar, restrict excessive spending by all levels of government and
consumers, fix the money supply, and stop frivolous lending. Remove all
government sponsored enterprises, other government guarantee and bailout
programs. Those programs and agencies only distort markets, offer a
false sense of security, and contribute further to inequality.
We can't regulate the
patient who wants to overdose on painkillers. We shouldn’t over burden
all banks with piles of rules designed to prevent a few outlaw borrowers
either. Remove the government as the safety net and return the
responsibility back to the people. Let the careless and the weak fall,
isn’t that what capitalism, evolution, and free markets are all about?
Until then, dollar will
continue to lose value and gold and oil will continue to rise in dollar
terms.

For those who are
interested in the gold and resource market, a good introduction will be
to visit for free, the world’s most attended resource
investment conference. Hosted by Cambridge House, the next event will be
held this February 9th through 10th in sunny Phoenix, Arizona. An
interview between me and the conference’s president is available at www.goldmau.com

© 2008 John Lee, CFA
Editorial Archive
Please
visit GoldMau for instant market alerts and stock updates.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
John
Lee, CFA | Mau Capital Management
| 1-800-851-1528 | Email
l Website
|