|

Gold, The Real Story This Month
by David
Morgan
Precious Metals Analyst, www.silver-investor.com
May 10, 2004
Although
silver got smashed this month, the real story is in gold.
Let
us restate and expand upon (as follows, below) what we published in our
monthly report a scant three days ago.
First
of all, as most are aware, the Rothschild interests are no longer
“fixing” the price of gold in London. There has been much
speculation about this event. Our view is the old adage that “he who
owns the gold makes the rules” is still valid; and the Rothschild
interests are moving away from the paper gold market but not necessarily
the real gold market.
Of
even more interest to us were documents provided to the Sierra Club that
buttressed certain disturbing claims of former Echo Bay Mines employee,
Allan Laird about Kinross,
and the mining industry at large.
Laird
says his elected representative and the Department of Homeland Security
were indifferent to evidence he presented about Echo Bay — since
acquired by Kinross —paying protection money to known terrorists
linked with Al Qaeda.
Documents
given to the Sierra Club show payments and supplies, including weapons,
delivered to terrorists in return for unspecified security services at
the Kingking project in the Philippines; equally disturbing, internal
company memos reveal hair-raising conditions at the mine.
The
most important point to be made is this statement, released to the
general public on Thursday: “The
US Department of Justice announced that it will in fact investigate Echo
Bay.”
We
immediately contacted our sources in Washington D.C. and asked if in
fact an investigation would truly begin. The answer was yes.
Now
comes word of an even more damning event — as regards gold —
reported by the Associated Press:
Bin
Laden Said to Offer Gold for Killings
CAIRO,
Egypt - A statement attributed to Osama bin Laden offered rewards in
gold Thursday for the killing of top U.S. and U.N. officials in Iraq.
The
transcript of an audio recording dated Thursday appeared on a Web site
known for militant Islamic messages. The Web site gave links to hear the
statement, but none were working.
"You
know that America promised big rewards for those who kill mujahedeen
(holy warriors)," the transcript read. "We in al-Qaida
organization will guarantee, God willing, 10,000 grams of gold to
whoever kills the occupier Bremer, or the American chief commander or
his deputy in Iraq."
He
was referring to L. Paul Bremer, the chief
U.S. administrator in Iraq,
and top military officials.
The
authenticity of the statement could not immediately be verified.
-END-
To
be crystal clear we did not have inside information when we wrote three
days ago that the next shoe to drop in the fight against gold would be
an identifiable link with terrorism.
Sure,
we didn’t like writing it, and our readers no doubt didn’t much like
what we had to say. But the “reality on the ground” is what we need
to deal with. Our long and continued study and participation in the
precious metals markets led us to our conclusion. But even so, we were
not sufficiently cynical to expect it would happen this rapidly.
ON
FURTHER EXAMINATION …
Let
us develop further what this means for the precious metals investor, and
why certain bureaucratic forces would want to paint a picture of a world
awash in gold and terrorism.
Gold
is first and foremost a political metal in that it is fungible and
leaves no tracks. Cash can be “laundered” — but, heck, gold is a
virtual Laundromat. It is malleable, untraceable, easy to transport and
extremely valuable.
You
and I know that once upon a time, not so long ago, there was one
currency, worldwide, and it came in the form of the yellow metal —
gold. (Silver, my favorite, was a close runner-up.) But that wasn’t
good enough for the internationalist crowd. They want a fiat money —
paper — global currency, preferably not backed by gold at all. They
want the flexibility to
create as much debt-money as they want, when they want and to charge
governments (you and I) massive amounts of interest for printing that
money.
In
the 1970s, they tried to control the price of gold and it got out of
hand. They tamed the price and then instituted what some (correctly in
my opinion) have termed a “conspiracy” to keep the price of gold
down through the 1990s. This was accomplished through massive short
selling of the metal, through the “carry trade” and by simply
talking the price down. (For a while, in the late 1990s when the price
of gold was threatening to rise, you couldn’t get through a month
without one central bank or another announcing a phony “sale” of
their gold assets to be held in the not-too-distant future — a future
that often, unsurprisingly, did not come.)
There’s
no gainsaying that gold has been on
a tear these last few years, a powerful uptrend. Even though the
short term technical picture looks blurry right now, gold very obviously
has not lost its allure, especially not for Asia’s growing and
powerful economies.
I
can only imagine the frustration of those who want to stomp on the price
of gold. After all these years of price-fixing the “barbaric” metal,
shorting it, selling it, damning it regularly in the press, gold just
keeps popping back up like some kind of fiendish, glittery
jack-in-the-box.
They
just don’t get it. Gold’s allure is not the product of some
irrational, historical hiccup. It’s the end result of thousands of
years of money competition. It’s won its place because people liked to
trade it better than salt, beads, sugar, spices and all the other things
that have been tried through the ages. The marketplace chose gold
(and silver). And what the marketplace chooses cannot easily be
undone.
This
has to be the latest gambit. They can’t fix it, short it or talk it
down any longer. So make the link between gold and terrorism. Just come
right out and tell people that those who own gold, trade gold and pay in
gold are apt to be terrorists
LET
THE GAMES BEGIN
So
let the congressional investigations begin into a
“link” between gold and terrorism! The general public will
soon be educated, no doubt (via massive media coverage) to associate the
two. And this approach — if it happens as I suspect – will probably
provide enough ammunition for one final washout in the gold market,
meeting our expected low in July of 2004.
Please
remember: Gold below $400
U.S. is a solid buy; silver at $7.00 or lower is also a steal. We have
highly recommended to our readership that they finish their physical
purchases over the next few months.
This
mainstream financial media — in the service of their political and
banking masters — may continue the effort to portray gold in the worst
possible light, but the metal will continue to outshine most other
investment choices in the longer term as it has for thousands of years.
David
Morgan
Silver-Investor.com
May 6, 2004 -- Posted Friday,
May 7, 2004
www.silver-investor.com
Email
© 2004
David Morgan. All rights reserved.
Bio and Archive
|