|
August
12 - Gold $393.90 down $1.50 – Silver $6.53 up 2 cents
"...I
do not see that one can blame the majority of Germans who, in 1933,
believed that the Reichstag fire was the work of the Communists. [The
Parliament burned down and a convenient Communist arsonist was fingered,
which the Nazis used as the excuse to unleash police-state tactics
against all opponents.]
What
one can blame them for, and what shows their terrible collective
weakness of character clearly for the first time during the Nazi period,
is that this settled the matter. With sheepish submissiveness the German
people accepted that, as a result of the fire, each one of them lost
what little personal freedom and dignity was guaranteed by the
constitution; as though it followed as a necessary consequence."
Sebastian
Haffner, Defying Hitler, 1939
http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/germany-1933.htm
Wake
up America! It time to realize what your government has been up to (and
for some time) before it is too late! Remember when you were a kid, and
as you were taught history, you thought. “How could the average German
ever have let that happen?” Well . . . your kids and grandkids are
going to be reading history books many years from now. And they are
going to ask how YOU could have ever let Washington and Wall Street do
what they are doing to America today. Chris Mathews, of CNBC’s
HARDBALL, recently said on his acclaimed show that he had traveled
around the world of late and found that "America is hated." It
is NOT for no reason. It is time for our once great nation to wake up to
what the financial/political powers have done and keep doing - all for
the WRONG reasons!
As
long as this sort of suspicious attitude prevails in the poor areas of
the world, America is going to find itself in deeper and deeper trouble
as the years go by in this new "era of terrorism."
KHARTOUM,
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir on Thursday
accused Western nations of interfering in its troubled western Darfur
region to try to exploit Sudan's gold and oil resources.
Sudan
is under intense international pressure to rein in Arab militias,
accused of looting and burning African farming villages, and provide
security for more than 1 million people displaced by the fighting in the
remote area bordering Chad.
If
not, the U.N. Security Council in a July 30 resolution says Khartoum
could face unspecified sanctions. There has also been talk of possible
foreign troop intervention in Darfur.
Bashir
on Thursday said Western nations, especially Britain, were inflaming the
Darfur fighting to destabilise wider Sudan.
"There
is an agenda to seek for petrol and gold in the region," he told a
women's union meeting on Darfur in Khartoum on Thursday. –END-
This
is not anti-America diatribe on my part, it is pro-America and anti
where the power structures in Washington and New York are taking our
country. The way I see it, the question for the average American is,
"If you were living in 1776, what side would you have fought
on?" The establishment British or the Colonists? Would you have
fought to preserve tyranny and the banking elitists or for freedom and
your deserved rights? Like it or not, that is close to where we are in
2004 in many regards.
Not
only are Americans in peril of losing long cherished freedoms, the
average Joe and Jane are in danger of losing a good deal of their hard
earned money when the stock and real estate markets collapse – due to
bursting "bubbles" engendered by the former strong dollar
policy of Robert Rubin, rigged markets (most importantly the gold
price) and deliberate misinformation emanating from Washington and Wall
Street.
It
is time for America to wake up before it is too late!
If
the venerable Jim Sinclair has it right, it may already be too late.
From this latest missive at www.jsmineset.com:
Thursday,
August 12, 2004, 11:30:00 AM EST
Blunder of Blunders - NOCs take Notice
Author: Jim
Sinclair
The
final act in this drama will be the population taking down the new
government of Iraq and demanding a Theocracy under the influence of Iran
while the Kurds and other elements demand autonomy. The West will be
rendered incapable by having their economies held in hostage via
oil.
The
inflationary implications of this will deliver a spike up in gold of an
enormous magnitude thanks to the manipulation by the powers that be that
have so far prevented the normal market power of gold to unfold. The net
result in markets for anything is to construct an internal coil of power
that once released by such events will multiply the upside potential by
orders of magnitude. Dan Norcini's read on the USDX extension on the
downside will become a reality. All this might be closer than anyone is
willing to accept. -END-
Fellow
Café members saw it (gold) this way early this morning:
Hi,
Bill:
Let's see now. Dollar down? Yup. Stock markets down? So far. Oil up?
Yeah, but so what? Gold's down. Even though it might appear to many of
your frustrated readers that nothing much has changed in the world,
everything has changed. One of these days soon, Toto will pull back the
curtain on the Great Oz to reveal the truth.
Jay
Morning
Bill,
This fraud is getting very old. The absurdity is sickening. Both gold
and the dollar down. For some reason I keep thinking about an old poster
that pictured a hawk on a tree limb with the statement: "Patience
Hell, I Need to Go Out an Kill Something!" I continue to remind
myself that the payoff is going to make this slow torture all
worthwhile, and the fundamentals just keep getting better. Although, as
you indicated last night, just what is their bullion supply?
Geopolitical events are really heating up, in addition to the existing
wars, Iran and the China Sea armada are stoking the flames. Things
continue to be very curious indeed. Time is on our side!
Rich
The
gold related news of the day was BULLISH all the way around, which you
will read as you go on with the MIDAS. A list:
-
Oil
shot up as high as $45.75 and closed at $45.50, up another 70 cents
per barrel.
-
The
dollar FELL .18 to 88.80 and the euro ROSE .44 to 122.54.
-
Fighting
in Iraq is intensifying.
-
The
US economic news continues to be abysmal and is worsening by the
week.
-
The
US stock market was soft all day and both the DOW (9815, down 124)
and the DOG (1752, down 30) closed on their LOWS.
Gold?
It shot up early and then THE GOLD CARTEL launched one of their
price-capping assaults, taking it from up $2.60 to down $1.50, where
they sat on it for most of the entire trading session. The Kitco daily
chart looks line another flatline brainwave of a dead person. Gold,
after making its high AGAIN in the first half hour, barely traded for
the entire session after its takedown. And that is with the stock market
cratering and oil surging. ONCE AGAIN, we see gold manipulated by the
cabal RIGHT at the time gold should be taking off. You have to wonder
how desperate the devious crooks are I think REAL desperate.
The
US economy is weakening, the dollar is shaky, the effects of the last
few years of stimulus are over, oil is soaring and Iraq is a mess. The
geopolitical and economic/financial market news is very likely to worsen
from here on in through the rest of the year. Can’t see the bums being
able to hold gold down too much longer. The creeps are going to be blown
out of the water.
A
potential BIG plus for the bull side of the gold market:
The
option writers on the gold floor have been writing calls on the metals
markets with impunity as of late. By the way they are writing the
options, it appears they don’t believe gold will make a move in the
next half year. This could be a source of panic short-covering in the
months ahead.
The
gold open interest fell 901 contracts to 218,161.
Silver
was quiet most of the session after falling back 10 cents from its
opening. Its open interest fell 1575 contracts to 95,616.
Good
news on the warehouse stocks front. After a 600,000+ ounce build
yesterday, the silver stocks fell 1,193,826 ounces this afternoon to
register a new low of 110,416,153. Still going the right way!
The
John Brimelow Report
Gold Crossed
Thursday, August 12, 2004
Indian
ex-duty premiums: AM $6.32, PM $6.64, with world gold at $395.85 and
$396.15. Ample for legal imports. India is a strong importer at these
prices. Mitsui-London noted that yesterday:
"Gold
was bid initially through NY with decent spec buying but Euro weakness
spurred dealers and locals to hunt down weak longs. Aggressive
physical buying from Turkey
and India provided support."
(JB emphasis)
Some
interesting light is shed today on the state of the physical market by a
report in a Gulf newspaper today that a jewellery show in Jordan last
week saw record sales, more than twice the usual in the event’s 5 year
history. Jordan, of course, has no oil, and is in the unenviable
position of being sandwiched between Israel and Iraq. However, this has
meant boom times for the Jordanian trucking industry, supplying the
occupation forces. Your US tax dollars at work! See
TOCOM
continues unimpressed. Volume fell 25% to only equal 9,244 Comex
contracts, and the active contract was down 10 yen. Open interest
slipped another 789 Comex equivalent. World gold stood 80c above the NY
close at the end. (NY yesterday traded 48,754 lots: open interest
slipped 901 contracts.)
Yesterday
saw powerful selling after the US data, with more than half the
estimated volume going through in the first 90 minutes of Comex. Refco
Research blames "fund and dealer" selling, while Standard
London, in an unusually frank commentary, appears to suspect short
selling:
"Gold
opened in Asia almost 2 dollars lower and it was evident what were on
the Asian dealers mind. One could almost see the glint of their smiles
while rubbing their hands as they were finally having the first chance
to direct the gold’s movement. So gold opened at 397.70 bid and
dealers initially sold it cautiously…Gold was soon banging at 396 but
physical demand underpinned the market there …With all things
considered, 397 seemed like a pretty good level to get short for the day
and so the European dealers gamely started selling it as well. …After
COMEX opened… everyone scrambled to sell some gold before the prices
became unattractive. Gold was pushed lower gradually and eventually
established the day’s low at 393.20 offer. Without fresh selling
interest, gold recovered its composure to close at 395.40 bid, which
technically is a bearable closing as it did not close below 395."
This
simply seems unwise in view of the buoyancy of the physical market.
Brightening
up a day in which another dreary round of trench warfare seems to be
underway between Eastern physical buyers and North Atlantic sellers is a
piece by Jessica Cross of Virtual Metals, published late last night on
Reuters. Most of this is a complaint about the shrinkage in the bullion
dealer community, a.k.a. possible buyers of VM’s service. However, the
occasion of the report is the publication of the "Hedge Book"
survey VM does for Mitsui. This shows that producer hedges were cut by
more than expected in Q2 ’04:
"A
Hedge Impact reduction of no less than 4.6 Moz was substantially more
supportive of the gold price than a simple committed ounce measure would
have suggested. And yet the price over the period fell from $427/oz to
$393/oz. This tells us that in the absence of this decline in hedging,
the gold price would have most likely fallen further and faster than it
did...As US interest rates turned up, signalling to many observers the
end of dollar weakness, so it appears that the speculative side of
the gold market went short in volumes that swamped the supportive 4.6
Moz of dehedging and resulted in the subsequent price
vulnerability."
(Cross
maintains, no doubt correctly, that the hedge reduction impact was
accentuated by the gold price decline and lease rate changes, which
influence the "delta".)
The
problem with the claim that this powerful uplifting influence was offset
by spec shorts is that there is absolutely no evidence that such
shorting occurred. Indeed, the CFTC data showed just the reverse, and
was widely thought to be replicated on a larger scale OTC. And, as Cross
notes, lease rates remain "glued to the floor".
Lower
prices + big producer hedge reduction + no huge spec short increase =
Undisclosed Central Bank activity
A
conclusion from which establishment publicists like Virtual Metals
always shrink. JB
The
complete Virtual Metals report follows for your perusal: The
Hedge Book Q2 04.pdf
Another
gold industry joke, this Virtual Metals. Perhaps hoax on the industry is
more like it. This report is completely disingenuous as it fails to deal
with the real reason the gold price tanked in the second quarter. To
blame the specs going short as a reason is ludicrous. For years Ms.
Cross, now of Virtual Metals, dealt with the large BIS gold derivatives
numbers as being related to the hedgers. Now that the hedgers have
sharply reduced their positions over the past few years while the
derivatives have not gone down, she says nothing and shies away from the
issue.
The
gold price is suppressed because there is a Gold Cartel out there
surreptitiously feeding central bank gold into the market to keep the
price from rising. How clear can that be?
By
the way, for new Café members, Ms. Cross is married to the former
number two at the South African Reserve Bank. During my tour of South
Africa I met with the bank’s number 3 and 4 in a government building
in Pretoria to lay out the gold scam story in an effort to expose the
fraud and free the gold price. The main beneficiary of a sharply rising
gold price (then about $258) would be the people of South Africa. The
two bankers giggled part of the time like a bunch of school kids when
they thought I wasn’t looking.
CARTEL
CAPITULATION WATCH
The
dismal US economic news:
08:30
July Retail Sales reported 0.7% vs. consensus 1.2%; ex-Autos reported
0.2% vs. consensus 0.4%
Prior Retail Sales revised to (0.5%) from (1.1%); ex-Autos revised to
(0.3%) from (0.2%).
* * * * *
(This
is old news, however it is negative because it reveals a weakening
trend, one which won’t be helped in the months to come by sky high
oil.)
The
Bank of Korea cut its key interest rate Thursday, stunning markets, in
an attempt to bolster the flagging South Korean economy despite the
threat of rising prices
* * * * *
8:59
Moscow court denies YUKOY more time to repay its $3.4B tax
* * * * *
Reuters:
"Britain became a net importer of oil in June for the first time in
11 years, official data showed on Tuesday."
10:25
Yukos local shares halted for trading at 10 minutes after this hour
Halted for one hour on the local shares, according to Micex. Meanwhile,
September WTI crude oil continues to move higher, now at $45.30, with
the expected corresponding drop in stocks. Dow (0.88%) to 9850.64;
S&P 500 (0.82%) to 1066.99; Nasdaq Composite (1.21%) to 1760.87.
* * * * *
A
monster disappointment:
Aug.
12 (Bloomberg) -- Hewlett-Packard Co., the world's No. 2 maker of
personal computers, said third-quarter profit rose to $586 million, less
than analysts expected, as sales of its server and storage computers
fell. The shares declined as the company cut its forecast for the
current quarter.
Results
are ``unacceptable'' and Hewlett-Packard will make ``immediate
management changes,'' Chief Executive Carly Fiorina said in a statement
that included preliminary results…. – END-
Even
the high end is suffering:
Tiffany
& Co misses by $0.04, guides Y04 below consensus (TIF) 31.80:
Reports Q2 (Jul) earnings of $0.25 per share, $0.04 worse than the
Reuters Estimates consensus of $0.29; revenues rose 7.7% year/year to
$476.6 mln vs the $496.8 mln consensus. Company issues downside guidance
for Y04 (Jan), sees EPS of $1.55-1.60 vs. Reuters Estimates consensus of
$1.64… - END-
China
has its problems too. Will they send them our way?
Bill;
Well look what we have here. Inflation is only a transitory problem in
China too. Thank god for that!
Aug.
12 (Bloomberg) -- China's consumer prices rose last month at their
fastest pace in more than seven years as food costs surged, making it
harder for the central bank to avoid raising interest rates. Bonds fell
after the report. .........
.....``The
inflation pressure is transitory,'' said Chris Leung, an economist at
DBS Bank Ltd. ``Why raise interest rates when the economy is already
slowing?''..
Monkey
see, monkey do.
Rob
Wall
Street pundits were hoping yesterday that the inventory numbers would
show healthy decreases. They didn’t get them:
10:00
July Business Inventories reported 0.9% vs. consensus 0.6%
Prior reading revised to 0.7% from 0.4%.
* *
* * *
WASHINGTON,
Aug 12 (Reuters) - Inventories at U.S. businesses rose more than
expected in June, marking their largest gain in four years and their
tenth consecutive monthly rise, a government report showed on Thursday.
The
Commerce Department said June business inventories rose 0.9 percent to
$1.234 trillion while sales at manufacturers, retailers and wholesalers
grew 0.1 percent. Wall Street economists had expected a milder 0.5
percent rise in June stocks.
The
June business inventory gain, the largest since a matching rise in June
2000, pulled a key measure of inventory leanness from recent lows. The
stock-to-sales ratio, which measures how long it would take to deplete
stocks at the current sales pace, rose to 1.31 months in June from 1.30
months in May…. –END-
More
bad economic news:
"The
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago said its index of manufacturing activity
moved 0.7 percent lower in June compared to May's levels. Three of the
four sectors followed by the index declined in June while the fourth
group was unchanged. The May reading was revised to show a 0.1-percent
tick higher."
* *
* * *
The
energy problem is not only about oil:
US
coal prices soar as output declines
Financial Times
Published: August 12 2004
US
coal prices are rising rapidly as unexpected growth in demand this year
is undermined by declining domestic production, according to Standard
and Poor's.
The
ratings agency says in a report to be released on Thursday that demand
has risen because of the stronger economy, weather-related usage and the
running of coal plants at higher capacities as utilities have
increasingly switched to the fuel to avoid paying skyrocketing natural
gas prices.
Yet
US production to meet this demand has been declining over the last few
years and coal exports have increased, with high-grade thermal coal
being marketed for Asia's surging steel production needs at a time when
the depreciation of the US dollar makes it attractive.
Efforts
to build up coal inventories are being hindered as US railroads
experience severe congestion, with demand for all commodities higher
than expected. Coal inventories already are at historic lows, with
coal-fired generation outpacing coal production. Some utilities report
inventories of only about one month.
"Inventories
will reach an all-time low by year-end 2004, potentially causing further
volatility in spot prices," said Aneesh Prabhu, S&P credit
analyst. -END-
Remember
when our Café source told us months ago the Chinese have tied up huge
coal supplies out of West Virginia and Alabama and were shipping them
back to China?
GATA’s
Mike Bolser:
Hi
Bill:
The Federal Reserve added $13.25 Billion in repos today August 12th
2004, an action that took the pool up ton $43.769B.
The
DOW's 30-day ma has slipped to a new low for the move and this is
interesting and suggests that the Fed may not be as well off as they
imagine. The relatively large add today hints at things to come and we
will have conclusive evidence that the Fed is in trouble when they run
the repo pool up over $50 Billion again.
Richard
Russell keeps advising investors to obtain gold in metal form and so do
I. Think not in terms of how many pieces of colored paper will buy an
ounce but in how many ounces one can get and still meet one's other
expenses. Inflation ravaged countries in Europe know this drill
all-too-well. The day of reckoning is in the future so it makes little
sense rushing to count gold "profits" in dollar terms.
Accumulation is all that "counts".
Derivatives
explosion or COMEX closure?
The
interest rate derivatives held at JP Morgan top $29 Trillion in the
latest quarter and much of that contract load is gold linked. The
language stipulates that "a pricing mechanism must exist" in
order for the contract to remain valid. This extremely odd language
insertion attracted my attention when I first saw it and I asked...why
is this here?
Well,
the cynical view is the phrase is there as an escape clause after the
authorities close the COMEX and other big gold markets under their
control to precious metals trading. Until there's a better explanation,
I'm sticking to this expectation so investors ought to beware of
precious metals options and futures as an avenue to prosperity. Under
such a scenario, metal itself will deliver its own very high leverage.
Philosophically,
the Fed's goons would make sure, by design, that their arch enemies in
the gold bug army made no profit when the price finally ran away. They
would deliver a scorched earth.
D-Day
When...
is the key question everyone wants to know, not if. The wild mutations
in historical ratios such as oil/gold and gold/real interest rates have
prompted even mainstreamers to comment of late. Something isn't right
all-too-few of them say.
By
watching the Fed's every move using proprietary metrics, many of which
have yet to be published, I attempt to guess where they are going. Right
now the Fed has just changed from up to flat in the DIVG ma even as they
are forced to keep M1 rising and suffer massive budget and trade
deficits that are, by all assessments, out of control. They took from
May 24th until this week to transition so they were not in too big a
hurry as they gently added more and more selling pressure.
I
don't think they can hold this for very long without some external event
to cover their next move which needs to be designed to halt the need for
gold sales. It could come in weeks or months...no one can say.
I
do not believe that D-Day will bring the same kind of failure we
experienced in 1979 because the Fed is dedicated to preventing just such
an un coordinated retreat from ever happening. They often speak of how
things are different today. Perhaps the biggest difference between 1979
and 2004 is that the Fed feels much better about bending economic truth
and therefore has become a full adversary to those holding wealth. Don't
waste your time listening to the Masters words...use his pieces of
colored paper to obtain metal while you can.
DOW
11,750?
By
Labor Day? It's all but a blown forecast but I'll concede defeat when
the time comes. I'm guessing that the election has been conceded so the
Fed may have chosen not to push things any harder. This DOW 11,750
defeat is one I'll gladly accept. BTW the democratic presidential
contender took a slight lead in the Florida polls today and IF the
hurricane does appreciable damage here, lightly motivated folks will be
absorbed in rebuilding first and voting second.
Mike
PS I'm hunkering down for Charles (hurricane) so there won't be a repo
update tomorrow.
The
amazing Mahendra has done it again. He just recently called for a
short-term sharp soybean rally. August beans closed up 50 ½ cents to
$6.87 ½. Then, he recently called for the dollar to weaken,
except against the South African Rand, which he said would weaken
against the dollar. Sure enough, the SA Reserve Bank lowered interest
rates today and the Rand
weakened against the
dollar, while the dollar fell against most other currencies. Now, if
only we could get the Gold Cartel to shoot themselves in the foot so his
gold prediction can pan out.
From
Richard Russell last
evening:
"But
what ever happened to the long-promised gold ETFs? When it comes to gold
and silver, the authorities will do everything they can to keep the
precious metals out of the hands of the public. When you buy the not-yet
approved gold ETC, you actually take an ounce of gold off the market,
reducing supply. The authorities don't want that."
This
is exactly what GATA said the US would do to this World Gold Council,
New York Stock Exchange product years ago when it was first proposed. It
will be two years behind schedule as of this fall. Once again GATA finds
more anecdotal evidence of a coordinated mass conspiracy to denigrate
gold and keep it off the average American investor’s radar screen.
Either that, or the World Gold Council is proving once again it is among
the least effective industry organizations in history. The most likely
reason for the delay is a combination of both reasons.
It
is time for the gold producers in the WGC to withdraw their support and
get behind a new organization to fight the gold price suppression
scheme, a scheme which is destroying their profits and demoralizing
their shareholders. If you are one of those disgusted shareholders,
don’t just sit there! Get on the phone and raise "Cain" with
the CEO’s of your gold companies; have them do something about this
nightmare. If you don’t make any effort to end this fraud, fine. Just
sit there, complain, and stay miserable!
Robert
Rubin’s Citigroup (a Gold Cartel honcho) has itself in some hot water
in Europe due to alleged market shenanigans (what else is new).
FT
Citigroup coup stirs up emotions
Published: August 11 2004 05:00
The
controversial trans-actions by Citigroup that have stunned the eurozone
government bond market came at a challenging time for the fixed-income
markets, provoking an unusually emotive response from many rival banks.
After
a period of exceptionally low interest rates, which helped make
fixed-income desks significant revenue generators for investment banks,
the cost of borrowing has begun to rise.
Meanwhile,
profit margins in the inter-dealer, or wholesale trading, of eurozone
government bonds have dwindled as pricing in the maturing market has
become more efficient.
This
has been driven by a move to electronic and internet-based trading,
which cut costs and incr-eases pricing transparency.
"Market-making
has be-come very tough," said a trader at a European bank.
"Five years ago, you could expect to make 4-5 cents [per Euro] on a
€100m transaction in German Bunds. Now it's about 1 cent."
But
unwelcome though they may be to rivals, large trades of this sort are
probably here to stay. Citigroup's market coup reflects the growing
power of a handful of leading banks in the capital market arena.
A
combination of their large balance sheets with electronic technology and
sophisticated financial modelling allows them to put together deals that
leave lesser players gasping…. -END-
Don’t
think for a moment the hedge funds are cleaning up these days:
Benton's
Andor Fund Assets Fell Almost 50% in July, People Say
Aug.
12 (Bloomberg) -- Dan Benton's Andor Capital Management LLC, the
eighth-biggest hedge fund at the end of 2003, lost almost half its
assets in July, people familiar with the New York- based fund
said.
Assets
in the fund, after 18 months of losses in its main Andor Technology
Fund, fell 46 percent in July to $3.5 billion, the people said. Investor
withdrawals of $1.5 billion led the decline as two of Andor's portfolio
managers left and Andor decided to close the funds they ran, the people
said.
At
Andor's annual meeting in May at the New York Public Library, Benton
asked investors to ``ride the technology wave'' with him. Computer and
telecommunications shares plunged in the following two months,
contributing to a 5.4 decline in net assets this year through July for
Benton's $1.7 billion Andor Technology Fund. -END-
Modest
gold supply increase:
China's
gold output expected to hit 210 Gold output in the Chinese mainland is
expected to reach 210 tons this year, according to an industry
organization.
The
figure will be up from 200.598 tons last year, said sources from the
China Gold Association. ***
To
give you some idea of how insignificant this increase is, compare it to
Turkey importing a record 30 tonnes in just one month.
Forked
tongue stuff:
Bill,
I know I'm a broken record on this, but once again, the feds are lying
about the deficit. From the Treasury Department's Bureau of the Public
Debt web page at http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpdodt.htm
I get the following numbers:
|
Date
|
Debt
Held by the Public
|
Intragovernmental
Holdings
|
Total
|
|
07/30/2004 |
4,267,913,389,239.04
|
3,048,654,181,993.85
|
7,316,567,571,232.89
|
|
09/30/2004
|
3,924,090,106,880.88
|
2,859,140,955,862.74
|
6,783,231,062,743.62
|
|
subtracting,
we get: |
|
10
months
|
343,823,282,358.16
|
189,153,226,131.11
|
533,336,508,489,.27
|
-
$533.34B
is not $395.78B. Where do they get their numbers, and why don't they
use the ones on their own web site?
-
$533.3
B / 10 = $53.33B average monthly deficit.
-
2
more months at that rate adds over $106B more.
-
That
projects the fiscal 2004 deficit to around $639B.
-
This
is the amount they pay interest on. It is the real FY2004 deficit.
The
$343.82B increase in the debt held by the public (mostly the bond
market) is close to the announced $395.78B, so I am assuming they are
using that, with some unknown fudge factor, possibly excess Medicare
receipts. The $189.51B increase in Intragovernmental Holdings represents
the various federal pension fund receipts in excess of the amount needed
to pay current benefits. Mostly this is Social Security. Their web site
explains it all in detail.
They
seem to be implying that they don't really owe the Social Security trust
fund the money they borrow from it, they simply use it as a cash cow,
knowing that some day they'll simply renege on it. What other
explanation could there be for not including it in the deficit? On the
other hand, they can't play those games with the debt, since by law it
is defined as anything they borrow that they must pay interest on.
That's why periodically, when they must raise the debt ceiling, they
borrow from other internal accounts while the bill works it's way
through Congress, and the numbers posted at the above web site virtually
freeze until the bill passes. They don't pay interest to those other
internal accounts, and so can get around the law that way until they run
out of those sources.
If
I were in charge, I'd change the law to require the excess SS funds be
invested in hard money, money that can't be reneged on. I think you know
which money I'm referring to. And I'd start selling those treasuries and
use the proceeds to buy more of the same. I know, fat chance.
Oh
what a sight it will be to see the printing presses in high gear in
2020.
Best regards.
Ed Peters
This
is a bit scary and food for thought:
Forward
Planning: Two
Years (or less) to $125 Oil
www.urbansurvival.com
Oh,
this is a for sure bummer: An Iranian oil expert makes the call at http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/stories/s1172992.htm
You can do the math, right? $45 goes into $125 2.77 times and with gas
at $2.00 now, that would project $5.54 gasoline within 2-years.
You
need not be a genius to figure out that we are quickly coming to a major
bifurcation point where the future will be wildly inflationary due to
soaring oil - when we get three times the oil price, we get a kick of
inflation that may exceed even the 1980's. On the other hand, oil prices
could actually fall but that would imply a collapse of demand. As
your people's economist I won't forecast which way things will
break, but you see the point, right? Consumption can never outpace
supply so if Peak Oil is here, stand by for the age of falling
standards of living.
No
doubt, the soaring oil price figured into the Fed decision to raise
rates yesterday. You see, it makes no difference to the government right
now whether employment falls later on this year. Their immediate problem
is to keep the string of carry trades intact, and thus keep the U.S.
dollar firm enough so that it won't take much more than $45 a barrel to
buy oil: http://business.scotsman.com/economy.cfm?id=923342004
The reality is that if the U.S. dollar falls, the price of oil
denominated in dollars will quickly head much higher - and that would
have a disastrous impact on what's left of the U.S. economy. It would
make the oil shocks of '73 and '75-76 look like child's play.
We
can only hope that folks over at the Fed are reading the news in serious
financial media - there is, it's coming out as we forecast, nothing
transitory about oil prices. See Forbes article at http://www.forbes.com/business/services/feeds/ap/2004/08/11/ap1499798.html
That Sir Alan and the crew would have been so foolish as to think that
oil prices would be transitory has prompted us to add yet another
word to our New Economic Reality Dictionary:… -END-
Russ
Winter is very sharp. The following is a copper analysis from Russ
at:
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=20402240
All
questions I have pondered. Let's just take copper, because that's the
most obvious and the one I'm playing actively.
Backdrop:
We have about 14 million MT consumed a year right now. We saw a 0.2%
drop in production (let's just call it flat) in the 2nd quarter despite
a $1.25 price. If we used Comex, LME and Shanghai inventories for draw
down we can closely construct the supply-demand set-up for this market.
Since production (supply) is flat we could probably give consideration
to utilizing this to diagnose the global economy, they don't call it Dr.
Copper for nothing. Maybe a little simplistic, but I think a good
exercise. From my daily index card.
May:
inventory drawdown was about 78,000 MT: copper deficit is 936,000
annualized, or 6.7% of global demand.
June:
inventory drawdown was 72,000 MT; deficit 72,000, 864,000, 6.2% of
global demand. Could it be argued that the world economy contracted 0.5%
from May to June? I think so.
July:
drawdown is 55,000 MT, deficit is 660,000 annualized, 4.7% of global
demand.
August:
8 days showing about the same drawdown rate as July.
Did
the world economy contract 1.5% in July? That may be overstating it, but
I'd still guess July was quite a contraction. Probably July saw the
arrival of disrupted Grasberg supply, so that accounts for about half
the down shift. I'd say 0.8% is my July-August SWAG. So I'll SWAG global
GDP having contracted by 1 1/4% annualized from May to August.
Sure
that might give the market "pause", but now let's examine
what's required to prevent the remaining 180,000 MT in LME, Comex, and
Shanghai inventory from going to goose eggs. The July-August
"economic contraction" draw rate is currently about 2600 a
day, or 650,000 MT annualized. That's a bit over three months to get to
zero. So if the world GDP contracted another 1% immediately, you would
get about a 500,000 MT deficit. In otherwords to get the copper market
back into equilibrium Dr. Copper (the economy) would have to contract by
over 4% (a depression by any measure) from August.
Could
that be about to happen? Possibly, but I think you will see price
rationing of the last 180,000 MT of inventory first. At any rate your
first clue will be in the drawdown rate (spread out over a month or so).
Remember there is no meaningful new supply, so if drawdown suddenly
dropped to 35,000 a month, that might suggest a another serious economic
deceleration was underway, 1.7% by my math.
But
let's just take a worse case, we are in mid-Sept, and the draw down has
slowed to a 420,000 MT annualized deficit (1750 MT a day), and the
global GDP is in deep retreat. We are now down to about 135,000 MT left
in inventory. That's nearly four months to zero, a little better
calendar wise, but worse in relative numbers. If you are a copper
consumer (say China), aren't you going to be getting damn nervous, weak
economy or not? And how about those hedge funds, wouldn't they be
tempted to start a run, weak economy or not?
Then
just carry out this exercise on through. Conclusion: a severe depression
(6% drop from last spring) will bring the copper market back into
equilibrium at extremely low inventory levels. I think there will be a
depression from this, but caused by price spikes from severe shortages,
probably in both energy and metals, and in time even food (a subsistence
item). New supply you say? That's several years away, and I don't see
anybody whatsoever in a hurry to deal with that solution, do you? HUGO
trades at 3.88 today, NTO at 1.96. They have two of the best undeveloped
deposits in the world, and nobody seems lined up for them, at least
today. -END-
On
this tumultuous day for most of the financial markets, and on one of the
most blatant gold rigging days of all time, the following emails from
Café members might help to put the big picture in focus:
Bill:
I've been thinking about the emails you're getting such as "Can we
then really say that the cartel is on its last legs? To my perception,
they seem to have complete control, at least for now."
Bill,
my take on the current situation is just the opposite. This is one hell
of a complicated Chess game and I do not doubt that the bad guys are
smart, ruthless and perhaps desperate, but they are not omnipotent, nor
do they have complete control. I think they truly are cornered. The
interest rate rise is the last thing they wanted right now. But it was
that or a Dollar collapse. It was a move FORCED on them by the
market.
Just
think: There is less than ONE OUNCE of Gold per person on this planet.
After 5000 years of mining!!! Each month the US Trade deficit is $45+
Billion. If that had to be settled in Gold (as it was under the Gold
standard) the US would have to ship 3000+ tonnes to its trading
partners.
Instead
this deficit is settled in paper promises, aka Federal Reserve Notes or
Treasury Paper. Think of it as a gigantic game of musical chairs. Each
month the US issues 45 Billion new tickets to the game without
increasing the number of chairs.
The
market knows this. So they probe for weakness. They are rebuffed and
withdraw. They probe again, testing the Fed's resolve. So far this year,
we've seen the Japanese save the Dollar, then the Chinese slowdown story
saved the Dollar, then the Fed promised to raise rates to save the
Dollar, then they actually had to do it twice. But these rate rises have
real consequences, some obvious (like housing) others not so obvious but
which we assume must be dramatic (like the interest rate
derivatives).
American
power has many sources both economic and military but the most efficient
instrument of that power is the US Dollar. For decades the American
government has abused that power, allowing its citizens to live beyond
their means. The strength of the Dollar is an illusion. American control
over other nations depends on the continued belief that the Dollar is
Money. It is the Fed's job to keep that illusion alive so that 45
billion new tickets can be absorbed each month.
For
those of us who understand this, it becomes obvious that we must secure
a chair before the music stops. How close is that day? I certainly don't
know but yesterday the October gold price closed only 10c above the Spot
price. This is ominous. As Antal Fekete argues:
"Backwardation
in gold has a perverse effect. In the case of agricultural commodities
backwardation provides a most powerful incentive for traders to sell the
cash commodity and buy the futures. Not so in the case of gold. Rather
than bringing out deliverable supplies of gold, backwardation tends to
remove them. The more the gold basis falls the less likely it becomes
that owners will exchange their cash gold for futures. Please remember
that you have seen it here first. This perversion of the gold basis
constitutes the self-destroying mechanism of the regime of irredeemable
currency. The longs tend to take delivery on their gold futures
contracts in ever greater numbers, and refuse to recycle cash gold into
futures, regardless how low the gold basis may go. As it is not set up
to satisfy demand for delivery on 100 percent of the open interest, the
gold futures market will default. Exchange officials will declare a
"liquidation only" policy to offset long positions in gol! d.
At that point all offers to sell cash gold will be withdrawn. Gold is
not for sale at any price. The shorts are absolved of their failure to
deliver on their gold futures contracts."
The
Gold price is down less that 8% from its high, yet somehow many gold
bugs have been convinced that the bull market is over. This is the power
of the Illusion the Fed feeds us. Don't listen. Trust Gold.
Cheers from Auckland, Ed
Dear
Bill, You may post this if you choose. I was around in the 1970s
playing the gold and silver markets. Made some money but was self taught
and got out mid 79 and left some on the table. This time around I
started buying back in 1996 quite early. Lost some money but kept
buying. Signed up with Lemetropole after you were about three months
old. In 2000 we placed $ 300,000.00 more in the market and kept buying
as was feasible. By 2003 with about $300,000.00 more invested. We took
profits in November 2003 of 1.55 mill.
And
still have our original money in the market. We paid off the mortgage on
our Holiday Inn and buying with all available funds back into the
market. I am a few years older now, but still think I have time to beat
these bums. But I if don’t my son sure as hell does. I would like
thank you personally. We could not have done it with out you. So we have
beaten them, and were going in for the kill. Can’t stop these boys’
come hell or high water. Don’t get discourage just keep buying. We
will nail these bums. You have given a great service to mankind and I
want thank you personally. TKT
Great
commentary Bill, as always. Knowing the facts makes it easier to
deal with the absurdities in today's markets. I have been accumulating
gold shares since 2001, taking profits along the way but always
re-investing the proceeds. "Be prepared" is what I was always
told, and thus I am preparing. Thanks to people like you and your
efforts, the truth, one day, will be for all to see and those who
listened early on will be safe with their
financial futures. Thank you for your hard work.
Dana D
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada
GATA
press:
Gold
bugs waiting for price jump
By
Jonathan Wegner
Omaha World-Herald
Wednesday, August 11, 1004
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_pg=46&u_sid=1171763
Since
gold prices bottomed in 2001, the shiny metal has held steadily above
$300 per ounce, no thanks to the Federal Reserve System, says Bill
Murphy, chairman of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee.
"We're looking for the price to more than double where it is,
easily. The only reason the price is here is because the gold cartel has
suppressed the price for the last seven or eight years. It's very
complicated," said Murphy, a former professional football player
and commodities broker from Dallas.
You probably haven't heard of the gold cartel, and the whole idea has
been debunked thoroughly by economists and other experts. Yet some gold
bugs hold fast to such conspiracy theories.
Murphy believes the Federal Reserve and major investment banks such as
J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs secretly sell their reserves into the
market to depress gold prices.
The Federal Reserve and other central banks alone, he contends, have
sold half their 32,000 tons in gold reserves. Murphy has invested his
entire net worth -- more than $1 million -- on the premise that when the
Fed goes to buy it back, it'll have to pay substantially higher prices.
"Hold prices are going to go bananas because the people suppressing
the price will run out of gold to maintain the price cap
operation," he said "All of a sudden, it's like every other
scandal. It has ramifications for the financial markets. It could be
another Enron."
Murphy knows it sounds slightly wild, but then people thought you were
crazy if you thought Enron might collapse, he said.
To publicize this to the world, he organized a world summit meeting in
Durban, South Africa, to draw attention to the problem. Though it wasn't
well-attended, it was a start, he said. "We had five nations
attend, mostly the gold producers and the mining unions."
Creighton University
economist Ernie Goss said it all sounds like something from late-night
AM radio.
"That just doesn't make sense. I do an economic round table with
the Fed once a year in Kansas City and I've never heard this one. They
try to be transparent. The goal is price stability, and that's not the
price of gold."
-END-
As
long as they are talking about GATA and the rig.... The mainstream
dismissal of what we have discovered is par for the course. NONE of
these people have looked at any of our evidence. Their retorts are both
mundane and of a noodle-brain mentality. A Goss is the same kind of
person who pooh-poohed the notion Enron was a fraud. After all, Enron
was lauded by Forbes year after year, and Ken Lay was a buddy of
President Bush. Because the Fed doesn’t discuss gold in its
conferences, gullible Goss says gold manipulation does not exist because
the Fed is transparent. How naïve can you get? He and his ilk sound
like kindergartners trying to explain to their daddies how the world
works.
This
is why the general American investor is in such trouble. These are the
types they look up to for some straight talk. Good grief!
Some
pictures of the Omaha story:


The
gold shares bucked the general trend today and closed on or near their
highs with the South Africans firmer due to the softening rand. The XAU
gained .74 to 85.64 and the HUI rose 3.55 to 185.13.
The
HUI needs to take out the 190 area to conclusively negate its well
established downtrend: See
Chart
As
it ought to be, the huge shorts in Golden Star Resources have begun to
cover. It closed at $3.99 up 29 cents.
While
today’s blatant price rigging was infuriating, the signs of the times
say The Gold Cartel is in deep trouble as outside market forces are
collectively going against them. We are a serious day closer to getting
out the GATA stretchers.
The
gold and silver shares remain THE historic investment opportunity of a
lifetime!
GATA
BE IN IT TO WIN IT!
MIDAS
Appendix
August
12, 2004
OUR ECONOMY DOESN'T WORK
By John Crudele
August
12, 2004 -- THE U.S. economy is broken and needs to be fixed — now.
The
Federal Reserve was forced to raise interest rates on Tuesday simply
because that's what everyone had come to expect.
And
because of some unique and historic problems with our economy, the Fed
couldn't concern itself with the fact that growth is clearly slowing and
its rate move was inappropriate.
You've
heard this elsewhere and read it here: Alan Greenspan's Fed is out of
step with the reality of the American economy.
But
it isn't all Greenspan's fault. The economy just is not behaving as the
textbooks say it should.
Sadly,
Greenspan is being forced to boost rates while Congress and the
president appear to have done all that they can to help the economy.
Last
year's massive tax cuts and refunds did boost U.S. growth for a quarter
or two. But that elixir's benefits wore off months ago.
With
tax relief now out of the question because of an exploding government
deficit and the Fed stumbling belatedly — and, I think,
inappropriately — toward raising borrowing costs, the economy right
now is damaged.
Broken.
It's an economy that by all rights should be soaring, but isn't.
Who
broke it? It was the Democrats and the Republicans.
People
like you and me are to blame for buying inefficient cars all our lives
and leaving our country at the mercy of the Arabs.
You
can also place some of the blame on greedy corporate executives who
fleeced their companies and made investors doubt the integrity of the
stock market.
And
leave some responsibility for corporate and Wall Street scammers who
brought us all those over-hyped Internet stocks in the 1990s.
Because
of all this and more, the Federal Reserve was forced to keep interest
rates too low for too long. And that's why now the Fed has little choice
but to give reassuring words and take ridiculous action.
A
sudden, large drop in the price of oil might help, but that's unlikely
to happen. So how do we fix the economy? First off, get better economic
statistics.
Most
of the panic lately has been over the unexpectedly small growth in the
number of jobs during June and July.
Those
weak jobs' numbers are as deceptive as were the remarkably good jobs'
figures that came out in March, April and May.
None
of those numbers were legitimate.
Second,
come up with an energy policy that'll work. Democratic candidate John
Kerry favors more fuel-efficient cars. President Bush wants to drill for
oil in restricted areas.
Both
are right.
Washington
should undertake a massive campaign to force auto makers to offer
fuel-efficient engines, like gas/battery hybrids, in all cars. In return
for a push for more hybrid cars, environmentalists will have to accept
more domestic oil wells.
The
real problem becomes: How do we get the economy moving now that more tax
givebacks are out of the question and interest rate cuts aren't
available?
As
I have suggested in this column a number of times, Americans should be
allowed to withdraw some of the trillions that have accumulated in
retirement accounts without being charged a penalty by the IRS.
If
the government can't give people money to spend in the form of tax
relief, let people spend their own money.
During
fat times, Americans should be permitted to contribute greater amounts
to retirement plans as a way to slow consumer spending and the economy.
Whatever
we decide, fixing the economy rather than just following the bouncing
stats should be our priority.
*
Please send e-mail to: jcrudele@nypost.com
From
today’s New York Times, which is politically biased to the left,
however it does not diminish the content in their lead editorial today.
This is partly what MIDAS and other contributors to my column have been
bringing to your attention for months:
New
York Times
August 12, 2004
Painting
the Economy Into a Corner
President
Bush reacted decisively to this month's shockingly bad employment report
- by quickly changing the topic to terror. The Federal Reserve chairman,
Alan Greenspan, also focused elsewhere, namely on rising oil prices. Mr.
Greenspan used inflationary energy costs as the rationale for raising
interest rates a quarter point, despite the drastic slump in hiring and
a recent slowdown in productivity growth.
What neither man seems ready to acknowledge outright is that policy
makers have run out of tools for stewarding an economy that - nearly
three years into a recovery - has yet to flourish and may even be
downshifting to neutral. The president's fiscal policies, mainly
high-end tax cuts, have resulted in a record federal budget deficit
without spurring hiring or income growth. If Mr. Bush continues on the
tax-cut path, continuing high deficits will further threaten job
creation and living standards.
Mr. Greenspan passed up opportunities to discourage Mr. Bush's
disastrous tax-cut strategy back when it might have done some good.
Instead, the Fed pursued its own stimulative policy, pushing interest
rates to the lowest level in a generation. One result has been a debt
load that is a big factor in the overall decline in households' net
worth, despite the rise in housing values. That alone argues for
tightening the money spigot. Another reason for raising rates is that
the continuation of a cheap-money policy would probably precipitate
inflation, as a glut of dollars would eventually feed rising prices.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Greenspan have now exhausted almost all of their
stimulus options. The economy is on its own, and it is not clear whether
it is on track for a stronger recovery in the second half of the year.
No wonder, then, that Mr. Bush won't acknowledge the bad news on jobs.
Doing so would imply a need to re-examine the policies that have led to
this point, something he is not willing to do. Given the facts, his
intransigence is appalling: according to a new research report by
Economy.com, an independent provider of economic data and analysis, the
$700 billion swing from surplus to deficit under President Bush
accounted for nearly two percentage points of economic growth a year.
But it has generated economic gains of just over one percentage point.
The main reason for the crippling discrepancy is that the tax cuts were
mostly handed out where they did the least good - that is, lavished on
the people least likely to spend the largess. The reduction in the tax
rates, the largest of Mr. Bush's tax boons, provided only 59 cents of
economic stimulus for every dollar of lost tax revenue. The tax cut for
dividends and capital gains produced 9 cents of stimulus for every
forgone dollar. (Did someone say, "Deficits as far as the eye can
see"?) In contrast, the economic bang for a dollar of aid to state
governments is $1.24. Yet such assistance accounted for only 3 percent
of the total cost of Mr. Bush's fiscal policies.
The president was right to use a fiscal stimulus to counter a recession
- it's just that his favorite tactics were wrong, and they failed to
create an environment that fosters growth in jobs and income. Now, along
with outside factors like oil prices, Mr. Bush's priorities are actually
contributing to the weak picture for jobs. And in a perverse feedback
loop, a continuation of these policies will further swell the deficit,
impeding job growth even more.
While the economy is still expanding and jobs are being created, the
pace pales in comparison with the pace of other recoveries at this same
stage. For real prosperity to take hold, a much broader swath of the
labor force must be able to find jobs and earn decent wages. That isn't
likely to happen under Mr. Bush's policies.

© 2004 Bill Murphy
Bio and Archives
|