|
I
consider the following news, which hit the tape, to be of such
importance to do a special recap for you:
Congress,
Bush will block IMF gold sales
Washington,
DC, Apr. 5 (UPI) -- U.S. Congress and President Bush will stop the
International Monetary Fund from selling its gold, the chairman of the
Joint Economic Committee said.
The
IMF is considering gold sales as a way of covering bad loans it has made
to impoverished borrowers now unable or unwilling to repay, but
Congressional approval would be required.
JEC
Chairman Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N.J., said he favors IMF debt relief through
write-offs financed out of the IMF's other resources.
"The
potential profits on IMF gold sales rightfully belong to the original
donor countries and their taxpayers," he said. "These IMF gold
sales would amount to a hidden appropriation from the donor countries
that were the original source of the gold."
Saxton
said the IMF failed to implement the proper lending safeguards and
accounting controls for making such loans.
"Not
surprisingly, some of its loans have gone bad, and the consequences
should not be papered over," he said. "The IMF's mistaken
forays into development lending have proven counterproductive, and
should not be repeated." -END-
As
long stated by the GATA camp, The Gold Cartel is running out of gold to
cap the price. The Swiss are done selling and the cabal had to lean on
the ECB for a surprise 47 tonnes. The one hope for the bums was to keep
the market subdued, partly via talk of IMF gold sales to keep the market
off balance. The psychological ploy was clear - one which they dearly
needed to work until they could somehow get the IMF to dump gold, and to
play for time to defuse the interest rate derivatives neutron bomb which
is now lit.
First
the Bundesbank, in a stunning rebuke of Germany’s Finance Minister,
came out against the IMF gold sales. Now James Saxton, Chairman of the
JEC, has stated Congress will oppose the sales. Last week I covered why
GATA may have played some role in the Bundesbank coming out the way they
did.
Tonight
I lay out GATA’s efforts in the past which may have played a role in
Saxton’s riveting comments. I say riveting because I think The Gold
Cartel and even the Bush Administration got bagged here. WE KNOW the US
is desperately trying to control the price of gold. Thus any public
comments against the sales by our US Treasury are a red herring,
especially with their apologists like Gordon Brown of England begging
for the sales.
I
will have more on this in days to come as events unfold. However, this
KILLS any potential for IMF gold sales in my book and should give a HUGE
lift to the gold price in the days and weeks ahead.
The
following is from 1999 MIDAS commentary. It will sound very familiar.
Only time will tell what effect GATA has had on James Saxton and the JEC.
You can make your own conclusions. However, one thing is clear. It
wasn’t the World Gold Council who had any impact here. SUPPORT GOLD
RUSH 21!
The
following letter was sent to Chairman Saxton to prepare him for GATA's
meeting on April 27, 1999:
|
Honorable
James Saxton
Chairman Joint Economic Committee
339 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-3003
April 26, 1999
Dear
Congressman Saxton,
The
purpose of my visit is to try and be of some assistance to you
and your committee regarding the issue of the proposed IMF gold
sale. It is the opinion of the Gold Anti Trust Action Committee
that the real reason for the intense lobbying and orchestrated
PR barrage about selling IMF gold by the White House and the
Treasury is not being revealed to Congress. We believe that the
real reason to promote the IMF sales has to do with a concerted
manipulation of the gold market to keep the price down in order
to bail out the gold shorts of Wall Street (ie bullion banks,
hedge funds, and other financial institutions).
That
has been going on for some time but began in earnest when Alan
Greenspan made this statement before a Senate Agriculture
Committee on July 30, 1998, "central banks stand ready to
lease gold in increasing quantities should the price rise."
We would like someone in Congress to ask Mr.Greenspan exactly
what he meant by that comment when he is testifying again before
committee.
It
is important to understand that there is a natural supply/demand
deficit in the gold market, meaning that demand for gold far
outstrips natural mine supply. Our associates figure that
deficit is around 1200 to 1600 tonnes and that deficit has been
met by gold producer forward selling, some central bank sales,
scrap supply, and gold lending. We think that the gold lending
is now so large that it has created a potential "systemic
risk" problem. Bullion dealers have been lending out
central bank gold to financial institutions at 1% interest
rates. The gold is sold into the physical market (depressing the
price) and the proceeds are then invested elsewhere. This is
called the "gold carry trade" which operates under the
same principle as the "yen carry trade" which blew up
late last summer when the yen rallied strongly against the
dollar. The short term demise of the yen carry trade caused
great financial consternation.
The
"carry trades" only represent cheap sources of capital
if the price of the entity borrowed stays the same, or
decreases. When the price of the yen suddenly rose sharply late
last summer it caused great financial distress as very
inexpensive loans became onerous. But, at least they could get
out of the loan via liquidating the yen; in essence giving it
back.
We
believe that the speculative gold loans are now as high as 3,000
tonnes of gold and that the total gold loans (producer forward
sales, etc) have reached 8,000 to 10,000 tonnes. If we are
correct, and at some future date the price of gold rallies like
the yen did, there will be financial turmoil. As yearly mine
supply in 1998 was only 2529 tonnes, the borrowers will not be
able to lay their hands on that much gold very quickly.
Inevitably, there will be defaults and many financial
institutions here and abroad will go bust. Many of the banks are
getting in this too deeply and are at risk of becoming
"Long Term Capital Managements." Panic is definitely
not too strong a word to be used here.
This
appears to us that the current administration and the NY
investment houses are in cahoots and what we may have here is
one of the great financial scandals in US history. Financial
commentators often point to the muddling, low gold price as to
how all is well in the economy and administration officials
point to a low gold price with pride, almost using it as a
report card on the great job they have done. The bullion banks
and investment houses have picked up on this and are making sure
that the price does not go up by supplying gold to the market
place. They feel they can borrow gold with impunity, even at
these low prices, as a result of Mr. Greenspan's comments. And
of course there is the connection of Wall Street to Secretary of
the Treasury, Robert Rubin. Everywhere we turn in our
investigation, we find Goldman Sachs, his former firm, involved
in gold bashing efforts.
Our
committee (GATA) has retained one of the premier anti-trust
firms in the United States, Berger & Montague of
Philadelphia, to assist us in our investigation into this
matter. If further evidence corroborates what we already have,
we intend to sue some New York bullion dealer/investment houses
for violation of the Sherman and Clayton acts. These firms are
making fortunes (while many associated with the gold industry
are being destroyed) through investments, after borrowing gold
at 1% interest rates. However, we think that some of them are
making these fortunes illegally as a result of collusive
activities and in the process have created a "ticking time
bomb" that could blow up to be a financial disaster in the
future.
It
is this cozy arrangement the administration has with these
investment houses that we believe is the real reason behind the
constant calls to sell the IMF gold. They both benefit from the
sale of the IMF gold, but the poor countries in South Africa and
West Africa lose as their mining industries deteriorate. I know
you have had other experts testify on all of this to you so I
will not get into that. But the American public, as well as this
country's mining industry, could really lose too. Our last
monthly trade deficit was $20 billion. At some point, there will
be an attack on our dollar. Our gold resources are one of our
greatest assets. Why sell any of them at these very, very low
prices? We can point to our gold stocks in defending our dollar
in the future. There are many financial analysts that think a
financial bubble has been created. That may or may not be the
case, but to advocate gold sales at this point in time will be
looked on as great folly if there is a bubble, and it bursts.
Yes,
the current administration and the greedy Wall Street houses are
winning the day today with this gold market manipulation. But,
if this charade about gold is not stopped now, someday the
American public will be big losers if a financial panic sets in.
If someone had stopped the Savings and Loans from their
over-extensions a decade ago, we might not have had that big a
crisis. The potential gold loan crisis could dwarf the Savings
and Loan one if the orchestrated gold selling game is not
curtailed now. I have attached some material for your perusal,
which elucidates much of what I have brought to your attention.
That material is:
1.An
April 16 Reuters PRNewswire in which Chris Thompson, the
Chairman of one of the world's biggest gold producers, Gold
Fields Limited, decries the tactics of the New York based
bullion dealers.
2.
An essay by John Hathaway, the highly regarded senior portfolio
manager of The Tocqueville Fund in New York, entitled, "
Bullion Dealer: Spin Meisters of the Gold Market."
3.
Commentary from Veneroso Associates entitled, "Gold Zaitech
- A Bear Bubble Driven By Cheap Credit". Frank Veneroso
wrote the 1998 Gold Book and is one of the leading authorities
in the world on the gold market. He has been economic policy
advisor to the World Bank, the I.F.C. and the O.A.S. as well as
many countries.
Frank
Veneroso is also one of the leading authorities on the gold loan
issue. I was with Frank when he determined out how large the
gold loans are and I saw how he figured it out by learning what
the gold loans were at individual bullion banks. In addition to
that, I was there when he spoke to Terry Smeeton, who just
retired as England's Chancellor of the Exchequer, about the gold
loans last year. Five years ago Mr. Smeeton was very chatty with
Frank about the loans. Last year, he would say nothing and could
not get off the phone fast enough when Frank told him how large
he now thought the gold loans had become.
4.
Commentary from the highly regarded James Turk, who publishes
the Freemarket Gold & Money Report. James is one of the
other leading authorities in the world on the gold market and is
known by all in the industry. His April 26 piece is very timely
and covers the problem of the payback of the gold loans. His
work shows that it could take a gold price of $608 to $923 to
solve this very sizeable problem.
5.
Brief commentary from the well established "International
Harry Schultz Letter." Harry Schultz also expounds on the
nefarious tactics of the bullion dealers.
I
look forward to meeting you on Tuesday at 1:15 and hope that we
may of help to you regarding this IMF gold sale issue.
Best
regards,
BILL MURPHY
Chairman, Gold Anti Trust Action Committee, Inc. |
In
September 1999 the price of gold went ballistic after the surprise
Washington Agreement announcement on September 26, leading to the
infamous comment by the Bank of England’s Eddie George, as stated in
Reg Howe's court case against The Gold Cartel to be found at:
http://www.gata.org/howe_complaint.html
"We
looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise
would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have
taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore at any price, at any
cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was
very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now
succeeded. The U.S. Fed was very active in getting the gold price down.
So was the U.K."
Do
you think GATA caught Chairman Saxton's attention when the gold price
rise was a worldwide fuss and potential disaster 5 months after our
meeting?
4/28
Report on GATA goes to Washington/Deutsche Bank conference call
April 28, 1999 - Spot Gold $282.70 up 70 cents - Spot Silver $5.25 up 8
cents
Feedback
to the Café about my trip Washington and meetings with Jim Saxton,
Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, the Staff Director of the
Joint Economic Committee, the senior macro economist of the Joint
Economic Committee, the Senior Counsel of the House Banking and
Financial Services Committee and the Staff Director of the Capital
Markets Subcommittee.
Washington
is in full bloom this time of year and it is extraordinarily beautiful
and bustling with activity. One cannot help but be inspired walking
around the Capitol while gazing at its majestic buildings and thinking
of what they stand for. It is one great country we have here, with all
its flaws, and an awesome, proud feeling came over me as I traversed
from the Capitol building to the Rayburn Building, to the O'Neill
building, etc. America is special because anybody can do anything here.
It is a land of individuals and we are very lucky to be living in such
an environment. I thought as such as Mitch McConnell, Barney Frank, and
other House of Representative Members sauntered by - all just part of
the crowd.
My
first meeting was with the Staff Director of the Capital Markets group
that is investigating Long Term Capital Management. I cannot get into
too much about this one, but I can tell you that I almost fell off my
chair when he told me that they were investigating Long Term Capital
Management for "anti-trust" violations. It was not my place to
probe further. But, now we understand why Long Term Capital Management
has reacted so expressively to the Gold Anti Trust Action Committee and
is sending our attorney a letter. I am sure that we are just a
coincidence that happened to show up at the wrong time for them, but no
one I have spoken on Wall Street had heard that anti-trust activity is
the reason a Congressional subcommittee is looking into their previous
operations.
Later
on, the Senior Counsel of the House Banking and Services Committee came
by and we had a long session about the "the sizeable gold
borrowings." He took copious notes. I stressed to him that it was
our opinion that a danger had been created by speculative gold borrowers
who had become so greedy that we believe that there are now about 3,000
tonnes of these loans out there. And, that the total gold loans may now
be 8,000 to 10.000 tonnes. I stressed that the borrowers were making a
fortune with virtually interest free money! But, in doing so, they have
created a potential banking disaster. If the price of gold were to
unexpectedly shoot up and go sharply higher (like the price of oil did
the past two months), the gold borrowers could not find 3,000 tonnes of
gold to pay back their loans, even if they wanted to. Panic could ensue.
Major banking defaults may occur and they could have 10 Long Term
Capital type, systemic risk problems on their hands, all at once!
I
told him that I was here today to alert the Banking Committee to this
potentially very serious problem and that this situation could be
likened to the Savings and Loan crisis. After the Savings and Loan
crises erupted, it was queried by many as to why someone did not do
something about it before it became a crisis. I told the Staff Director
that there is no reason for history to repeat itself. NOW, is the time
for the Banking Committee to ask the bullion dealers and major financial
institutions what their gold books look like; ask them to reveal the
gold books (confidentially) to a banking or economic committee. If they
will not do so, ask why? If they do and we are we are right, somebody
had better blow the whistle. If we are wrong, then it was a waste of
just a little time and a few phone calls.
We
discussed the gold loans issue in great detail. You know much of our
reasoning and evidence, so there is no point going into all that. What
is important is that at the end of the meeting the Senior Counsel got up
grinning and said, "Geez, got a small order here, have to save the
banking system".
The
next meeting was with Jim Saxton, the Staff Director of the Joint
Economic Committee and their senior macro economist.
Jim
Saxton is one class act. We had some fun talking about my cousin, Bobo
Sullivan, who also has been a force in New Jersey Republican politics
for many years as he ran the election campaigns for Bush and Reagan in
that State. Jim just got back from a fact finding mission in Yugoslavia
and now is also preparing legislation to reform the Exchange
Stabilization Fund by introducing the, ESF Transparency and
Accountability Act.
"This
legislation will end the legacy of secrecy and obscurity at the ESF,"
Saxton said in his press release. The ESF was established in 1934 at a
time when the dollar was pegged to gold, but has survived into the
current era of flexible exchange rates despite its lack of clear
objectives and its secretive operations."
"This
legislation will end the legacy of secrecy and obscurity at the ESF,"
Saxton said. "We need this kind of secrecy in our nuclear weapons
programs, not in our international economic policy, but most Americans
have never heard of it. The American people have the right to know how
billions of their tax dollars are being used. Excessive secrecy is part
of an even larger problem: the lack of accountability to congress or the
American people."
I
told Jim that GATA was concerned about the lack of transparency in the
gold market too and that we felt there were many shenanigans occurring
in the gold arena. GATA applauds his efforts, and intended legislation,
which could cut off another potential source of manipulation of the gold
market.
Most
of the discussion was about: 1) what GATA felt was the real reason
behind all the IMF proposed gold sale PR commotion and 2) GATA's opinion
that gold loans had become so large that they had become a danger to the
U.S. banking and financial system.
I
went on to say how large we felt the gold loans had become and that if
something were to happen to cause the price of gold to rise sharply, and
the gold borrowers wanted to get out of their gold loans and pay the
gold lenders back with physical gold, that it would be impossible for
them to do so in a short period of time without the price of gold
skyrocketing. With 1998 mine supply at 2529 tonnes in 1998, it just
cannot be done. I followed with what I had told the Senior Counsel of
the Banking Committee, that I felt the resulting turmoil could produce
10 "systemic risk problems," not just the 1 that our Fed had
with Long Term Capital Management. What would the Fed do in that case?
It
was stressed by me that almost no one thought there could be a Long Term
Capital Management either; that even the Central Bank of Italy invested
in Long Term because of the supposed lack of risk in investing with
them. The biggest and the best invested in Long Term. "And look
what happened," I told Jim. I then pointed out that it is these
same "biggest and best" that are borrowing gold at 1% interest
rates and are thus, in effect, short gold to a staggering degree. In
essence, they are investing all over the place for practically free (as
long as the price of gold does not go up). I asked him if he would like
to be able to go his bank and take out virtually an interest free loan?
Did he think his investment performance would look pretty good if he
could do so? That is what I told him I felt was behind all this IMF gold
sale talk spewed forth by our administration, the bullion dealers, Wall
Street and anyone else who's arm they can twist. I do not think it
proper to recant any of his conversation, but I think I can comfortably
say that he has a great smile.
All
3 committees want to very much hear whatever more we have to convey on
this matter.
THE
GOLD PRICE IS GOING MUCH, MUCH HIGHER!!!

© 2005 Bill Murphy
Bio and Archives
|