|
The
Market Edge Market Summary
A
mixed bag of economic reports coupled with a jump in oil prices saw
stocks trade in a volatile, see-saw pattern last week with most of the
major averages ending the period in the loss column. An example of the
conflicting reports occurred on Friday when a strong durable goods
number for December was off set by the decline in new home sales for
2006, which was down over 17% from 2005. This was the largest, year over
year decline since 1990. But the real drag on stocks was the continued
rise in interest rates and the realization that a hope for a rate cut
anytime soon has all but vanished.
The
DJIA was all over the board as it lost 88 points on Monday (DJIA –
12477.16) and then posted it's 26th record high on Wednesday with a 87
point (1.3%) gain closing at 12621.77. The move was trumped on Thursday
as the blue chips dropped 119 points (-0.9%), it's largest point decline
since 11/27/06 and finished at 12502.56. Friday's action saw further
declines as the DJIA ended the session at 12487, a loss of 78 points for
the week.
Navarro's
Big Economic Picture
Mixed
Messages
I’m
not buying that a stronger than expected economy is putting a damper on
the stock market. The logic
is that a strong economy raises the prospect that the Fed won’t cut
rates and might raise them. Who
cares if the economy is robust, which would mean good news for earnings.
Nope.
The big thing driving up the long end of the yield curve and
roiling the stock market is a change in Chinese strategy which involves
buying fewer U.S. bonds. That’s
the real problem: the prospect of higher interest rates and mortgage
rates due to changing bond market fundamentals.
This
Week's Market Movers
The
Fed meets on Wednesday and that’s likely to be the fulcrum for the
market’s week. I
don’t expect much change in policy – certainly not a rate cut or
hike. The only thing in
play is the Fed’s language re: bias.
The
International Scene – Technical Take
The
International Scene - Technical Take
Germany,
Japan, Brazil and Mexico all showed modest technical improvement as did
gold.
|
Country
or Region
|
ETF
|
This
Week
|
Last
Week
|
Two
Weeks
|
|
U.S.
|
SPY
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
Europe
|
EZU
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
Europe
S&P Eur 350
|
IEV
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
- Germany
|
EWG
|
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
Emerging
Markets*
|
EEM
|
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
Asia
50 ADR
|
ADRA
|
|
Long,
-1
|
Long,
-1
|
|
- China 25
|
FXI
|
|
Long,
-1
|
Long,
-1
|
|
- Japan
|
EWJ
|
|
Long,
-1
|
Long,
-1
|
|
- Australia
|
EWA
|
|
Neutral
from Long, -2
|
Neutral
from Long, -2
|
|
- Korea
|
EWY
|
|
Avoid,
0
|
Avoid,
1
|
|
Latin
America
|
ILF
|
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
- Brazil
|
EWZ
|
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
- Mexico
|
EWW
|
|
Long,
-2
|
Long,
-2
|
|
Gold
|
GLD
|
|
Neutral
from Long, -2
|
Long,
-2
|
*Argentina,
Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India,
Indonesia, Israel, Jordan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan,
Peru, Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, and
Turkey.

Vaino's Biotech
Corner
Will Hollis-Eden
Ever Find Paradise?
The
upcoming week will be a big one for Hollis Eden Pharmaceuticals (HEPH),
a company I’ve written about previously.
The company was founded in 1992 and they’ve not advanced a
single drug to a Phase 3 clinical trial.
Their
lead compound, called Neumune, prevents loss of white blood cells (neutropenia),
loss of platelets (thrombocytopenia), and loss of red blood cells
(anemia). This drug has been
demonstrated safe in several Phase 1 clinical trials.
The biggest indication for Neumune is protection against acute
radiation syndrome (ARS).
Project
Bioshield, a response to potential terrorist attacks, was signed into
law in July 2004. One of the
purviews of Project Bioshield is to develop and stockpile drugs to
protect Americans from biological, chemical, and nuclear attacks.
The anthrax scares in Washington DC are a chilling reminder of
why this may be important: I’ll
leave comments about feasibility aside.
Sensing
opportunity, Hollis Eden has been seeking to provide the Government
(specifically the Department of Health and Human Services, HHS) with
Neumune to protect against a radiation attack.
At first glance, this was a smart strategy.
Implementation, however, has not been so easy.
HEPH
has been trading wildly (according to Yahoo Finance beta = 5.42) over
the past few years, due in large part to their attempts to secure a
contract for Project Bioshield. In
my opinion Hollis Eden has an extremely weak pipeline, and this
procurement is their last hope. Trouble
is, much like Lucy pulling the football away before Charlie Brown can
ever kick it, HHS keeps moving the deadline back.
Initially a target date of September 30th 2006 was
set, which was pushed back to November 30th, which was pushed
back to January 31st—next Wednesday.
So,
while I would never recommend HEPH as an investment, I think it will be
a fun stock next week for day traders (take a look at Friday
afternoon’s minute-by-minute chart) and those looking to speculate
next week. If HHS awards a
contract to Hollis Eden the stock will take a nice spike.
If they don’t deliver on a contract, or delay it a third time,
I think the stock will take a substantial dive
There
are a couple of ways to play this. A
good volatility play is a straddle with March $5 options: open interest
on February options is very low, and March options, while still illiquid
have a higher open interest.
Now,
Project Bioshield has hit some hiccups. A
debacle in which a $1B contract was cancelled sent Vaxgen’s stock (VXGN.PK)
to the Pink Sheets. There have
also been calls, by Senators Collins and Lieberman, for a congressional
investigation into Project Bioshield.
But
here’s another twist. A week
after announcing the November delay in the HHS procurement, Hollis Eden
announced it was selling $26M worth of shares at $6.50, a substantial
discount then. The company had
$48M in cash at the end of Q3, and were burning on average $6M per
quarter: there certainly was
danger of running out before the January 31st tentative date
set by HHS. Waiting until after a
contract award would have meant a higher share price, and a bigger
infusion of cash.
One
can speculate endlessly about what the secondary offering of stock means
about management’s confidence in obtaining the contract.
To be clear, according to a November press release, Hollis Eden
is “not aware of any other company that remains in the competitive
range for this contract award”.
Whether
or not HEPH gets a contract next week is pure speculation.
The stock is trading near $6, so shorting it can be
risky—shorts I recommended on AVNR and ENCY were both in this range,
and both paid off very well! This
is a situation where I like to buy puts, and I have purchased some.
To be clear, this is highly speculative, but I like the
odds of betting on government inaction. Should
be a fun week!

“Any
trader or investor who ignores the power of macroeconomics over the
world’s
financial markets will, sooner or later, lose more than they
should—and if they are
trading on margin, perhaps more than they
have.”
-- If It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks
The
Market Edge Market Summary from www.marketedge.com
|

|
Peter
Navarro is
a business professor at the University of California and the
author of the best-selling investment book
If
It's Raining in Brazil, Buy Starbucks and The
Well-Timed Strategy.
His latest book is The Coming China
Wars: Where They Will Be Fought, How They Can Be Won. |
|

|
Andrew
Vaino is a Ph.D. chemist who spent two years at
The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, CA, working in the
laboratories of Nobel-Laureate Barry Sharpless and Kim Janda. He
currently teaches at The University of Maine, where his research
group is focused on exploring the interface between enzymology,
organic chemistry, and nanotechnology. |
©
2007
Peter Navarro and Andrew Vaino
www.peternavarro.com
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Peter Navarro
Irvine, California USA
Email
| Website
DISCLAIMER:
This newsletter is written for educational purposes only. By no means do
any of its contents recommend, advocate or urge the buying, selling, or
holding of any financial instrument whatsoever. Trading and investing
involves high levels of risk. The authors express personal opinions and
will not assume any responsibility whatsoever for the actions of the
reader. The authors may or may not have positions in the financial
instruments discussed in this newsletter. Future results can be
dramatically different from the opinions expressed herein. Past
performance does not guarantee future performance.
Disclaimer
|