|
The Spread Watch exclusively analyzes
market spreads, rather than individual markets. The purpose of this
report is to discuss historical and current price relationships between
related markets with the goal of identifying high probability, high
risk/reward set ups for spread trades. A "spread trade"
consists of being long in a market(s) and simultaneously being short in
another market(s). The objective is to profit from the change in the
price difference (spread) between the markets. Sometimes inter-market
spreads (spreads between different markets) will be discussed, sometimes
intra-market spreads (spreads between different delivery contracts of
the same underlying market) will be looked at, once in a while we throw
in an inter-exchange spread (spreads between markets traded on different
exchanges), and when we are feeling exceptionally smart, we will include
ratio spreads, too. There are times when it seems that technical
analysis applied to an individual market is not easily discerned. The
result is that the analyst/trader is unable to get a clear enough
picture to form a trading strategy for that particular market. However,
there are also times when that same market is analyzed in relation to
another market and a much more obvious outlook begins to emerge. This
can create new possibilities and trading ideas for the analyst/trader.
This is what we have endeavored to do with the Spread Watch.
Interest Rates

Treasury bonds vs. Ten-year notes (NOB
spread) - The June NOB
spread (T-bonds - T-notes) recently hit a multi-month low of 2-29.
Further support is at the weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at 2-16.5
(as measured between last year's weekly low of 27/32nds and last year's
weekly high of 5-07). If the NOB spread does not establish support here
it could continue to erode to last year's weekly low of 27/32nds.
Technical resistance is at the daily February high of 4-17 (premium
T-bonds). Major technical resistance would start to be encountered about
a half-point higher: The daily contract spread high was 5-01 in
December, the 2006 weekly closing high was 5-07, the weekly
January 2006 high and the weekly February 2006 high were both at 5-01,
the 2005 weekly closing high was 5-03, the 2006 monthly closing
high was 5-08, and the 2005 monthly closing high was 5-14.
Obviously, this is an important wall of price resistance and an ideal
spot to look for an entry on the short side of this spread. Bottom
line: Look for an opportunity to short this spread if it trades near the
5-00 mark. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Ten-year notes vs. Five-year notes
- The June 10-year notes/5-year notes spread has now formed a
possible head and shoulders top pattern on the daily chart: The
September 25th high of 2-24.5 (premium 10-year notes) would be
the left shoulder, the November 30th contract high of 3-00 would be the
head, and the March 13th high of 2-24.5 would create the right
shoulder. A decline from here could take this spread back to the daily
January low of 1-31 followed closely by the weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement at 1-28 (as measured between last year's weekly low
of 1-04 and the November weekly high of 3-03). If this spread does not
establish support here it could plummet to last year's weekly low of
1-04. Technical resistance on the weekly chart is located between the
November weekly high of 3-03 and the January 2006 weekly high of 3-05.
A breakout above these highs could flatten the yield curve even more
and send the spread up to the psychological 4-00 area. Bottom
line: Watch to see if a trade set-up materializes near 3-00. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Treasury bonds vs. Five-year notes
- The June T-bonds/5-year notes spread finds important technical
support at the daily January low of 4-31 (premium T-bonds). If this low
is broken the spread should quickly hit the weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement at 4-13 (as measured between last year's weekly low of 1-31
and last year's weekly high of 8-10). Near term technical resistance is
at the daily February high of 7-09 (premium T-bonds). Bigger technical
resistance is clustered between the daily contract high of 8-00,
the weekly November high of 8-10, and the January 2006 weekly
high of 8-02. A strong breakout above this price barrier could
allow the spread to catapult to the 2005 all-time high of 9-28. Bottom
line: Watch to see if a set-up to get short materializes near 8-00.
Current Trade Strategy: Stand
aside.
Treasury bonds vs. Two-year notes
- The June T-bonds/2-year notes spread finds important technical
resistance at the head and shoulders top on the monthly chart: the 2003
high of 12-03 is the left shoulder, the 2005 high of 14-23 is
the head, and the 2006 high of 12-03 is the right shoulder. A
strong close above the 2006 high of 12-03 could indicate that the
flattening yield curve will push this spread all the way up to the 2005
all-time high of 14-23. The June T-bonds/2-year notes spread finds
support at the daily January low of 7-17. Further support is at the
weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at 7-02 (as measured between last
year's weekly low of 3-29 and last year's weekly high of 12-05). If the
spread does not stabilize in this area it could plummet to last year's
weekly low of 3-29. Bottom line: Watch to see if a trade set-up
materializes near 12-00. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

Euro bunds (10 yr.) vs. Euro BOBL (5 yr.)
- After establishing a
double bottom on the daily chart (between the January 29th low 6.22 and
the February 13th low 6.24), the June bunds/BOBL spread rallied
into resistance at a major daily Fibonacci .382 retracement and then
turned back down. If the June bund/BOBL spread plummets below the double
bottom on the daily chart, it could easily decline to last year's low of
5.54 on the weekly chart. On the other hand, if the spread can take out
the daily March high of 7.43 it could run to the major daily Fibonacci
.618 retracement at 8.17 (as measured between the contract high
of 937 and the contract low of 622). Once the spread is at 8.00 or
higher, it's time to start looking for a set up on the short side.
Historically, the spread doesn't stay above 8.00 for very long.
If the spread can clear the Fibonacci .618 retracement, expect it to
close in on the all-time high of 9.11 on the weekly continuous
chart. Bottom line: Watch to see if a trade set-up materializes to
get short near 8.00 or higher. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand Aside.
Eurodollars (calendar spread)
- The December '08
Eurodollar/December '07 Eurodollar spread closed at new highs again. The
December '08 Eurodollar is trading at a premium of 27 basis points over
the December '07 Eurodollar. Therefore, the December '08 Eurodollar has
an additional quarter-point rate cut priced in. (Remember that the price
on a Eurodollar is inverse to the US interest rate so when the
Eurodollar price goes up, the interest rate goes down). The uptrend is
still intact as this spread has exceeded the previous month's high for
five consecutive months now. Since the spread made the 2006 low last
April on the daily chart, this spread has made minor pullbacks along the
way. Until the spread reverses the current multi-month pattern of higher
highs and higher lows, traders should employ a strategy of getting long
on measured pull-backs. Bottom line: Buy dips in this bull market.
Current Trade Strategy: Stand
aside.
Currencies

Canadian dollar vs. Australian dollar
- The June Canadian dollar/Australian dollar spread is now
trading at the lowest level since June of '05. It is currently trading
just above the major weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at .0454 (premium
Canadian dollar). Further support may not be found until the weekly 2005
low of .0162. Near term resistance is at the daily March high of .0812
(The June Canadian dollar/Australian dollar spread has only broken a
previous month's high once in the last six months) and the weekly 18-bar
Moving Average (The Canadian dollar/Australian dollar spread has not
closed above this declining weekly 18-bar Moving Average since October).
A breakout above a previous month's high and a close above the weekly
18-bar Moving Average could signal a trend change for this spread. If
this occurs the spread could rebound to the current major weekly
Fibonacci .382 retracement at .0916 (as measured between last year's
all-time high of .1612 on the weekly chart and this year's current
weekly low of .0484). Further resistance is at the current major weekly
Fibonacci .618 retracement at .1181 (as measured between last
year's all-time high of .1612 on the weekly chart and this year's
current weekly low of .0484) in confluence with the weekly July reaction
low of .1182 (old support). Bottom line: Still in a down
trend, but nowhere near historic extremes. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Australian dollar vs. New Zealand dollar
- After nailing support at a major weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement in January, the June Australian dollar/New Zealand dollar
spread rebounded and closed back above the weekly 18-bar Moving Average
for the first time since August. Near term resistance is at the daily
March high of .1027 (premium Australian dollar). A close above it could
cause a challenge of the current major weekly Fibonacci .382 retracement
at .1067 (as measured between last year's all-time high of .1510
on the weekly chart and this year's current weekly low of .0793) in
confluence with the weekly October and November reaction highs of .1077
and .1076. If the rally does not end here the spread may run
to the current major weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at .1236 (as
measured between last year's all-time high of .1510 on the weekly chart
and this year's current weekly low of .0793). Important technical
support at clustered between the weekly 2005 high of .0803 (old
resistance), the major weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at .0799 (as
measured between the 2005 all-time weekly low of .0360 and last
year's all-time high of .1510), and this year's current weekly low of
.0793. A weak close below eight cents could hammer the spread down
to support just below the four cent area: the weekly 2003 low was at .0392,
the weekly 2004 low was at .0395, and the weekly all-time low in
2005 low was at .0360. This would be an historically low price
area for the spread worth monitoring for a long position. Bottom
line: The spread just reversed direction to an up trend. However, we are
more interested in buying at historic levels. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

British pound vs. Euro currency
- After peaking out at an
all-time high in mid-January, the June British pound/Euro currency
spread closed below the weekly 18-bar Moving Average for the first time
since April 2006 and signaled a trend change. Therefore, traders should
be focused on the short side of this spread. The spread then declined to
an intermediate weekly Fibonacci .382 retracement and bounced.
Currently, the June British pound/Euro currency spread is testing
resistance at a weekly Fibonacci .382 retracement around 63 and a half
cents. Further resistance is at the current major weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement at .6495 (as measured between this year's current
all-time weekly high of .6735 and this year's current weekly low of
.6107). If the spread does not peak out here it could challenge this
year's current all-time weekly high of .6735 (premium British pound). If
the June British pound/Euro currency spread stalls out and starts to
decline again after nearing these technical resistance levels, traders
should consider adding to short positions and risking above the bounce
high of the move. Near term support is at this year's current low of
.6052 on the daily chart. A close below it could cause a swift decline
to the current intermediate weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at .5787
(as measured between last year's weekly low of .5201 and this year's
current all-time weekly high of .6735 ). If the spread does not
stabilize here the spread could get plummet to the major weekly
Fibonacci .618 retracement at .5372 (as measured between the 2003
all-time weekly low of .4529 and this year's current all-time weekly
high of .6735) or even last year's weekly low of .5201. Bottom
line: The trend is down so trade from the short side of this spread.
Current Trade Strategy: Look
for opportunities to get short after this spread backs off from
resistance levels.

Euro currency vs. Swiss franc
- The June Euro currency/Swiss franc spread reached a new
all-time high of .5193 (premium Euro currency). Since this spread is in
un-charted territory, there's no old highs to look to for resistance
levels. It could keep moving toward the psychological 55 cent area. An
important support level we are watching for to identify a trend change
is the weekly 18-bar Moving Average. The Euro currency/Swiss franc
spread has not closed below the weekly 18-bar Moving Average since
December 2005. Therefore, a close below the weekly 18-bar Moving Average
would be a major event that could signal that the bull run is over. If
this happens, traders should look for opportunities to get short. This
could lead to a quick decline to the 2004 and 2005 weekly highs of .4762
and .4761 (old resistance levels) followed closely by the
current major weekly Fibonacci .382 retracement at .4757 (as
measured between the weekly 2005 low of .4081 and this year's current
all-time high of .5175 on the weekly chart). If support is not
established in this area the spread could keep moving toward the current
major weekly Fibonacci .618 retracement at .4499 (as measured between
the weekly 2005 low of .4081 and this year's current all-time high of
.5175 on the weekly chart). Bottom line: Watch for a close below
the weekly 18-bar Moving Average and then look to trade this spread from
the short side. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Euro currency vs. Japanese yen -
The June Euro currency/Japanese
yen spread reached a new all-time high of .4903 (premium Euro currency)
on the weekly chart. Since this spread is in un-charted territory (like
the Euro currency/Swiss franc spread), there's no old highs to look to
for resistance levels. It could quickly tag the psychological 50 cent
area. If it doesn't reverse there, it could add another nickel and hit
55 cents. Near term technical support is located at the weekly 18-bar
Moving Average (the Euro currency/yen spread has not closed below the
weekly 18-bar Moving Average since February 2006) followed by the most
recent weekly correction low of .4617. Since last year's weekly low was
established in February 2006, the Euro currency/Japanese yen spread has
only broken a previous weekly correction low two different times.
Therefore, a close below the weekly 18-bar Moving Average or a break
below a previous correction low on the weekly chart could be used as
indications of a trend change. If this occurs, look for a decline to the
current intermediate weekly Fibonacci .382 retracement at .4134 (as
measured between the weekly 2005 low of .2891 and this year's current
all-time weekly high of .4903). If the spread does not establish support
in this area it could decline to the weekly 2005 high of .3832 (old
resistance). Bottom line: Watch for a close below the weekly
18-bar Moving Average and then look to trade this spread from the short
side. Current Trade
Strategy: Stand aside.

British pound vs. Japanese yen
- The June British pound/Japanese
yen spread recently traded at a fourteen year high in January. In
February the spread closed below the weekly 18-bar Moving Average for
the first time since last Spring and plummeted to a three month low. The
decline off the highs was the largest correction since at least 2005.
This "overbalancing of price" could indicate that the up trend
that has been in place since mid-2005 has come to an end. Also, the
pound/yen cross rate (British pound rate divided by the Japanese yen
rate) nearly matched the 1998 high and reversed to trigger the same
trend change as the spread. This left a nice double top formation on the
weekly chart. The British pound - Japanese yen spread has rebounded back
above technical resistance at the major weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement at 112.00 (as measured between the weekly close
spread high of 114.22 and the weekly close March low of 108.42). Traders
may want to consider getting short if it backs down from this area.
However, a breakout to new highs should be a signal to liquidated the
spread and cut losses. A breakout to new highs could send this spread on
up to the weekly 1992 high of 118.22. If June British pound/Japanese yen
spread breaks below the daily March low of 104.66 (premium British
pound) it could plunge to the intermediate weekly Fibonacci .382
retracement at 102.31 (as measured between the weekly 2005 low of 83.05
and this year's current all-time weekly high of 114.22). Further support
is at the weekly 1998 high of 97.57 (old resistance) or the weekly 2005
high of 96.71 (old resistance). Bottom line: The trend has
reversed. Trade this spread from the short side. Current
Trade Strategy: The short British pound (x2)/long Japanese yen spread
entered at approximately 110.65 as per the March 23rd Trade Alert should
be liquidated only on a two consecutive day close above 114.35.
Metals

Platinum vs. Gold
- The platinum/gold spread is
testing major technical resistance between a major weekly Fibonacci .618
retracement at $588.10 and the daily November spike high of $596.80.
This may be an ideal spot to attempt a trade on the short side. However,
if the spread does not back off here it could run to the spread high of
$634.70 on the daily chart or even last year's all-time high of $655.90
on the weekly chart. Important weekly support is located at a double
bottom between the weekly December low of $481.70 (premium
platinum) and the weekly October low of $478.50. This double
bottom happens to be just below a Fibonacci .618 retracement (as
measured between the weekly 2004 low of $382.80 and the weekly 2006
all-time high of $655.90) as well. If the platinum/gold spread breaks
this double bottom it could free fall to the psychological $400 area in
confluence with the weekly December 2004 low of $395.10. (Note to
traders: This spread should be traded as a ratio of two platinum: one
gold since the platinum contracts control 50 ounces of platinum while
the gold contracts control 100 ounces of gold). Bottom line: This
is an extremely risky spread, but high risk-takers may want to look for
set-ups to get short on rallies. Current
Trade Strategy: The short July platinum (x2)/ long June gold spread
entered at $583.20 as per the March 23rd Trade Alert should be
liquidated only on a two consecutive day close above $636.00.
Energy

Crude Oil vs. Heating Oil
- Here's a
"no-brainer": Demand for heating oil rises in the winter due
to the cold weather. Because of this, it is not unusual for heating oil
prices to rise faster than crude oil prices during that time. However,
the January '08 heating oil is trading at a premium to January '08 crude
oil that has only been seen two other times in the last twenty-three
years (on a weekly closing basis). There is a carry-charge on both
contracts, but the January '08 heating oil contract is even higher due
to the additional built-in premium for seasonal demand on the winter
month deliveries. The trend for this spread is currently up as January
'08 heating oil continues to outperform the January '08 crude oil. On a
daily chart, this spread is at the highest level since September and it
has retraced half of the decline between the spread high and the spread
low. Since the spread low was established in mid-January there has only
been three times that the spread has closed out the week lower than the
previous week's close. We will continue to monitor this spread for a
potential opportunity to trade it from the short side. Bottom
line: We are monitoring this spread for a potential short trade.
Current Trade Strategy: Stand
aside.

Heating Oil vs. RBOB Blended Gasoline
- Looking at the December
delivery contracts, heating oil is currently trading at a premium of
nearly twenty-one cents above the price of RBOB gasoline. On a monthly
closing basis, there have only been four times in the last twenty-two
years that heating oil has been priced twenty cents or more above RBOB
gasoline. On a weekly closing basis, there have been just twelve
different times since 1985 that heating oil has been priced twenty cents
or more above RBOB gasoline. History suggests that the December heating
oil/RBOB gasoline spread is trading at a good place to look for a set up
on the short side. The daily closing high of the Dec. '07 heating oil/RBOB
gas spread was +2426 (premium heating oil) in December, +2498 (premium
heating oil) in January, +2314 (premium heating oil) in February,
and +2289 (premium heating oil) in March. A Fibonacci .618
retracement of the decline between the contract high of +2498 and the
March low of +1772 could take the December '07 heating oil - RBOB gas
spread back up to +2221. This area might be an ideal technical
resistance level for traders to initiate a short spread position.
However, a breakout to new spread highs should be taken as a signal to
exit the short spread and cut losses. You can always get back in if a
new signal is triggered. If the December heating oil/RBOB gasoline
spread continues to trend lower, expect it to eventually invert so that
the RBOB gasoline trades at a premium to the heating oil contract. Bottom
line: Trade the December heating oil/RBOB gasoline spread from the short
side. Current Trade
Strategy: Work orders to short the December heating oil/RBOB gasoline
spread as per the recent Trade Alerts. This spread should be liquidated
on a two consecutive day close above +25.15 (premium December heating
oil).
Livestock

Live Cattle vs. Lean Hogs
- On the weekly chart, the live
cattle/lean hog spread is trading just above 35 cents (premium
cattle). On a weekly closing basis, there are only three other times
when cattle had a premium this large over the hogs: in December 1998
cattle peaked out at a premium of 37.52 over hogs, in November
2003 cattle peaked out at a premium of 49.30 over hogs, and in
January 2006 cattle peaked out at a premium of 37.65 over hogs.
Historically, this is an ideal area to watch for a set up on the short
side of the spread. However, the front month April contracts have only a
couple of weeks left until expiration so there is really no time to
trade it. The October cattle/hog spread recently traded just below 31
cents (premium cattle) so we will monitor this one. Since the low of the
year was made in late January, the October cattle/hog spread has only
had one weekly close that was negative. Also, this spread has only
closed below the 18-day Moving Average once since late February. This
shows that the trend is currently strong on the upside. Hopefully, the
trend will continue to drive it toward the 34 area. Then we will
vigilantly watch for a set up on the short side. If the October
cattle/hog spread reverses it could drop down to the daily contract low
of 22.65 (premium cattle). A break to new lows could pressure the spread
down to the seven cent level or lower (premium cattle). Over the last
twenty-six years, 2002 is the only year where the spread did not trade
at 7.00 or lower on the weekly chart. Bottom line: Watch for a set
up on the short side of the October cattle/hog spread. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

Feeder Cattle vs. Lean Hogs
- Historically, the feeder/lean
hog spread likes to top once they trade near 49 cents (premium hogs) or
higher. On the weekly chart, we can see that this spread has annual
highs of 48.85 in 2002, 52.47 in 2003, 52.40 in
2004, 55.17 in 2005, and 53.40 last year. The October
feeder cattle/lean hog spread just broke out to a new contract high of
nearly 43 cents (premium feeders). If the rally persists, we will be
very interested in looking for a set up to get short on a reversal
signal after it trades near the 49 cent area. Since the low of the year
was made in late January, there has only been two occurrences when the
October cattle/hog spread closed negative for the week. Also, this
spread has not closed below the 18-day Moving Average since late
February. Hopefully, this will keep the momentum going and take this
spread near 49 cents. Bottom line: Watch for a set up on the short
side of the October feeder/hog spread. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

Feeder Cattle vs. Live Cattle
- In January the April feeder
cattle/live cattle spread dropped to a multi-year low of only about a
fifth of a cent (premium feeders). Historically, we like to be long
feeders/short live cattle when the spread drops to even-money or even
inverts. Feeders do not trade at the same price or a discount to live
cattle very often. The spread has since reversed and rocketed back up to
over twelve cents (premium feeders). The August spread is even higher at
a premium of 19 cents (premium feeders). Now we are monitoring the
opposite side of this spread! Historically, we like to be short
feeders/long live cattle when the feeder cattle trades at a premium of
20 cents or more over the live cattle. In the summer of 2000 feeders
peaked out at a premium of 20.57 over live cattle, in October
2001 feeders peaked out at a premium of 22.07 over live cattle,
in the summer of 2004 feeders peaked out at a premium of 33.15 over
live cattle (all-time record), in the summer of 2005 feeders peaked out
at a premium of 32.62 over live cattle, and in June of last year
feeders peaked out at a premium of 32.27 over live cattle. (Note
to traders: This spread should be traded as a ratio of four feeders:
five live cattle since the feeder contracts control 50,000 lbs. each and
the cattle contracts control 40,000 lbs. each). Bottom line:
Monitoring the August feeder/live cattle spread. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Grains

Soybeans vs. Wheat
- After hitting an all-time low
last fall, the soybeans/wheat spread has recovered and traded to the
highest level in nearly two years. Historically, this spread has been a
great buy when it trades at $1.40 or lower on the weekly chart (premium
soybeans). It then tends to run back up to at least the $3.00 area. The
July soybeans/July wheat spread exceeded $3.50 at the beginning of
April. Going back to 1980, we can see that the spread is
"pricey" when beans are trading $5.20 or more than the price
of wheat. On the weekly continuous chart, this spread peaked out at $5.53
3/4 (premium soybeans) in 1983, $5.21 1/4 (premium soybeans)
in 1984, $6.49 (premium soybeans) in 1984, $5.20 (premium
soybeans) in 1997, and $6.57 (premium soybeans) in 2004.
Therefore, if the bean/wheat spread gets above five bucks we will be
looking for a set up to short the beans and get long on wheat, if it
drops back below $1.40 or lower getting we will be looking for a set up
to buy the beans and get short on wheat. Bottom line: We are
monitoring this spread for a trade above five dollars or a trade below a
buck and a half. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
"Crush Spread" - Soybeans vs.
Soy Meal & Bean Oil - When
a soybean is "crushed", it results in soy meal and soy oil.
The relationship between the prices of soybeans and these two soy
derivatives is an important one as it is monitored by producers to
determine whether to "crush" or process the beans or not. When
the "crush spread" is high, producers will process more
soybeans to take advantage of the bigger profit margins. When the
"crush spread" is low, producers will usually scale back their
operations until the profit margin increases again. The "crush
spread" is calculated by subtracting the price of soybeans from the
sum of soy meal plus bean oil. Since we are analyzing these market
spreads from a technical and statistical viewpoint, we will skip the
fundamental discussion of this spread. Instead, we will note that the
new crop "crush spread" between November soybeans and December
meal plus December bean oil is trading in the middle of it's twenty-six
year range. The same spread for the 2008 soy crop is at a similar level.
Therefore, we are not inclined to jump into a trade at the current time.
However, we want to keep this spread on our watch list in the event that
it reaches a historical extreme in the future. Bottom line:
Nothing to do until there's a trade set up at historic extremes.
Current Trade Strategy: Stand
aside.

Soy Meal vs. Corn
- In February, the price of soy
meal dropped to a ten and a half year low against the price of corn.
These two markets are related as both are used for feed by livestock
producers. However, growing ethanol demand caused additional demand for
corn. This is most likely why it outperformed soy meal. Since 1980, the
only time that the meal/corn spread has traded at a price spread this
low was in 1996. This suggests that this price level is a good time to
consider getting long meal and short corn. Technically, this severe down
trend reversed in late March when meal rocketed back up relative to
corn. The September meal/corn spread broke above a previous month's high
for the first time in the last seven months. This spread then pulled
back to Fibonacci support area on the daily chart. Traders should
consider buying the September spread (long meal/short corn) on pullbacks
to support levels. Of course, a break to new lows should be taken as a
signal to exit the spread and cut losses. You can always get back in if
a new signal is triggered. Bottom line: Look for a set up to buy
the September meal/corn spread on a pullback. Current
Trade Strategy: Monitor for an entry levels.
Wheat vs. Corn
- The July wheat/corn spread is
trading just over 90 cents (premium wheat). Historically, this spread
has been a great short sale when it trades at the $1.60 - $1.80 area
(premium wheat). In the past, when this spread peaked out in this area
it would reverse and decline to the 60 cent mark. Quite often it would
continue it's decline and make it all the way down to a spread of only
20 cents. On the other side of the coin, this spread has been a great
buy when it trades at 20 cents or lower (premium wheat). Historically,
once the spread traded at 20 cents or lower it recovered and went back
up to at least the $1.00 mark. Bottom line: This spread has to
gain at least 70 cents or lose at least 70 cents before we are
interested in establishing a position. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

Corn vs. Oats
- On a weekly closing basis,
there are only four times in the last twenty-six years that the corn
market has been priced near $1.80 or more than the oat market: in
September 1983 corn reached a premium of $1.86 1/2 over oats, in
April of 1984 corn reached a premium of $1.81 1/4 over oats, in
July of 1996 corn reached a record premium of $2.88 over oats,
and just a few weeks ago in February 2007 corn reached a premium of $1.79
3/4 over oats. (In late February, we sent a Trade Alert to our
clients to notify them the spread was set up for a trade on the short
side!) The spread has since plunged more than a dollar off the high.
Historically, this spread is a good candidate for a short trade when it
trades near $1.80 or higher. However, if the spread continues to
plunge it could decline to 10 cents (premium corn) or less. If this
takes place the spread would be at a price level worth looking at from
the long side. Bottom line: Continue to monitor the corn/oat
spread for a trade at historically extreme price levels. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.

Wheat vs. Oats
- Historically, the wheat/oat
spread has been a good trade on the short side once it reached $2.60 or
higher (premium wheat). In October, the wheat/oat spread peaked out at
$2.89 on the weekly continuous chart and has since declined to as low as
$1.46 on the front trading month contracts. If it continues it's descent
the spread could wind up south of 90 cents or lower. Historically, this
would be the level where we want to start looking for a set up to buy
the wheat/oat spread. Thanks to the carry-charge, the December wheat/oat
spread is currently trading above $2.30. This December spread
peaked out at $2.76 in August, $2.83 in September, $2.92
1/2 in October, $2.78 3/4 in November, $2.80 in
December, $2.73 in January, $2.75 in February, and $2.63
1/2 in March. Therefore, traders have a shot at selling the December
wheat/oat spread on a rally back near the $2.60 mark.
Coincidentally, a rally to the current major Fibonacci .618 resistance
area (as measured between the daily contract spread high of $2.92 1/2
and the daily contract spread low of $2.08 1/2) would price this spread
at $2.60 1/2. Bottom line: Look for opportunities to short
the December wheat/oat spread on rallies to $2.60 or higher. Current
Trade Strategy: Stand aside.
Miscellaneous

Hogs vs. Corn
- The cost of production in the
hog business can be monitored by the price of corn. As a matter of fact,
some figures put corn prices as representing as much as nearly
three-quarters of what it costs to raise a hog. The hog: corn ratio is
often used as a historical gauge to predict where hog supplies will be
twelve to eighteen months out in the future. Traditionally, a ratio of
2:1 is used as it is roughly estimated that it takes about one 5,000
bushel contract of corn to feed the equivalent of two contracts of lean
hogs. However, we want to look at this ratio a little different. What we
want to do is compare the current underlying value of the contracts
being traded in both markets and find the ratio that would give them
close to an equal value. On February 22nd, the December lean hog
contract closed at 68.35 cents a pound. Since a contract of hogs
controls 40,000 pounds, the value of the contract on February 22nd was
$27,340 (68.35 cents X 40,000 lbs). That same day the December corn
contract closed at $4.27 3/4 per bushel. Since a contract of corn
controls 5,000 bushels, the value of the contract on February 22nd was
$21,387.50 ($4.27 3/4 X 5,000 bushels). To equalize the values, you
would need approximately 12.7 contracts of December corn for every 10
contracts of December hogs. Rounded up, the ratio of corn: hogs is
roughly 13:10. When a spread chart is created by subtracting 13 corn
contracts from 10 hog contracts, we can see that the summer of 1996 is
the only time since 1980 that this 13:10 spread ratio traded lower than
the low hit in February. Also note that this spread has shifted
substantially in favor of the hogs before the year was out. Obviously,
history suggests that this could be a good level to be short corn and
long hogs at a ratio of 13:10. On the daily chart, the 13:10 ratio
spread between December corn and December hogs reversed substantially in
late March. Technically, the trend has now changed. Traders should now
consider buying the spread (with a 13:10 ratio) on pullbacks to support
levels, such as the 18-day Moving Average or Fibonacci retracments. Of
course, a break to new lows should be taken as a signal to exit the
spread and cut losses. You can always get back in if a new signal is
triggered. Bottom line: Buy pullbacks on the December hog/corn
spread with a ratio of 13 corn to 10 hogs. Current
Trade Strategy: Monitor for an entry levels.

Crude Oil vs. Sugar
- OK, so this spread sounds
a little far fetched. But hear us out on this one! The idea behind this
spread is based on the observation that the price of crude oil can
impact the price of sugar due to it's usage in ethanol. As crude oil
prices rose substantially from 2004 to 2006, sugar rose as well. Sugar
was rapidly being converted to ethanol In South America as Brazil
grappled with gasoline shortages. Then as crude oil prices plunged in
the latter part of 2006, sugar dropped substantially as well. We are
going to look at this spread as a ratio to give the markets equal dollar
value. To calculate this ratio, first find the underlying value of the
contracts being traded in both markets. Then divide the largest value by
the smallest value. This will tell you how may contracts of the cheaper
market you need to equal the same value of that of the market with the
larger premium. For example, October crude oil closed at $69.65 a barrel
on April 2nd. Since each contract controls 1,000 barrels of crude oil
the underlying value for one contract of October crude oil is $69,650
($69.65 X 1,000 barrels). October sugar closed at 10.25 cents a pound on
April 2nd. Since each contract controls 112,000 lbs. of sugar the
underlying value for one contract of October sugar is $11,480 (10.25
cents X 112,000 lbs). Divide the value of the October crude oil contract
($69,650) by the value of the October sugar contract ($11,480) and you
get 6.06. Therefore, we need roughly six contracts of October sugar
($11,480 X 6.06 = $69,568.80) to equal the value of one contract of
October crude oil. The ratio of sugar: crude oil is roughly 6:1.
Currently, the 6:1 spread ratio of sugar: crude oil is trading at levels
only seen three other times in the last twenty-four years. In 1984,
1985, and 2005 this current level was met. Within a few months, the
spread dropped severely and changed dramatically in favor of the sugar.
The current 6:1 ratio spread between October crude oil and October sugar
is still climbing on the daily chart as crude oil continues to
outperform sugar. This ratio spread has not made a two consecutive day
close below the 18-day Moving Average in the last two and a half months.
Also, there have only been three times in the last three months when
this spread ratio has changed in favor of sugar on a weekly closing
basis. So a close below the 18-day Moving Average for two consecutive
days could be a potential trigger to enter a ratio spread consisting of
short one October crude oil and long six October sugar contracts. Of
course, a breakout to new highs after the spread is entered should be
taken as a signal to exit the short spread and cut losses. You can
always get back in if a new signal is triggered. Bottom line:
Watch for a reversal signal to enter the 6:1 ratio spread in October
sugar vs. October crude oil. Current Trade Strategy:
Monitor for an entry signal.
Disclaimer:
There is risk of loss in all commodity trading. The data contained are
believed to be reliable, but have not been independently verified by
Pearce Financial. Accordingly, such data cannot be guaranteed as to
reliability, accuracy, or completeness, and as such are subject to
change without notice. Pearce Financial will not be responsible for any
indirect, compensatory, or consequential damages, including loss of
profits which may result from reliance on this data. Pearce Financial
and/or its Principals and employees may or may not follow strictly any
or all of the trading recommendations contained herein. The
risk of trading futures and options can be substantial. Each investor
must consider whether this is a suitable investment. Past performance is
not indicative of future results.

© 2007
Pearce Financial, LLC
Archived
Editorials

CONTACT
INFORMATION
Pearce Financial, LLC
(800) 800-1399
Email l Website
Futures
trading involves risk and is not necessarily appropriate for all
investors.
Notice
& Disclaimer
|