|
I
grew up watching Bill Laimbeer, the tough blue-collar center from the
Detroit Pistons. He was always the opponent, playing opposite some of my
favorite teams of that era.
NBA.com
describes him and his well-known drop to the hardwood like this: The
Laimbeer "flop" became the stuff of legend. A grimacing
Laimbeer would often go careening to the floor in reaction to the
slightest tap from an opponent.
Pulling
just such a move from this four-time all-star center’s playbook, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the referee of choice for the
investment community has blown the whistle on numerous regulations,
when, as in the many instances that Mr. Laimbeer fooled the on-court
refs, there was no foul.
The
foul, the act of impeding the movement of a player in basketball,
depends on the quick eyes of the referee. Never have the fans played a
roll in the call yet the outcome of some of those decisions remain
burned into many a fan’s memory.
Christopher
Cox, the chairman of the S.E.C. announced on Wednesday that his
regulatory group was calling “foul” on such important regulations
such as Sarbanes-Oxley, the right for foreign companies to come to our
shores in order to list their offerings and play by our rules, hedge
fund minimums and company disclosures. Shareholders suddenly became the
opponent crying “flop”.
The
portion of Sarbanes-Oxley in question, Section 404, made it mandatory
for all companies to have their financial statements audited for
accuracy. Called a knee-jerk reaction to the historical downfall of
companies like Enron and Worldcom, Section 404 was adopted at great cost
– at least initially. The price of those auditory regulations was the
subject of the flop.
Many
larger companies have now integrated the law into their regular practice
and actually have found the cost has dropped significantly as auditors
worked the legislation into the software tools they use.
Small
businesses, the very companies that have the most to reveal in their
statements to their shareholders, will now be exempt. These companies
are the high-risk investments in the mid- and small-cap space. By
flopping, they simply added another layer of risk without adding any
additional reward to investors who purchase their shares. The money
saved from this change of rules will not find its way into the
shareholder’s pockets.
Criticism
of the rules came from the top down. Under the guise of competitiveness
and transparency, you can now expect many of these smaller firms to use
the S.E.C.’s ruling to increase the perception of shareholder value
without the accounting proof to back it up.
Allowing
small companies to tailor their accounting to suit their own
circumstances opens the door for other businesses to follow. It is a sad
day when the S.E.C. allows itself to simply react abstemiously.
The
second flop came from overseas companies looking to list and run.
Regulations, according the foreign markets biggest advocate, Henry
Paulson, our Secretary
Treasurer, had stymied the IPO market and gave many foreign companies
reason to pause before they entered into our regulated investment
havens.
The
hallmark of American markets was the regulations in place to protect
investors. The hallmark of globalization is the deconstructing of such
barriers to allow the free flow of commerce and the power of capitalism
to make the rules. If we truly wanted globalization, we should force
foreign markets to rise to our regulations. That would clarify the rules
of commerce that we so xenophobically lay claim to having created.
Mr.
Cox also sought to slap the collective wrists of hedge funds by raising
the minimum investment from $1 million to $2.5 million. While this is
will have little if any trickle down effect on the average investor, the
efforts of the S.E.C. to expose the Wall Street Laimbeers for what they
really are will now be a mote point. These cowboy investors now have the
range to themselves.
The
final flop came to the prospectus. Considering the rise of internet
ready information as a good enough reason, the S.E.C. will now allow
investors to get their shareholder information via the web. Only if
investors request a paper printout will they receive one. Only if
investors are well organized will this information have the same value
as the hard copy.
Bill
Laimbeer would have loved the way the S.E.C. blows the whistle. The
opposing team, the shareholders, should not.

© 2006 Paul Petillo
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Paul Petillo
Blue Collar Dollar.com
Portland, OR USA
(501) 313-5252
Email
| Website
|