|
Economic reality will likely prove forecasts of major international
institutions about Europe’s 2008 growth prospects wrong. So, let us
first see what they think; then we will see what I think
and why.
A number of major institutions have provided their 2008 Eurozone economic
forecast. Interestingly, many of them just recently (December 2007)
revised down their forecasts. Here is a quick survey: 2.1% by IMF –
revised its 2008 growth forecast for the Eurozone down from 2.5%; 1.9%
by OECD; 2.0% by ECB, the midpoint of their range, down from previous
midpoint of 2.3%; 2.0% by EU Commission; 1.8% by ING Financial
Markets.
Still, until the end of January, most have only modestly lowered their
economic forecasts from about 2.4% in 2007 to about 2% in 2008. They see
a Eurozone slowdown, maybe 0.3-0.4% lower than 2007.
I see a Eurozone hard-landing. I see major recessionary forces that
forecasters conveniently downplay or ignore. I see the 2008 Eurozone
economy in a tailspin. I see it on the brink of recession in early 2009.
I believe that they all these “reputable” international institutions
are too complacent and detached from reality.
A 1-2% slowdown is definitely possible. Even a cursory look at the latest
Eurozone soft-landing in 2001 suggests that it is possible. For example,
a 4% growth in 2000 was down to barely 0.5% by 2002. The point is that a
2% drop in growth in just one year is perfectly normal. Thus, while this
is certainly possible, the big question is whether it is likely.
The issue really boils down to this: will Eurozone’s growth rates in
2008 shave off just 0.3-0.4% or more like 1.5-2.0%. In disagreement with
all major institutions, I believe in the second. I have ten good reasons
to make this strong claim. So here they are.
1.
Strong
Euro.
Over the last couple of months, the Euro has risen a lot. The Eurozone
is export-driven, so this chokes the export sector. Currency hedging
still largely mitigates the problem; not so in 2008. The ECB is not
likely to take measures to weaken the currency. Thus, in 2008 the Euro
is likely to get much stronger relative to the dollar. Just watch it
happen.
2.
Tight Credit.
Somehow, major institutions explicitly assume that the Credit Crunch
will not spill over into the real economy. This is what they assumed
also for the U.S. economy. The U.S. reality proved them dead wrong, and
so will the European reality. Only this factor alone could easily slow
growth with 1%, possibly even more
3.
Rising Oil Prices.
True, oil prices in euro have not risen as much as in U.S. dollars.
Still, they are up close to 50% in 2007, from about 40 Euro at the
beginning to about 60 at the end. This has got to hurt the economy at
some point, while Peak Oil will make sure that oil prices will remain
stubbornly high despite pronounced economic weakness in the U.S. and
Europe.
4.
Rising
Gas Prices. Putin really enjoys his energy grip over Europe. RIA
Novosti reported on November 21 that “Gazprom
intends to raise gas prices for Western Europe by 60% in 2008. Deputy
CEO Alexander Medvedev, head of Gazprom Export, said on November 20 that
gas prices for Western Europe might grow from the current $250 to
$300-$400 next year.”
This has got to hurt Europe’s economy.
5.
U.S. Hardlanding.
The U.S. economy is rapidly decelerating. Whether it avoids recession or
not is irrelevant. Personally, I believe that it is already in
recession. In either case, slowing U.S. demand for European exports is
certain. I see a U.S. hardlanding and a stronger negative effect on the
Eurozone economy.
6.
Bursting
Bubbles. Major real estate bubbles are already bursting in the
U.K., Ireland, and Spain. Smaller ones in France, Portugal, Italy and
Greece are just popping. By now, U.S. current experience should have
convinced everyone that bursting real estate bubbles could drive an
economy into a tailspin surprisingly fast. Moreover, drivers of Eurozone
aggregate demand are countries with huge current account deficits: Spain
- $126B, Britain $87B, Italy - $48B, and Greece $42B. Not surprisingly,
these countries have wild real estate bubbles driving their demand, just
like in the U.S. When their bubbles burst, the demand will evaporate.
7.
Rate Hikes in the Pipeline.
The ECB began its monetary tightening in December 2005. It ended its
tightening cycle in mid 2007. Such monetary policy effects are usually
felt strongest with a 12-24 month lag. The tightening has barely taken
effect so far. It is in the pipeline and will have its strongest impact
in 2008.
8.
Stubborn ECB.
The ECB is stubborn in its stance. In its December meeting, it did not
cut rates. Moreover, it reiterated its strong anti-inflationary stance.
Whether it cuts rates in March 2008 or in June 2008, its effects will
not be felt fully until 2009. So, there is no monetary help in the
pipeline at this moment.
9.
Elevated Euribor.
Euribor is the Euro interest rate that European banks charge each other,
the equivalent of LIBOR for U. S. Dollars. Since the August Credit
Crunch, the Euribor has been elevated 50-90 basis points above the ECB
benchmark rate. This, however, is equivalent to the ECB having raised it
benchmark rate by another half or three-quarters percentage points. Its
decelerating effect will be felt in full force in 2008.
10.
Comatose Bond Markets.
Europe’s junk bond market is comatose. There has not been a single
junk-bond issue since August. Even governments have major funding
difficulties. Here is what the Financial Times reported on December 3,
“A
severe bout
of illiquidity has hit eurozone government bonds, threatening to impair
the ability of some governments and other borrowers to meet their
funding needs in coming months,
… ‘European
government bond markets are facing challenges they haven’t done for
decades,’ said Steven Major, head of fixed-income strategy at HSBC”.
I believe that these are major
factors that will affect Europe’s economic growth in 2008. By far, the
list is incomplete. The anecdotal evidence is there to fill a
dissertation: major strikes in France, massive fires in Greece, LIBOR daily
spikes of 20-50 basis points, collapsing Spanish economy, sharply lower
consumer and investor confidence in Germany and France, etc.
Undoubtedly, most of my arguments
rest squarely on monetary, financial, and credit issues. This is for a
good reason that may escape the North-American reader. The European
financial system is fundamentally different from the U.S. financial
system. In Europe, equity markets are not as important as in the United
States. Instead, the European financial system is heavily dependent on
bank credit. Therefore, the European economy is much more vulnerable to
bank problems than the U.S. economy.
The European economy is likely to
surprise downward in 2008, and so are the European equity markets.
Therefore, expect a full-blown equity bear market, although I would say
that at this point the bear market is firmly entrenched.
Investment
Advice: Conservative investors should cut down their long European equity
exposures. Aggressive investors should accumulate gold and short major
European indexes.
©
2008 Krassimir Petrov, Ph.D.
Email l Archived
Editorials
|