|

INVESTMENT
REASONS FOR BUYING GOLD PART 2
Excerpts
from GLOBAL WATCH: THE GOLD FORECASTER
by Julian
D.W.
Phillips
November 2, 2007
Too
much money looking for a home.
Cast
you mind back to previous currency declines in currencies other than the
$, so bad that the national authorities of those nations believed they
needed intervention to hold up or down exchange rates [Deutschmark –
Pound – Lira etc]. These happened in the early seventies, eighties,
nineties and the noughties we’re in now, so this is by no means new to
the currency world. For instance, the Bundesbank repeatedly had to back
off holding the Deutschmark down, as speculators matched their
intervention, in the seventies. Later the Bank of England paid a very
heavy price before it just had to give in to the attack on Sterling
[thanks to George Soros]. Then, in the Eurozone area, remember the Lira
pegs of Europe’s Exchange Rate Mechanism? Well it ain’t over yet!
Lately we’re seeing it on the Persian Gulf O.P.E.C. states and now in
Hong Kong].
But
when the going really gets rough it won’t just be the hedge funds
reaping a large crop of profits, but we’ll see nations pulling out of
currencies and piling into others. At the extreme, small nations
thinking they suddenly had become the darlings of international
investment will have to build walls to stop the inward and outward flows
of funds far larger than their competence to contain them. Surplus
holders finding it difficult to find a home for their investments will
watch as their values decline. At the same time watch speculators,
aggressive predators of the markets, charging into the herds of major
investors trying to organize changes in their portfolios in an orderly
manner, bring bouts of panic into the currencies separated from the
herd.
Unlike
the wild, speculators will not be sated with one victory, but
invigorated and will go onto the next until the tsunamis of capital
waves have run their course and the weak currency authorities accept
their losses in the form of much lower exchange rates and an obligation
to bring value back to their money. Or will nations let themselves be
infected by inflation and see currencies cheapen as they try to retain
export competitiveness in concert, giving the impression of continued
order? No doubt they will do whatever works for them in the short-term.
Will
the solid Eurozone be able to withstand the pressures of a strengthening
€ or will members such as France and Italy threaten to break ranks,
while Germany smiles under the umbrella of the E.C.B.? Can the €
contain the member nations howling as their economies demand different
remedies, different interest rate levels and different protections for
their own economic health to the dominant Eurozone?
Has
the global economy been infected by the ills of the States beyond its
own strength?
If
only China would let all this money into there and let the Yuan rise the
problem would be solved, then all could enjoy the profits from a rising
Yuan, but that is precisely what China will prevent, because it then
becomes the victim, stunting its own growth in the process. Jim Rogers
is trying to get in there and quite rightly from an investment point of
view. But why should the Yuan accommodate someone else’s currency
mismanagement? Brace
yourselves and hide in gold.
Banks,
hoping to rebuild confidence?
The
securities that caused the “Sub-Prime crisis” are still not
saleable. The only way they can be made so is if assets are put into the
packages to completely offset the problem assets and give the securities
real value. Until then, no moneyman in his right mind will touch them.
At best they will go at basement prices or be put into the hands of
hedge funds like Bridge Asset to be re-packaged as distressed debt and
gratefully given some value.
Right
now some major banks are in the process of trying to put together a
package aimed at convincing the banks responsible for this mess and
others involved that these securities [including Special Investment
Vehicles] will have real market value. We don’t know yet whether the
sponsoring banks believe this is possible or not, but under the worried
eyes of the U.S. Treasury, faltering efforts are being made to make it
possible. The new entity, called a Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit,
or M-LEC, could raise as much as $200 billion or more through the
issuance of its own securities, and use the money to buy securities that
otherwise might be dumped on the market. We find it surprising that
bankers should even attempt to convince other bankers of something they
don’t believe themselves and actually put their own money up to do so,
but there it is and we await in awe for the presentation of this
crisis’ solution.
Or
is no solution on offer? Are we going to be told that the banks will be
there to lend money to those in distress, while hoping they won’t have
to? After all the numbers being put up are so small, relative to the
amounts involved, they can only be there to give an impression of
helping? Simply put, the scheme is a front that they hope will prevent a
fire sale.
Of
course if they fail, they could precipitate a far worse crisis than the
one we saw in July and one that will take a very long time to recover
from. Imagine the sight of disrupted credit market and a Fed desperately
trying to pick up the pieces while not actually saving the investors
themselves. What does the Federal Reserve believe about the crisis? The
Federal Reserve Chairman said recently, “Despite a few encouraging
signs, conditions in mortgage markets remain difficult…. A weak
economy, he added, could reinforce problems in the credit markets”.
Not
too encouraging, I’m afraid.
The
reality is that global credit markets are in trouble, confirmed now by
the first IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG Structured Investment vehicle,
which has lost about half its value and is unlikely to repay all its
debt. Rhinebridge suffered a "mandatory acceleration event"
after IKB's asset management arm determined the S.I.V. may be unable to
pay back debt coming due, the Dublin-based fund said. Rhinebridge had
$1.2 billion in commercial paper outstanding as of Oct. 5. Rhinebridge,
Cheyne Finance Plc and other S.I.V.’s, which borrow from the
short-term commercial paper market to fund purchases of asset-backed
securities, have struggled as investors retreated from all but the
safest debt. S.I.V.’s have dumped about $75 billion of assets as a
result, prompting U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to organize an
$80 billion bank-run fund to buy some of the securities. In August,
Rhinebridge had to sell $176 million of its assets to cover obligations,
and as much $320 billion of holdings by S.I.V.’s worldwide may be
dumped if the market doesn't improve.
The
path forward for credit markets is not a happy one! Gold is no-one’s
obligation, so this is again gold positive.
Capital
Inflow Controls have started.
India
alone in one fortnight during the second half of September received
inflows of over $15bn, compared to barely averaging $16bn annually
during 2000-2006. Emerging equity markets are up over 440% since 2002
compared to barely doubling in the US and a bit more than doubling
elsewhere in the OECD.
But
emerging equities are not yet overpriced. Emerging nations are good
growth stories, particularly for those oriented towards China. Many
emerging nations are creditors now as growth infuses vast flows of
capital to them. No doubt as the developed world shows a poor
performance relative to these rapidly growing nations, alongside
commodities, superior returns are being achieved.
The
excessive amounts of capital, a consequence of deficit trade financing,
[far too much money] will attempt to squeeze into those markets, taking
values beyond achievable expectations, leaving a empty big drop below
prices should the expectations turn bad. But where the growth does
continue in the nations providing commodities for the major growth
nations such as China, prices will hold at higher levels, as the price
will be in depreciating currencies, such as the U.S. $. Hence, as with
oil, these prices will not be seen as high once the depreciated value of
the currency is brought to bear. But there is such a huge amount of
capital readying itself to move into sound markets, the dangers of
overpricing will have to trigger nations to prevent asset bubbles from
forming with capital inflow controls.
Right
now many, many large institutions are researching the gold market, the
commodities markets and are as keen as ever to go into emerging markets.
Just a tiny portion of the institutional money lying around, estimated
to be just under $200 trillion a massive tsunami of capital, is in part,
about to go walkabout. And if they can get in, most emerging nations are
just not capable of absorbing these flows. As in South Africa’s case
where they are getting in the country can become a fool’s paradise
believing they have attracted such capital because they are attractive
investment homes. A dropping interest or exchange rate will soon cure
that.
So
what can these poor nations do? As we wrote last week, many will turn to
impose Capital Inflow restrictions. To those who remain unbelievers and
think we are pipe dreaming, please note that recently, the Indian
government recently moved to impose restrictions on non-resident equity
inflows, which led to a sharp correction in the Indian stock markets and
the INR, from which the Indian markets have only partially recovered.
The curbs were thought to [reasonably so, in view of the Bank of
India’s objective] keep the Indian Rupee low against the U.S.$. Since
then the Rupee and the Stock markets have recovered to some extent.
As
we have written in last week’s issue we warned that many emerging
economies will find it impossible to continue current policies that
attempt simultaneously to target exchange rates and the pursuit of
independent
monetary
policy, while allowing the free movement of capital. This trilemma is
just not workable, so be certain that such and similar measures will
spring up in many other countries.

© 2007 Julian D.
W.
Phillips
Archived Editorials
This
opens wide the possibility of great profits and great losses for both
individuals and institutions who are able to act quickly, decisively and
with knowledge beforehand. We at Gold & Silver Forecaster have
considerable expertise and experience in profiting hugely from these
situations going back 36 years. [Please contact us for more details].
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Global Watch -
The Gold Forecaster
P. O. Box 809
Somerset West
Cape 7130
South Africa
Email l GoldForecaster.com

Subscription Information l Notice
& Disclaimer
|