|

CENTRAL
BANK SALES OVER THE NEXT
19 MONTHS TO REDUCE BY 400 TONNES?
Excerpts
from GLOBAL WATCH:
THE GOLD FORECASTER
by Julian D.W.
Phillips
February 29, 2008
When
it was learned that the Treasury was to support the sale of 400 tonnes
of gold all were surprised. We
realized that Congress would still have to be asked to approve the sale.
When the mist cleared and we saw in sharp focus what lay ahead we
realized that much more needed to be done before the sales became a
reality. These are the steps still
to be overcome for these sales to take place:
1.
The
I.M.F. must trim their staff, by 15%. This is not a quick action?
2.
The
U.S.A. must get the approval of Congress; an approval that was denied
them in the past.
3.
They
must get the approval of 85% of their members and the U.S.A. accounts
for 17% of the votes. They must find another
68% of their members in favor.
4.
They
must organize their sales as below.
Should
these obstacles be overcome at some point in the future, the proceeds
would then be used to finance an expected income gap in this fiscal year
of about U.S.$224m and the balance be placed in a fund from which the
income can be used to fund the I.M.F.’s overheads.
What
Type of Sales Will These Be?
The
Second Amendment to the Articles of Agreement in April 1978 required
that the IMF:
When
dealing in gold, avoid managing its price or establishing a fixed price.
The IMF
may sell gold outright on the basis of prevailing market prices, and may
accept gold in the discharge of a member's obligations at an agreed
price, based on market prices at the time of acceptance.
The IMF
does not have the authority to engage in any other gold
transactions—such as loans, leases, swaps, or use of gold as
collateral—nor does it have the authority to buy gold.
The IMF
has a systemic responsibility to avoid causing disruptions to the
functioning of the gold market.
Profits
from any gold sales should be used whenever feasible to create an
investment fund, of which only the income should be used.
How
will it achieve this? It is thought that the I.M.F. will only sell to
another Central Bank, but we don’t see any such stipulation in their
articles, but it is one of their options.
In the past they have used the auction method of selling gold [at
the highest offered price], but again this is not stipulated in their
Articles. They also have the
right to choose one or more bidders at this price. The fact that the
Central Bank Gold Agreement was mentioned implies that they could sell
in the same manner and on the “open” market.
In a background paper, the IMF said if the
gold was sold on the ‘open’ market, as opposed to off-market
transactions, the sales would be phased over time to avoid market
disruptions. This
gives us direction on how the sales will occur.
The current European agreement limits banks' gold sales to no
more than 500 tonnes a year.
Central
Bank sales over the next 19 months to reduce by 400 tonnes, replaced by
I.M.F. sales?
Perhaps
the most important, if somewhat vague statement coming from the I.M.F.
at the end of January meeting said, “Secondly, the sale should take
place within the existing Central Bank Gold Agreement, that is to say it
would not be additional to sales already programmed by central banks,
but would be accommodated by reductions in the amounts of gold that the
central banks might sell under the Central Bank Gold Agreement.
And thirdly, we
have emphasized that the sale should be undertaken in a very careful way
in terms of their periodicity amounts and manner of sale such as not to
disturb the market.”
We
sat and stared at this for a while making sure the words did actually
mean what they said and were not the writers mistake, but there it is,
no mistake! They are
saying, “it would not be additional to sales already programmed by
central banks, but would be accomodated by REDUCTIONS in the amount of
gold that the central banks might sell under the Central Bank Gold
Agreement”!
By
our reckoning there are only 537+ tonnes left of the “announced
sales” plus a possible Spanish 100 tonnes of “unannounced sales”
left to sell. If we
interpret their words correctly, the 400 tonnes from the I.M.F. would
replace 400 of these tonnes, leaving the signatories to the agreement
possibly selling another 139 tonnes of “announced sales” and a
possible 100 tonnes of “unannounced sales” over the next 19 months?
Perhaps this is why the sales pace under the agreement has slowed
down so much? Bear in
mind the I.M.F. proposed sales, if it can hudle the remaining obstacles,
may be some time away still. There’s
no hurry for the signatories to sell the little left, so they can afford
to wait still?
Will
the Sales Impact the Gold Price?
Perhaps
these obstacles can be overcome by September 26th, 2008, at
which point these proposed sales –were they to occur thereafter over
the next year. With
the statement above from Crocker of the I.M.F. we see that the full
compliment of gold sales from the C.B.G.A. will not be met, and will
fall to around 239 tonnes over the next 19 months.
Add the 400 tonnes of the I.M.F. and the amount to sell over 19
months remains the same [plus a potential 100 tonnes from Spain] still
only 8.4 tonnes a week, if indeed they will sell what they announced?
q
The
‘ceiling’ of 500 tonnes ensures that all “Official” sales will
not affect the gold price.
q
The
I.M.F. have said they will not disturb the gold price.
q
Lower
sales than the “ceiling’ of 500 tonnes would actually spur the gold
price higher still.
q
And
against this positive picture, all the sales of the European Central
Bank in the past [the “Washington Agreement” from 2000 to 2004 and
the Central Bank Gold Agreement 2005 to 2009] have not prevented the
gold price from nearly quadrupling.
This
is extremely positive for the gold price!
If
they went, instead, to the auction method it would simply be an open
invitation to Russia or China or another Central Bank to bid in the
knowledge that they will get the gold without driving up the gold price.
Once it is known they achieved the purchase, it will be known that gold
is being sought after by Central Banks. Add to that the fact that the
sales will be limited to 400 tonnes. This
removes the so-called Central Bank gold sales “overhang” from the
market.
It
is clear that there is a spirit, quite rightly, that is within
“Official Circles” that does not like to further gold sales.
If
they sell direct to a Central Bank then their attempts to abandon the
use of gold in the monetary system will in reality, if not in theory, be
undermined. This can only be positive for the gold price!
“So
any which way you look at it these potential sales if they come to pass,
will, in reality, have a positive impact on the gold price.”

© 2008 Julian D. W.
Phillips
Archived
Editorials
HIGHLIGHTS
FOR SUBSCRIBERS
“Global Watch – The Gold
Forecaster”
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Global Watch -
The Gold Forecaster
P. O. Box 809
Somerset West
Cape 7130
South Africa
Email l GoldForecaster.com

Subscription Information l Notice
& Disclaimer
|