|
Natural
Gas Market Update
There appears to
be a great deal of confusion as to the true state of the North American
natural gas market. Washington
politicians, who are often long on rhetoric and short on results, tell
us we are facing a natural gas crisis. NYMEX futures traders seem to think the potential for a crisis is
dissipating after several weeks of strong storage injection numbers.
I believe we are in the early stages of a natural gas crisis and
provide three fundamental reasons to support this claim. (Please note,
in below tables I have used the most recent data available.)
1)
Falling natural gas production in the US and Canada.
One of the oldest and best collectors of petroleum
data in the United States is the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC). After the massive East Texas field was discovered in 1930, the
country was awash in oil. The East Texas discovery drove the price of oil from $1.10 a
barrel to only $.10 a barrel. In
1932, the Texas legislature, in an effort to support the price of oil,
passed a law giving the RRC control over oil production. (It should be noted that OPEC used the RRC as a blueprint for its
foundation). If a well
operator went over his quota, the RRC sent out the Texas Rangers to put
a stop to the cheating.
Today, the Texas RRC monitors both oil and natural
gas production. With Texas producing over 30% of all natural gas in the
United States, the monthly natural gas production numbers issued by the
Texas RRC are a proxy for US production.
Natural gas production from the state of Texas has
been in a steady state of decline for the past 12 months.
Texas
Natural Gas Production*
*Source: Texas
Railroad Commission
After only a 1% increase in natural gas
production in 2002, Canada is on track to experience its first
production decline is several decades. According Natural Resources Canada, March 2003 production totaled
529 billion cubic feet (bcf), down 3% from March 2002 levels.
I expect several more months of year-over-year production
declines (between 3-5%) as Canadian producers struggle to replace
falling production out of Ladyfern and elsewhere.
As I was putting the finishing touches on this
month’s newsletter, the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board handed down
its final decision to shutter 900 natural gas wells in northern Alberta
to protect the bitumen surrounding the reservoirs. Bitumen is the raw material used to make synthetic crude oil. The shutdown, which will take effect on August 1st,
will affect wells which account for 2% of Alberta’s total natural gas
production.
2) North American natural gas consumption
continues to rise.
North America’s decline in natural gas production is
coming at a time of growing consumption. The below table clearly illustrates Canada’s healthy natural
gas consumption growth over the past year. Future years are certain to bring even higher
consumption levels as several synthetic crude
projects in northern Alberta come online.
US natural gas consumption continues to remain
strong despite a sluggish economy. While makers of fertilizers and chemicals continue to head for
countries with cheaper natural gas, there still remain two growth areas
for natural gas consumption. The
proliferation of McMansions, thanks to the easy money of Alan Greenspan,
that dot the landscape of suburban America, are certain to keep a floor
under US natural gas consumption. Over
70% of all new homes built in the past five years use natural gas as
their primary heating source. Very few homeowners will let their biggest
asset go to ruin no matter how high natural gas prices go in the next
few winters.
The other big driver of US natural gas consumption will
be as feedstock for natural gas fired power plants. While the pace of new gas fired power plant construction has
slowed in recent months, there is a strong possibility that gas fired
power plant construction will continue for the foreseeable future.
As discussed in the June 2003 issue (see Boric Acid and Natural
Gas), the aging nuclear power plant fleet in the US is a sleeping giant
for natural gas consumption. While
there are only a handful of nuclear facilities that are up for
re-certification in the next few years, the end of this decade is a
different story. In the
years 2009 to 2011, nearly 25% of the nuclear power producing facilities
in the US will be up for re-certification. While it is unclear how many of today’s active reactors will be
de-commissioned, any reduction in US nuclear generating capability will
likely be replaced by natural gas fired power plants.3) North American natural gas storage levels
remain below historical norms.
While many market observers have become concerned
about the fall out from 2 months of high natural gas storage injection
numbers in the US, I believe the US natural gas storage picture remains
very bullish. The key to
understanding the natural gas market is to look at the supply picture.
As previously mentioned, production continues to fall in both the
US and Canada. The quote below is from the US Energy Information
Agency’s storage report for the week ending July 4, 2003:
“Working gas in storage was 1,773 Bcf as of
Friday, July 04, 2003, according to EIA estimates. This
represents a net increase of 111 Bcf from the previous week. Stocks
were 580 Bcf less than last year at this time and 317 Bcf below the
5-year average of 2,090 Bcf…..At 1,773 Bcf, total working gas is
below the 5-year historical range.”
While the year-over-year supply deficit has come
down in recent weeks, I believe the reasons for the deficit reductions
are temporary in nature. Very
mild early summer weather and fuel switching to distillates have
accounted for a significant portion of the recent high injection numbers
in the US. With the arrival
of more normal summer weather in the US and surging crude oil prices
(making distillates less competitive), I have serious doubts we will
continue to see above average storage injections much longer.
The natural gas storage picture in Canada is equally
bullish. With Canadian
storage 37% less than year ago levels (228 BCF vs. 361 BCF in 2002)
Canada also has a significant storage deficit to make up before the
start of the winter heating season. With the heating season starting a month earlier in Canada than
in the US, we are nearly
certain to see a significant curtailment of imports
to the US in coming weeks.
Energy
Apathy
Apathy towards an investment class is a sure
sign tremendous returns await patient investors. In 1980, Dr. Marc Faber gave a speech about US government
bonds at an investment conference in Hong Kong. Dr. Faber’s speech was
scheduled for the afternoon session of the conference. The topic of the morning session was gold. Needless to say, the auditorium was standing room only for
the morning discussion on gold. At
a time of over 15% interest rates on US government bonds,
Dr. Faber only had one person in the audience for his speech. Talk about apathy towards an investment class!! After
thanking the one gentleman who attended, Dr. Faber immediately sold all
of his gold and loaded up on long-term US bonds.
Gold has still not returned to its highs of 1980 and all
high quality bonds were a great investment and have outperformed
equities. (Today the
roles have reversed, gold is a tremendous investment class and US
Treasuries should be avoided.)
I believe we are currently witnessing three
distinct types of apathy towards energy: media, industry and investor
apathy. This indifference,
coupled with the sector’s strong fundamentals, has created one off the
most bullish signals that energy is going to be an outstanding
investment class for the next decade.
The amount of apathy towards energy
as an investment class by the financial media is truly mind boggling. While recently perusing several widely read financial
periodicals, it struck me as unfathomable that many do not contain even
a mention of energy much less a story. Some of the worst offenders continue to have entire sections
dedicated to technology investing; while completely ignoring the
world’s largest industry, energy.
In an environment that is truly nirvana for North
American E&P companies (high energy prices, low interest rates and
very good rig availability), we have seen only a modest increase in
activity. It
appears that many E&P management teams are
still not convinced that high energy prices are here to stay. This lack of conviction shows up in a stagnating number of
rigs actively searching for oil and gas. We have seen the Baker Hughes US natural gas rig count hover
around the 900 mark for the past 9 weeks. There are simply not enough rigs to stem the production decline
of natural gas in the US.The disinterest towards energy among the investment
community is truly amazing considering that energy investments offer a
risk/reward ratio that only comes along once in a generation.
Just about every firm in the Model Portfolio is on track for
record cash flow and earnings in 2003 and yet many of the stocks still
trade at single digit price/earning multiples. With natural gas prices likely to hold the $5US range for the
balance of the year and oil stubbornly remaining over $30US, I see
little to derail record performance for all of 2003.
While the fundamentals of energy equities are
extremely strong, I consider the recent stock market activity in the US
the most bullish signal that energy shares will head significantly
higher. The quote below can be found in Michael Santoli’s “The Trader” column in the
June 14, 2003 issue of Barron’s:
“A ranking of S&P 500 stocks by their returns
since the recent market low March 11 reveals a pattern among the lagging
80 stocks. The list is
thick with energy and consumer staples companies, many with fairly
bankable earnings and above-average dividend yields…”
The fact that the best performers of this bear
market rally are the market’s most speculative issues clearly
indicates that the general bear market in equities is not over. Until market participants become painfully disabused of the
notion that purchasing the market’s riskiest, highest beta stocks is
the way to compensate for previous portfolio losses, the outstanding
fundamentals of the energy sector will continue to be ignored.
Bank
of Canada Lowers Rates
On June 15th, the Bank of Canada lowered
its key overnight lending rate 25 basis points to 3%.
This caused the
Loonie to give up previous gains against the US dollar.
One US dollar now buys $1.39 of Canadian assets. The official
statement the BOC gave as reasons for the rate cut ranged from mad cow
disease to SARS but mostly focused on the appreciation of the US dollar
against the Canadian dollar.
I have repeatedly stated in this newsletter my
strong belief that the US and Canadian dollars are going to parity
before the end of 2007. The
recent rate cut by the BOC does no alter this belief. The US is likely to resume its descent against the Canadian
dollar and other commodity currencies before too long due to the anemic
state of the US economy. The
ballooning US federal budget deficit, the growing federal debt and the
large US current account deficit will make it hard for the US dollar to
stay afloat much longer.

© 2003 Bill Powers,
Editor
Canadian Energy Viewpoint
See Mr. Powers' Cover Page for Bio and
Archived Editorials

CONTACT
INFORMATION
Bill Powers
773-271-7574
Email | Website
Information presented in
this newsletter was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but
accuracy and completeness and opinions based on this information are not
guaranteed. Under no circumstances is this an offer to sell or a
solicitation to buy securities suggested herein. The editor may have an
interest in the companies mentioned. All data and information and
opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.
|