|
There’s a remarkable
exchange in this morning’s Yahoo! message board for KBH, the big
homebuilder, some of which appears below. It needs little explanation,
other than to say that REO stands for “real estate owned,” a measure
of what banks have repossessed from borrowers.
Echos of 1990?
by: PBernhardt (M/Albany, CA)
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Sell
04/17/06 09:34 am
I found this in the
comments section
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=18675105&postID=114523706536759710
(res ipsa loquitor)
"I'm the former
RTC REO Marketing Analyst, but prefer to be Anonymous because I know
some people are going to become very alarmed and very angry when I
discuss what happened the last time.
When I left the RTC at
HomeFed Bank in 1991, the RTC was in the process of closing down. It was
the tail end of that cycle.
While at the RTC, I
personally sold bank REO for 20%-30% of what it appraised for just two
and three years earlier. Not for 20-30% less, but 20-30% of that real
estate's former value from just 2-3 years earlier.
Mortgage defaults and
bank REO are increasing rapidly already as of today. Keep in mind that
banking regulators will never give lenders leeway to play the market so
to speak, or hold on to REO in the hope of an improving market to get a
better price or to cover their nut (i.e., mortgage). They HAVE to get
those non-performing assets OFF their books. I have lots of stories
about those days and I'm convinced this time it will be far worse
because back then we didn't have any of the Geo-Political crises we have
now (rampant illegal immigration, wars, we're a bigger debtor nation, we
have a bigger trade imbalance with China than we ever had with Japan I'm
sure, etc., etc.), interest rates that were artificially depressed to
levels not seen in 40 years, dangerous and irresponsible lending
products, and because the advent of the internet now facilitates the
free flow of information much faster. Look at all the housing bubble
blogs there are with all the reliable data they are providing. It's
almost an avalanche of data supporting why all but the most ill-informed
should not be looking to buy for at least 2 years.
I remember telling
people in 1989-1990 that the writing was on the wall and nobody listened
because there was no publicly available data (brokers like me knew based
on MLS data only available to members) to cite in support of the
impending crash, and the media, especially newspapers, weren't going to
report it because their largest advertising constituency is
Realtors/brokers.
With the internet and
the info that is available on it, you'll soon see the amount of time it
takes for real estate to crash significantly compacted this time. Just
look how fast things have turned bad since just before the holiday
season started last year.
Homeowners are now
increasingly starting to put their homes up for sale to get an early
start on the summer home buying season, and some are just now realizing
how inventories on their local MLS's have tripled, quadrupled and worse.
As of today, ZipRealty reports that San Diego is just about 4 weeks away
(based on the average daily increase in inventory I have been monitoring
since late last summer) from breaking the old record of 19,250 during
the last down cycle.
I know some have said
that you can't use that figure because San Diego has a larger population
today, but I disagree and here's why. There are far more FSBO related
companies today than 15 years ago because of the Internet and
collectively, many of their their thousands of listings are not included
in the ZipRealty figures. Also keep in mind that last year population in
the County went down, and don't be surprised when it goes down again
after this year finishes up.
Look how the tone of
articles from mainstream media in the last 2 months alone have changed.
Panic has already set in for many, but they have no idea how ugly it
will get."
Echos of 1990?
ptII
by: PBernhardt (M/Albany, CA)
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Sell
04/17/06 09:35 am
"The one thing I'm
always amazed to find out is how many borrowers think that when their
home goes back to the bank, that's the end of their problems. What they
don't realize is that if the lender writes off or forgives any debt to
them (i.e., short sale, etc.) the former borrower will get a 1099 for
the amount of that forgiven debt as though they had received it as
income. If they sold their home through a short sale at the begining of
the year and they got a 1099 by January 30th of the following year, they
not only have to pay taxes on that forgiven debt, but now penalties and
interest too, because it was due (unless you pay estimated quarterly
taxes) at the time the debt was forgiven. I personally knew a borrower
who had 11 rental properties and after he lost the first one to
foreclosure, he got hit with a huge IRS penalty. He started selling off
the others, but had huge tax hits because of depreciation recapture, and
because the market was getting worse, he could not sell some for what he
owed. I was an underwriter at the time and on paper, just prior to
losing his first property he had equity of over $1,000,000; but in the
end he lost it all because he couldn't sell in a market where bank REO
dominated, and when he tried, the tax hit from depreciation recapture
buried him further.
The same sheeple
psychology that drove everyone to ignore cash flow fundamentals by
flipping condos and homes based on the greater fool theory, will invert
like it did in 1990, and for the next few years you'll hear nothing
about real estate except how terrible of an investment it is, and it
will be true for those who either bought with high leverage or
refinanced with max cash out based on the value of their homes in the
last 2 years.
And anyone who says
rents will catch up to all the adjusting I.O. and ARM loans is in
fantasy land.
Between 1990 &
1994, I had my landlord reduce my rent three times by simply giving
notice that I could rent a better condo at the beach for less. And you
know why that's possible? Because of all the bank REO that was (and will
be again) unloaded on the market. Owners who buy REO can easily compete
on price alone. Market rent is meaningless to them. I rent a $750K place
now and have been renting since we sold our residence in 2002 and our
rent is under $2,000 and in the 5 years we'll have been here, the rent
will have only increased by 3% from 2002 through 2007.
To those who ask how
long to wait and how low will it get, here's my answer. Even though the
Internet will compact the time it takes to crash, I still say don't even
think about buying for at least another 18 months. Don't be fooled by
ocassional news or market conditions that lead you to think things have
turned better because that always happens on the way down, just as it
does with stocks on companies you know are "Dead Man Walking".
As far as the
percentage, don't think in terms of what percentage it will go down
relative to the overall market, but what discount you can get on
hardship situations, like bank REO. I think you will be able to get
property for 20-30% of what it appraised for in 2005. Trust me. Even if
you don't for whatever reason, others who are diligent will.
In 1995, my wife and I
bought a La Jolla 1-BR condo one block to WindanSea beach with a peek
ocean view off the balcony. It was in default and we bought it for a
total price of $104,000 AND got the broker to kick in half his
commission. That's how bad it was last time : )"
Re: Echos of
1990? ptII
by: marc_wohlbier
Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Sell
04/17/06 10:27 am
I can vouch for what
you are saying I was with the FDIC from '87 to '94 at the Houston
Consolidated Office (Bank Liquidation) there is no doubt that this
period is worse than then. This company, if I read the earnings report
correctly, had a 40% drop in net profit yet it keeps hanging. The
crooked deals that I saw were not to be believed and yes we sent out
1099's like snow flakes with debtors calling us in a rage. These hb
stocks should be at half the current value and be under investigation
for all the crooked deals in which they are involved but that won't
happen. Once Clinton got in and Bill Siedman out huge pools of assets
were bulk sold with the debtors buying back their own notes at .10 on
the dollar with the tax payer picking up the tab. Gold is up $10.00
today and HB stocks are being supported by means that are more foul than
fair IMHO.

© 2006 John Rubino
DollarCollapse.com | Financial
Sense Editorial Archive
John
Rubino is
the author of The
Coming Collapse of the Dollar (co-written with James Turk), How
to Profit From the Coming Real Estate Bust (Rodale, 2003), and Main Street, Not Wall Street (William Morrow, 1998). A former Wall
Street financial analyst and columnist with theStreet.com, he currently
writes for Fidelity Magazine, CFA Magazine, Kiplinger's
Personal Finance, and Merrill Lynch Advisor. He lives in Moscow, Idaho.
Contact by Email.
|