|
Back in January I
posted a short
piece on how banks tend to pile into whatever is hot just as
it’s about to implode. Bank of America’s acquisition of credit
card giant MBNA, at a time when consumer debt was setting records
was, I predicted, the deal that would put an exclamation point at
the end of history’s longest credit boom.
Okay, maybe that
was a little premature. The real orgy, it seems, is just
beginning:
Earlier this week, money center bank Wachovia agreed to buy Golden
West Financial, California’s second largest S&L, for $25
billion. The deal gives Wachovia 120 new branches in California
and more than doubles its home-loan portfolio. And—get
this—almost all of Golden West’s mortgages are adjustable
rate. ``We now have the geographies that we have coveted in this
deal, and we will focus on these high-growth markets,'' said
Wachovia CEO Kennedy Thompson.
The
next day, MarketWatch ran an article titled “Wachovia deal
may force more mergers”, which concluded that other banks will
now feel compelled to make big acquisitions “to avoid losing
ground in the huge California market.” And then today Bloomberg
reports that Merrill Lynch is shopping around for a major mortgage
lender. As amazing as it sounds, the big banks are suddenly hot to
get into real estate, especially California real estate.
So…let’s take this piece by piece, working from broad to
narrow:
Household debt. In 1990 American families owed
banks, car dealers and credit card companies about $3.6 trillion.
Today we owe nearly $12 trillion. The cost of servicing this debt eats
up about 17% of disposable income, a level typically associated
with the onset of recession. AND since much of this debt is in the
form of variable rate mortgages and adjustable rate credit cards,
its cost is ratcheting up as rates rise across the yield curve.
Not the profile of a society about to make mortgages a growth
market.

The
housing market in general. That some formerly hot markets
are imploding is common knowledge by now. But it’s still fun to
see the numbers and hear the stories.
From the Honolulu
Star Bulletin, May 6: Honolulu home sales down 41% year over
year in April, and Maui condo sales off by 50%.
The New York
Times, May 9: The inventory of homes for sale in the Fort
Lauderdale area has quadrupled, year over year, to 20,000.
Dow Jones
Newswire, May 8: “Preliminary reports from builders Hovnanian
Enterprises Inc. (HOV) and Toll Brothers Inc. (TOL), whose
quarters ended April 30, indicate demand is falling faster and
more sharply than previously thought, and that the pullback is no
longer confined to hot markets that had seen sharp home price
run-ups in the past few years. Hovnanian's orders fell 20% in its
fiscal second quarter - an about-face from the 5.5% order growth
reported in its fiscal first quarter. Toll's orders declined 32%,
which is steeper than the 29% dropoff posted in its fiscal first
quarter.
For Toll, the order decline was across the board as all of its
geographical regions reported year-over-year decreases in demand.
Chairman Robert Toll attributed the declining demand to higher
cancellations and to speculative buyers who are dropping out of
the market and putting the homes they recently acquired up for
sale. Although Toll said his company doesn't sell to speculators,
‘we have certainly been impacted by the overall increase in
supply.’"
According to real estate consultancy Majestic Research, new-home
sales in all 40 markets it tracks fell during February and March.
Some examples:
Washington, D.C., -22%
Tucson, Ariz. -50%
Phoenix -37%
The major homebuilders, instead of pulling back in the face of
falling sales, are apparently trying to make it up on volume.
According to Dow Jones, “Toll Brothers plans to open 80
communities during the next six months, and expects to wrap up
fiscal 2006 with 295 subdivisions, up from 230 in fiscal 2005.”
As all those adjustable rate mortgages ratchet up, it’s getting
harder for last year’s marginal homebuyers to make ends meet.
According to real estate consultancy RealtyTrac, “A total of
323,102 properties nationwide entered some stage of foreclosure in
the first quarter of 2006, a 72 percent year-over-year increase
from the first quarter of 2005 and a 38 percent increase from the
previous quarter.”
The California
housing market. 80% of San Diego homebuyers chose
adjustable rate mortgages in both 2004 and 2005. Home sales
are down 46% in Sacramento, 30% in San Francisco, and 50% in Los
Angeles/Long Beach, year-over-year. From the New York Times: “A
house at 57 Marina Boulevard in San Rafael, across the bay from
San Francisco, was originally listed at $1.45 million. The owner
recently dropped the price to $949,000 when a competing house on
the same street lowered its price to $959,000, from $989,000…In
Marin County, the prices of about a quarter of all listings have
been reduced….In Santa Cruz, inventories have tripled to 124
days, from 42 days.”
As for the idea that California’s population will keep growing
because everyone wants to live there, real estate analyst Rich
Toscano at Piggington.com notes that San Diego’s population
actually shrank in 2005. "But it's even worse than that,
because much of the population growth of recent years has been due
to births. Until Countrywide goes live with their Fetal Lending
Division, we can probably just focus on migration: people moving
in and out of San Diego (or, put another way, population growth
with the effects of births and deaths removed).” Analyzed this
way, it turns out that for three years running, more people have
moved out of San Diego than have moved in—and the trend is
strengthening.

More from the New
York Times: “For the first time in nearly a decade, you can
smell the anxiety. The listing agent for a four-bedroom home on
Scripps Trail in San Diego informed other agents in the
multiple-listing service that a "very, very motivated seller
will entertain all reasonable offers" and "will help
with closing costs." The house was listed in September at
$810,000. After a previous price cut, the seller is now willing to
entertain offers as low as $685,000. But they didn't attract much
interest…Inventories in the San Diego area have risen 25 percent
in the last year, to more than 19,000 unsold homes, a record.”
And on a personal note, my little town in northern Idaho is
crawling with transplanted Californians. A neighbor (and recent
immigrant from Sonoma) is a real estate appraiser, and says that
the last five houses he’s done have been for Californians moving
in.
A final word from Rich Toscano: “There has been zero upward
price pressure this spring, for the first spring in who knows how
long. It looks like things are truly going to start falling
apart.”
Classic short. What does all this mean for banks?
Well, since they make money by lending it out and getting paid
back, a crash in home sales and a spike in defaults would
seem to be a bad thing. As Fleckenstein Capital’s Bill
Fleckenstein put it in early April:
“It is indeed the financial institutions that are most at risk
in the real-estate market (which is not to say that consumers and
speculators won't get hurt). The lenders will bear the brunt of
the pain, because in many cases, they loaned the entire purchase
prices of many homes. As I have said often, the housing bubble has
been more a lending bubble. It will be the impairment of the
financial institutions that will stop the flow of credit to the
real-estate market. In turn, that will accelerate the collapse in
house prices somewhere along the way.”
So
Wachovia has done us two favors with one stroke of a pen. First,
it has validated the idea that the longer a credit expansion goes
on the crazier bankers become. Second, it has handed the Sound
Money community another classic short. When the housing crash
moves from business section to front page, and stories of
dispossessed formerly middle class Californians are everywhere,
and bad loans are chewing through bank income statements like
demented termites, the owners of Wachovia LEAPS puts will be rich.
Load up the wagons!
|