Moneyization:
The global financial phenomenon of individuals and businesses
moving their funds to monies in which they have the highest
confidence, or money which has a higher store of faith.
Or,
Understanding Up and Down
Direction
is an essential parameter that must be understood. Gold investors
have the right direction while paper asset groupies continue going
off the wrong way. Perhaps the fundamental problem is the
education of so many of today’s professional money
“managers.” Being able to turn on a computer does not make one
a qualified investor. Apparently though, that is perhaps the only
skill required of so many of those managing other people’s
money. Those comments may be somewhat of a digression from our
proper “direction,” but that is to be expected when trying to
understand the “red or black” betting that has replaced
investment in today’s world. Perhaps the CFA should be replaced
with the CRF, Certified Roulette Forecaster. If you doubt this
criticism, read some of the antics in what is called correlation
trading!
Knowing
what is up and what is down is part of understanding direction. The
dollar value of Gold tells us something about the direction of the
dollar’s value. A lot of effort is expended trying to guess
the direction, trend, support, resistance for many purported
measures of the dollar’s value. Simply looking at the dollar
value of Gold gives you the answer. Gold is the only near
efficient market for the pricing of national monies, and that
includes the formally mighty dollar.
The
dollar price of Gold also gives you the Gold price of a dollar.
The meaning of that almost cute statement is important, and should
not be dismissed. Understanding this fundamental, but simple,
concept will help one understand the implications of the economic
and monetary policies that are influencing tomorrow’s value of
your wealth. Gold’s rising price in dollars, and a goodly number
of other national monies, indicates that the purchasing power of
fiat money is declining. Gold may be the only decent statistic
around for assessing and evaluating the purchasing power of a
national money.
With
the exception of the mindless twits that calculate the consumer
price index for the United States, the rest of us understand that
such measures are nonsense. Those measures fail to serve their
intended functions. Rather than providing a meaningful tool for
understanding what is happening to the purchasing power of the
U.S. dollar, they are constructed in some bizarre fashion that
results in measuring nothing meaningful. The Federal Reserve then
goes a step further in the game of fantasy statistics by excluding
most of a consumer’s needs, preferring a measure that only
includes “brussels sprouts and electronics.” Few of us spend
most of our money on the fictional consumer basket that the
Federal Reserve uses to set policy. How many of you decided not to
buy gasoline last month, opting instead to buy a flat screen
television?
Coming
to understand that when $Gold is up the dollar is down is
investment enlightenment.
The dollar price of Gold also tells us the Gold price of the
dollar. Such is also true for any other national money. For
example, if Gold is trading at $400 per ounce that value can be
converted into how much Gold is necessary to buy a single dollar.
Simple take one(1) and divide it by 400. That translates into
0.0025 ounces of Gold per dollar. $500 Gold, likely this year,
converts to 0.0020 ounces of Gold per dollar.
When the dollar price of Gold is rising, the Gold price of the
dollar is falling. The rest of the world will pay less
Gold for each dollar. The value of that dollar, in Gold the
eternal money, is going down. The most recent trend in the value
of the dollar is portrayed in the first graph. For those of you
living in other national monies, these rules likewise apply to
your money and Gold.

In
that first graph is plotted the Gold price of the dollar over the
past couple of weeks. The time period chosen is in particular post
Katrina and pre Rita. At first the dollar’s value rose as the
world was relieved that New Orleans did not meet the dire fate
most expected after listening to the news media’s storm
coverage. Slowly the reality of the situation became evident. The
value of the dollar began to slip. As is readily apparent in the
graph, the value of the dollar plunged to a low.
Why
is the world appraising the dollar’s value in this way?
First, the storm’s damage is no trifling matter. A $200+
billion hole is a big hole, even for an economy as large as the
U.S. Wall Street gurus, afraid that people might wisely take their
money out of paper assets, have put a positive stroke on Katrina.
Many have concluded that Katrina is actually good for the U.S.
economy. No doubt some will be raving bulls over Rita. Matter
similar to that wisdom can also be found amongst the litter in the
cat box.
Second,
the U.S. government clearly is determined to raise the city of New
Orleans above sea level by filling in the hole with dollar bills.
That approach might actually be cheaper than whatever will really
happen. We all know the U.S. government does not have a spare $200
billion, or that needed for post Rita. In the past year the U.S.
deficit was about $600 billion. So, the U.S. deficit will jump
more than a third.
The
problem is where they get the money. Foreign investors already
have more than $2 trillion of U.S. government debt. Their appetite
may be waning as we will see later. If enough gullible foreign
investors cannot be found, the Federal Reserve will buy it. For
some time the Federal Reserve has avoided monetizing a significant
portion of the U.S. government deficit as foreign investors did it
for them. That time may be passing, and the markets realize
that the Fed Res monetizing debt means the value of the dollar
should go down. Markets like to discount the future ahead of time
so the dollar went down now. $Gold went to a new cycle high.
Global
financial markets are appraising the likely response of the
Federal Reserve to the events of the future. This appraisal is
decidedly negative. Given the historical performance of the
Federal Reserve that response is quite rational. The world may
have been fooled with the first bubble in stocks. People, though,
adapt and learn from their mistakes. The world is not being fooled
by either the U.S. Mortgage Bubble or the massive deficit looming
at the federal level. Given the near total politically oriented
policies of the past on the part of the Federal Reserve, holding
dollars is not judged to be a good idea. If
the rest of the world realizes that, why are you still holding so
many?

The
second graph portrays the Gold value of the U.S. dollar over the
last ten years. For those relatively new to Gold, the peak in that
value came in 1999. That was the year when several European
central banks realized that selling Gold and buying U.S. debt was
a really dumb idea. They could see the bubble at work in the U.S.
stock market even if the Federal Reserve could not. Those banks
may have continued to buy U.S. debt, but they did not do so with
money from selling Gold. That event marked the top in the value
for the U.S. dollar.
$Gold
is at a new cycle high because the value of the U.S. dollar is at
a new cycle low.
That understanding is fundamental to your wealth’s well being.
If you still own dollar denominated equities the purchasing power
of that wealth has gone down. Ok, so your portfolio is up some in
the past year. What it will buy though has declined. The value of
the dollars it represents is less. You are not making “money,”
you are losing purchasing power. Do not
be deluded by the illusion of wealth in paper!
Many
investors are now developing an interest in Gold, and that is
good. This response though must include more than buying Gold with
idle dollars. While that action does improve your overall
financial defenses, the paper assets you retain are still
vulnerable. 10% of your portfolio in Gold is certainly better than
no Gold in your portfolio. However if that means that 90% of your
wealth is still in dollars, little has been done to alter your
risk portfolio. A now popular concept is Value At Risk(VAR). With
90% of your wealth in dollar assets, your VAR is still in the
wrong direction. You need to reduce your holdings of dollar assets
and buy $Gold.
As
mentioned earlier, for some time the Federal Reserve has not had
to materially monetize the deficit of the U.S. government by
buying that debt. Foreign investors have been quite willing to do
so. That appetite continues to wane, as shown in the third
graph. Plotted is the year-to-year change in the holdings at
the Federal Reserve of U.S. debt by foreign official institutions,
which comes from the Fed’s weekly report. The trend in that
buying is fairly obvious. Foreign central banks are buying less
U.S. government debt. That leaves only two buyers to fill the
gap, the Federal Reserve and the Social Security System.

Imagine
the discussions in the central banks around the world. Their
economists and other wise staffers have been recommending selling
Gold and buying dollar denominated debt. Being wrong is not
hard to do. Being that wrong really takes some special skills!
How will the boards of these institutions response? If you were
one of the directors of a central bank, how would you respond to a
recommendation to sell Gold and buy more U.S. dollar debt?
We
are witnessing in the dramatic rally of dollar Gold the
moneyization phenomenon. Investors, institutions, and consumers
around the world are turning away from the dollar, and other
national monies. They are seeking security in the single form of
money which history as shown as more reliable than all
governments, Gold. Those that have over the years remained loyal
to Gold have been referred to in rather disparaging manners, often
called Gold Bugs. Well, the Gold Bugs
have been right as shown in the fourth chart. The Paper Asset Nuts
are the ones that have been wrong, and need a serious reality
check. This graph might be a good one to send to your
investment advisor if they still have your portfolio mired in
stock mutual fund goo while you are being charged exorbitant fees.

That
all said and while the long-term case for dollar Gold is solid,
every day does not necessarily present the best time to buy. As
the last chart shows, good times to buy Gold do develop. Times
also exist when holding and watching are wisest action. Dollar
Gold is seriously over bought as a result of the storm surges, and
a correction can be expected. What is not known is whether the
correction will come from $475 or $500. Gold
belongs in your portfolio, and you should be preparing cash to
invest in Gold at the next buy signal. $1,300 Gold is
in our future, and you should have part of that gain in your
portfolio.

A
final comment for those readers involved in defined benefit plans
at your place of employment.
If your plan does not include a Gold “bucket,” the time has
arrived to start complaining to your human resource department. No
longer is it necessary, given all the alternatives for buying Gold
and Silver, to restrict the investment options to paper assets. The
principal reason for such restrictions are tradition and those
massive fees and commissions paid to consultants, managers and
mutual fund companies. It is YOUR retirement, and you may
want it to have some purchasing power when you retire. Otherwise,
enjoy whatever your social security check will buy. Recommend
e-mailing this article to all of your human resource staff.

GO TO TOP
© 2005 Ned W. Schmidt
Archived
Editorials
Ned
W. Schmidt,CFA,CEBS is publisher of THE VALUE VIEW GOLD
REPORT. That report now includes a weekly message, TRADING
THOUGHTS, to help investors identify timely points for
buying Gold and Silver. His monumental report, "$1,265
GOLD", with 255 pages and 98 graphs, is now widely known,
and is available at www.amazon.com
or from the author by clicking HERE
This work has now been read by investors in over twelve countries
around the world. Ned welcomes your comments and questions. His
mission in life is to rescue investors from the abyss of financial assets
and the coming collapse of the U.S. dollar. He
can be contacted by Email.
Please remember that no method is perfect nor is the one
running the model.
All estimated returns are for the model portfolio and
do not reflect those earned on actual portfolios.
|