Before
Dad passed away, we often went for walks while we debated how history
might repeat itself, and when.
Our
primary concern was the wild 1970s, the time of the most rapid, the most
threatening and the most profitable market events in modern history.
That’s
when double-digit inflation reared its ugly head ... the dollar’s
value collapsed ... gold surged from $103 to $850 ... and short-term
interest rates catapulted from 4% to 20% — all in less than four
years.
That’s
also when major American banks lost so much money in the bond market it
wiped out most of their capital ... and when investors made so much
money in precious metals, Midas would have been green with envy.
Under
what circumstances could something like that happen again? How could
investors protect themselves from the fall-out? How could they profit?
The key
to finding the answers, we agreed, would be to identify parallel
patterns — not only in the world of money but
also in the arenas of political conflict.
Those
parallel patterns are precisely what I see today.
My one regret: That Dad is no longer here to see them with me.
My great wish: That you
see the perils and take the needed actions.
Parallel
Pattern #1
Easy
Money Creates Bubbles
Major
market moves — and even many social ills — often begin with money.
When
money is too easy to get, too easy to spend and too cheap to borrow, it
creates economic bubbles that inevitably burst: Bubbles in stocks and
bonds ... bubbles in real estate and housing ... plus bubbles that are
not always visible to the naked eye.
That’s
what happened in the late 1970s. And that’s also what’s happening
right now.
Late
1970s
The
troubles began in 1974-75.
We saw
the Dow plunge 40%. We saw the economy suffer its worst recession since
the 1930s. And we saw giant companies like Chrysler and Penn Central
Railroad sink into bankruptcy.
Even America’s
largest city, New York, was going under.
Federal
Reserve officials reacted with one common emotion:
fear. They feared a chain reaction that could
sink the nation into another Great Depression. And it was that fear
which drove them to abandon all restraint, opening the money floodgates
like never before.
They made
massive amounts of easy cash abundantly available. They slashed the cost
of short-term money to 4%, its lowest level of the decade. And they
encouraged Americans to borrow, spend and speculate with wild abandon.
Sure
enough, the stock market recovered. But simultaneously, massive bubbles
emerged throughout the American economy:
- There
was an obvious bubble in real estate as thousands of savings and
loans, flush with hot money, dished out cheap mortgages to nearly
all takers.
- There
was an obvious bubble in Detroit, as millions of American drivers
piled into gas-guzzling automobiles.
- And
there was a not-so-obvious
bubble in the bond market, where investors loaded up with long-term
Treasury bonds, tax-exempt municipal bonds and speculative junk
bonds.
Today
Decision-makers
at the Fed have followed an almost identical script.
In the
early 2000s, former Fed Chairman Greenspan and his cohorts watched the
Nasdaq — representing America’s largest and most
advanced technology companies — crumble by 70%.
They
watched the plunge of Enron, WorldCom and hundreds more into a cesspool
of scandal and red ink.
And they
saw the ugly face of the monster that scared them the most of all — deflation
and the threat of falling values on every front.
So again,
much like their counterparts of the 1970s, they began flooding the
economy with easy money. But this time, they went even further.
Rather
than just cutting interest rates down to 4%, they slashed them all the
way down to 1%, the lowest in a half-century.
And
rather than just allowing ordinary, traditional borrowing, they
encouraged Americans to literally hang themselves with the most
dangerous kinds of loans ever created.
Sure
enough, as in the 1970s, the stock market recovered. But ...
- Again,
there was a bubble in real estate, as millions of households
borrowed at low fixed rates ... and millions more rushed to take out
adjustable-rate mortgages, interest-only mortgages and even negative
amortization mortgages in which the loan balance gets larger month
after month.
- Again,
there was a bubble in Detroit, as America’s love affair with the
gas-guzzling sedans and station wagons of earlier decades was
replaced by a love affair with the gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks of
today.
- And
again, there was a not-so-well-known bubble in the bond market, this
time attracting mostly investors from Western Europe and East Asia.
The
precise names and places have changed. But the overall pattern is
uncannily similar: a big
scare ... a bigger
outpouring of easy money ... and the biggest
bubbles in history.
Parallel
Pattern #2
Benign
Neglect of the Dollar.
Major
Explosion in Gold Prices!
The
inevitable consequence of cheap and easy money is a cheap and falling
dollar.
Late
1970s
Despite
occasional lip service to the contrary, the dollar was, at best,
neglected by domestic politicians ... and, at worst, viciously attacked
by international investors.
Its value
sank precipitously against all the major currencies of the time — the
German mark, the Swiss franc, the Japanese yen, even the relatively
weaker British pound.
And
as the dollar fell, gold rose.
On the
afternoon of August 25, 1976, the price of gold was fixed
in London at $103.50 per ounce.
Just
three years and five months later, on January 21, 1980,
the London afternoon fix was $850 per ounce.
In a very
short period of time, the price of gold surged more than 8-fold.
Today
The
pattern is almost identical: The dollar is falling — this time not
only against the currencies of Europe and Japan, but also
against those of emerging nations.
And, as
before, the dollar’s fall is stimulating gold’s rise:
On April
2, 2001, the London afternoon fix for gold was $255.95 per ounce. Just
one week ago, on Monday, May 12, it was $725.
But in
comparison to the 1976-1980 surge, gold’s current rise is still in its
infancy.
Just to
match the 8-fold magnitude of the 1970s rise, gold needs to go much
higher — to $2,062
per ounce.
And, not
coincidentally, that’s also roughly the same level it needs to reach
just to catch up with the inflation that’s occurred since 1980.
Parallel
Pattern #3
Steep
Gold Market Corrections
Lead to
Even Steeper Upsurges
Even as
gold rocketed higher in the late 1970s, there were many more naysayers
than enthusiasts.
Like
their counterparts today, Wall Street brokers looked upon gold with
great disdain. They saw it as the anti-investment, the domain of
prophets of doom, the den of profiteers of gloom. So they jumped on
every chance they could to discourage precious metals investors.
In 1978,
for example, there were two steep corrections in the gold market:
- Gold
surged to an all-time peak of $190 per ounce on March 8, and then
suffered a 15% correction to $160.90 by April 27.
- Then,
in November, after hitting an even higher all-time peak of $242.75,
it suffered an even sharper, 20% setback, down to $193.40.
But no
matter how steep the corrections, the ensuing price upsurges were even
steeper. Anyone who abandoned gold in the wake of a correction was
sorely disappointed; anyone who bought on the dips, richly rewarded.
Finally,
in late 1979 and early 1980, gold went virtually straight up. Indeed ...
In the
last hurrah of gold’s bull market, the yellow metal rose
more than it did in all the years and centuries
that preceded it. It surged from $374 on October 29,
1979 to $850 by January 26, 1980 — a rise of $476 in just 54 trading
days.
Anyone
who had lost faith and bailed out during an earlier correction missed
an opportunity that was greater than virtually all previous
opportunities combined.
Today, we
see very much the same situation:
Gold
suffers periodic corrections, such as last week’s 10% drop. Each time,
a regular entourage of analysts inevitably makes the media circuit,
seeking to talk the yellow metal down further. And each time, gold turns
right back up again, surging to even higher peaks.
Can there
be more corrections? Yes.
Will they
end the bull market? No.
Parallel
Pattern #4
The Gold
Bull Market Continues Until
The Fed
Slams the Door on Easy Money
In the
1970s, the gold bull market didn’t end when the Fed started raising
interest rates. Quite to the contrary, the Fed had been raising interest
rates since 1975, and the rate hikes did nothing to slow down gold’s
rise.
Nor did
gold stop surging when Fed officials began talking the talk about
getting tough on inflation. Investors took one look at the still-low
interest rates and laughed in their face. They ran from the dollar. And
they rushed to gold in even larger numbers.
In fact,
gold didn’t stop surging even
after the Fed started walking
the walk.
By that
time, the Fed was so far behind the curve in fighting inflation, it had
to take a running jump to leap
ahead of inflation
In other
words, the Fed had to jack up rates to astronomical levels. But no one
at the Fed had the guts to do so.
The end
result: Throughout the 1970s, rising interest rates did nothing
to stop the gold bull market.
The Fed
funds rate rose to 8%, 10%, 12% ... and gold still kept surging.
It
wasn’t until the Fed funds rate got up to 20% that it finally had an
impact. That’s when the Fed finally slammed the door on easy money and
ended the bull market in commodities.
In
contrast, take a look around you right now. Do you see the Fed slamming
the door on easy money? Do you see astronomical interest rates?
Not even
close! The Fed funds rate is still at only 5% and just starting
its rise. Like in the late 1970s, the Fed is so far behind the inflation
curve, it’s the laughing stock of investors all over the world. And
those investors are likely to use every opportunity — especially sharp
corrections — to dump the dollar, dump their U.S. bonds
and switch some of their money into gold.
Parallel
Pattern #5
Wars and
Winds of War
An
inevitable consequence — and cause — of any easy-money boom is the
intensifying global competition for scarce resources.
That
competition always breeds economic conflict.
And it
often leads to war.
In
the 1970s, just as the Fed was losing control
over spiraling inflation, President Jimmy Carter was losing control over
world events.
In Afghanistan,
Soviet tanks swarmed into Kabul, triggering worries of a hotter cold
war, a ballooning military budget, and still another fire under
inflation.
In
neighboring Iran, the Shah, America’s staunchest ally
among oil-exporting nations, was deposed, and subsequently, students
took over the U.S. embassy, capturing 54 hostages.
All over
the world, the power of America and its dollar was being
questioned.
Today,
the parallel patterns are so numerous they boggle the imagination.
In
Afghanistan, for example, the same die-hard Taliban fighters that
defied the Soviets are again defying the U.S. and its allies.
And in Iran,
the stand-off between Carter and Ayatollah Khomeini of 1980 is mirrored
by today’s showdown between Bush and Ayatollah Khamenei.
Even the
places and some of the names have not changed substantially.
Parallel
Pattern #6
Falling
Confidence and
Rising
Exasperation
In
1980, President Carter, snowed under by inflation and sandbagged by the
Iranian hostage crisis, found himself losing support domestically at a
very rapid pace. His approval rating dropped from the 80s in the first
months of his presidency to the low 30s as his term approached an end.
Today,
President Bush is following the same path. The president is sandwiched
between an avoidable Iraq war which he can’t end and a
unavoidable Iran war which he can’t start. Despite growth in the
economy and improvements in the job market, his ratings have dropped
from the 80s to the low 30s, just like Carter’s.
The
Carter and Bush administrations may be separated by 26 years and vast
differences in ideology. But their political plight is one and the same:
A cycle of economic malaise, wars they cannot control, falling
confidence and rising exasperation.
Grave
Perils and
Great
Opportunities
For U.S.
Investors
These
parallel patterns point to a parallel future.
There
will be many differences; history will twist and turn events to surprise
us all. But throughout it all, I have little doubt that surging gold,
and commodities and interest rates imply some of the greatest
opportunities of a generation. That was true in the late 1970s. I
believe it’s true again today.
To profit
from them, you don’t need a big stake. Nor do you need to catch every
up and down move. What you need most is patience.
Although
protective measures, like stop-loss orders, are always prudent, don’t
run at the drop of the hat. Don’t let your vision be clouded in the
shadow of each correction. Stick with your core positions and
strategies.
Always
remember: It’s not until the Federal Reserve slams the door on easy
money that you need to worry about an end to the rise in gold, silver,
oil or other natural resources.
At the
same time, recognize that these kinds of sweeping upsurges don't come
every year or even every decade. It is a once-in-a-generation cycle that
you or I are unlikely to ever see again.
So if
your aim is large profits, and you have speculative funds available for
leveraged investments, it’s now or not at all.
If not,
stick with the exchange-traded funds and mutual funds that we have been
highlighting here. And enjoy the ride, whether bumpy or smooth.
One
Last Thought
Dramatic
change is not the end of the world. We went through this a
quarter-century ago, and we’re still here. We have survived, even
thrived. So although Dad saw the dangers clearly, he also had a vision
of a better world. Like me, he was truly an optimist at heart.
Next
week, I’ll explain why.
Good luck
and God bless!
Martin
Martin
Weiss,
Ph.D.
Editor, Safe Money Report
support@martinweiss.com

© 2006 Martin D. Weiss,
Ph.D.
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Weiss Research, Inc.
15430 Endeavour Drive
Jupiter, FL 33478
Email
| Website
|