|

5 NEW
SHOCKWAVES
5 BIG DANGERS
6 OPPORTUNITIES
by Martin D.
Weiss, Ph.D.
Editor, Safe Money
Report & MoneyandMarkets.com
January 29, 2007
A
new world war is unfolding with untold consequences for investors. But
Wall Street remains largely oblivious.
This
war is not confined strictly to Afghanistan and Iraq. It is already
spreading to Pakistan, Iran, Gaza, Lebanon and beyond.
Nor
are its protagonists limited to the few countries regularly mentioned in
news reports. To the contrary, even considering only those countries
that are directly involved with troops or weapons, I count over
forty — the U.S., Britain, Germany, and nearly all the members of
NATO ... plus Iran, Syria, Pakistan and many other Muslim nations from
Morocco to Malaysia.
Stop
and think for a moment:
How
many times have you heard someone admit that the situation in Iraq is
“dire” recently?
How
many times have you wished that all those with the wisdom to recognize
the severity of the crisis could be equally wise in proposing the
pathways to its resolution?
How
often have you been frustrated by the futility? Or discouraged by the
dissonance?
My
advice: No matter how you may feel about what’s happening on the
battle front, you must not let that hamper your response on the
investment front.
This
morning, I will show you the economic consequences as I see them. I will
demonstrate why there’s still hope for the eventual outcome. And I
will point you to the actions we recommend.
First,
though, please understand the full implications of the new shockwaves
that have erupted just in the past few days ...
Shockwave
#1
Beirut, Lebanon
Riots
are raging to topple the government, with four people killed and 150
wounded just in the last few days.
The
most recent outburst began with a scuffle in the student cafeteria at
Beirut Arab University. Then it spilled into the street. And soon it
escalated regionally with vanloads of reinforcements that suddenly
appeared on the scene.
Right
now, the Lebanese Army has restored some calm with a heavy presence in
tense neighborhoods. But the only optimism expressed is of the kind that
rarely pans out — the feeling that things have gotten so bad that,
maybe, just maybe, they won’t get any worse.
The
danger: Lebanon is torn by the same Shiite-Sunni schism that is
already tearing apart Iraq. Now, if Lebanon erupts into civil war, it
implies that parallel conflicts could also explode in virtually any
other Muslim nation with a Shiite majority or large minority. That
includes Azerbaijan and Afghanistan
... India,
Pakistan
and Turkey ... Yemen,
Bahrain, Qatar,
and Saudi Arabia.
Shockwave
#2
Islamabad, Pakistan
On
Friday, a suicide bomber blew himself up outside the Marriott hotel in
an upscale neighborhood of the country’s capital.
It
was supposed to be a “high-security zone” — where foreign visitors
stay, where important government functions are held, and where
ministers, members of Parliament and diplomats live.
But
it’s obviously not secure any more.
My
brother lived there with his family in the early 1980s. Back then, in
terms of scenery and security, it was almost like Switzerland. Now,
however, it looks like it could turn into a scenario more reminiscent of
Beirut or even Baghdad.
The
danger: Militarily, Pakistan is easily America’s most critical
ally in the region. But politically, it also happens to be one of the
most fragile.
The
president, General Pervez Musharraf, has been unable to root out
widespread popular support for the Taliban in Afghanistan, even among
his own secret service.
He
is despised by the country’s devout Muslims, the majority among the
country’s 167 million people. He has been the target of at least
four assassination attempts in recent years. And his regime could
easily fall to extremists, upending the balance of power in the War on
Terror.
Shockwave
#3
Gaza Strip, Palestinian Territories
Just
this weekend, escalating battles between Hamas and Fatah killed 25
Palestinians and wounded 76, dashing hopes that the two rival factions
might form a coalition government.
Major
roads in Gaza City are blocked by concrete barriers put up by security
personnel loyal to both factions. Large security details from each side
are deployed at major street corners and outside potential targets.
And
there’s every indication that the Palestinian territories could soon
follow Iraq and Lebanon down the wayward path of civil war.
The
danger: Without a resolution of the factional fighting among
Palestinians, talks between Israelis and Palestinians, including an
upcoming U.S.-sponsored summit, are next to meaningless.
And
without an improvement in the 60-year Israeli-Palestinian dispute, there
is unlikely to be any reconciliation with Syria, Iran or the world’s
estimated one billion Muslims worldwide that are now aligned
against the West.
Shockwaves
#4 and #5
Afghanistan and Iraq
NATO
forces in Afghanistan are bracing for a massive spring offensive by the
Taliban, likely to be the bloodiest and most dangerous since the
hard-line Islamists were ousted by US-led forces in 2001. And already,
American officials are reporting increasingly brazen cross-border
attacks from Pakistan.
Ironically,
however, at a special meeting convened by Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice in Brussels this past Friday, America’s European allies refused
to commit to sending additional troops.
France
and Germany are adamantly opposed to deploying their troops in the south
of Afghanistan, where the spring offensive will be the most intense.
Prime Minister Romano Prodi of Italy is battling allies in his own
government who oppose the Afghan mission and want the government to set
a deadline for withdrawing the country’s 1,800 troops. Other, smaller
NATO allies are also on the verge of pulling out.
Not
coincidentally, in Iraq, we see a similar dilemma, but on a much larger
scale. Indeed ...
Just
as most Americans now agree that the “situation is dire,” they also
must recognize that the broad commitment to war is rapidly waning.
Most
of America’s allies are about to throw in the towel. Most of
America’s population is withdrawing its support. And even America’s
President is warning that his patience is limited.
The
twin dangers:
In
both Afghanistan and Iraq, the West’s will to win seems contingent on
its pace of success — the more political and strategic ground the
allies lose, the more they want to withdraw.
But
among our enemies, we see precisely the opposite pattern — the more
they’re beaten down, the greater their zeal to bounce back.
This
is not exactly a winning formula. Nor is it likely to change.
Shockwave
#6
Iran and Weapons of Mass Destruction
Over
a decade ago, I was tracking and analyzing another Gulf war. And in its
final days, I saw a heated debate raging in the White House:
Should
we march on to Baghdad and depose Saddam Hussein?
Or
...
Should
we make a pact with the devil and keep him in power?
Surprisingly,
the first President Bush opted to make the pact. He decided that a
united Iraq under Saddam was a necessary evil, a buffer against a far
greater, longer term threat — Iran.
Today,
the fury of that fateful debate — and the reasoning behind that
fearful decision — are echoing from the White House walls and
reverberating through the halls of Congress. Slowly at first, but with
gathering momentum in the last few weeks, U.S. policymakers are waking
up to ...
The
truly dire danger:
*
Iran, not Iraq, was — and is — the greater menace to the West and to
world peace.
*
The war in Iraq has opened a Pandora’s box that Iran is leveraging
virtually without restraint ... reinvigorating long-term alliances with
Iraq’s leading political parties ... pouring in its operatives ... and
laying the groundwork for a de-facto takeover of the Shiite south or
even the entire country.
*
But now, the U.S. government may have exhausted its power — and its
credibility — to effectively counter the Iranian threat.
Just
look at how things are panning out ...
Whenever
Iran’s president denies the holocaust or cries for the destruction of
Israel, the West does little more than utter a sigh of frustration.
Whenever
U.S. officials accuse Iranian operatives of fomenting violence in Iraq,
everyone remembers the earlier intelligence fiascos in Iraq ... they
roll their eyeballs ... and they think only of the boy who cried
“wolf.”
Worst
of all, even when Iran announces new steps in their development of
weapons of mass destruction, the West’s response is muted.
Just
this past Friday, for example, the head of the UN’s nuclear inspection
agency, Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei, announced that Iranian engineers will
begin installing new equipment next month in an industrial-scale nuclear
plant to enrich uranium.
This
will set into motion a new escalation between the West and Iran, which
ElBaradei says could be irreversible: Stronger UN sanctions against
Iran, followed by more counter-actions by Iran against the West.
And
it could lead to war. In fact, ElBaradei himself said on Friday that the
next logical outcome could be a military strike by the U.S. or Israel on
the nuclear plant.
Why
All Hope Is Not Lost
Despite
the dire outlook, there’s still a basis for hope:
There’s
a substantial minority in the Muslim world that, under the right
circumstances, would rally to the support of the United States.
·
In Iran in particular, a large segment of the population, much like
those living behind the iron curtain in 1980s, are quietly waiting for
the opportunity to embrace modern Western culture.
·
Even the hard-line leadership in Iran seems to be losing faith in the
nuclear confrontation pursued by its president.
·
Overall, the silent majority in the Arab world abhors confrontation and
prefers reconciliation.
But
before they can find their voice, become more vocal, and exert
influence, much will have to change. And until then, the outlook is
bound to worsen in the shape of a new world war that’s difficult to
avoid.
The
Economic Consequences:
Worse Than “Dire”
There
is no resource more essential to the world than energy ...
And
...
There
is no greater threat to energy supplies than the Middle East and Persian
Gulf conflicts that are now spreading.
This
is both undeniable and inescapable.
Anyone
who makes financial decisions, structures their portfolio or plans their
life without serious consideration to these realities is
sleepwalking through a minefield.
Don’t
be among them! And if you are, wake up now!
The
declines you’ve seen in oil and energy prices in recent weeks are like
a tempting mirage in a waterless dessert. They give you — and all of
the world’s energy consumers — a fleeting sense of security and a
false sense of relief.
That’s
too bad. Because it can only make the subsequent energy shortages and
price surges that much worse.
What
other outcome is likely when virtually every major economy on the
planet, especially in Asia, is still ramping up its consumption of
energy?
What
other scenario is reasonable, when the ability to produce and ship that
energy can be hampered, cut back, cut off or even destroyed by wars?
This
points straight to:
-
Crude oil prices at new all-time highs ...
- Huge investment flows to alternate energy
suppliers, such as uranium miners and ethanol producers ...
- Massive flights of capital into safe havens,
including gold, silver and the world’s strongest currencies ...
- A major worldwide build-up of defense capabilities,
with hundreds of billions spent on new weapons ...
- Huge risks for investors that have most of their
money tied up in nations heavily involved in war, such as the U.S., and
...
Equally
large opportunities for those with money invested far from war’s
reach, such as East Asia and Latin America.
All
this helps explain why our Money and Markets editors have been
relentless in their advocacy of alternative investment opportunities for
you. It helps explain ...
1.
Why Sean Brodrick, our small cap specialist, has been so adamantly
recommending uranium producers and his favorite small mining companies.
2.
Why Tony Sagami, our Asia specialist, has been so consistently
recommending his favorite stocks in China, Taiwan, Singapore and Japan.
3.
Why Larry Edelson, our gold and natural resource expert, has been so
diligently telling you about the very best natural resource investments
he can dig up.
4.
Why John Burke, our defense specialist, has been advocating some of the
most wildly successful weapons and homeland security companies.
5.
Why our separate money management division has been using global
strategies to help some of its clients achieve returns of up to 63% from
8-6-04 through 12-31-06 (22.53% annualized).
6.
Plus, it helps explain why Mike Larson and I have given you multiple
ways to safeguard your retirement (such as with a Treasury-only
money market fund), and to
build your wealth with solid
global investments.
Take
a moment to use the links I’ve given you above. Read our current
articles carefully. Act on the ideas that fit your goals. Come back to
Money and Markets each morning for urgent new updates as a new world
war unfolds. Then pray for the best and prepare for the worst.
Good
luck and God bless!
Martin

© 2007 Martin D. Weiss,
Ph.D.
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Weiss Research, Inc.
15430 Endeavour Drive
Jupiter, FL 33478
Email
| Website
|