|
“Our
Worst Nightmare - the Puncture of the Current US Housing
Bubble”
”The
key to holding up the entire speculative US financial system
with its current excessive levels of debt - federal (current
account and trade), state, municipal, corporate and household
– is maintaining the U.S. housing bubble. Anything less would
result in America’s worst nightmare and, in short order, the
entire world.
The
housing market is dominated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac who
hold 75% of all outstanding home mortgages (and the Federal Home
Loan Bank Board to a much lesser extent). One too many
additional increases in the Fed rate may well turn out to be the
U.S. economy's Achilles' heel and lead to a major crisis at
these two institutions generating an out-of-control systemic
breakdown situation and disastrous financial implosion.
Here's
why. Fannie’s and Freddie's (FF) original functions were to
provide liquidity to the housing market. After a mortgage
lending institution (MLI) originated a mortgage – say,
$100,000 - FF would purchase that mortgage from the MLI for a
fee and hold the mortgage to maturity. The MLI now had $100,000
to make yet another mortgage loan and earn yet another fee. By
the repeating of this process FF injected liquidity into the
housing market making it possible for MLIs to increase the
number of mortgage loans they could make each year and earn
considerably more fees in the process.
Where
did the money come from for FF to raise money to
purchase these mortgages from MLIs? It was easy. FF simply
issued bonds (which, as you know, are a form of debt) at a
somewhat higher interest rate which was their spread or profit.
The more mortgages they bought from the MLIs covered by the
issuance of their bonds the more money they made. And it was all
totally secured by the assets of the houses themselves. A risk
free arrangement. Not bad. The MLIs made money, FF made money
and the consumers owned houses on which they could afford to
make their monthly mortgage payments.
Beginning
in the 1980's FF got greedy! They began to encourage the MLIs to
sell mortgages to purchasers who would have to spend more than
the U.S. Department of Housing’s recommended 28% of gross
income to service the housing (mortgage payments, home insurance
payments and home property tax due) costs involved. As FF
expected the demand for houses went up, the price of houses went
up, the number of mortgages went up, the size of mortgages went
up, the profits of the MLIs went up and the profits of FF went
up. But the degree of financial risk for FF increased
dramatically. Many mortgagees had to pay out 50-60% of their
household income in housing costs and were extremely vulnerable
to any economic setback they might encounter - loss of job;
increased cost of living; health problems; death, incarceration
or illness of breadwinner. As a result, the rate of
delinquencies and foreclosures went up. In many cases the down
payments made by these new mortgagees were so small that the
only way FF could recoup its outstanding mortgages was if
the resale prices of the homes appreciated considerably from the
date of the initial purchase. The greater the appreciation of
such homes the less the risk to FF.
Next,
in the unending search for increased profits, FF undertook some
financial innovation. They began bundling groups of mortgages
together as mortgage backed securities (MBS) on which they
guaranteed, in case of default, to pay interest and principal
“fully and in a timely fashion”. They sold these MBSs for a
fee, to mutual and pension funds and to insurance companies
around the world. This gave the funds a claim to the underlying
principal and interest stream of the mortgage. In doing so the
risks entailed in the owning of mortgage debt were broadened
beyond FF. If FF were unable to fulfill their guarantee (and the
monies provided by the government are totally inadequate) these
funds, too, would be adversely affected and depending on the
extend of the default, gravely so. FF's profits went up but its
reward/risk ratio dropped like a stone!
And
finally, to squeeze out even more profits, FF began taking 50%
of their MBS holdings and pooling them once again into
derivative instruments called Real Estate Mortgage Investment
Conduits, i.e. "restructured MBS" or into what are
called Collateralized Mortgage Obligations for which they are
paid a fee. These instruments are highly specialized
derivatives, i.e. bets on the direction of future rates of
interest. FF's profits went up even more but the risks
associated with these actions became excessive!!
Thus,
what started out as a simple home mortgage, has been
transmogrified in to something one would expect to find at a Las
Vegas gambling casino. Yet the housing bubble now depends on
precisely these instruments as sources of funds.
If
too great a portion of FF mortgages were to go into default and
cease to pay interest or principal, FF would not have sufficient
cash to pay the holders of its bonds. If the situation were to
become too great FF would default on its bonds. So, whereas
before one had one economic catastrophe - the default of some
mortgages – because of the way the housing market is
structured, this produces a second catastrophe – the default
of FF’s bonds which are at least 10 times greater than that of
any corporation in the U.S. Such a default would put an end to
the U.S. financial system, right then and there.
Yet
a second obligation compounds the problem - its guarantees on
the MBS. In a crisis in the housing mortgage market, FF would
not be able to meet the terms of their guarantees and would go
bankrupt from this source, if it had not already defaulted on
their bonds. The pension and mutual funds which had bought the
MBS on it guarantees, would suffer tens of billions of dollars
in losses.
Finally,
FF's derivative obligations in hedges, allegedly to protect it
from risks, could themselves go in to default against the banks
and other counter parties.
The
above mentioned obligations of FF total over $5 trillion.
Another $1 trillion in obligations are held by the Federal Home
Loan Bank Board and private issuers of MBS. These $6 trillion in
risky obligations are distinct from, and in addition to, the
more than $6 trillion in mortgages themselves. As such, a total
in excess of $12 trillion is laden on to the homes and attached
to to the incomes of America's homeowners. And then there is
credit card debt, car lease debt, cell phone contract debt, bank
loan debts, margin debt, etc!
Nothing,
absolutely nothing, must stand in the way of consumers
fulfilling their financial obligations - and they absolutely
must not default on their mortgages. Cheap money must prevail.
Not dirt cheap like before but still very cheap by historical
standards. Cheap money is necessary to keep the real
estate bubble in force because consumer spending increases 0.62%
for every 10% gain in the housing market (more than twice that
of a 10% gain in the stock market).
Regretfully,
though, this FF house of cards is on the verge of collapse. Bond
prices have fallen and interest rates are approaching 5%. The
ramifications are dire.
A
wide variety of partners hold large chunks of FF debt:
commercial and investment banks, hedge funds, mutual funds,
pension funds, insurance companies, private investors. They are
all exposed to large losses were either Fannie Mae or Freddie
Mac to default on their debt. In the U.S., for example, 60%
of all banks (approx. 5000) own FF debt in excess of 50% of
their equity capital. As the Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight has said "such an event as the default
of FF debt could lead to contagious illiquidity in the market
for those debt securities which would cause or worsen
illiquidity problems at other financial institutions ....
potentially leading to a systemic event."
The
Fed is between the proverbial 'rock and a hard place'. They
engineered low interest rates in the first place, both to keep
the financial markets going, and in large measure to keep the
housing bubble afloat. They are now in the final stages of raising
interest rates to prop up the collapsing US dollar and to
forestall rampant inflation. Were they to initiate one quarter
percent increase too many it would destroy the interest rate
environment that is essential to keeping the housing bubble
alive; to keeping consumers spending at a high level thereby
keeping the economy growing; to keeping corporate sales and
profits high thereby keeping the stock market healthy. Have they
gone too far already? The bubble seems to be loosing air slowly
at this point but what will the impact be of the next increase?
The impact of one too many rate increases on such a chronically
debt-ridden and maladjusted economy must not be over
estimated.
It
is just a matter of time before further increases in
mortgage rates will result in increases in monthly mortgage
payments than some borrowers can not handle. This will be
particularly so for borrowers of sub-prime loans who were able
to purchase their first homes with almost nothing in the way of
a down payment and who, even now, have a delinquency rate at
near record levels. In addition, as mortgage rates rise further,
fewer first-time buyers will be able to afford to buy a home
which will, in turn, slow down the sale of new and resale homes.
With
further increases in mortgage rates there will be dramatically
reduced refinancing of mortgages which have gone a
long way to financing the retail boom in retail sales over the
past few years. Indeed, more than $500 billion in equity has
been withdrawn annually in the US and $29 billion annually in
Canada for that purpose.
But
rest assured the Fed will do absolutely everything in its power
to prevent the puncturing of the housing bubble!
FF
assets have expanded so rapidly over the past few years due to
the number of mortgages, the escalating value of mortgages (as a
result of escalating real estate prices) and the refinancing of
mortgages and they have so much debt in the form of mortgages,
bonds, MBS’s and derivatives that should they encounter any
problems servicing the debt it most likely will have a
destabilizing effect on the US economy.
Indeed,
the Fed are so concerned about this happening they are
flooding the economy with almost limitless liquidity. There must
be a crisis of historic proportions coming, and the Federal
Reserve Bank of the United States is making sure that there is
enough liquidity in place to protect our nation's fragile
financial system. The amazing thing is that the Fed's actions
mean they know what is about to happen.
What
could it be?" Perhaps the Fed finally recognizes that
the housing bubble has experienced a leak that could well
escalate into major proportions soon. Perhaps the Fed has
learned that one (or more) of the 3 American banks holding 95%
of U.S. derivatives are experiencing some difficulties managing
their risks. Perhaps the FF are encountering major derivative
losses once again. Perhaps the Fed are concerned that
the rising budget deficit and/or the ever increasing and already
record-high current account (trade) deficits are very near the
tipping point. Perhaps it is their fear that the recent and continuing
interest rate hikes are going to have a very negative impact on
the already overly indebted U.S. consumers (rising mortgage,
lease and credit card rates), the stock market (lower
corporate profits) and the bond market and lead to a recession.
Perhaps the Fed sees their greatest fear of all - deflation -
just around the corner.
So
where should we be investing our money? Certainly not in real
estate. Definitely not in bonds. Absolutely not in the general
stock market. What’s left? Well, there is cash (at least you
won't lose your shirt if you hold it in something other than
U.S. currency); gold bullion which performs well in such a
chaotic environment (and by extension mining company shares
and/or their warrants) and also energy stocks because of the
political climate being the way it is in the Middle East. Pay
off your debts, build up your savings and invest accordingly and
you will be protecting yourself from what could well become our
country's (and the world's) worst nightmare and enjoying sweet
financial dreams for years to come. Good night and God bless!” |