|
a split second when it can be recalled and perhaps remedied" Pearl S. Buck (1892-1973) The
quote above is not meant to suggest that we need to prepare for gloom
and doom in the new year, but to remind us that in 2007 the investment
markets will not necessarily behave as they did in 2006. Bull markets
have a tendency to make us forget about the benefits of true asset class
diversification. Since we are now into year five of the current bull
market in U.S. stocks, it may be a good time to take a moment and check
on your portfolio's asset class correlations. It is not uncommon to find
what I call "false" diversification in what appears to be a
well-diversified portfolio.
The
Concept of “False” Diversification
Let us assume we have a somewhat typical, well-intentioned investor who
has a real job and a real life outside of the financial markets, which
limits his or her ability or desire to follow the financial markets on a
daily basis. This typical investor understands the need to be
diversified or to “spread out” the risk in their investment
portfolio. To illustrate the concept of “false” diversification, we
will also assume that this investor has growth as their primary
investment objective. This profile fits many investors between the ages
of 20 and 55 (still at least 5 years from retirement). In a genuine
attempt to diversify, our typical growth investor builds the following
investment portfolio allocation giving them exposure to a wide variety
of asset classes and management strategies:
Table 1
Table 2
Figure 12  For those of you who prefer ETFs, you could build a similar portfolio with false diversification using the S&P 500 ETF (SPY), Blackrock Core Bond Trust (BHK), Vanguard Large Cap ETF (VV), Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), Vanguard Mid Cap ETF (VO), Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF (VBK), Blackrock Global Opportunism (BOE), and the Vanguard European ETF (VGK). It seems reasonable to believe that twelve different growth investments would offer some type of downside protection in a difficult period for U.S. stocks. If you are like many investors, the current bull market has lulled you into thinking that you are diversified. The “diversified” portfolio above would have declined by 42.29% during the bear market. During the same period, the S&P 500 declined by 46.01% (as measured by the dividend reinvested performance of the S&P 500 ETF). The fact that the investments above all declined when the S&P 500 declined and that they declined in similar magnitude tells you all these investments have a high positive correlation to the S&P 500. A high positive correlation means when the S&P 500 goes up, all the investments tend to go up and when the S&P 500 goes down, all the investments tend to go down. Now you can see why the term “false diversification” applies. Research shows that there may be a better way to build a portfolio of investments that offers “real” diversification and an opportunity for improved returns. In an effort to better prepare for 2007 and beyond, I recently conducted some extensive research on the potential benefits of investing in a wide array of asset classes, including some with low or negative correlations to U.S. stocks. Since the study, Protecting Your Wealth From Inflation And Investment Losses, is lengthy and somewhat tedious, I will attempt to summarize what the historical numbers tell us in future articles. While there are several ways to successfully approach the investment markets, I feel we can all gain some advantage from reviewing how different asset classes performed in both bull and bear markets. As time permits, I will continue to expand on these topics in the coming weeks. Potentially impacted stocks and ETFs: SPY, QQQQ, VV, VTV, VO, VBK, BHK, BOE, VGK. Happy New Year! Chris Ciovacco
All material presented herein is believed to be reliable but we cannot attest to its accuracy. Investment recommendations may change and readers are urged to check with their investment counselors and tax advisors before making any investment decisions. Opinions expressed in these reports may change without prior notice. This memorandum is based on information available to the public. No representation is made that it is accurate or complete. This memorandum is not an offer to buy or sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned. The investments discussed or recommended in this report may be unsuitable for investors depending on their specific investment objectives and financial position. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The price or value of the investments to which this report relates, either directly or indirectly, may fall or rise against the interest of investors. All prices and yields contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This information is based on hypothetical assumptions and is intended for illustrative purposes only. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE. PAST PERFORMANCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE FUTURE RESULTS. CONTACT
INFORMATION The opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of Financial Sense. |
"False"
Diversification May Prove Costly In 2007
