|
Shouldn’t
this article’s title have been written a few days ago, with gold once
again above $420 and within striking distance of a break to new highs?
Actually, I think this headline is more compelling now that gold
has backed away from those levels and has caused many to suspect that a
larger pullback is on the way.
This
essay has little to do with fundamentals and more to do with the chart
pattern that has developed in the metal over the course of this year.
For fundamental commentary, my recent article, “Bonds,
Gold and Oil: More of the Same,” provides my case for creeping
inflation and, thus, gold as a timely investment.
The same piece, it should be noted, also highlights that I am not
one to breathlessly predict higher gold prices at every turn as the gold
bugs always seem to do.
I
am, however, writing this article to suggest that higher gold prices may
finally be at hand, an argument that is based on how strikingly similar
the recent price action in gold is to the consolidation phase we saw in
the metal a couple of years ago.
As
gold finally started to rally from its lows near $250/ounce in early
2001, it did so in a very orderly fashion until finally encountering
resistance near $325/ounce more than a year later.
A look back at the correction that ensued is what I thought
investors today should see:

In
the chart above (May 1- December 1, 2002), it can clearly be seen that
the first correction of that run, while sharp, was enough to shake out
weak holders and provide enough relief to set the stage for the next
phase of the metal’s rally. The
balance of that correction (early August through late November) was one
of time, not price, and actually formed a nice, orderly pattern of
higher highs and higher lows.
Now,
look at gold’s action over the last 12 months:

Is
it me, or do those two corrections look virtually identical?
Let’s see… big rally, scary correction, then some
backing-and-filling in a quietly positive march back to old highs.
No, I don’t think it’s just my imagination.
Is
this analysis too simplistic? Admittedly, I presented the price action above without
additional studies to more clearly show the similarity of the two moves,
so yes, the thinking presented is rather simple.
To this point, however, I would ask a little leeway; I’m an
experienced, widely-quoted technical analyst who has peeked at more than
his share of charts, one who has made some pretty darned accurate
predictions on currencies, interest rates and equities in the last
couple of years (if I do say so myself).
To highlight one such call as well as to prove that I’m not a
stopped-clock precious metals bull, I encourage investors to also glance
at “Silver
Rallying on Questionable Rumors” from earlier this year.
In today’s case, I’m trying to share a little bit of my
“gut feel” or instincts with readers, something I feel I can rightly
claim.
By
all counts, short- and long-term, gold simply appears to be in a
powerful bull market, one that seems poised to make another push higher
in the near-term.
So
what, exactly, am I suggesting for investors?
First,
don’t forget what the price of the metal did when it did breakout from
that first consolidation range by moving above $330/ounce… below is
the same chart as the first one shown in this essay, but extended by one
month:

Here,
the start of the rally that took gold to $390 in just two months can be
seen. Gold literally exploded
when it broke through resistance.
Likewise,
a move solidly above $430 would likely see similar action, in my
opinion. Indeed, I think the move
would be even more explosive. Why?
For the answer to that question, I need to include one more
chart, this one longer-term in nature:

A
nearly 15-year chart of gold shows heavy, heavy resistance in the area
near $400, the level that I warned coming into this year might bring
about a period of consolidation. Indeed,
if I am wrong in suggesting today that a gold price breakout is
imminent, it will be that 3-year resistance level from the early-1990s
that causes the metal to continue its sideways action. If I am right, however, a break to new highs will be made more
significant due to that past resistance seen above.
This
leads me, finally, to my point: despite the volatility in 2004, all that
has really occurred is that gold has paused to consolidate its gains.
In my opinion, the worst-case scenario for the metal will bring
more of the same. In the best
case, the $430 level falls and gold sprints higher.
Take
a look again at gold’s price action over the course of this year.
Since that first big pullback to $375, a clear pattern of higher
highs and higher lows can be seen; with this in mind, any rally from
here will put considerable pressure on that $430 level and might be the
surge that finally causes the breakout.
By
my analysis, there seems to be little chance of a meaningful pullback in
the price of this metal; the fight appears to be between more sideways
action or a powerful upside breakout. Could the metal pull back a few dollars, say to $400, before
surging again? It could without
changing any of the thinking outlined above.
Investors,
however, should not get cute about their pricing/timing of precious
metals purchases at this point. For
those that don’t yet own any gold but want to, it would be wise to
purchase at least a partial position now for fear of missing the boat
and being left on the dock as gold sails above $500, which is what I
expect to happen quickly following the next break to new highs.
Again,
here’s the point of all of this: don’t get cute— act!

©
2004 Chip Hanlon
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Chip
Hanlon
President
Delta Global Advisors, Inc.
Huntington Beach, CA 92648
Phone: 800-485-1220
Email l
Website
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense. |