|
“Truth,
like gold, is to be obtained not by its growth,
but by washing away from it
all that is not gold.”
Counter-trend
Correction
The
recent correction in the precious metals has left investors shaken. In
response to their fears is a litany of opinions as to what awaits the
precious metals. The $64 dollar question is will they go up, or will
they go down.
We wish we had a definitive answer that addressed both time and
magnitude, but alas, we do not. Our crystal ball was broken many years
ago attempting such prognostications. From such we have learned that all
that is needed, is to know the direction of the primary trend, and to be
aligned therewith.
The
primary trend of the gold market is bullish. Look at any long-term chart
of gold, silver, or the precious metal stocks: the trend is quite
clear.
Bull
markets have a unique signature illustrating the primary trend as a
series of higher lows and higher highs, proceeding from the bottom left
hand corner of the chart, upwards to the top right hand corner of the
chart: a veritable stairway to heaven if you will.
All
bull markets experience corrections – of both short and intermediate
term duration. As we have said several times before: there has not been
an intermediate term correction since May of 2005. One was due,
expected, and has arrived. Of this there is no doubt, nor should there
be any surprise.
Intermediate
term corrections in the precious metals generally run about four to five
months in duration (18-20 weeks). So far, this correction is about 2
months (8 weeks) old.
A
significant move down in magnitude is not a given, although it remains a
distinct possibility. Without question – time is going to play a major
part in this correction. We are more certain of the time factor than the
magnitude factor.
We
do feel that a fair amount of risk is being ignored, and that many see
nothing but blue skies ahead. We see blue skies ahead, but that
doesn’t mean that storms will not roll in and out as well.
Signposts
The
May 2005 lows were below 170 for the HUI; $425.00 for gold; and below $7
for silver. We’ve come a long ways baby: 230 points in the HUI; 290 in
gold; and 8 in silver (over a doubling in price for silver). The
following are just examples of possible
retracement levels, or signposts along the way.
Thirty-three
Percent
HUI
= 76 points = 324
GOLD
= 96 = 619
SILVER
= 2.64 = 12.36
Fifty
Percent
HUI
= 115 = 285
GOLD
= 145 = 570
SILVER
= 4 = 11
Sixty-six
Percent
HUI
= 152 = 248
GOLD
= 192 = 523
SILVER
= 5.28 = 9.72
Time
As
stated above, the general duration of intermediate term corrections is 4
to 5 months. That brings us to September, give or take a few weeks
either way. In addition, intermediate term corrections, have on
occasion, lasted longer than 4 to 5 months, so caveat emptor.
Between
now and then there will be significant moves both up and down, as
volatility has become the norm. For those quick on the draw, these moves
offer potential. For those that buy and hold, any forthcoming
significant lows will offer an opportunity to accumulate new positions
at bargain basement prices.
Excerpts
The
following are excerpts from our market wrap for the week ending June 30,
2006.
Conclusions
I
sold several of my gold stock positions at the end of last week. This is
not because I am negative on them – I simply booked profits that were
quite significant for the few weeks time I owned them. In addition, I
still own several more. The gold stock portfolio below indicates the
ones sold and the date and selling price.
I
am of the opinion that the pm lows recently put in place will be tested.
When they are tested, and hold their lows, I will buy more.
I
do not see an intermediate move up occurring in the precious metals at
this particular time. A lot of technical damage was done during the
recent correction, and there is now significant overhead resistance that
needs to be worked off. Time heals all wounds.
I
remain very bullish on the precious metals, and still believe they are
the investment opportunity of a lifetime. However, even the strongest of
bull markets have to have corrections, both short term and intermediate
term.
The
precious metals have not experienced an intermediate term correction
since May of 2005. One was due, is here, and is standard operating
procedure. My mantra remains: buy weakness – sell strength. Do the
hard trade.
Finally,
below are the market indicators for most of the major markets and the
gold stock positions. And that’s a rap.
Commentary
Thank
God, the FOMC meeting has finally come and gone. The entire world seemed
to be on hold – waiting with baited breath to hear the gospel
according to the wizards of finance.
Finally,
it came, and with it came celebrations in almost every market – except
the US Dollar, which turned down while others turned up. It seems the US
Dollar has some karma to work out.
The
importance of the 25 basis point rate hike was blown way out of
proportion, and was not viewed in the proper context. The minutia was
insignificant – the full-fledged policy a dead man walking.
Furthermore,
and more importantly – the lack of understanding of what is going on
regarding monetary policy (or the lack thereof), both here and abroad;
and the repercussions such will exact on the economies of the world –
is literally scary.
FOMC
Press Release
Release
Date: June 29, 2006
The
Federal Open Market Committee decided today to raise its target for the
federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 5-1/4 percent.
Recent
indicators suggest that economic growth is moderating from its quite
strong pace earlier this year, partly reflecting a gradual cooling of
the housing market and the lagged effects of increases in interest rates
and energy prices.
Readings
on core inflation have been elevated in recent months. Ongoing
productivity gains have held down the rise in unit labor costs, and
inflation expectations remain contained. However, the high levels of
resource utilization and of the prices of energy and other commodities
have the potential to sustain inflation pressures.
Although
the moderation in the growth of aggregate demand should help to limit
inflation pressures over time, the Committee judges that some inflation
risks remain. The extent and timing of any additional firming that may
be needed to address these risks will depend on the evolution of the
outlook for both inflation and economic growth, as
implied by incoming information. In any event, the Committee will
respond to changes in economic prospects as needed to support the
attainment of its objectives.
Voting
for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman;
Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Susan S. Bies; Jack Guynn; Donald L.
Kohn; Randall S. Kroszner; Jeffrey M. Lacker; Sandra Pianalto; Kevin M.
Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.
In
a related action, the Board of Governors unanimously approved a
25-basis-point increase in the discount rate to 6-1/4 percent. In taking
this action, the Board approved the requests submitted by the Boards of
Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Boston, New York,
Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis,
Minneapolis, and Dallas.
Market’s Response
The
markets responded to the rate hike by rallying full steam ahead, all
that is except the US dollar, which was once again, hammered down 1.8%
for the week.
The
experts explained that the markets see the end coming for future rate
hikes, so onwards and upwards the markets marched. We disagree in the
markets and the experts (most experts – not all) interpretation of the
rising tide of interest rates sweeping round the world.
From
the BIS 76th Annual Report 2005/06: An Overview
Chapter
I: Introduction:
resilience to mounting strains
“...Yet,
as the year wore on, fears began to grow about prospective inflationary
pressures. Concerns also began to mount about the growing imbalances in
the global economy, not least the low saving and high investment levels
in the United States and China, respectively, and record current account
imbalances. Against this backdrop, monetary policy tightened in a number
of industrial countries...”
Chapter
II: The global
economy
“...However,
several features of the current global upswing are less positive: fiscal
deficits are large; household savings seem unsustainably low in a number
of advanced economies; investment levels remain low; and global current
account imbalances have reached unprecedented levels...”
Chapter
IV: Monetary policy
in the advanced industrial economies
“...As
deflationary pressures faded, the Bank of Japan announced the end of its
unconventional quantitative easing policy but initially left its policy
rate unchanged at zero...”
Chapter
V: Foreign exchange
markets
“...As
in previous years, three main factors underpinned exchange rate
developments during the period under review: interest rate
differentials, the current account deficit and rising net international
liabilities of the United States, and continuing reserve accumulation in
China limiting the dollar's depreciation against the renminbi...”
Chapter
VIII: Conclusion:
coping with risks, today and tomorrow
“...Yet
there are considerable uncertainties and associated risks, not least
concerning inflationary pressures on the one hand, and a possible
unwinding of accumulated economic and financial imbalances on the
other. These could lead to financial market turbulence or a long period
of relatively slower global growth developments, or both...”
We
will not bore the reader by going over what the BIS has clearly stated,
except to note that they seem to see some problems and imbalances that
could have a negative impact on the global financial system. Both the
experts and the market are wrong, or the BIS is wrong – take your
pick. We will take one from column A, and one from column B, thank you
very much.
Liquidity
The
critical issue in all this (at least one of them) is liquidity, as in
excess global liquidity that has created a boom of never before seen
proportions – a virtual bubble bath of credit flooding the world.
After booms come busts – it is but the way of natural law.
Because
of both the sheer magnitude of the credit expansion, and the lack of
experience and track record of the new credit derivatives fueling a
large portion of it – we are without a doubt sailing in unchartered
waters. We may be up the proverbial creek.
Already
many unintended consequences have resulted, it remains to be seen what
other collateral damage unintentionally manifests itself. It is much
like Pandora’s box – better to leave unopened.
So
now, the mess of excess secretions is trying to be mopped up. Interest
rates around the world are on the rise. However, are the central bankers
serious about cleaning up the mess they have made, by inundating the
world in a flood of paper fiat credit and debt instruments?
Alternatively,
do they even know what such would entail, and how to go about it – or
if it is even possible to accomplish, without creating more unintended
consequences, resulting in the cure being worse than the disease? The
Fed is damned if they do and damned if they do not. The Fed is simply
damned, as well it should be. It is an accident looking for a time and
place to happen.
We
do not believe those responsible for monetary policy understand the
complexity of the task that stands before them, nor that they have the
means to address it, even if they were aware of it. Greed has blinded
many an eye to the light of the day.
We
are concerned that either the cure will be worse than the disease, or
that when push comes to shove, an addict will do what an addict does –
feed his habit with more of the same, trying to kill the pain without
first killing himself.
The
prognosis does not look favorable. The only solution that has the power
to fight such profligate pestilence – is Honest Money of silver and
gold.
The
problem is the excess liquidity – it cannot be cured with more of the
same. However, it is imperative to recognize that the cause of the
excesses is inherent within the nature of the beast: the creature known
as paper fiat debt-money.
When
credit, debt, and money are the same, the only choice is to inflate or
die. As we said, the prognosis is not promising without a return to the
hard currency system of the Constitution.
In
paper fiat land, the least that the central bankers should be doing is
raising reserve requirements So far it has been all talk, and my dad
always said – talk is cheap.
COMING SOON: A REQUEST FOR
AN AUDIT OF US GOLD RESERVES

© 2006 Douglas V. Gnazzo
Editorial Archive
Come
visit our new website: Honest
Money Gold & Silver Report
And read the Open
Letter to Congress

All
rights reserved. Any republication without written permission
of author
and Financial Sense prohibited.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Douglas V. Gnazzo
Honest Money Gold & Silver Report, LLC
Canton Center, CT USA
Email
| Website
About
the author: Douglas V.
Gnazzo is CEO of New England Renovation LLC, a historical restoration contractor
that specializes in restoring older buildings that are vintage historic
landmarks. He writes for numerous websites and his work appears both
here and abroad. Just recently he was honored by being chosen as a Foundation
Scholar for the Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education
(FAME).
Disclaimer:
The contents of this article represent the opinions of Douglas V.
Gnazzo. Nothing contained herein is intended as investment advice or
recommendations for specific investment decisions, and you should not
rely on it as such. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not a registered investment
advisor. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and
using methods believed to be reliable, but Douglas. V. Gnazzo cannot
accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result
of your reliance on this analysis and will not be held liable for the
consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein
or any omission. Individuals should consult with their broker and
personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities.
Do your own due diligence regarding personal investment decisions. This
article may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by
law. The purpose of this article is intended to be used as an
educational discussion of the issues involved. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not
a lawyer or a legal scholar. Information and analysis derived from the
quoted sources are believed to be reliable and are offered in good
faith. Only a highly trained and certified and registered legal
professional should be regarded as an authority on the issues involved;
and all those seeking such an authoritative opinion should do their own
due diligence and seek out the advice of a legal professional. Lastly
Douglas V. Gnazzo believes that The United States of America is the
greatest country on Earth, but that it can yet become greater. This
article is written to help facilitate that greater becoming. God Bless
America.
|