|
THE
NEW WORLD ORDER
Part 3: Secrets
by Douglas V.
Gnazzo
December
5, 2006
[
Previous parts: 1, 2 ]
“Who
was the fool, who the wise man, beggar or king?
Whether poor or rich, all's the same in death.” [1]
Abstract
In
last week’s part two of the series, we ended with several quotes from
Professor Carroll Quigley, a world renowned scholar who had written
quite extensively about secret societies and other elite groups, whose
sole purpose was to establish a New World Order.
The
following part of one such quote reveals important insights into not
only Quigley, but the entire subject as well.
“In
fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has
no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and
frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I
have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the
early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret records.
I
have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my
life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected,
both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies (notably to its
belief that England was an Atlantic rather than a European Power and
must be allied, or even federated, with the United States and must
remain isolated from Europe), but in general my chief difference of
opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in
history is significant enough to be known.” [2]
Notice
that Quigley states that he had no aversion to the “network” and
that he was close enough that he was allowed to examine its papers. He
also states that for MOST OF HIS LIFE he had been close to it and its
instruments.
Quigley
is talking about a “network,” which in his own words was comprised
of secret societies, and one that included wars and the killings of tens
of thousand of Africans and the capture and placement into slavery by as
many more – yet he says he doesn’t have any aversion to it?
Would
secret societies allow a non-member to examine its papers and secret
records, especially a world renowned scholar and writer? For what reason
would they allow that to occur?
Also,
notice how Quigley did not agree with the network’s Atlantic versus
European Power point of view. These are all very subtle pieces of the
puzzle we shall return to.
Paradigm Shifts
We
have seen the huge part that World War I played as a major pivot point
in the dynamics of paradigm shifts, the acting out of political
intentions, and their subsequent affect on society and human behavior,
both on the national and international level.
Prior
to WWI the emphasis was on the nation state. After WWI the focus was on
internationalism - government no longer constrained by national borders.
However, this change did not occur all at once. It slowly made the
transition from one view to the other.
In
part one of the series it was shown that the
established world view perceived the purpose of World War I to be the
war to end all wars. It did not accomplish its stated cause; instead, it
laid the groundwork for World War II. It was as if a purposeful design
had somehow formed and followed a desired function.
What
World War I did accomplish, and with surgical precision, was the end of
the Old World Order, and the preparation of a fertile crucible: the
human race – to accept the New World Order. It laid the groundwork for
the transition phase to begin, but it was not completed until after
World War II.
Groups
The
world was now the stage to several powerful groups with the same basic
goal: the establishment of a New World Order. However, each of these
groups had their own particular twist as to how the knot should be tied.
Yet the thread running through the strains remained the same.
There
were several main groups that were born from the same genetic makeup,
and in turn they spawned other sub-groups. The exegesis is similar to
throwing a stone into the water.
The
force of impact creates concentric circles, or waves of energy, that
emanate out from the center source. The further out from the center, the
weaker the force. The closer to the center, the more powerful the force.
All comes forth from the center source of power.
The
following are the main groups. There were others as well, but not as
powerful as these:
-
The
Club of Rome in Italy
-
The
Fabian Society in England
-
The
Round Table Group in Britain
-
The
Council On Foreign Relations in the U.S.
-
The
Institute for Pacific Relations in the U.S.
-
The
Royal Institute for International Affairs in Britain
As
with all endeavors there must be a source of money to finance whatever
is undertaken. This was true even with the elitist groups. Some had
members that were either wealthy or had well-placed friends with money
– or both. Sir Abe Bailey and the Astor fortunes were two main
contributors. Rhodes' and Rothschild’s were two more. Lazard Frere
another.
The
money power is the most dominant force in the world, even greater than
military power, for without funding there can be no military power. He
who holds the purse strings has control over whatever entity they are
financing; consequently, the money changers are often the dominant force
behind all such elite groups.
Dawn or Sunset?
The
dawn of the 20th Century was witness to a much weaker British
Empire than that which had ruled the world throughout the 19th
Century. Britain’s dominance had come from two main sources of
strength: it was home to the Industrial Revolution that had allowed
great wealth to be amassed, and this wealth gave rise to not only a
commercial superiority, but a military superiority as well, especially
on the high seas.
Britain’s
slow decline as the world’s greatest power came from a weakening of
its two above-mentioned sources of its strength. With all great empires
that try to rule the world, from Rome to Alexander, to Genghis and
Charlemagne, they all end up failing because of what can best be
describe as over reach.
If
any nation tries to conquer the world, driven by the lust of greed and
desire for power – that nation ends up defeating itself. It is the law
of thought – of destiny, and can be no other way – it is what it is.
The
war against Germany and its allies had accelerated the loss of Britain's
global dominance. By 1917, Britain was nearing a financial crisis, as
its gold reserves and American bonds had almost all been depleted to
fund the war. In steps the U.S. financiers, especially Morgan and
Rockefeller.
The Round Table
In
1910 Lord Milner, Cecil Rhodes, and Lionel Curtis formed the Round Table
Group. Of no minor significance is the name, which is a reference to
King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. The knights were also an
elitist group, in search of the Holy Grail nonetheless.
The
exact purpose of the Group is not easily discernible, as it had three
founders that each had a bit of a different world view in mind. Not
often brought up in discussions on the Round Table is the issue of
unseen powers behind the scenes – they who paid the bills.
We
have previously seen how Rhodes was somehow allowed ten years to go to
Oxford while taking trips to and from Africa. Rhodes had no money when
he started off for Africa, except for the money that Nathan
Rothschild put up to back him. Rothschild was the financial power
behind Rhodes. What was Nathan’s world vision and gain in all this –
gain, and nothing more.
Rhodes
was many things, but at the top of the list was the fact that he was a
white supremist. All other peoples were inferior and were to be ruled by
the white Aryan super race. Truth be known, Rhodes’ view was no
different then Nietzsche and Hitler’s.
He
was an elitist’s elitist - down to the bone. For Rhodes the Round
Table Group was a means to a greater end. He died before the Group was
actually formed, his vision left undone. Rhodes believed that if the
American Colonies had not been lost to Britain that a New World Order
would already have been complete.
It
was Milner as caretaker of Rhodes' trust money, and Curtis as the
visionary, who together finally created the Round Table. Milner was best
described as an Imperialist. His world vision was for Britain to remain
the super power of the world based on a nationalistic point of view that
would establish a supranational form of government. Rhodes' world view
was to rule the world based on an international style of a one world
government – run by the elite White Aryan Race. Milner was a racist as
well, but not of the scope of Rhodes.
Milner
was most interested in forming a British Imperial Federation to secure
Britain’s place in the world. For him the Round Table was the means
and the end was a consolidated British Empire. Milner was a doer not a
thinker. His was a hands-on approach that did not involve
internationalism.
Visions or Delusions?
The
delusional mind is most fascinating in how it works. It can say one
thing yet do the complete opposite, and then rationalize it all to
itself. For example, both Rhodes and Milner were involved with the
killing of tens of thousands of Africans, as well as the trade of tens
of thousands more into slavery. The rest were perceived as chattel,
subservient to their masters.
Yet
they both preached world peace – a world peace where one was either
one of the superior elite, or one of those ruled over as an inferior, or
dead. Simple and neat, at least for the elitists. If you asked those who
were subservient indentured chattel, or those that had been killed, not
many would vote in favor of such a twisted vision of world peace.
But
one never knows for sure, some say that in the end most want security
more than freedom. Presently, within the United States, the surrender of
precious freedoms in return for promised security can be seen taking
place before our very eyes.
Implementation
After
the unexpected death of Rhodes, all was left to Milner and Curtis to
complete. Curtis was obsessed with a one world government – Milner was
not. He was more interested in seeing the British Empire consolidate its
holdings in a United Federation across the globe. This is an important
point to recognize: Milner was not interested in forsaking any British
sovereignty for an international organization, as was Curtis, and
Rhodes, before he died.
In
1910, Milner finally agreed to formally recognize the Round Table Group,
and to have it publish reports to spread its propaganda – they named
the publication: The Round Table.
Soon
other Round Table Groups sprang up across the British Empire: Australia,
Canada, South Africa, India and New Zealand all had chapters.
Milner
saw the Federation of the British Empire to be the end result of the
Round Table. Curtis on the other hand, saw the Federation as a step
towards a global government or New World Order. Curtis was much closer
to Rhodes' world view than was Milner.
Tentacles
By
the end of the war in 1914, the network had to be expanded. Lionel
Curtis took the challenge on quite readily. He formed various
organizations in all of Britain’s dominions, as a cover for the select
elect to build their New World Order.
In
Britain he established the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
whose inner core consisted of the members of the Round Table Group. The
United States saw the Council on Foreign Relations appear in New York,
which was a front for J.P. Morgan and Company who had direct ties with
England’s Round Table Group, and a smaller version in New York, as
well.
During
the Paris Peace Conference, many of Morgan’s boys met and became
involved with Milner’s boys. Morgan was one of the big financiers of
the elite in America, although he heralded from England through Peabody
and Company, and had Grenfell Morgan & Co. in London. This meant
that ultimately Rothschild was behind Morgan, as he had set Peabody up
as his emissary. Peabody in turn started Morgan off in business. The
roots runs deep – the seed the same.
Legal Eagles
Morgan
also had a number of other Wall Street firms that he was associated
with, especially legal firms. Elihu Root, Russell Leffingwell, and the
Dulles brothers were a few of Morgan’s legal experts. This legal
connection is generally not recognized for the large part it plays in
the establishment of the New World Order. Some say that the biggest
crooks are they who carry the laws around with them in their brief
cases. Owen Young of the Young Plan for war reparations was a Morgan
boy, as was Dawson, Lamont and Davis.
Jerome
D. Greene, Harvard Law graduate, was general manager of the Rockefeller
Institute from 1910-1912. He then became a trustee to the Rockefeller
Institute, to the Rockefeller foundation, and to the Rockefeller General
Education Board until 1939.
From
1917-1932 he was with the firm of Lee, Higginson, and Company. In 1918
Greene was appointed executive secretary of the American section of the
Allied Maritime Transport Council, which was stationed in London. While
in London, Greene lived in Toynbee Hall, which has been founded by
Milner of the Round Table Group. In 1883, Milner and Toynbee had formed
a group of political intellectuals at Oxford University.
New York by Way of
London
Thus
Greene had direct contact with the members of the Group. At the Paris
Peace Conference he was secretary to the Reparations Commission. Upon
his arrival back in the United States, he helped establish the Council
on Foreign Relations, which served as the New York front for Curtis'
Institute of International Affairs.
Through
Wilson, Morgan and Rockefeller pushed for their version of the New World
Order at the Paris Peace Conference. Britain’s weakening position can
be seen in that Wilson’s Fourteen Point plan was the core of the Peace
Agreement.
It
must be remembered, however, that Colonel Mandall House was behind
Wilson’s plan, and that he had designed the plan with Lord Milner.
Both House and Milner were elite socialists. Thus the depth of the inner
core of the elite affected the outcome no matter which “side”
prevailed.
This
is their signature mark – to control both sides through their
clandestine resources of power, seeing which side appeared to be winning
as the end approached, and then removing their support from the
weakening side – thus insuring the winner and sealing the final fate
of both sides.
Senator
Henry Cabot Lodge led a majority of US Senators that were dead-set
against Wilson’s 14 Point Plan, especially in regards to its limiting
and restricting of American freedoms, be they at home or overseas. The
senators saw Wilson’s plan for what it was – a socialistic attempt
at a New World Order that sacrificed nationalism for internationalism.
Nevertheless, Wilson refused to compromise. The US Senate rejected
membership in the League on March 8, 1920.
Blue
Bloods
Steady
minds in the US had prevailed, at least for the time being. However,
collectivists don’t give up easily, if at all. The elite international
family dynasties have carried the battle on for centuries – they see
it as their heritage to pass on to their progeny. It is in their blood
they say – blue bloods born to conquer and rule.
"We
are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this
mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local
nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips
what we are doing with our hands." [3]
This
ends part three. Next week part four to continue the story of The New
World Order.
“Read
no history: nothing but biography,
for that is life without theory.” [4]
[1]
Skull & Bones Engraved Motto
[2]
Tragedy and Hope by Professor Carroll Quigley
[3]
Arnold Toynbee, "The
Trend of International Affairs Since the War", International
Affairs, November 1931, p. 809
[4]
Benjamin Disraeli

© 2006 Douglas V. Gnazzo
Editorial Archive
All
rights reserved. Any republication without written permission
of author
and Financial Sense prohibited.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Douglas V. Gnazzo
Honest Money Gold & Silver Report, LLC
Canton Center, CT USA
Email
| Website
About
the author: Douglas V.
Gnazzo is CEO of New England Renovation LLC, a historical restoration contractor
that specializes in restoring older buildings that are vintage historic
landmarks. He writes for numerous websites and his work appears both
here and abroad. Just recently he was honored by being chosen as a Foundation
Scholar for the Foundation for the Advancement of Monetary Education
(FAME).
Disclaimer:
The contents of this article represent the opinions of Douglas V.
Gnazzo. Nothing contained herein is intended as investment advice or
recommendations for specific investment decisions, and you should not
rely on it as such. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not a registered investment
advisor. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and
using methods believed to be reliable, but Douglas. V. Gnazzo cannot
accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result
of your reliance on this analysis and will not be held liable for the
consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein
or any omission. Individuals should consult with their broker and
personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities.
Do your own due diligence regarding personal investment decisions. This
article may contain information that is confidential and/or protected by
law. The purpose of this article is intended to be used as an
educational discussion of the issues involved. Douglas V. Gnazzo is not
a lawyer or a legal scholar. Information and analysis derived from the
quoted sources are believed to be reliable and are offered in good
faith. Only a highly trained and certified and registered legal
professional should be regarded as an authority on the issues involved;
and all those seeking such an authoritative opinion should do their own
due diligence and seek out the advice of a legal professional. Lastly
Douglas V. Gnazzo believes that The United States of America is the
greatest country on Earth, but that it can yet become greater. This
article is written to help facilitate that greater becoming. God Bless
America.
|