|
BUSY
BEE BUGABOO AND ANOTHER
UNSUSPECTED AGENT OF DOOM
by David Petch
www.treasurechests.info
May 21, 2007
This
article was posted for the benefit of subscribers on May 6, 2007
Recently,
beekeepers have reported losses of up to 80% of their hives from various
locations around the globe. Over the past month, there have been several
different hypotheses proposed for the sudden disappearance of bees
recently coined “Colony Collapse Disorder” (CCD):
i)
Transmissions from cell phones might be killing bees http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/wildlife/article2449968.ece.
Cell phones and their networks have been around for 20 years, so a
sudden decline due to phones is highly improbable.
ii)
Mites infecting bees around the globe: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21660605-421,00.html
iii)
Interestingly, research into the mites have shown they are
carriers of potential viruses that infect bees: http://www.latimes.com/news/la-sci-bees26apr26,0,7437491.story?track=mostviewed-storylevel
. The article goes into detail about how fungi, Nosema cerenae have been infecting hives. This fungi is one of many
bee pathogens, including mites that infect bees with RNA viruses called
iflavaviruses. Protection of hives from the fungi can be used to protect
hives as well as pesticides to wipe out mites.
Nosema
cerenae used to
only affect Asian bees, but with importation of bee colonies around the
globe, this spore-forming fungi now resides in many countries. Addition
of fungicides to reduce the impact of fungus on beehives will only cause
a stronger, resistant strain to emerge, making it even more deadly
(Okay, here is a joke: a mushroom was not having much luck with the
ladies and his friends could not figure out why; they all thought he was
such a fungi). This type of fungicide abuse is similar to what is
occurring in hospitals. The over excessive administration of antibiotics
for cuts and in soaps etc. has lead to drug-resistant bacterial strains
that are deadly to immune-compromised people (organ transplant patients
on immunosuppressive drugs, cancer patients, AIDS victims, elderly
etc.), particularly bacteria with the genus Pseudmononas.
The
above different points suggest that there are numerous pathogens that
can affect bees, many affected by climate temperature. The past few
years have seen the Northern Hemisphere and other places around the
globe experience higher temperatures, which could improve growth
characteristics for certain pests. As an example, British Columbia,
Canada has had a pine beetle infestation that threatens to destroy
between 70-80% of their forests by 2013. In the past, naturally
occurring forest fires would burn sections of forest that would
eliminate the beetle or other forest pests. Rotations of multiple fires
over many years would significantly reduce the population of the pine
beetle or other pests so only small regions of forest were affected at
any given time. Since forest fires have been fought tooth and nail over
the past 60 years, a greater percentage of the current forest is at risk
from being wiped out. Man has created a monoculture in BC in a sense, by
having large sections of forest not being allowed to burn.
Much
warmer temperatures in BC over the past decade along with forest fire
prevention have created the “setup” for a significant ecological
collapse in BC over the next 10 years (less water retention in trees
translates to less water storage in soil will cause flash floods,
increased erosion etc. etc.). Things will eventually stabilize, but the
bottom line is “Do not mess
with the mechanics of Mother Nature or at some point it will come back
and bite you in the butt
”.
The
bees will continue to live, but at a reduced level until they reach a
balance with nature. Saskatchewan has had a ban on importing bees for 20
years, which has resulted in preventing the introduction of foreign
pests e.g. mites, viruses, fungi. The following article is very
informative and discusses why CCD is not as big a problem in Canada: http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/insects/index.html
The
following article is one of the best I was able to dig up on CCD, which
basically describes the condition as a summation of stresses coming to a
head at once: http://www.agbio.ca/Docs/Colony_collapse_bees.pdf
. Another thread I wish to address is from the one and only, Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony_collapse_disorder
. I do not think that genetically modified crops are having any impact
on bee populations. Tests are performed prior to new crops introduced
into the environment to ensure key insects are not impacted: http://www.cornpest.ca/lib/news.cfm?id=32#bottom
. Other articles similar to this may be found at www.cornpest.ca.
The
importance of bees can not be understated but an urban legend may have
been created about a supposed Albert Einstein quote “If the bee
disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four
years left of life”. I will refer you to the following thread that
questions the validity Einstein even made such a quote: http://www.snopes.com/quotes/einstein/bees.asp
. It is always important to check and double check references and never
assume what you hear is the gospel. Do your own research to arrive at
your own conclusions in any facet of life and many bumps along the way
will be avoided.
It is
unlikely that ALL the bees are going to die off the face of the earth.
The big problem for bee declines appears to be present in commercial
beehives. Honeybees are not native to
North America
, instead they were introduced from other countries. Honey bees are
selected for many traits, one of them being a “degree” of
aggressiveness towards innocent creatures stumbling within a certain
vicinity of their hive. The following thread highlights the accidental
introduction of the African honeybee into the Brazilian environment and
it’s tracking to the north over the past 4 decades: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/MG113
. The globalization of economies has also resulted in the introduction
of new pests into ecosystems. As such, a millennium will likely be
required at a minimum to establish a new equilibrium within the balance
of ecosystems; far too long to even consider in the day to day driven
economics. Man is going to have to quickly learn to go organic and use
lesser amounts of herbicides and pesticides, not only due to the
potential disruption in pollinated food crops due to declines in bee
populations, but peak oil.
The
first thing that pops into the head of a person first stumbling upon the
term “Peak Oil” is “Oh great, now it is going to cost 3x the
current amount to fill my gas tank………@#$^$#$% great”. What many
people fail to realize is how integrated oil is in our day to day lives.
Oil is used to make plastics, herbicides, pesticides, antibacterial
agents (benzoic acid) etc. The following thread is an interactive
cartoon that shows what household items contain a link to oil: http://www.priweb.org/ed/pgws/uses/uses_home.html
. The number of items is nearly inexhaustible due to its presence in
most items. When peak oil does become more of a reality, it will
significantly impact the amount of fertilizer, herbicide and pesticide
application onto fields, which will result in increasingly lower global
crop output going forward.
Transportation
of beehives across counties will become limited to a narrow range, so I
think apiarists are going to become as common as the baker, tailor, and
butcher over the course of the coming years. Operations will be local,
but the apiarist will likely be one hat of many that an individual may
wear e.g. the future apiarist likely run a farm or simply be a family
planting their own crops.
Peak Oil, the Other
Unsuspected Agent of Doom
I wanted to tie peak
oil into the prior portion of the article to show how the effects are
further reaching and deeper than most would initially suspect by a
surface viewing of a headline. The remainder of the article will discuss
two aspects of peak oil I think will have significant implications for
global society: peak global GDP and peak CO2.
Peak
Global GDP
Since
the dawn of time, economic growth of any nation has involved
exploitation of resources of another kingdom once they deplete their
own. Easter Island is renowned for having numerous stone statues, but
most are not familiar with the ancient economics that drove that
population to death (refer to the following thread for full reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Easter_island
). A former tribe living on Easter Island made an economy for building
and moving statutes. Carts were made to move the statues as well as
maintain a fleet of fishing vessels and homes. The rapid explosion of
their population resulted in complete deforestation of the island, which
translated into no new fishing boats to be built or maintenance of
current ones i.e. no fish, no food with death to follow. The sudden
disappearance of the trees collapsed the statue industry and all was
abandoned; the civilization as they knew it ceased to exist.
Fast
forward to the 15th-17th century Europe when
England, France and Spain had nearly depleted their forests. The
European conquests of the new Americas during this time frame saw the
accumulation of gold the European Central Banks have been selling onto
the market as of late. It is interesting to note that the wealth of
England, Spain, France and other notable countries was initially founded
upon exploitation of resources from South America. The gold came at no
cost, aside from filling ships full of prisoners and the equivalent of
Hells Angels persona to go to rape and pillage the new found land, all
in the name of “Her Majesty”.
The
USA was initially settled by those of Asian descent some 12,000-24,000
years ago (based upon current research) only to essentially be
expropriated by European conquerors in the 1600’s. The growth seen in
the USA or any other prior culture for that matter has been, and always
will be, based upon an apparent inexhaustible energy source until it
became apparently exhausted. Failure to have a constant supply or an
ever-increasing amount of energy will result in an inevitable implosion
in society (see above). For this reason, the primary driver for
countries seeking new land in the past was to secure new resource pools
for continued economic growth.
Currently,
it appears global oil production peaked at 86 million barrels/day and is
now in the process of declining (currently producing between 85-85.5
million barrels/day). The growth in China and India has been around 8%
and 10% YOY, respectively for the past 10 years. Their consumption of
global energy has risen from some 5% 10 years ago to 11% today. If
growth in China and India continue at their blistering pace, they must
consume oil that would otherwise be consumed by other nations. Peak oil
will likely result in a 3-6% decline year over year in production so in
2017, global oil production will be between 62.7 – 50.9 million
barrels/day, respectively.
There
have been some extremely famous people (Jim Rogers) state the current
commodity boom will run for 20-30 years, with the globe currently in
year 7. As stated in the recent paragraphs, expansion of other countries
i.e. consumption of resources requires a constant or growing supply of
energy. Once peak oil occurs, it will result in the inevitable decline
of global GDP for a significant period of time until a new equilibrium
is reached. Oil is used for transporting goods, so a sudden lack of oil
or high oil prices are going to significantly impact the consumption
profile of global consumers. High prices could literally cap consumption
that could cause demand destruction.
Countries
will try and get around higher commodity prices by inflating their
currencies, but eventually a collapse of debt and hyperinflation will
cause a severe deflation (as per Easter Island). Commodity prices are
likely to remain high for the next 20-30 years, but that does not
necessarily translate into a 25-year bull market in related
stocks.
The
Mexican government received around 40% of the money in their coffers
from the Cantarell Oil Field. With Cantarell now declining around 20%
YOY, this is going to significantly affect the ability of the Mexican
government to function at current output. The socialist candidate in the
2006 elections, Obrador lost by a marginal 1.35% (give or take). Over
the coming years, expect pressure on the government to eventually take a
similar stance to Hugo Chavez in Venezuela post 2012 Mexican elections
(I expect a socialist landslide at this point in time). Nearly every
gold or silver company in Canada or the US has some form of operations
based in Mexico. An event such as this would be more than enough to cap
the bull market in gold/silver stocks. Gold and silver bullion likely
would rise even higher in price due to the typical scenario of
socialists mining known deposits without diverting any cash to pay for
drilling to increasing reserves or maintain infrastructure.
Many
countries are going to nationalize their assets by 2014, making
ownership of resource stocks improbable. Fear of nationalization will
drive down stock prices, just look at any stock that had exclusive
presence in Venezuela or Bolivia. For the threat of nationalization post
2012, we recommend conversion of money in Mexican gold/silver stocks
into gold/silver bullion around mid 2010 to no later than early 2011 (it
will be the late investors that end up holding the bag in gold and
silver stocks). The above scenario may take later to occur than
presented, but it is better to lower the degree of portfolio risk than
take any risk at all.
Peak
CO2
Peak
oil also will bring many different peaks e.g. peak technology, peak GDP,
peak industrialization etc. One unsuspecting item is the likelihood of
peak CO2 (at least the amount from human production). The
levels of CO2 have been increasing slowly since the advent of
the industrial revolution in Europe in the late 18th
century.
Currently,
there is a 10-15 year window mankind has to establish a flat lining of
CO2 production to cause a reversal of the warming trend
50-100 years from now. The expected 3-6% YOY decline in oil production
will result in a similar decline in CO2 production. Many
suspect that coal consumption will be increased in order to meet rising
energy demand, thereby negating the percentage decline expected to be
seen from declining oil production. Oil is used for transportation and I
suspect that many will be surprised at how quickly the declines in
extracting coal and other forms of mining on a daily basis will be seen
once supplies bottleneck. As such I think although global warming is an
important issue, it is relatively safe to assume that CO2
production from humankind will decline 3-6% YOY for the next 20-50
years.
Currently,
the global icecaps are melting, which causes one to ponder a well-known
Newton’s law. “For every reaction, there is an equal and opposite
reaction. There are large blocks of ice in Antarctica and other places
around the globe exerting a tremendous downward pressure on the
Earth’s crust. Melting the ice away essentially lifts the pressure
from the vice, allowing the opposite pressure to be exerted in an upward
direction. This could translate into strong plate tectonic movement over
the coming centuries, which translate into more volcanic activity. Since
one major volcanic event can spew more CO2 into the
atmosphere than man produces in a given year, Mother Nature will be the
likely culprit for any increases in the coming decades.
Summary
The
purpose of this article was to collate all the current information about
CCD seen with bee populations and possible causes. This phenomenon
should be the central focus of governments for research, because a
measly 3-5 million USD/year is small compared to allowing a $15
billion/year crop industry to operate. If the trend continues, expect
food prices to go off the charts.
Peak
oil ties into the bee issues via herbicide, pesticide, and fertilizer
production. Lower levels of these components to crops will result in
lower yields. Fertilizing fields with organic means (cow, pig and
chicken manure, composting etc.) will be important for attempting to
maintain yields.
With
Peak Oil will come Peak CO2. The Earth will return to a
homeostatic balance over the course of the next 300-500 years and
hopefully humankind is still around to witness this event. The release
of carbon trapped beneath the surface of the Earth (oil, bitumen and
coal) has increased the carbon pool of the planet, thereby carbon based
life for hundreds of millions of years. One of the few benefits of
humankind has had in recycling carbon back to the planet for
carbon-based life.
There
is a lot to learn about the web of nature and it is important to walk
around such webs rather than right through, because the outcome could be
rather sticky.
Last
week I released an update on the US Dollar Index, which will be the last
of technical analysis reports I put on the web for the next 4-5 months.
The next article I put out in 3-4 weeks will be controversial to say the
least…hint: it has to do with the global government system.
David
Petch

© 2007 David Petch
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Captain Hook
TreasureChests.info
Email
Treasure
Chests is a market timing service specializing in value based position
trading in the precious metals and equity markets, with an orientation
geared to identifying intermediate-term swing trading opportunities.
Specific opportunities are identified utilizing a combination of
fundamental, technical, and inter-market analysis. This style of
investing has proven to be very successful for wealthy and sophisticated
investors, as it reduces risk and enhances returns when the methodology
is applied effectively. Those interested discovering more about how the
strategies described above can enhance your wealth; please visit our web
site at http://www.treasurechests.info.
Disclaimer:
The above is a matter of opinion and is not intended as investment
advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and
utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility
for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Comments within the text should not be construed as specific
recommendations to buy or sell securities. Individuals should consult
with their broker and personal financial advisors before engaging in any
trading activities. Do your own due diligence regarding personal
investment decisions.
Unless
otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by www.treasurechests.info
. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any
purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification,
storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than
personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense.
|