|
BETWEEN
A ROCK AND A HARD PLACE
by Captain Hook
www.treasurechests.info
September 17, 2007
Bernanke is an academic,
and he acts like one, relying on the safety of flawed models all too
often. And all too often, it could be argued this is keeping him behind
the curve in terms of official measures, looking at backward indicators
in setting future policy. Greenspan on the other hand operated more like
he came from the school of hard knocks (like a streetwise gangster),
where some (neocon types) would argued he had a real feel for what need
be done, and was customarily ahead of the curve in official policy
measures, or backroom deals for that matter, whatever would get the job
done. Of course another way of looking at Greenspan’s style is he was
an insecure little egomaniac who would pander the mob far too easily. In
turn then, and in consideration of all the water that flowed
beneath the bridge during his tenure, the maestro made it almost
impossible for the next guy to succeed in his job because of his own
success, not only in using up resources (increasingly aggressive money
supply growth thresholds), but also in terms of making comparisons to
the new guy impossible unless he were equally crazy.
Enter
Ben Bernanke, who could be saying to himself now, ‘I must have been
crazy to take this job because I will come out of this looking like a
fool no matter how good a job I do’. And you know what, if that’s
what he saying to himself now, he’s right. There’s no way he will
come out of this situation looking good in my opinion, because the party
is over. And I think he is in fact attempting to do a ‘good job’ in
the sense he knows this, and opposite to the Helicopter Ben label
hung on him while he was busy being an academic, is not only attempting
to shake this stigma, but also trying to get people understanding just
how serious the problems are American’s face. So, we go from monetary
policy being handled by a secretive and opaque sociopath who still loves
(even though he’s supposedly retired) to subject the public to
grandstanding, to a family man who is becoming increasingly humbled by
the reality of his job the more time he spends in the position.
Between
a rock and a hard place – how does such a catchphrase fit into this
picture then? In a nutshell, and in relation to the above, this is where
Bernanke’s Fed currently resides, stuck between a rock, which is the
monetary discipline a rising gold price demands, and a hard place, which
is deflation. You see Bernanke cannot make the true level of monetary
inflation known because if this were to become a realization by the
market, gold would go up and he would be forced to either pull back on
the throttle or watch increasing numbers attempt to raise prices,
killing the credit cycle for sure. Of course on the other side of the
equation that’s exactly what the problem is, the consumer is up to his
eyeballs in debt, getting older, and beginning to realize maybe he
doesn’t need all the toys considering it’s putting in his grave
prematurely. So, increasingly these two worlds appear destined to
collide, one suggestive we should look forward to some degree of
accelerating hyperinflation first, with the other pointing out the fact
we’ve already been there and done that, and now we fall down go boom
in deflationary collapse a la Japan circa 1990. The belief here is once
the real estate bubble is popped – it’s all over.
Naturally
then, the mob is demanding rate relief. As alluded to above however,
they’ve already had it. First via carry trade, where unregulated hedge
funds got paid not only on unbelievably leveraged investment schemes
with a zero cost of capital, but in currency gains as increasing numbers
continued to jump on the bandwagon until recently. And second, through
the housing related ATM machine the lax lending standards the ‘credit
crunch’ is predicated on provided to ‘Joe Public’. So, as
mentioned in previous discussions on the subject, and although I cannot
offer any cumulative totals or percentages of what all the combined
monetary largesse was with the various schemes added together (the M’s
did not capture aggregate / hidden inflation totals correctly), it’s
my belief the world has already enjoyed a mild hyperinflation of sorts
already then. What’s more, I also think it’s reflected in the gold
price, but that because of various methodologies employed by a price
managing establishment, gains were no where near what they should have
considering the oceans of fiat currency brought into creation these past
years through various means.
But
now it appears both the mechanisms and benefits associated with these
practices are gone, with officials now having to give away money in
preventing implosion. That’s right, both the Bush Bail Out and a Befuddled Bernanke
are not good signs pressure in the global economy’s pipe will be
maintained under current management. As evidence concern exists here,
stock markets appeared generally unimpressed Friday in reaction to a
concerted effort of not only giving a bunch of free money away, but also
promising there’s more where that came from. Indeed, and in my
opinion, stock markets put in lack luster performances considering that
was a pretty big card Bush played last week.
Why
did this occur? The simple answer is because these measures simply won’t work. The
more complicated answer is in history. One aspect is biblical and the
other just common sense. The first is from the bible. Please forgive me
if this is not exact verse. ‘Do onto thy neighbor as one would have
them do onto you’. Here, what I am referring to is the fact many
unsuspecting Europeans and Asians are very upset American brokerages
unloaded disproportionately high percentages of their toxic (subprime)
waste on them, meaning good luck even selling them T-Bonds in the
future. American brokers did this to get these loans off their books,
because even though some other schmuck owned them through some sort of
fund, failure here had the potential to impact a firm’s working
capital, which is exactly what you are seeing today from one corner of
the world to the other. And the second thing to look at is what happened
in markets historically, where we will start with a more recent stunner
(you might be stunned by the result), and work through the rest of
the material from there. Here, I am referring to the fact the
credit cycle is exhausted, FOR REAL, and is perhaps best tracked for our
purposes in terms of margin debt. (See Figure 1)
Figure
1

As you
can see above, stocks generally continue to rise as long as the credit
cycle, or more specifically margin cycle as it applies to stocks, is
growing in healthy fashion. Such a sequence can be observed in the post
’87 crash run taking stocks into a blow-off top witnessed in the year
2000. At the end, the Fed was worried about potential Y2K problems and
flooded the system with money ahead of the turn at millennium. This
provided the liquidity that fuelled the tech bubble in turn. What’s
more, it’s important to note that at this time the system was in
relatively good shape in comparison to today, where it didn’t take
much largesse on a relative basis to create this condition.
Today
however, it’s a different ball game, where just over the past month or
so some half trillion dollars has been collectively added to European
and US banking systems in addressing what is being termed ‘liquidity
problems’, which are in fact largely insolvencies. Combine this
knowledge with the observation the rate of change in margin debt has
recently shot up just like prior tops in stocks (like in 2000), and one
must conclude this is not a good sign for stock market bulls. This is
especially true because again, like in 2000, the rate of change in the
S&P 500 (SPX) remains divergently depressed, meaning a very
important ‘sell signal’ has just been triggered. This is the most
important technical observation that can be made with regard to the
stock market’s fate at present in my opinion. This is also why
although there are conflicting signals that will be presented below, one
must be extremely cautious in terms of your portfolio structure at
present, as a significant ‘liquidity related event’ in the stock
market is now confirmed and not far off if history is a good guide. (See
Figure 2)
Figure
2

And
the Toxic Subprime Disaster
is spreading like a disease, with even the oldest and most established banks in
the world being infected. What’s more, speculation is circulating a
big bank is about to go bust. Based on this news then, it wouldn’t be
a bit surprising if it turned out to be Barclays. Talk this weekend in
Jackson Hole about the credit collapse only affecting the shadow banking system
is self-serving and disingenuous, especially coming out of the top
German banker. First we have prominent banks in Germany needing a bail
out, and now it’s spreading to England, while these guys are still
attempting Houdini tactics in having us look the other way. Logic would
suggest it’s only a matter of time before a big US bank finds itself
in some real trouble. The problem in Western economies (Japan included)
is that purchasing power at the consumer level is gone. US manufacturing
jobs are gone, and so is the work force’s collective purchasing power.
In the U.S. purchasing power as measured by M1 has been
contracting for some time, indicative of recession, or worse; but
authorities hide this condition. What is worse? Answer: Deflation, and
then depression.
This
is why while one can expect some kind of a pop in stocks later this
month if the Fed cuts interest rates by at least a half-point, but
don’t expect the rally to last. At least that’s the message
presented in Figure 3 below, which is what happened the last time (1930)
the US was in similar circumstances compared to present. Consumers were
tapped after a credit binge in the 30’s, just like they are right now,
which is why even after initial interest rate cuts, stocks still kept
falling (crashing) for a period of time. (See Figure 3)
Figure
3

Further
to this vein of thinking, this is why interest rates, both at the Discount level and to
the consumer (Fed Funds Rate) will
need to go negative in real terms before any noticeable / prolonged
effect from interest rate policy should be expected. As you can see
below, in attempting to fight the inflation bogy, real rates are a long
way from being negative. (See Figure 4)
Figure
4

Where
the Fed is going wrong here is it’s attempting to fight commodity
inflation based on growing demand originating out of Asia while ignoring
it’s own collapsing consumer. This is a recipe for a crash in equity
values due to a non-responsive / misguided Fed. The implication here is
it will take a ‘big hit’ in the stock market before the Fed wakes up
to the realization it’s behind the curve in terms of lowering rates.
And as mentioned above, even when rates are lowered, such policy will
have a negligible effect for quite some time if history is a good guide.
Again, and in terms of rates to the consumer, they had better hurry up
because the Real Fed Funds Rate is a long way from being negative when
measured using official inflation statistics. (See Figure 5)
Figure
5

Of
course if we were to use an inflation rate closer to reality, real rates would already be
negative. But this exercise is based on measuring relativity, so we will
not belabor this point. Just so you know however, if such figures were
used, they would indicate the situation is far worse than official
statistics are letting on; again, with actual real rates already
negative. What’s more, this is another ‘big reason’ to be
concerned about the stock market, because it means maintaining pressure
in the pipe might prove difficult if other factors begin to unravel.
With this in mind, below we present two analog based plots measuring the
comparative trades patterns of the Dow from the 1930’s and the SPX of
today. If I had to pick between the two, the first one appears to be a
better match, which in fact also matches Dave’s thoughts on the
trading pattern that should be expecting in coming days. Here, the
bottom line is that after a lower high in the SPX is witnessed in coming
weeks, if history is a good guide, stocks would peel-off approximately
50-percent in the following six-months. At least that’s what happened
to the Dow after it reached its echo-bubble crescendo in 1937. (See
Figure 6)
Figure
6

And
I would not characterize the other possible outcome as ‘good’
either, where an extension of sloppy trade into next year would likely
not provide us with the returns in our metals and energy related
holdings we are anticipating at some point. (i.e. sizable intermediate
degree gains.) Of course such concerns would not matter to us if we
could make money on the short side of the stock market while we wait
(hedging relating short selling / protective put buying), but being
observant speculators we cannot short stocks, not with exiting short positions at
historic highs along with monetization efforts
accelerating. Here, it’s the observant investor / speculator that’s
also ‘between a rock and a hard place’, not able to ‘safely’
invest / bet on either inflation or asset deflation at this particular
time. (See Figure 7)
Figure
7

So, we
wait and watch in this respect, where if things change over the next
month or so, meaning renewed strength in stocks burns off a large part
the collective short position in the market, we would of course
reconsider our position at the time. Along these lines I do find it
interesting some signs of a possible top in
shorting activities are beginning to show up. But one must remember the
golden rule in this respect. If the Specialists are not
buying insurance, neither should you. Moreover, monthly candles appear
quite bullish in predominantly all markets we follow. We witnessed some
impressive reversals in August. Potentially unfortunate for the
unobservant however, hidden in side the recovery in prices, 10-minute
bars are counting higher in threes, suggestive all gains made in the
second half of August will at a minimum be tested at some point in the
not too distant future. Here, if the corrective process in stocks is to
extend a ‘normal’ amount of time, which often turns out to be 55
trading days, then we should see ‘round two’ of the panic witnessed
in July between now and mid-October. Stochastically speaking it’s
difficult not seeing bank stocks and financials breaking
down further soon, closing right on trend line support in August.
We
apologize, but we must reserve the rest for subscribers. This is of
course not a problem if you like what you read below.
If
this is the kind of analysis you are looking for, we invite you to visit
our newly improved web site and discover more about how our service can help you
in not only this regard, but on higher level aid you in achieving your
financial goals. For your information, our newly
reconstructed site includes such improvements as automated
subscriptions, improvements to trend identifying / professionally
annotated charts, to the
more detailed quote pages
exclusively designed for independent investors who like to stay on top
of things. Here, in addition to improving our advisory service, our aim
is to also provide a resource center, one where you have access to well
presented ‘key’ information concerning the markets we cover.
On
top of this, and in relation to identifying value based opportunities in
the energy, base metals, and precious metals sectors, all of which
should benefit handsomely as increasing numbers of investors recognize
their present investments are not keeping pace with actual inflation, we
are currently covering 62 stocks (and growing) within our portfolios. Again, this is another
good reason to drop by and check us out.
And
if you have any questions, comments, or criticisms regarding the above,
please feel free to drop us a line. We very much enjoy
hearing from you on these matters, although we may not be able to
respond back directly, so please do not be disappointed if this is the
case.
Good
investing all.
Captain
Hook

© 2007 Captain Hook
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Captain Hook
TreasureChests.info
Email
Treasure
Chests is a market timing service specializing in value based position
trading in the precious metals and equity markets, with an orientation
geared to identifying intermediate-term swing trading opportunities.
Specific opportunities are identified utilizing a combination of
fundamental, technical, and inter-market analysis. This style of
investing has proven to be very successful for wealthy and sophisticated
investors, as it reduces risk and enhances returns when the methodology
is applied effectively. Those interested discovering more about how the
strategies described above can enhance your wealth; please visit our web
site at http://www.treasurechests.info.
Disclaimer:
The above is a matter of opinion and is not intended as investment
advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and
utilizing methods believed reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility
for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis.
Comments within the text should not be construed as specific
recommendations to buy or sell securities. Individuals should consult
with their broker and personal financial advisors before engaging in any
trading activities. Do your own due diligence regarding personal
investment decisions.
Unless
otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by www.treasurechests.info
. No part of these pages, either text or image may be used for any
purpose other than personal use. Therefore, reproduction, modification,
storage in a retrieval system or retransmission, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, for reasons other than
personal use, is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense.
|