|
THE
MAGNIFICENT SEVEN
(Part 5 of Series)
by Dr. Stephen
Rinehart
July 26, 2004
Background:
The
Magnificent Seven is a chronicle about the adventures of Seven
Weekly Cycles who rode onto the western scene many decades ago
to save a poor small village from being raided by a group of
vicious bandits. Today
we look back in time at the Magnificent Seven riding with the M3
Monetary Boys. What did you say your name is - Nelson? Well, Mr
Nelson maybe we can pass some time together in the hot afternoon
sun while waiting for the stagecoach to Purgatory:
You
say there was a rumor in 1910 about a group of investment
bankers who proposed a new currency system with a uniform
discount rate? Mr Nelson, I found this old sign from a private
railroad car under a wagon wheel with the following numbers
written on it: 40, 52, 69, 109, 176, 233, and 333. Let us go
back in time to look at these numbers (i.e., long wave cycles)
in the M3 Money Stock from 1980s.
The
Old Wild West:
Charts
1 - 6
describe the Magnificent Seven as they looked when they rode
thru the M3 Money Stocks from the 1980s. We are accustomed to
thinking the M3 Money Stock following a linear regression
trendline for long periods of time (i.e., Chart 1 and Chart 2)
and this is the case. However, there has been a distinct change
in the slope of the trendline from 4.6 billion per week
(1981-1994) to 11.4 billion per week (1995-2004). However, the
surprise finding was the
very periodic oscillations (long wave weekly cycles) in the
actual M3 dataset from 1981-2004.
This
is a possibly a significant finding – yet to be further
explored.
One might intuitively expect that if longwave weekly cycles
existed, the result would come from oscillations in the source
term (M3) itself but the fact that the oscillations are very
periodic over long time-scales implies something more
fundamental is taking place. There maybe a controlled and
pattern behavior of “cycles” in M3 by the world Central
Banking System which feed into the amplitudes of the cycles
world equity markets (such cycles are also probably present in
M1 and M2). The largest cycle in M3 is usually the 266-week
cycle but other smaller cycles can sometimes generate larger
amplitudes.
If
the Federal Reserve is trying to actually control the Fed Funds
Rates based on some type of economic chaotic model and the only
stable “economic limit cycles” for the interest rate
hikes/drops are “multiples of pi” (usually pi, 2*pi, 3*pi,
or 4*pi as discussed in Part
IV), then the
“vortex source terms such as M3” should also have key
longwave cycles. A comparison of the 266-week cycle in M3 versus
the largest 233-week cycle in the Ten Year Bond (Chart 5) show
that these cycles run nearly opposite in phase. However, a major
shift in the 233-week ten year bond cycle may be taking place.
The Central Bank may have been introducing significant cyclic
amplitudes in M3 (via longwave weekly cycles) for decades.
However, if one claims the M3 variation is simply a response to
cyclic recessions such as occurred in 1981, 1990 and 2001 as a
result of interest rate “jumps” with a phase lag then why do
“recessions” tend to appear as a consequence of the
sinusoidal behavior of M3 components as shown in Chart 6 as the
cycle falls.
The
Magnificent Seven at the OK Corral:
The
two-dimensional “limit cycles” or “weekly long-wave
cycles” presented in the Magnificent Seven are actually
n-dimensional waves of an “expanding vortex of money in
circulation around the world”. The source of the vortex is the
Federal Reserve M3 money pump which goes 24/7 and has no
practical limits. There are very well-defined oscillations
(long-term weekly cycles) in M3 Money Stock including 31, 37,
52, 58, 69, 148, and 266 weekly cycles. These M3 components
appear to be the “cyclic source” for most of the amplitudes
of the cycles in major world indexes (it feeds the increasing
amplitudes in world indices). Thus, we can speak of the
“vorticity of money” in circulation worldwide as it travels
from node to node. The growing amplitude of the 266-week cycle
strongly suggests this a “limit cycle” in a non-chaotic
system or a chaotic system close to equilibrium but slowly going
unstable (enter interest rate increases from stage left). The
amplitude of this 266-week cycle is now over 100 billion dollars
peak to peak taking the M3 dataset at face value!?
The
Modern West:
Chart
7 presents
the predicted cyclic behavior of M3 from June 2004 thru 2007
given the present long wave weekly cycles continue in the M3
waveform. We are currently experiencing a major descent in the
major cycles of M3 thru Oct 2004 (bottom). The 266-week cycle is
directly related to the current market downside trends in the
NYSE Composite Index according to several different Neural Nets
which were run using all the frequencies of NYSE, M3, Ten Year
Bond, Fed Fund Rate, Total Debt, etc. This will be discussed in
a future article on the Magnificent Seven. Specifically one
needs to be very cautious about being long in a market when the
M3 components are falling as in the period from Feb 2005 thru
June 2005 and Dec 2005 to April 2006. These may time scales may
be part of future “secular bear downside waves”.
If
one simply assumes a linear trend in M3 in future predictions
(i.e., as in Neural Nets), you may be missing “a significant
oscillatory source term” from the 266-week M3 cycle which
correlates highly with the NYSE Composite Index Closings, Ten
Year Bond Yields, Fed Fund Rates and
S&P 500 Weekly Index among many others. We expect
this 266-week cycle will show up also in M1 and M2. In our next
visit, we will meet with Mr JP regarding the future of the Ten
Year Bond Yields!?
“Ghost
Riders in the Sky” (Words (modified) and Music by Stan Jones
(1949)):
As the riders
loped on by him he heard one call his name
If you want to save your soul from hell a riding on our range
Then cowboy change your ways today or with us you will ride
Tryin' to catch this devil “M3 currency”....
a-cross these endless
skies.
Yipie i ay
Yipie i oh
Ghost
Riders in the Sky.”








© 2004 Dr.
Stephen Rinehart
Editorial Archive
DISCLAIMER:
The author is not a registered stockbroker nor a registered
advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an
expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any
manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock,
option, future, bond, commodity, index or any other financial
instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be
true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible
sources. Of course, the author recommends that you consult with
a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate
regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making
any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you
confirm the facts on your own before making important investment
commitments.
CONTACT
INFORMATION
Dr.
Stephen Rinehart
Lynn Haven, FL USA
Email |