Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Editorial Archives  l  About Us  l  Contact Us

QUICK LOOK REPORT #18: DJIA Index
by Dr. Stephen Rinehart
January 19, 2005

Background:

Quick Look Reports will look at a possible dominant trend in an Index, Equity or Commodity and some possible long-term (monthly/yearly) trends which could emerge from the dominant cycle(s) (the datasets will be either daily, weekly or monthly). Quick Look Report # 18 revisits the weekly closing prices of the (late) great Dow Jones Index (DJIA) from 1918 through Dec 2005 (see also Quick Look Report # 4, June 2005 as well as earlier DJIA predictions on Magnificent Seven).

The primary seven weekly cycles in the DJIA Index are at periods of 52, 69, 109, 176, 233, 334 (or 354) and 1900 (37 Year K-Cycle) weeks (looks almost identical to S&P 500/NYSE Weekly Index). A prediction of the DJIA Weekly was made in July 2004 (see FSU Archives Rinehart on Magnificent Seven). As we have noted in the past, the amplitude of the long-term cycles in these major market Indices correlate very strongly with similar cycles in M3 and Bond Markets (for decades). In Quick Look Report # 4, it was noted the 354 week cycle (shifts by 20+-weeks depending upon M3 pumping) was peaking in July 2005 which has contributed to this large broad top. The real effects of this cycle will come into play in 2006 as it starts to accelerate downward (in unison with other large cycles).

The 176-week and 354-week cycles have been around in the DJIA (carry over from Bond Markets) for decades. By way of review, Chart 1 shows how these large cycles came together in phase in 1929 to contribute in a major way to the Stock Market Crash of 1929 (and every other market crash). It may be possible to phase large financial cycles if you control the fiat money supply of a country. My what big eyes the Fed has – why the better to see the long-wave cycles, my dear!

The largest cycle in the DJIA Index weekly closings (the 334 to 354 -week cycle) is shown in Chart 2 from 1980 thru 2005. This major cycle has formed a top (max predicted peak in July 2005) and will start taking the DJIA down with it for 2006 (possibly already started). There is no long term bull market in the DJIA Weekly Index again until this cycle bottoms in Sept 2008! Is everybody all excited by the start of a “bull market” for Jan 2006 in the DJIA? What’s wrong with this picture?

Chart 3 shows the prediction for two large cycles (233, 334 week cycles) in the DJIA Weekly Index from Jan 2006 thru 2012. The DJIA is predicted to drop significantly after June 2006 and these cycles do not bottom until mid-2008!? These large cycles will be reaching the maximum downward acceleration in Oct 2006 – so where is the beef for the DJIA rally or linear growth in 2006?

Chart 4 shows the participation of the 18-week cycle from 1918 thru 1939. This cycle formed an increasing amplitude into the “crashes” of 1929 and 1937. In other words, based on reviewing/predicting other crashes in the DJIA since 1918, it is the 18-week cycle that shapes the approaching wavefront of a crash and produces the sharp “drop”. This could be an early warning indicator for an approaching cold front. Yes, this method predicted the coming crash of 1937 if we truncate the data in 1935 (because of the large cycles such 176,233, and 354 week were going down together) but it was the “growth” in the 18-week cycle which sharply defined the 1937 crash wavefront and that happen in the last 18-week cycle before the crash.

Chart 5 shows the participation of the 18-week cycle in 1987. This cycle started increasing in amplitude but one only had “one full cycle” (or less) of warning before the market crashed. In other words, in some cases we may have only 18 weeks or less warning until a crash occurs after the amplitude in the 18-week cycle starts growing. 

Chart 6 shows the current 18-week cycle in DJIA from 2004 thru 2005. This cycle has started increasing in amplitude! We do not know (on just the basis of this cycle) which top will be involved in the “crash” but it is flagging a potential incoming storm. The 18-week cycle is currently heading down with maximum downward acceleration in late January with bottom in Feb 2006.

Chart 7 shows the predicted tops in the 18-week cycle in DJIA for 2006 thru 2007. My favorite candidate is April 05, 2006 since this date is close to Iranian Oil Bourse and Fed needs to pump against this cycle top to keep its head above water. Watch for some neat coming volatility. What interesting times we live in!?

Chart 8 shows the prediction DJIA for 2006 and after a final top in April 2006, it is heading downward. This prediction does not include the 1900-week cycle (which is also heading down). The DJIA will close at (or below) 9071 on Dec 24, 2006. If we include the 1900-week cycle it could be below 9000. The beach sands (of M3) are eroding away for the Fed against the incoming waves. There are no redeeming features to this formation for 2006/2007 and I have not liked the DJIA since Oct 2005 (since earlier Quick Look Report # 4).

Bottom Line: 

  1. The predictions given in this study (and the other studies) do not predict “business as usual for the DJIA”. The DJIA is in major trouble and is headed down (watch out after June 2006). If you remove Exxon, Amex, AIG, etc (energy and financials) from this index, the industrials are in poor shape and declining. Exxon has been carrying the load for the past five years in the DJIA and some of the old guard are sadly on life-support (GM, Ford) and others are simply deceased (Sears, Eastman, Goodyear etc). The DJIA has more shifting components than “Carter has Liver Pills”. 
  2. This study does not predict any linear growth in the DJIA of 7% for FY2006 as predicted by 95%+ of the analysts or pundits for FY2006 (although a great run by Exxon in 2006 may yet keep the DJIA afloat and if we add Google or enough Internet fliers to the mix who knows - but you would want to get rid of GM, Ford, Alcoa, Intel and Hewlett-Packard ). The currently defined (as of Jan 2006) DJIA Index could end at 9071 (or below 9000 if you include the 1900-week cycle). It is predicting a drop on the order of 18% from a high of 11,070 for FY2006. 
  3. The downward trend will continue into FY2007 as we could be entering into a major recession worldwide. As soon as one “industrial” falls in this Index, it is replaced by another financial/energy entity to pump up the DJIA. It remains only to get rid of the Dogs of the Dow and add Google, Conocco and Chevron, etc to keep the game going. What a shell game for the DJIA! 
  4. If this were “Texas Hold ‘Em”, my two ideal hole cards would be Canadian “aces” (oil and natural gas) and “the flop” of gold, silver, Canadian currency (or basket of hard currencies against the USD) with the “turn card” of trust dividends and the “river card” would be “grains”. I am all in against any DJIA/S&P 500 Index “cards” beating my hand in FY2006. So what’s your river card for the DJIA hand – Google or AIG or JPM? As always, the “Big Blind” is the Fed.
  5. The period from June 2006 thru July 2008 continues to be flagged as very dangerous for US equity markets with one bottom in 2007 and another in mid-2008. Please avoid the using the term “Secular Bear” out loud as we do not want to wake any other “sleeping analysts” in 2006 who do not believe in such mythical creatures.
  6. The “early warning indicator” in the DJIA (and other indices) is the 18-week cycle. If this cycle begins growing in amplitude (due to the continuous feeding of M3 fiat money), it is one of the major warning sign to monitor. The 18-week cycle has started growing in amplitude in 2005. If a 600 to 800 point drops occurs in the next few weeks in the DJIA leading into April 2006, we have the initial conditions setting-up for a coming “crash” in the DJIA for 2006 or early 2007.
  7. That foxhole you think you are standing in for the approaching Bear (or Rally?!) is really the large paw print of a Chinese Red Dragon as viewed from above. For after the Bear Cometh, the Red Dragon shall appear whose tail shall sweep…………………………………………
Hypotheses: Seven major cycles in virtually all the worlds’ indices/commodities determine our financial lives far into the future (and have for many decades). Hey, printing press #1600 sounds a bit “squeaky”, how about greasing the bearings and keep this puppy rollin’. So what is all this about an Iranian Oil Bourse? What are they trying to do – upset the USD!? Bartender, could we have another round of oil - my DJIA has just run dry? A recent study has shown it will take all the pine trees in Florida to print enough USD in the next five years – maybe we should just stick with electronic transfers so everything can be tracked by the NSA. No paper trails please.


© 2006
Dr. Stephen Rinehart
Editorial Archive

CONTACT INFORMATION
Dr. Stephen Rinehart
Lynn Haven, FL USA
Email

DISCLAIMER: The author is not a registered stockbroker nor a registered advisor and does not give investment advice. His comments are an expression of opinion only and should not be construed in any manner whatsoever as recommendations to buy or sell a stock, option, future, bond, commodity, index or any other financial instrument at any time. While he believes his statements to be true, they always depend on the reliability of his own credible sources. Of course, the author recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction, before making any investment decisions, and barring that, we encourage you confirm the facts on your own before making important investment commitments.

Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Editorial Archives  l  About Us  l  Contact Us

Send this site to a friend! (click here)

Copyright ©  James J. Puplava  Financial Sense™ is a Registered Trademark
P. O.  Box 503147 San Diego, CA 92150-3147 USA  858.487.3939