Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Editorial Archives  l  About Us  l  Contact Us



THE MAIN REASON WHY GOLD MINING STOCKS
ARE UNDERPERFORMING GOLD

by Boris Sobolev
ResourceStockGuide.com
May 23, 2007

As investors are well aware, costs in the mining industry have been rising over the last several years. Here at Resource Stock Guide, we track production costs for several dozen small and mid-tier gold, silver and uranium producers with around 100 operating mines. Quarterly, we analyze cost and margin trends.

Silver and uranium stocks have been good performers over the last 12 months. RSG Silver Benchmark is up over 20%, while Uranium Benchmark is up over 100%; gold stocks, however, have been definite laggards.

We poured through Q1 financials of a large number of gold producers and selected the most representative to summarize our findings.

The list includes 8 companies encompassing 23 mines spread over 12 countries in diverse geographical regions. In our analysis, we used total cash costs per ounce, a common metric used by companies to manage and evaluate operating performance at each mine and widely reported in the gold/silver mining industry as a benchmark for performance measurement.

 

 

 

Profit

Profit

 

Company Name

Mine

Country

Margin Q4*

Margin Q1*

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iamgold (IAG)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sadiola

Mali

52.24%

37.08%

-15.16%

 

Mupane

Botswana

12.30%

0.00%

-12.30%

 

Yatella

Mali

61.86%

72.31%

10.45%

 

Rosebel

Suriname

32.19%

22.31%

-9.88%

 

Doyon

Canada

26.48%

21.69%

-4.79%

 

Sleeping Giant

Canada

27.30%

49.23%

21.93%

 

Tarkwa

Ghana

44.58%

42.31%

-2.27%

 

Damang

Ghana

25.18%

28.31%

3.13%

Yamana (AUY)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sao Francisco

Brazil

53.71%

49.54%

-4.17%

 

Jacobina

Brazil

45.88%

27.69%

-18.19%

 

Fazenda Brazileiro

Brazil

41.81%

49.23%

7.43%

 

Fazenda Nova

Brazil

50.28%

15.23%

-35.05%

 

San Andres

Honduras

43.11%

44.77%

1.66%

Gammon Lake (GRS) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ocampo

Mexico

52.24%

33.23%

-19.01%

 

El Cubo

Mexico

48.16%

21.85%

-26.32%

El Dorado (EGO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kisladag

Turkey

68.54%

70.15%

1.61%

Centerra (CG.TO)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kumptor

Kyrgyz Rep.

-28.61%

1.69%

30.31%

 

Boroo

Mongolia

63.32%

71.69%

8.37%

Golden Star (GSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wassa

Ghana

24.36%

24.92%

0.56%

Meridian Gold (MDG)

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Penon

Chile

100.33%

110.46%

10.14%

 

Minera Florida

Chile

94.95%

86.00%

-8.95%

Randgold (GOLD)

Loulo

Mali

46.86%

50.77%

3.91%

 

Morila

Mali

46.70%

50.46%

3.77%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

44.95%

42.65%

-2.30%

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Profit margin based Non-GAAP total cash cost measure

As seen in the table above, average profit margins based on total cash costs fell from 44.95% in Q4/06 to 42.65% in Q1/07. This is at the same time when gold rose from an average price of $613.5/oz in Q4/06 to an average $650/oz in Q1/07 or 5.96% gain.

Cash costs were negatively impacted by the industry-wide escalations in labor, spare parts and energy costs, due to the processing of lower grade ores and in some cases lower mine production.  So, in fact total cash costs per ounce are rising at a faster rate than the gold price. As a result, most gold producers have become less profitable over the past 2 quarters.

This appears to be one of the major reasons why gold stocks have been underperforming the yellow metal.

As paradoxical as it may sound, the best thing that can happen to gold producers is an economic slowdown especially if one remembers the anti-cyclical nature of gold.

As far as silver producers are concerned, their stock prices have been rising despite decreasing profit margins.  But the situation there is quite different in terms of investor expectations, which is the subject of our next article.


© 2007 Boris Sobolev

Editorial Archive

Disclaimer: The above information in this article pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. The information provided by Resource Stock Guide is obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. Resource Stock Guide advises all readers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured on Resource Stock Guide or any stocks for that matter. All statements and expressions of the companies featured are not meant to be a solicitation or recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Boris Sobolev
Resource Stock Guide
Denver, CO USA
Email  |  Website

The opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of Financial Sense.

Home  l  Broadcast  l  WrapUp  l  Storm Watch  l  Editorial Archives  l  About Us  l  Contact Us

Send this site to a friend! (click here)

Copyright ©  James J. Puplava  Financial Sense ® is a Registered Trademark
P. O.  Box 503147 San Diego, CA 92150-3147 USA  858.487.3939