|
Home:
Golden Jackass website
Subscribe:
Hat Trick
Letter
Jim
Willie CB is the editor of the “HAT TRICK LETTER”
For specific detailed analysis of the Gold, US Dollar, Treasury bonds,
and inter-market dynamics with the US Economy and Fed monetary policy, see instructions for subscription to my
newsletter research reports, which include stock recommendations
positioned to rise in the commodity bull market.
Dangerous words, right?
Does the current climate and commodity bull market resemble the
1970 decade?
To me, such a claim is really lacking in substance.
After a quick read of this brief comparative analysis, answer the
question:
Do
you still think this decade strongly resembles the 1970 decade ???
Most claims of decade similarities are a bit
trivial, obvious, and not important. Crude oil has tripled in
price, from its origin to the present. Gold has more than doubled
from its origin. Stagflation threatens to grip the US Economy.
Conflicts with Persian Gulf oil producers are prevalent. These are
to be sure. However, differences are profound and extremely
critical to stock investments, monetary policy, pricing dynamics,
and economic development. These dissimilarities are so great that
the current climate differs like summer and winter. Each season
has sunshine, precipitation, and winds. Summer and winter each
offers sunburn (in winter, try the elevations in Colorado), offers
occasional dumps in precipitation (snow blizzards versus rain
floods and hail storms), and requires battening down the hatches
against wind damage. The big temperature contrast, bite of the
chill, withered leafy formations on trees, and frozen structures
make for the profound change that keenly identifies winter. The
same holds for this decade versus the 1970 decade, whose
differences are so huge, so deep, so wide that it is almost
tragically humorous to hear of claimed similarities.
Back then we escaped after a couple of very harsh
years, conned and fleeced the Arabs who suffered erosion in the
Treasury Bonds bought with recycled petroleum sales revenue. The
conjob was so blatant, so shameful, like a pro dealing with a
vulnerable rookie blessed with an inheritance. The US “deal”
with Saudis can be compared to a Mafia don setting up shop with
the high schools in suburbs where kids widely inherited parental
fortunes, offering sports gambling cards to the brats. The mob
offers 4-to-1 returns if a kid can select 6 winners against a
point spread. By the way, that is a 64-to-1 odds event paying out
4-to-1 rewards. As interest rates rose directly from US Fed
decisions, Arabs lost a fortune. That is a key difference between
back then and now… Arabs and Asians will not get screwed on
their reserves. They will diversify more out of US TBonds and rely
less on the US$-based securities. The financial world is less US
Treasury centric.
The United States adapted, adjusted, and worked
in the 1970 decade to become more efficient as a nation in energy
usage. Tighter gasoline efficiency was legislated, along with
lower speed limits. Tax credits were granted for renewable energy
device deployment. Nowadays, we are not adapting to anything, but
rather work to create more extreme situation. The Soviet
counter-balance is gone, permitting the United States to exert its
will with no resistance on a global scale, except with respect to
the energy wars and its many tyrants lying on the periphery to
OPEC. The lack of military balance seems to be matched by a
coercion globally for foreigners to hand over savings, and to
finance the $3.2 billion in daily credit requirements. Somehow the
label of “international extortion” seems fitting. See
“Petro-Dollar
& Protection Racquet” from April 2005 for a fuller
layout.
Instead of adapting to become more efficient, the
US Economy has become more pig-like with larger vehicles and
SUV’s, larger houses and utility requirements, larger household
debts, more abuse of home equity, and no seeming regard whatsoever
to direct attention nor efforts toward remedy. The entire
justification of a consumer economy, hellbent on lifting the
shopping mall as shrines to capitalism, building a system upon a
sandy foundation, all this sounds ludicrous in the present and
hardly evident in the 1970 decade. We have proceeded through at
least three wondrous economic mythology exercises since that time,
each more preposterous, yet accepted, than the last. Note the
trickle down theory, the tech-telecom productivity miracle, and
the flexible credit system, each heretical in description, fully
practiced and endorsed by lunatic bankers. A system built upon
inflation for wealth generation must deceive both its participants
and its credit suppliers in order to continue to perpetuate itself
into the future. What Bernanke needs more than ever right now is
some cockeyed new economic mythology to sell to the world.
Unfortunately, the US might have sold its last moronic pitch. A
darker, more risk laden, more violent, less free future is what
lies ahead instead.
Sorry, but claims of similarity in the decades
end abruptly with rising oil and gold prices, or more generally
rising commodity prices. The peering heads of those prices above
the surface of trading exchange floors hide their entirely
different structure under the surface. Implications to stock
investments, monetary policy, pricing dynamics, and economic
development are staggering. These implications are discussed and
analyzed in depth in the upcoming July Hat
Trick Letter issue, due out in midmonth as usual. This topic
lack of parallel has been a repeated theme of mine for months on
end. There is almost no similarity beyond the superficial which
the naïve public might not even be capable of comprehending. In
the differences lie the important meat of the matter. We are in
winter, where debt deflation is a monstrous threat. Constant, even
accelerating, credit supply is essential in order to maintain flat
economic growth. It is at grave risk that central bankers are
uniformly hiking interest rates and tightening on liquidity. This
is precisely how depressions occur, misjudgments at critical
decision points. Back in the 1970 decade summer, reflation was a
simple breeze, as easy as a walk on the beach. Nowadays, central
bankers have urged a walk by the US Economic children along the
high ledge next to the precipice with the chasm below in obscured
view.
CRUDE OIL
Back then, crude oil supply was constricted by
embargos, with sudden price shock hitting the US Economy like a
ton of bricks. Back then, the global economy had to adapt to an
immediate triple in oil price, which took time. Now, crude oil is
not in shortage, but energy deposits are in depletion in every
major global production zone. Now, powerful Chinese & Indian
demand is new, growing, and relentless. The oil price has risen
largely due to this fresh rising demand, which is not going away.
Thus the crude oil bull market will be sustained for a much longer
period, my guess forever. Implications to price inflation are
huge, but not being integrated like 30 years ago. We simply cannot
monetize the higher energy costs without sending the US Dollar to
the pits.
PETRO-DOLLAR
Back then, a new petro-dollar standard was in
tumultuous infancy, as it struggled mightily to become accepted
and used as the world reserve currency and commercial system for
settlement of international transactions. Back then, an unsigned
treaty guaranteed security by the United States. It was forged in
return for Arab recycled petroleum revenue. The US Congress never
signed any such treaty. Israel tolerated the agreement.
Nevertheless, the Saudis hired on a security force in the grand
picture, and could proceed to plunder their national wealth as the
standard of living declined at a horrible pace for ordinary Saudi
citizens. Now, the petro-dollar standard is aging and long in the
tooth, failing from its extensions, under great strain from its
chronic abuse, subject to global revolt being seen widely from
Russia to Norway to Venezuela to Iran. Now, numerous oil producing
nations are selling in non-US$ transactions, including our
friends. Thus the US Dollar bear market will be sustained for a
much longer period. Some claim the US Dollar petro standard is
dead and buried, with prospects of its resurrection demanding a
total overhaul. Probably so, which is a far cry from 30 years ago.
GLOBAL
ECONOMY
Back then, the US Economy was more a closed
system. Hence, reflation was a simple prospect and undertaking to
execute a plan. Back then, when the US Fed increased money supply,
wages increased with prices in a simple dance step. My first three
salary increases saw a hefty 12% pay raise in the 1981, 1982,
1983. Even nitwits who contributed nothing received the same
generous pay hike, people who were in truth a detriment to
progress rather than participants. Now, the US Economy exports
inflation to Asians and Arabs on a larger scale. As the oil price
rises, our foreign energy bill rises. Instead of asset bubbles
just in Asia, they are present now in the Persian Gulf nations. As
the manufacturing sector vanishes, our foreign product bill rises.
Absence of US mfg means that US retail chains are replenished by
Asian producers, paid handsomely. US wages stagnate. As the
service sector erodes, our foreign bill rises further. Now, China
& India eliminate the easy cost-push, and impose a tight price
ceiling which renders an incredibly painful squeeze on the US
middle class which was nowhere to be seen 30 years ago. Thus the
US Economy cannot benefit from rising wages so as to handle higher
costs. The globalization phenomenon has rendered the United States
as bankrupt, unless you expect the housing boom to continue ad
infinitum. Not me.
STRUCTURAL
MAKEUP OF US ECONOMY
Back then, the US Economy had positive savings, a
notable trade surplus, a still vibrant mfg sector. Economists
plied their trade with effective policy to counter reckless
politicians who turned the budget into a military subsidy and
social network safety net. Paul Volcker made difficult choices to
fix problems, unlike Greenspan who made easy choices to cover up
problems. Now, the US has big negative savings, big trade
deficits, and almost no mfg sector remaining. These negatives are
not being remedied, as foreigners are demanded to fill the gap and
do the dirty work for the obsessively consuming Americans. Now,
the US is vulnerable to a recession and restricted credit, as
bankruptcies rise. Our wages cannot overcome the rising costs of
living, as outsourcing looms constantly as a bargaining chip to
labor groups. Our product prices cannot overcome the higher
material costs, when in competition from Asia. Thus the US Fed
will have a major challenge to inflate so as to prevent a
collapse.
The US Fed must get with the program and realize
that they cannot fight inflation when that precisely is their
reason for being. My disrespectful title for the US Fed Chairman
is the Secretary of Inflation. Cutting off price inflation is
tantamount to cutting off the foundation legs of the US Economy,
namely the housing sector on the tangible side and the stock
market on the financial side. Home equity extraction is the
umbilical connection between the two, now showing strain from
limited credit blood flow. Inflation is all the US Economy has
left for wealth. Well, we do have intellectual property (IP),
which is quickly bestowed upon Asian laborers for wage benefit.
Worse, IP royalty is often not collected at all, to the tune of
$60 billion per year from China, and $250 billion per year
globally. The main dangerous IP trend lately is that Research
& Development as a function has been increasingly been
exported to Asia, in particular to Taiwan.
To address the price inflation problem is to kill
the patient, which has lived for several years on an intravenous
lifeline from the grand credit vat. Back off, rookie Bernanke.
Treatment of the problem kills the patient, even in the early
stages of treatment. By the end of 2006, the banking community and
investment world will realize the US Fed has no more credibility.
The tragedy we face is that we have no more bubbles to erect. We
have so abused the US Dollar that it must be devalued to obscenely
low levels. We must keep the housing bubble alive. We must keep
the stock bubble alive. We must not discourage foreigners from
supplying us ever increasing credit. Flat growth is all we have
had, not the claimed 5% GDP. If you believe that claim, you must
believe price inflation is wandering around the 3% level, and has
been for several years. Robust growth and low inflation are each a
lie. Such believers see only through corporate bias and political
lenses, or else are avid buyers of Tennessee beach front property.
We are deploying monetary restriction in the face of flat growth,
a slowdown.
We cannot yet turn on the printing press as the
sole source for credit supply, since the brand name on that
machine bears the “WEIMAR” nameplate. The concept is worth
repeating. Constant, even accelerating, credit supply is essential
in order to maintain flat growth within the US Economy.
©
2006 Jim Willie, CB
Editorial
Archive
Jim
Willie CB is a statistical analyst in marketing research and retail
forecasting. He holds a Ph.D. in
Statistics. His career has
stretched over 24 years. He
aspires to thrive in the financial editor world, unencumbered by the
limitations of economic credentials.
Visit his free website to find articles from topflight authors at
www.GoldenJackass.com.
For personal questions about subscriptions, contact him
at “JimWillieCB@aol.com”
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense. |