| As
I had expected in last
Sunday's Chartmentary, the market had one of its best weeks
since November last year. It would appear that this rally
carries enough strength to continue, and I was about ready to go
with the flow and turn in my new Chartmentary accordingly. But
then, there's something that keeps bothering me.
This was the
chart that made its début about a month ago. In my previous
analysis I pointed out the inverse correlation between the
market and the M2 minus M1. For new visitors, backing out M1
leaves M2 with just the savings accounts, time deposits of under
$100,000, and balances in retail money market mutual funds. This
I believe is where a large portion of the money flows in and out
of the market. I don't believe I've seen anyone using this
indicator.
This chart
below shows a reliable degree of inverse correlation. It would
seem that money's leaving M2-exM1 for the stock market. While
this indicates another upleg in the rally, the one-week lag time
of the Fed's money stock report always put a little apprehension
in my mind. In addition, the latest decline in M2-exM1, for the
week ended 5/9/2005, was the slowest decline of the past two
weekly declining cycles - the weeks ended 4/4/2005 &
4/25/2005.
That made me
think twice about the real strength of this past week's rally.

Let me turn to
another one of my favorite indicators for verification. It's the
200-day Exponential Moving Average of the broad market index,
Wilshire 5000. As I've mentioned before, the breaks of this
200-day EMA trendline signal change of the market direction.
Based on this indicator, our forecast had been right on the mark
2 weeks in a row. This week it seems to indicate the
continuation of the rally as well.
The 200-day EMA
moved another notch higher. The tech sector was leading the
charge. The Internet and the Computer Network sectors, in
particular, looked unstoppable. And, Google started looking very
attractive to me at this point. But, wait a minute! What's with
that Consumer Non-Cyclical (bottom pane of the chart) also
charging ahead of the market? It can not be.

This next chart
shows that when the Non-Cyclicals running ahead of the market,
the market tends to start reversing its uptrend. Intuitively, I
believe that's when the investor's confidence starts to leave
the market for the so-called "defensive"
sector. Although other major indices demonstrate similar
pattern, I used NASDAQ for comparison as this rally was led
primarily by the tech sector. Were this investor's psychology to
be repeated, then last week's surge of the Non-Cyclicals would
mean that the market is due for a decline.
Fine. So, I
noticed these little inconclusive negativities. So, what? No
one's saying this is a strong market. There's going to be signs
of weaknesses in this market. What's so unusual about that? I
guess it's nothing unusual except that something just continues
to bother me. It's never easy for me.

Something that
Dr. Alexander Elder said about the volume that really bothers me
- "Changes in volume provide
clues as to whether trends are likely to continue or to reverse."
I went back to
my 200-day EMA indicator and checked on the volume. As shown on
the chart below, Friday's volume was 12% below the 2-week (10
trading days) exponential moving average. Now since Friday was a
minor down day for the broad market, let's check on NASDAQ,
which had an up day on Friday.

NASDAQ volume
also showed a decline (9.76%). In addition, the Percentage
Volume Oscillator (PVO) didn't break above the 0 line with all
its strength last week. This is sign of a declining buying
pressure.
"A
breakout on low volume shows
little emotional commitment to a new trend. It
indicates that prices are likely to return into their trading
range. Falling volume shows that the Remaining Bulls Have a
Higher Level of Pain Tolerance." --- Dr.
Elder.

Volume as per
Dr. Elder is the backbone of the market trend. This rally last
week, while appeared bullish on surface, did not have the strong
backbone to provide the necessary support for its continuation.
Having recognized this landmine under the bullish surface, for
an inquiring mind like mine, I needed another confirmation.
I'm not sure if
the inverse correlation between the Dollar and the market is as
a common sense amongst investors as I thought it should be.
Without getting into all the fundamental details, this chart
shows the technical inverse correlation between the two.
Therefore, technically speaking, the rising Dollar is going to
put pressure on the market. Dollar Index has been on a strong
uptrend with approx. target of 90. This can not be good for the
market.

Based on the
above analysis, I'd stay away from long positions this week. It
does NOT appear likely that last week's rally would carry on too
much further.

© 2005 David Yu
Editorial Archive
CONTACT
INFORMATION
David Yu
Walnut Creek, CA USA
Website
l david_3011 @ yahoo.com Space before and after @
was left intentionally to avoid spamming. Please remove this
space when sending your emails.
The
opinions of FSU contributors do not necessarily reflect those of
Financial Sense. |