|
Investment
fads come and go. Every bull market has its favorites—the must have, can’t lose,
make a fortune companies that everyone must own. In the 1950s and 1960s it was
electronics. In the 1970s it was conglomerates and “nifty fifty” stocks. In the
80’s and 90’s, it was consumer products, drug, and technology companies. Bull and
bear markets alternate by trading places. This reminds us of Newton’s third
law—what
goes up must come down. Today’s winners could become tomorrow’s losers. The one
truism on Wall Street is that stock prices will fluctuate. They always have and
they always will. Despite repeating market cycles, underlying principles of sound
investment should not alter from decade to decade as Ben Graham was fond of
saying.
Somewhere
along the way we’ve transitioned from an investment-led market to a speculative-driven market. We have forgotten the habit of relating what is paid to what is
being offered. Today most investors couldn’t tell you why and what it is they
own. The prevailing trend in the markets is to buy after something has gone up
and sell after it has gone down without ever asking why. Buy and sell first—ask
questions later. It is all part of the momentum game. Yet, like all mechanical
approaches to the market, there are deficiencies. The black boxes don’t tell you
when the seasons have changed. It's only long afterward, when it is obvious, that
the leaves have changed and the snow is falling.
Another
truism about markets is that there will always be uncertainty. There is no "sure
thing" and anyone that tells you differently is suffering from delusions. The markets over the last 100 years
have demonstrated [even throughout all
their vicissitudes—the unexpected and the unforeseen]
that
sound investment principles produced generally sound results. While you may not
be able to count on the returns from stock appreciation, something more bankable
is the returns you get from dividend payments. Dividends are the closest thing
you get in the stock market to a “sure thing.” They aren’t guaranteed, but they
are predictable. A company can always lower its dividend or in extreme cases
omit it under financial difficulties. Nonetheless, most dividends arrive like
clockwork every quarter. They are bankable and you don’t have to sell a stock to
receive the cash.
What’s
important to investors is that dividends offer several advantages. They enhance
investors’ returns over longer periods of time. Dividends make the difference between
superior performances in both bull and bear markets. They can lower risk by
creating greater stability in fluctuating markets, since dividend paying stocks
hold up much better during periods of market uncertainty. They can also produce
positive results when markets are unfavorable.
Dividend
investing goes out of style when markets are going through a period of euphoria.
They come back into favor after a decline. Following the stock market crash of
1929 dividend investing would remain in favor throughout the 40’s, 50’s, and
60’s. Throughout this period investors bought stocks because of their dividends.
Since stocks were considered to be a riskier class of investment, they offered
investors higher returns. Most of those returns came through dividends. Investors
wanted actual cash—not a future promise of higher earnings down the road. It
would surprise most investors to learn that stock dividend yields were higher
than bond yields throughout most of the last century. After the stock market crash in 1929,
dividend yields rose to
10% and remained high and above bond yields until the 1960s. They rose again
during the bear market of the 1970s.
It was
only during the last bull market that stock yields fell below bond yields. A
change in the capital gains tax in 1981 and a tax law change reducing the
deductibility of CEO salaries altered the markets favoring capital gains versus
dividends. A new tax law, “The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2003,” has once again altered the investment landscape. Dividends are now more
favorably taxed. The new laws have lowered the taxable rate on income from most
dividend stocks to 15%. There is a catch to this favorable tax treatment. Unless
extended, the tax break ends at the end of 2008.

Source: www.thechartstore.com
Long-Term
Investment = Superior Terms
When the
historical record is examined for investing in stocks, the attractiveness of
dividends becomes more pronounced. In their landmark book “Triumph of the
Optimists” authors Leroy Dimson, Paul Marsh & Mike Staunton show the terminal difference of reinvesting
income to be monumental. Over a 101 year period, a portfolio of stocks compounded
at an annual rate of 5.4%, handily beating the annual rate of inflation
of 3.2%. The real return to investors was 2.1%. However, when dividends
were reinvested, the annual return rises to 10.1%. This is significant
when time is considered. In their study a $1 investment in stocks grew to $198
without dividends and $16,797 with dividends. The accretion in wealth was 85
times larger through reinvestment of dividends.

The
authors found the impact of reinvested dividends to hold true in every equity
market around the globe. Their conclusion: the longer the investment horizon,
the more important dividends become in producing superior returns.
Jeremy
Siegal came to the same conclusion in his new book “The Future for
Investors.”
He warns that the reason most investors don’t do well is that they overpay for
stocks. Their enthusiasm for new fads or trends causes them to pay too high a
price to get in on the action. He calls this fallacy of investing “The Growth
Trap.” “The growth trap seduces investors into overpaying for the very firms and
industries that drive innovation and spearhead economic expansion. This
relentless pursuit of growth—through buying hot stocks, seeking exciting new
technologies, or investing in the fastest-growing countries-dooms investors to
poor returns.”
[1] The
biggest beneficiary of the latest technology is not individual investors. The
biggest gains go to the entrepreneurs, the inventors, the venture capitalists,
the investment bankers, and ultimately the consumer who buys a better product at
a lower price.
A Case in
Point
To
illustrate this point Siegal compared the returns offered on two stocks: IBM and
Standard Oil of New Jersey (now ExxonMobil). If you think of one invention that
altered and drove our economy over the last half century, it would be computers.
If you were fortunate enough to get in early on IBM, you would have expected to
outperform an old economy stock such as Standard Oil. Siegal found just the
opposite. From 1950 to 2003, the years of his study, IBM’s growth was superior to
that of Standard Oil in every way. Sales and earnings growth were higher as were
dividends. The reason that Standard oil outperformed IBM was simple:
overvaluation. You paid more to buy every a $1 of earnings in IBM. IBM’s P/E
multiple was more than twice that of Standard Oil. The dividend yield on
Standard was also two-and-half times higher. This meant, as an investor, you
were
paid more every quarter and when you reinvested that dividend, you bought more
stock. It cost you $13 to buy $1 of earnings in Standard Oil. By contrast, IBM
investors had to pay nearly $27 for the same $1 of earnings.
|
THE
GROWTH TRAP |
|
Growth Measures
|
IBM |
ExxonMobil
(Std. Oil NJ) |
| Revenue
per Share |
12.19% |
8.04% |
| Dividends
per Share |
9.19% |
7.11% |
| Earnings
per Share |
10.94% |
7.47% |
| Sector
Growth |
14.65% |
-14.22% |
|
Valuation
Measures
|
|
Avg
P/E
|
26.76% |
12.97% |
| Avg
Dividend Yield |
2.18% |
5.19% |
|
Return
Measures
|
| Price
Appreciation |
11.41% |
8.77% |
| Dividend
Return |
2.18% |
5.19% |
|
Total
Return |
13.83% |
14.42% |
|
$1,000
Investment (1950-2003)
|
$961,000 |
$1,260,000 |
|
Source:
The Future for Investors by Jeremy Siegal |
As a
result of higher dividends and a lower P/E multiple, an investor in Standard Oil
as opposed to IBM was able to accumulate 5 times more stock. IBM investors were
only able to increase their stock holdings three-fold through reinvestment versus
a fifteen-fold increase in Standard Oil. This combination of higher dividends and
a lower P/E multiple resulted in an increase in wealth of $299,000 or a 31%
higher overall return.
In Siegel’s
judgment dividends and valuation are paramount in producing superior returns for
investors. When investing over the long run, they become a critical factor.
Dividends, in effect, become the wealth multiplier. In Siegel’s own words, “The
power of the basic principal of investor return is magnified when the stock pays
a dividend.”
The
Advantages of Constancy
Dependability
If
investors looked at the advantages of dividends, they would find them to be the
one true investment constant of the stock market. They offer investors multiple
benefits from income, the ability to compound returns and tax advantages to
greater stability. The first advantage of dividends is that they provide a
steady stream of income. This income is steady and dependable. Dividends on most
stocks are paid every quarter. The income provides a return you can count on
regardless of stock market conditions or price fluctuations. These dividends can
also increase over time providing investors with a greater source of income and
an inflation hedge. You don’t get this with a bond. Bond values can erode with
inflation, making the interest and principal worth less as a result of inflation.
Steady
Income
Another
advantage of dividend paying stocks is in addition to providing a steady stream
of income, they also have historically produced higher total returns than
non-dividend paying stocks. Dividend stocks have also been less
volatile historically. They tend to fluctuate less and hold up much better in down markets.
As shown in the graph below of Mergent’s
Dividend Achievers, superior dividend
paying stocks have not only outperformed the S&P 500, but they have also fluctuated
less in down markets. The reason is that dividends provide a cushion in times of
market stress. In declining markets, investors gravitate to more defensive issues
such as dividend payers in search of refuge in a storm.

Source: www.dividendachievers.com
Good
Corporate Governance
In
addition to income dividend paying, companies generally provide investors with
better corporate governance. Once a company implements a dividend paying policy,
they seldom abandon it. Dividend payments have to be included in cash flow and
budget projections each year. Dividends more closely line up with company
earnings and cash flow. Management is reluctant to pay out dividends—or increase
them for that matter—if the earnings aren’t there. At a time when corporate
earnings have become suspect, dividends become a reliable safeguard against
management abuse of shareholder capital. You either have the earnings or cash to
pay the dividend or you don’t. You can’t pay out false earnings. Studies have consistently
shown that there is a direct link between good corporate governance and control
with dividend payouts.
Superior Dividend Paying Stocks
In his
recent book, “The Future for Investors,” Siegal found the best performing stocks
were those with strong brand names in industries that provide a product or
service that people need. They are companies that all have what Warren Buffett
calls a big moat around them. In studying the S&P 500 over the last 53 years,
Siegal found 20 superior companies in three kinds of industries: consumer
staples, pharmaceuticals, and energy. These companies outperformed the S&P 500
in annual returns as shown below:
|
ANNUAL
EPS AVERAGE DIVIDEND |
| |
Return |
Growth |
P/E |
Yield |
| Average
of Top 20 |
15.26% |
9.70% |
19.17% |
3.40% |
| S&P
500 |
10.85% |
6.08% |
17.45% |
3.27% |
|
Source:
The Future for Investors |
The fact
that dividend paying stocks have outperformed the major indexes is a well kept
secret. Study after study has shown the superior performance of dividend stocks.
In a recent study conducted over a 31-year period, dividend paying companies
outperformed non-dividend payers by 0.37% per month.[3]
Similar studies conducted in each decade over the last 30 years yielded similar
results. Stock prices can fluctuate wildly over time. Dividends have
demonstrated that they are the one true investment constant. Dividend returns
are not only more consistent, but they also have become more reliable with time.
What makes
a good dividend paying stock?
According to Mergent, superior dividend companies
have several attributes in common. They are as follows:
1)
They are large and mature
companies.
2)
They are past their growth
phase with no major expenditures.
3)
They have strong
cash flow and earnings growth.
4)
They have good management
with solid corporate governance.
Most
companies,
when they first start up,
need to conserve all the cash they earn from
operations. This cash is used to build and expand the business. Once the business
becomes mature and a brand name is established with a dependable customer base,
they have less of a need for major capital expenditures, which consume earnings
and cash. Mature and established companies have less of a need to come up with
revolutionary new ideas or new products to stay profitable. Another aspect that
makes companies good dividend payers is lower R&D requirements. If they do
have to spend money, they have large operating margins, which support that R&D
effort. Good examples are drug and healthcare companies.
You’ll
find that there is a common attribute to all of these companies. They tend to be
in businesses that provide a product that people continually consume. They tend
to have a strong brand franchise that engenders repeat business and customer
loyalty. Because of this brand loyalty, they can charge more than their
competitors. This is the reason they tend to enjoy higher profit margins on the
things they sell. It is the higher profit margins that generate the cash that
pays the dividends. Moreover, since they provide a product that people need and
consume, customers keep buying their product, which means more growth in sales and
earnings.
Selecting Good Dividend Stocks
When analyzing a dividend paying stock, there are several ratios that analysts use to
evaluate a dividend candidate. They are listed in Basic
Financial Metrics & Ratios. These ratios are not all inclusive, but the investor will find
them helpful in evaluating a prospective company. They are a place to start.
Most of the information that an investor needs can be found in a
Value Line Investment Survey or on the
Internet at such sites as Yahoo Finance,
EDGAR Online, or
10K Wizard.
There are also many excellent books out on the subject that investors can learn
much from. I’ve listed a few in the footnotes.
A Sound
Strategy
Markets change over time. Stock prices will continue to fluctuate,
but sound
investment strategies never lose their relevance. The one investment constant
that keeps showing up in study after study of investment markets and investment
returns is the importance of dividends and the role they play in compounding
wealth. When we forget this investment constant we become most vulnerable to the
vagaries of the investment markets. At a time when so much uncertainty abounds,
returning to the basics of sound investing means taking a serious look at
dividend paying stocks. Markets may forget them, but they don’t forget investors.
Dividend paying stocks provide a steady and dependable return in rising or falling markets.
Finally,
we are at a stage in our country's development—as are European countries
and Japan—where populations are ageing. Aging populations have a greater demand
for income. What we know about planning for retirement is that people are living
longer and must deal with ever-rising living costs due to inflation. As long as
we have governments that spend more than they receive in taxes and as long as money
has no anchor such as gold, another investment constant is inflation. Inflation
is a fact
of life that investors should become more mindful of in an age of fiat
currencies. If you are planning for retirement today, compounding your wealth
takes on more importance. In the future you may have to depend more on what you
have saved as governments increasingly come under duress due to ageing
populations. Social security is in trouble as is Medicare. This means investors
can look at lower benefits, means testing, later qualifying dates, and less
income from government-type pensions due to inflation. This, dear investor, means
you will have to rely more on yourself, if you are ever to become financially secure. The
more that you can save; the more you can compound your wealth, the more you will
have when you retire. Dividend investing is ideally suited to accomplish both
objectives.
|
DIVIDEND
ACHIEVERS |
| Company |
1994 |
1999 |
2004 |
| Alcoa |
$221 |
$442 |
$662 |
| Archer-Daniels
Midland |
$
36 |
$154 |
$245 |
| Altria
Group |
$183 |
$333 |
$510 |
| Aqua
America |
$609 |
$783 |
$1,065 |
| ExxonMobil |
$460 |
$529 |
$668 |
| Coca-Cola |
$183 |
$306 |
$470 |
| Johnson
& Johnson |
$244 |
$480 |
$960 |
| Chevron-Texaco |
$415 |
$553 |
$682 |
| Procter
& Gamble |
$216 |
$397 |
$647 |
| Tootsie
Roll |
$
54 |
$154 |
$207 |
|
Total
|
$2,621 |
$4,131 |
$6,116 |
|
$10,000
Investment Each Company
www.financialsense.com Source: Value Line & Bloomberg |
To illustrate this point,
I’ve taken $100,000 and divided it equally among 10 high-dividend achiever stocks.
All of these companies provide either essential services or manufacture
a product that we consume. Going back 10 years, I show the income that would have
been received from this portfolio at the time of origin and over a ten year
period. As this real example demonstrates, income would have gone up each and
every year. In addition to increasing dividends, the portfolio also appreciated
over time. The original investment of $100,000 would be worth over $326,000
today. During that ten-year period, the annual dividends would have completely
recouped the original investment. Had an investor reinvested those dividends, he
or she would have become a millionaire. No more needs to be said. To
create real wealth, you need to compound your investments. There is no better way
to do that than through dividend investing.
Jim Puplava
References
[1]
Siegel, Jeremy J., The Future For
Investors: Why the Tried and True Triumph Over Bold and New, Crown
Business, 2005, p.3.
[2]
Ibid, p.44.
[3]
O'Shea, Peter & Worrall, Jonathon, Beating the S&P with
Dividends: How to Build a Portfolio on Dividend Paying Stocks, by Peter O’Shea & Jonathan
Worrall, John Wiley & Sons, 2005, p.42.

© 2005 James J. Puplava
Storm
Watch Archives
NOTICE:
You are welcome to print this article for your personal use.
However this article may NOT be reproduced for public distribution without
the expressed, written permission of the author. Email
Author Selective quotations are permissible as long as the
author, Jim Puplava, and this web site are acknowledged through hyperlink
to: www.financialsense.com
E-mail
Notification
Disclaimer
Copyright
©
James J. Puplava
Financial Sense ® is a Registered Trademark
P. O. Box 503147 San Diego, CA USA 858.487.3939
|